Corrupt Cop Goes To PRISON After This Stop! 

He gets out tomorrow

I like the idea and I'd try it out if it wasn't so damn expensive !!! $98.00 for the starter kit and $10.00 for each flavor packet refill ?!? Come on man. That's taking advantage of folks who are just trying to kick the nicotine addiction.

Trading one bad habit for another more expensive one. No thanks.

vaping was made to help people quit smoking, now we have to have products made to help people quit vaping... lmao

​@walt436 bro and the worst, it's not helping at all because I don't smoke because I have habit to suck flavored air 🤣🤣🤷🤦🤦🤷 wtf worse ad I see in this channel

First time?

Three months made my heart drop...I mean putting your service weapon to people's heads, then literally no punishment is...wow.

At least he got one right? Most of them in these videos get retirement.

38 months is not a light sentence considering this is his first time going to jail. It's very rare for someone to even go to prison for their first offense

Yeah, he could have received multiple life sentences for numerous felonies and crimes. Lets list them. USC 18.13.241 and/or 242 and while doing so being armed and threatening the use of deadly force and committing crimes like kidnapping, abduction, unlawful restraint/false imprisonment, assault/battery, etc. So 242 in part reads "if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death." 1) the cop was armed and at all times threatening the use of deadly force. Just like the courts have held that an armed person who goes and robs a bank is threatening the use of deadly force even if the person doesn't touch the gun, doesn't explicitely make threats, and even if the person doesn't actually have a gun, because the mere appearance/impression of having a gun while committing crimes is sufficient to conclude the threat of lethal force was being made. 2) According to MN penal code 609.25, this cop committed the crime of kidnapping at least in this instance and likely in the numerous other times he did similar things. So each time he handcuffed someone, trapped them in his car, then committed felonies like illegally searching a car or house without legal cause, that is another potential life in prison or worse penalty. Yeah, I'd say he got a slap on the wrist. Kidnapping law in Minnesota: 609.25 KIDNAPPING. Subdivision 1.Acts constituting. Whoever, for any of the following purposes, confines or removes from one place to another, any person without the person's consent or, if the person is under the age of 16 years, without the consent of the person's parents or other legal custodian, is guilty of kidnapping and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2: (1) to hold for ransom or reward for release, or as shield or hostage; or (2) to facilitate commission of any felony or flight thereafter; or (3) to commit great bodily harm or to terrorize the victim or another; or (4) to hold in involuntary servitude. §Subd. 2.Sentence. Whoever violates subdivision 1 may be sentenced as follows: (1) if the victim is released in a safe place without great bodily harm, to imprisonment for not more than 20 years or to payment of a fine of not more than $35,000, or both; or

It is, that's why he was sent to prison and can never serve in law enforcement again. Had he pressed these "drug" cases to court where the victim would have been incarcerated, he would have faced even more serious charges and would have served a MUCH longer sentence

Constitutional Republic = EVERYONE is equal under the law. Qualified immunity = Not everyone is equal under the law. Constitution is not valid in an oligarchy..so no, not serious .

No even the president can ignore the constitution these days. Our country is losing its foothold

​@@whatever8243yeah trump avoiding consequences and trying to subvert the investigations is insane.

​@jsncrso except the tens of thousands of pigs that just move to another city/ state to go back to with after getting a tiny talking to

Yeah, if a normal citizen did this, it would be 15 years without parole!

They should at least get double the normal sentence!!

Not the same. They are suppose to do a profesional job.

@abielgarcia463 Law SHOULD be equally dealt out regardless of whether you are rich or poor. Ignorance and wealth is no excuse!

@@joejohnson2478 Those with authority should be held to the highest standard. IMO, he should have received the max sentence of each charge, particularly since he clearly had no issue with throwing the lives of others away.

Another example of why Police Unions need to be abolished and banned. They get far to many protections.

But didn't he steal people's drugs for personal consumption and let them go? I don't think the victims were too upset, because the alternative would be going to jail.

@@AZURNERUB most people, even dealers and junkies, would gladly give up their stash to avoid having their entire life destroyed.

I mean he could have sent them to jail…something tells me the dealers were happy he just took the drugs lol

@@MintBerryCrunch who's to say he didnt just take some of the drugs and STLL send the dealers to jail? i dont see this as an "either / or " outcome.

I agree but shit seeing those quick clips of him holding a gun to those dudes heads is fucking crazy

The fraternal orders, the brotherhoods, the lodge members do not pay. They only get slaps on the wrist to appease the people.

​@@GospelOutsideAnd only to appease the people

​@@GospelOutside Agreed. Experienced it. LEO union reps & union attorneys help officers "cover up" on r off duty indiscretions, at work or home. The right to remain silent as a lawbreaker is encouraged and imperative to cover-ups. The citizen rarely "wins".

Sound fair to me then forced to do extra time for every minute they were locked up.

If a citizen planted drugs on a pig car, the citizen will get the life sentence.

True but not even pigs should be convicted by a kangaroo fed court.

​@@user-wu1jc7zr4yI have been looking, have not been able to find information on this case / sentencing. Any info?

@@user-wu1jc7zr4y That’s not even close to true. Being a drama queen doesn’t help anything. It helps you spill emotions…but this is not about you. Be factual. Don’t lie just to try and validate your emotions.

Justice is truly blind, especially when it comes to sentencing cops

This is really getting out of hand. I might be wrong, but this looks intentional to mess with the public.

That's just crazy. I'd never get to where I had to go. Streets full of people stopping drying off plates to appease the Cops.

To many law abiding citizens cops have to make up shit to meet thier quota

I’ll take the ticket 🎟️ 😂

@@licensedprofessional4742 You risk the cop taking your life or livelihood instead, unfortunately.

Life is a little dumb , and maybe just maybe you being a criminal who wouldn’t understand a fair sentence vs crime committed fake argument. It should be more damaging and harsh but life in prison is something a communist or awful monarchy would want for anything other than murder/ disgustingly violent crimes

it would end up a short life as cops are on there own in jail no back up no help

@@johnwilson6707 All the more reason not to do it.

Planting should be deemed as attempted murder

Indeed, more time is warranted but it's at least a step in the right direction. 10 years ago they would have swept it under the rug, placed him on paid suspension, if that, then later promoted him.

the checks from the police unions keep the prosecutors and judges in line.

Shut up! The enda justify the means!

💯.

In the UK, you can literally get pulled over for having snow on your headlights, roof, hood and number plates. It's an absurd law brought in by Southern politicians who rarely ever have blizzard conditions. It's to stop snow flying off your car and hitting pedestrians and other road users. It's a ridiculously stupid law in the North of Scotland where we her blizzards and where its essentially ignored. Never underestimate the stupidity of those who govern

Well its just not so the snow doesn't hit pedestrians or other vehicles, snow shouldn't be covering your headlights because they don't work very well if at all. Also if your car is covered in snow you are very hard to see whether you are crossing the street or another driver, it's called a "white-out" if everything is covered in snow including your car. Not having your plate covered in snow is common sense as well as nobody can see it including the cops and other drivers

If you are brushing the snow off your plate every time you go to drive somewhere is shouldn't be a problem. If you get home from work at 5pm and it snows all night when you leave for work at 7am there's no reason why you wouldnt be able to take the time to brush off ur plate so it can be seen

Yes it is

Yeah, deactivating your camera should be immediate grounds for disciplinary action and investigation.

​@elise3455 absolutely, it's ridiculous that they have the option to turn it off. Turning it off completely defeats the purpose.

​@@elise3455tampering with evidence charge.

@@elise3455 Just make a camera without an off button and a battery life of 24 hours. It starts recording when you remove it from the charger, and stops when the contents are downloaded and charging starts.

@@PrometheusZandski "Battery life of 24 hours" Bro lives in la la land. What device of that size that you know of that is capable of recording decent quality audio and video that lasts for 24 hours? You must be a genius!

Wow. Arrested for that? Ridiculous

DWB?

That's a rare outcome. Usually what we see is a supervisor might let a driver off due to the inappropriate charges, but they still often try to justify the mistakes of the other cop. I've never seen one where the supervisor freely admitted the other cop screwed up, much less require the other cop to apologize. You experience the equivalent of a police unicorn!

@@bp3986 No. Just a dumb rookie cop

"... he would take care him" Sargent: "Drinks at Billy Bob's?" Cop: "Yeah, sounds good, I'll buy this time!"

name

@@JETBLADER google

​@@Shaunsweeney-Kubach71🤓

@@Shaunsweeney-Kubach71 be specific, gronk. Don't just say google and not give any info on it. With so many getting life, that could be anyone you speak of.

​@@JETBLADER Zachary Wester (Jackson County)

Right?

Bit of an emotional leap. Investigate, sure. Not drop every single one

@@mike9031 The person who planted drugs on the suspects? The man who took away drugs and released criminals? The man who threatened people in handcuffs with a gun? Conduct an investigation? I doubt that at least one of those he imprisoned was guilty

@@alexursus4719 yes. You don't just throw it out. You reinvestigate. Is it really this hard to not be over emotional?

They aren't capable of reinvestigating . They're not truth finders ​@@mike9031

@@mike9031how can u not be emotional with such a disgusting pig, erm i mean cop sry

100%

Absolutely! No arguement anymore, that this is some "rare occurrence" or that this isn't intentionally.being allowed to happen. Like "Here's The Deal" said the other day. Even a pointless, consequenceless basketball game has a non partial, non alegience or ties to either team referee. Yet here we are, giving the worst amung us unchecked, un audited cartblanche power over free innocent people. The system is. "If your able to get away with it. Keep doing it. It pays the system very well, and enforces fear from the people. Otherwise, it would be too easy to add a constitutionally trained group of comunity members with ZERO ties to the police or courts. That have a history of public and private rights advocacy. To go over, and even be there with some of these thugs. Instead, we get more of the same.

Lol criminal record is not a good indicator of behavior. The mass majority of corrupt police and judges have flawless clean legal records. They’re evil, they just didn’t get caught and got a job where they could be evil legally.

I trust a person with a criminal record who turned their life around vs someone I know nothing about every day. I know the reformed criminal is capable of self reflection, accountability, honesty and integrity.

That's a silly way to judge a person.@@kaydnburns5935

38 months for ignoring rights meanwhile people getting more for less

I'm glad you worded this the way you did. People don't realize that police officers are regular people hired to enforce the laws the city/town wants to enforce. The police officers' work equipment are their firearm, baton, badge, etc. The instant they quit/get fired, they lose all of that because they never owned it in the first place.

@@MrBigEBoi Sorry are you under the impression anyone thinks they're born with the baton in their hand..?

​@@MPD90 It should be common sence that police officers are hired and held to higher standards. Feminism, LTGBQ, DEI and CRT lowered those standards and even removed them.

@@0Diazzz0 You must be lost, did you not see who was quoted in my reply... try again.

But becoming a sovereign citizen is the main perk of the job.

There was one, in Florida I believe, that had over 100 cases thrown out after it was discovered he was planting drugs.

This guy was STEALING drugs, not planting them. ATA was speculating, and even admitted he doesn't know. The charges against this guy were for taking drugs, not planting them.

That opportunity has LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG passed. ACAB

You can't.

Now you’re getting it!

I don't trust any of them 🐷

Same goes for doctors, schools, politicians, media, etc. It’s not just the police.

He stole drugs and used them, he did not plant them. you can plant them, or you can use them, not both.

We do what we need for the sake of justice!

This actually happened to a good friend of mine an she was clean in recovery for 18 months an they were trying to catch her old plug an they had stayed friends but she took him a pack of cigs an a Mt. Dew an they were watching his house an pulled her over leaving an planted dope in her car an I know she ain't have nothing an was set up an I bailed her out an of course she wouldn't turn on her friend so when it did go to court they ended up "drooling" the charges an never got a reason why 😅 Not all but Cops are grimy asf 😬

​@@Mister_GOD.What are you babbling about?!!!

@@jasonbender2459why the fuck can you not do both? Why, logically, can’t an addict cop, plant drugs? Not every addict uses every chance he gets to use/steal for usage. Some addicts have jobs (like this one) and stable income, they do not need to jump at every opportunity to get their next fix.

All the cases that he was involved are gonna be reviewed and a good lawyer will get them out

​@abes3925 how many can afford a good lawyer, they'll lose the paperwork guaranteed these guys stay in a cell it's crazy but it's true

We can only hope he gets some street justice while there.

​@@baxill23he's in segregation with the pedos

Lay off the dope bro.

Hardly considering someone selling drugs to consenting adults get much longer.

38 months. Is a slap on the wrist for what he did.

@@oughv I don't disagree. I'm surprised he got anything at all.

Every now and then they'll sacrifice one of their own to give the appearance they take police corruption seriously. They don't.

@@oughvI mean, 38 months in prison is no walk in the park. Plus, he’s a convicted felon for life. I just wish other, non-cop criminals received similar sentences.

When did you?

Smart decision to make....they aren't our friends. At all.

I was put in handcuffs at the age of 14 for trying to visit my gf who was a freshman in highschool cause I was held back and in 8th grade still. The officer who put me in handcuffs for simply trying to see my gf after school let out is what made me realize police are just ordinary f**k ups too.

Long story but to keep it short, I was let out of my school which is next to hers and she didn’t get out for another 30 min. The cop said come back at 3:50 when they get out so I came back at 3:52 and I was being polite, he flexed his badge and felt manly for putting a 14 yo (me) in handcuffs and walked me through the school with handcuffs on while scolding me for simply trying to see my gf. That’s exactly what happened. I was polite the entire time. I’ve also been yelled at by police and experienced their aggression when getting pulled over I assume because I have tattoos they think I’m a dumb criminal. I had one cop pull me over in a small town outside of my city and to quote he said “if I catch you in this town again, I’ll get you for DUI”………. Even if I’m not under the influence at that time. He said I was stoned because the way my eyes are (I’m native) my eyes looked “squinty”

Neither do I !!!!!

people in power should theoretically get MORE consequence than average depending on the sitch.

Or should there be polices to put police in prison 😊

polices

If a citizen planted drugs on a pig car, the citizen will get the life sentence.

@@matthewmuellner woopsidoodle

I remember him,sheriff Wester

In the US you just need some kind of ID card, but you can also just give the officer your drivers license number for them to look up. I have done it a couple times myself. Usually they won't even bother to run the info as long as you're being pulled over for something minor like having a brake light out.

In most US states you get 31 days on average to go to court and show you got your shit in order. Most.

Depends on where you are, what you look like, and the mood of the cop in the US. They have the ability to look up your license in the system to see if it's valid or not. They just usually choose the option that's worse for the citizens. Especially if the citizens in question have darker skin.

In the UK you also get arrested for "Hate speach"

@@Warcrimeenthusiast What the fuck is ‘hate speach’? 😅

There are a lot left

Imagine for a moment you get pulled over and have drugs on you. Would you rather a straight cop (= you're going to jail) or a Jindra who thieves the drugs on the sly (= you're going home)? While I don't for a moment condone his actions and he absolutely needed to be fired/punished, I do think people are rather misunderstanding his crime.

@@MPD90what? We still want the straight one, the one doing drugs is corrupt and police can’t do drugs

@@MPD90 no he still takes you to jail... its just when you get caught win an ounce of blow he takes half... you still get the sentence you would get for having just enough to get that sentencing minimums. but he also gets to take the rest and make arrests so he doesn't have to worry about his quota. im guessing one arrest for drugs is worth at least 10 speeding tickets. people dont break the law in front of cops often on purpose. and to anyone saying there isn't a quota. not officially usually. but it DOES go to the most profitable people to put in those cars. and if you're not one of them you get a boring job at the court house and make no where near as much money. you're looked at as less then by other officers.... if you go driving around all day and catch 0 crime. and you do that a lot. they give the car away to someone else who wants the chance to impress.....

Zachary wester is the worst

It’s Minnesota, legal here.

​@@dragonnsv9710doesn't matter. Legal in a lot of states, but they will get you for driving under the influence and search your car for other drugs.

@@dragonnsv9710 It's still probable cause for a search in legal states.

​​@@dragonnsv9710not when this pig did this, it was still illegal in 2019

Yeah even if it's legal you can't smoke it in your car like how alcohol is legal but u can't have an open container

I lived in a small town and whether you were white or black the cops never gave you a break because they were bored. In just a few years I'd been pulled over 10 times, no tickets despite them trying hard, because I worked a night job. More than once we were stopped because we were on our lunch break. My coworkers all smoked so we'd go outside so they could smoke and constantly we'd get pulled over or stopped. Just sitting there eating a sandwich while one of smoked a cig.

Right? That seemed incredibly defensive for no reason, it didn't even seem like they were paying any attention to him

@@shadowprince4482quotas. Or just kudos for cop of the week certificate.

I found that particularly odd and disturbing, as well. My smart-ass would have made a comment right back to him.

How did you misinterpret the information you were given so badly? His entire MO is that he steals the drugs instead of submitting evidence, for his own recreational use. How does that in any way tie to him planting drugs? It's literally the polar opposite... Use you head! If he was planting drugs then he wouldn't have let the guy go... his crime here is that he found the guys drugs and then pocketed them for himself while letting the guy go.

But without that badge he’s just another punk out there

NO, planting evidence should be a mimimum of the maximum of the total of every act. If the planting was an ounce of heroin and it was third strike on someone then LIFE. If it was 20 times, but a one year maximum, then 20 years.

Sociopaths that's what they hire

Why does a mugger mug? Why does a rapist rape? Why does a murderer murder? Evil is everywhere, this evil happened to wear a uniform.

Keep the fact straight. Only one person claimed there is a benefit of doubt given to the accuser. ATA decided the presumption of innocence goes to the state and the burden of proof lies with the accused. Don't forget that is the narrators exact mentality and path of thinking. When there is no evidence he sees evidence of guilt. His words. With minimal research anyone can find multiple examples of case law and very solid arguments contradicting the conclusion ATA offers as legal analysis. He appears to give a balanced and unbiased look at these videos, but it does not take much to see just how biased his takes really are. It is the downfall of trying to fight a broken system from within the system while claiming the system is still good. The entirety of ATA's analysis relies on a presumed authority, a presumption of righteousness from the system. The cops are good, the courts are infallible, the government is the final authority. Just imagine ATA is funded by a state agency, the videos are selected and the script written by the state. Just enough dissension and misinformation to satisfy some and arouse others. Just another way to create divide and conflict, to prevent a unified front against the injustice system. It doesn't need to be true but that thinking will explain ATA and comments like the one you noted. Such caution and skepticism will prevent blind trust and the urge to cite ATA as a useful source. I've seen the person use case law from other federal circuits to make a point where case law exists in the relevant circuit that conflicts.

​@@eshootziscrs2868 hit the nail on the head. ATA has rubbed me wrong on every case he reviews. It seems like he goes out of his way to find any kind of case law that he can to justify the officers actions. But the suspects aren't given the same. I find it rare that he has the suspect when they say don't search my stuff or I invoke certain amendments. He never seems to cover that.

Can each of you give the name of your channel?

Yeah you pissed off the democrats ?

The Corrupt FBI

And as we saw by the DoJ's report, MPLS police showed a pattern of systemic corruption.

@@forsakenquery Explain.

@@forsakenquery When was the last time a Democrat was selected and confirmed to be FBI Director?

Except he didn’t arrest him. He let him go

Stamford Police & Ct Judges conspiracy false felony arrests, 5/22/2019, 7/19/2019, 4/15/2021, 6/24/2021, 11/30/2022, 4/14/2023 6-24-2021 w/ $645,000 unconstitutional bail w/ Stacy Decausey the Bail Bondsman. Ct racketeering crimes concealed by Hearst media over 5 years. City of Stamford & State of Ct racketeering crimes are concealed for over 45 years in Stamford CT. cgs sec 4-61 dd prohibited actions against a Whistle Blower.

He must have realized he screwed up on his body-cam and changed his tune to let the guy go - hoping it didn't go to a complaint. This guy was a well know danger cop in the area that the old MPD leadership protected for a long time.

I would like to know the race of those that he arrested in this manner. Just in case if a racist motive was also involved.

@@michaeltelson9798 You're probably right but I'll offer this; Even if the scumbag cop targeted Black people, it may be because he believed he'd be more likely to get away with it if he falsely accused Blacks. His motive may just be about falsely charging and arresting people, that he has better luck victimizing Blacks may be incidental. It's a racist thing to do but his motive may not be racist. The system that allowed him to get away with it, that may be where the motivated racism lies.

Nothing will happen.... they'll get a good talking to and made to watch some 5 minute video. ..

@@calixindox28 Don't forget their promotions and raises after.

Well said. But now what?

There sure are a lot of a certain 13% of the population without freedom. I bet that has something to do with your question. Not to mention cops still have a habit of turning off their body cams with no punishment for doing so.

Corrections Facilities are a business. They need inmates in order to turn a profit. They are not about rehabilitating offenders. They are about creating repeat offenders. It's all about the dollar bills. There's no justice if it's just us.

He wasn't charged with planting anything. He was charged with STEALING drugs. Big difference.

Yeah! In my _opinion_ (for legal reasons), his big mistake was not giving his bosses their cut!

He was arrested for stealing drugs, not planting them, you dunce.

And reinforced the behaviour

Minneapolis PD, and right before George Floyd too. Corrupt department

​@@elishelton3300😂 Your boy Floyd OD"d.

Yes, what cops can call "traffic stops" vary greatly from what citizens think they are. It's one reason why they insist you get back into the vehicle so they can conduct them. I've even seen cops walk up to cars, no lights, no sirens, or even knock on people's doors to give week-old tickets.

In many cases 99% of private propery owners give law enforment permission to act on there property.

@@jamesvw769 but they still need permission FIRST and without SOLICITING after the fact

@@someguy4131 Sorry, again not true. Cops can enter private property just like any other citizen, e.g. postal workers, girl scouts, neighbors,etc. What they _cannot_ do is remain if told to leave, unless extenuating circumstances, like an arrestee, fleeing suspect or person in distress is also on said property.

@@conscientiousobserver8772 You keep bringing up ridiculous points that have nothing to do with things Of course they can enter private property idiot. But they can't enforce traffic infractions on private property. Such as no license plate, underage driving, etc. They can enforce handicap zones and fire zones. But basic traffic infractions cannot be conducted on private property. Yes they can deal with a car parked without a registration..... But only if the owner of the property has contacted them about it and they wish for that card to be removed. A cop can't just come on to private property, even if it is open to the public, and enforced a traffic violation that is pertaining to public roads. IF THE COP WANTED TO CONDUCT A TRAFFIC STOP.... YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE SO BEFORE HE ENTERED THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OR WAITED UNTIL THE DRIVER LEFT THE PROPERTY. This cop did not pull the guy over. The cop did not turn on his lights. The cop did not conduct a legitimate traffic stop.

A city I used to hang out in had a scandal where the police tried to assassinate the mayor who was trying to stop police corruption. Same city had a scandal where the cops got a cut from the tow company and tied something like 7 times the amount of cars than they did the previous years. That's just 1 city, there are thousands of cities in America and state police and most of them are fairly corrupt in one way or another.

Because Illinois is completely ran by the KKK.

​@@bpdmf2798thats some Serpico level corruption

conviction means he cannot be hired again, loses health ins, retirement benefits and that fat weekly check. thats hurts more than jail. he now has to look over his shoulder forever in fear of getting tracked down by a victim with a baseball bat in the dark. can't get any job with great benefits because they will do background check on new hires. The cop who messed with me drives a tow truck today. i trapped him and he got busted.

@@gerardjones7881that’s is absolutely not worse then 20 years in prison. He can get a job anywhere else just not as a law enforcement officer.

it is called FULL FAITH AND CREDIT and it is CONSTITUTIONAL, not contractual.

You got pulled over because out of state plates. Nebraska stops everyone with out of state tags. Scumbags

Especially if his cellmate was arrested by him and even more especially if that was another example of a false arrest.

He's never hitting gen pop

Albion zone unit with dirty cops and chomos

His own unit(damn spell check)

I feel zero pity for him