Could Boeing Ever Introduce Another 787 Variant?

Подписаться 367 тыс.

Просмотров 59 тыс.

50% 1

Boeing’s twin-engine 787 ‘Dreamliner’ family has taken the widebody world by storm over the last decade. Having recently celebrated 10 years since its first delivery, more than 1,000 examples of this next-generation aircraft family have now been produced. These modern twinjets are spread across three variants, but could Boeing introduce another?
Article link: simpleflying.c...
White drawings: Norebbo.com
Video sources:
787-8 Kenya Airways • Kenya Airways Dreamlin...
787-8 United • Video
787-10 United • 【4K】『なが～い UNITEDの787-1...
787-10 United • 【4K】ユナイテッド航空　Boeing 7...
787-8 Xiamen Airlines • Xiamen Airlines B787-8
787-8 Zipair • 【4K】ZIPAIR　Boeing 787...
787-10 and 737 MAX 9 Boeing • Boeing 787-10 Dreamlin...
737 MAX 10 • The New Boeing 737 MAX 10
787 ANA delivery of the first • Boeing and ANA celebra...
787-9 ANA Demo Flight • Amazing! The beauty of...
787-10 Saudia Water Cannon • 787-10 Dreamliner - طا...
787-10 Dreamliner KLM 100yrs • KLM’s first Boeing 787...
777F Qatar Airways Triple Delivery • Triple deliveries of B...
A321LR Air Transat • Our new Airbus A321neoLR
737 MAX 8 LOT www.youtube.co...
787 Tahiti Nui • Air Tahiti Nui Tahitia...
787-9 Air France Air to Air • Le Boeing 787 Dreamlin...
Simple Flying:
Visit our website where we publish 150-200 news stories per week: simpleflying.com/
Listen to our weekly podcast: simpleflying.c...
Download our iOS & Android app: simpleflying.c...
Daily email digest sign up: simpleflying.c...
Check out our second RU-vid channel: / @longhaulbysimpleflying
Follow us on social media:
Instagram: / simpleflyingnews
Twitter: / simple_flying
Facebook: / simpleflyingnews
Linkedin: / 33222643
#aviation #flight #avgeek #airlines #flying

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 357

@jlmarc01 2 года назад

Flew from LAX to LHR. Smoothest flight ever. It was amazing. A winner all the way. Can’t wait for the 777X

@3Tyanatanat 2 года назад

if you rate it from 5 how much would u rate the flight

@ant2312 2 года назад

an A380 would be smoother

@Timpon_Dorz 2 года назад

@@ant2312 so facts you can't dispute.

@stevegiboney4493 2 года назад

@@ant2312 fanboy weighs in again….

@maxsaviation9512 Год назад

@@stevegiboney4493 i bet you’re an even bigger Boeing baby

@Luke_Go 2 года назад

As a starter: it would be nice if Boeing would produce and deliver any 787 ...

@NaenaeGaming 2 года назад

One that works would be a great next step!

@k9killer221 2 года назад

The only new variant I would be interested in as an airline is the 787-Q. Q for Quality.

@NaenaeGaming 2 года назад

@@k9killer221 That’s called an A330neo…

@greggstrasser5791 2 года назад

@@NaenaeGaming 767 NG.

@andersonrodriguez8258 2 года назад

Yet still the biggest plane company on the planner lol

@turbofanlover 2 года назад

Love the Dreamliner. The 787-9 is my fav variant, but all these birds have the most beautiful/elegant wings in the biz.

@TheBrowncoat2112 2 года назад

Given that they don’t have a direct 757 replacement and the 737 has probably reached the limits of its growth, a downsized 787 might just the the thing to fill the gap until Boeing’s next all new plane is announced.

@explorenaked 2 года назад

I agree. They need to find a solution to this gap. I would much rather fly a smaller wide body over a larger narrow body on long flights.

@spongebubatz 2 года назад

That could very much be an option, it could be though that need to be some changes done to the wing as the current one could produce too much lift

@johniii8147 2 года назад

Shrinks have bad economics. That's why the canceled the 787-3 years ago now. It was too heavy

@spongebubatz 2 года назад

@@johniii8147 the 787-3 wasn’t a shrink but a medium-haul 787 based on the 787-8. It had the same fuselage

@ricardokowalski1579 2 года назад

The technologies that make the 787 do not scale down. The generators, cables, insulation, batteries of the "more electric" airplane concept become (proportionally) too heavy when applied to a 757 replacement.

@paxundpeace9970 2 года назад

The 787 -8 is the choice for many very long and thin routes. 787-9 is the airplane for standard volume routes and very long range that has more range to fly in both direction by a big margin. The 787-10 is a huge capacity airplane is for short flights like Central Europe central america or Central Europe middle east and middel east to east aisa

@themomentchannel3498 2 года назад

the 787-8, A330-200 and 300, and A350 are popular “domestic” aircraft in china because domestic travel in china is very popular (the same for japan)

@jp7585 2 года назад

The 787-10 at 7400 miles range isn't a short haul plane by any means IMO.

@Sacto1654 2 года назад

The most likely variant: a higher mean takeoff weight (MTOW) 787-10 with uprated engines and more fuel capacity to increase the range of the 787-10 to 7,300 to 7,400 nautical miles. That would make it a true replacement for the 777-200ER and a likely competitor for the Airbus A350-900.

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

Don't forget that the B787-9 is already fine tuned for ultra long flights.

@Sacto1654 2 года назад

@@chrismckellar9350 But it's still a smaller plane than the 777-200ER or A350-900. Hence the interest in a higher MTOW 787-10.

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

@@Sacto1654 - The B787-9 is bigger the than the B767-300/300ER.

@graysono 2 года назад

I believe Boeing will revisit the 787-3 possibly even smaller than before to fill the NMA position? It would have A320XLR beating range, by some margin. Wouldn't matter being a twin aisle.

@phxpaul 2 года назад

Boeing is in crisis as far as I'm concerned. The scandal of the Max, and now the blocked deliveries of the 787 for the past 6 months. Something is up. Oh, and don't forget the 777X.

@mh12-47 2 года назад

Boeing are not to blame with the delays of the 777X. The GE engines were not up to spec which delayed the plane by 6 months and the FAA wanted additional testing requirements.

@laurenz3997 2 года назад

@@mh12-47 I partially agree, though the regulations stuff is because of that MAX fiasco.

@ntuthukodlame1894 2 года назад

Boeing is strategically bankrupt Paul. Definitely in crisis . There is an issue with each product line in the commercial planes division. No new competitive products arriving in the next 10 years... Soul searching is needed at Boeing in providing value to airlines. There's a lot of issues such as suppliers which airlines can understand but the Boeing strategy is not aligned to airline demand.

@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 2 года назад

787HGW = 787-9LR & 787-10ER with 260T MTOW & 1000nm further range

@xiemhong74 2 года назад

When reading of the B787-10 and saw the range of it, I was disappointed that there was not an ER or LR model for the Dreamliner. That may have got Qantas thinking harder on who they would go with project sunrise. Keep up the great work. Love your stories. 👍✈️

@ntuthukodlame1894 2 года назад

Very true. The focus should've been an ER or LR variant of the 787-10 at launch. To your point, that would've made the likes of Qantas consider it and would also have stemmed the A350 runaway orders happening

@k9killer221 2 года назад

I think Boeing needs to address all the serious quality problems on the 787 before they get any fancy ideas about new variants.

@ronaldcuieii4775 2 года назад

Range is of importance to the airlines. Perhaps Boeing can take the-10 and increase its range significantly followed by increased range for the 777x.

@Turboy65 2 года назад

The long range variant is never the variant that holds the most passengers. Range is one goal, payload is another, and they are on the opposite ends of the spectrum.

@ronaldcuieii4775 2 года назад

@@Turboy65 That's true. But check out the upcoming A321XLR😃. Has the most seats out of the A320 family and will fly up to 4700nm, the farthest.

@jp7585 2 года назад

In reality, airlines want the right range, not just more range. Long range on short to medium routes is just wasted capability and extra structure (weight) to haul around.

@ronaldcuieii4775 2 года назад

@@jp7585 That's true🙂🙂. They can always have their aircrafts customized to fit their needs😃😃.

@Turboy65 2 года назад

@@jp7585 True. There's no justification for a passenger jet that can fly around the world nonstop. But having more range gives you more route options, too.

@christianfelipe2824 2 года назад

Waiting for Hawaiian airlines to get their 787s. Cannot wait to fly on them.

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

Mee too😃

@vuongthequang1405 2 года назад

I think because passenger demands are less we will have to do the b787-7, it will be slightly more narrow but just enough wide to have a 3-3-3 seating, and will be much shorter but just enough to look beautiful so not like the a310

@Turboy65 2 года назад

A thousand large twinjets built in a decade is unprecedented. The Dreamliner has been quite an accomplishment. And having flown on them, I have to say they're definitely a big step forward for passenger comfort and convenience.

@jordanalexander4331 2 года назад

I think there is no need for a 787-9 hgw variant, being as though it has a good amount of range, however, I do believe that there is room for a 787-10ER being as though the aircraft could directly replace the 777-200ER.

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

There is already a 'HGW' variant being the B787-9 which is already fined tuned to ultra long haul non stop flights which Qantas and Air New Zealand are using.

@steinwaldmadchen 2 года назад

It has to if they want to win big in Asia. Asian carriers flying to N. America can replace their 77W to A350 with almost no sacrifice of payload. You can't really do that with 787-9, let alone 787-10. HGW would make 787 a better heavylifter across the Pacific.

@CalebICT 2 года назад

In truth, Boeing should bring a new 757 variant.

@RobloxianX 2 года назад

Honestly I think a 777-7 would be a better option than a 787-11

@aryapatel1932 2 года назад

Given the current demand for planes the capacity and performance of the 757, Boeing could make a further shrink called the 787-3, with capacity of the 757, but with better performance, and being a wide body, it might be a hit Although there was a proposed 787-3 when the program was launched, which was In between the size of the -9 and the -10 and was made for the Japanese market, the only 2 customers, ANA and JAL, switched their orders to the -8 when there were delays to the 787

@emilhilmy8682 2 года назад

Isn't Boeing CEO already talk on HGW (high gross weight) variant of 787-9 and 787-10 ? So seems the possibility of both 787-9ER and 787-10ER can happen.

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

The B787-9 has already been finely tuned for ultra long haul operations hence Qantas and Air New Zealand is using this variant of ultra long haul, non stop routes.

@johnboz8087 2 года назад

@@chrismckellar9350 evidence?

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

@@johnboz8087 - Qantas Perth to London non stop services and Air New Zealand Auckland to Chicago nonstop and Auckland to New York (Newark) nonstop that is currently on hold due to the global health pandemic.

@johnboz8087 2 года назад

@@chrismckellar9350 u said fined? Fined by who?

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

@@johnboz8087 - I meant to say ... finely tuned...

@BRTripReport 2 года назад

I would always prefer a new version of the 787 than a new version of the 737, but airlines going single aisle on long range flights are becoming even more common, just look at some flights that TAP Portugal operates to Brazil and the US. I guess it makes sense to invest on single aisle aircrafts that are able to fly further and further...

@shimonsaied8714 2 года назад

Tap uses de a330 to fly to Brazil

@BRTripReport 2 года назад

@@shimonsaied8714 not only, they also use the A321LR to fly to REC and MCZ, for example.

@shimonsaied8714 2 года назад

@@BRTripReport okay, but that isn't the future. the wide body planes will be always required

@BRTripReport 2 года назад

@@shimonsaied8714 I’m not saying they will disappear, what I’m saying is that in the future, more and more airlines will use single aisle aircraft on long haul flights.

@anweshbhowmick4411 2 года назад

I think a 787-8 ER maybe better to kickstart the long overdue NMA program for replacing the ageing 757s

@vikrantsatpute9984 2 года назад

Flew from BOM-BKK and back in business class in 787-8 as first flight of life. Always been Boeing fan.

@shababbzaman6161 2 года назад

Would really love to see B787-10ER!!

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

indeed

@MB-xw3nr 2 года назад

Is a 737 MAX 10ER not possible ?? I think that would make great competition for the A321 series .

@jimmyjiang3413 2 года назад

It could be possible to make one based on -10 but with range matching 77W or 789. Could be 787-10ER, with same capacity but range of 789 and 77W, and 789 with ultra long range of a359ulr and 77l.

@rossmason8812 2 года назад

The 787-10ER would be a great idea.

@rajnirvan3336 2 года назад

Makes sense

@mh12-47 2 года назад

Boeing would have to add a triple axel landing gear like the 777 to a new model/ER varient as the current landing gear can no longer support more weight.

@mmm0404 2 года назад

@@mh12-47 a350-900 : 142 tons empty weight and 283 tons MTOW. Landing gear : two aisle 787-10: 135 tons empty weight and 254 tons MTOW 787-10ER : 136 tons empty weight and 260- 265 tons MTOW ( according to rumours) No need for a triple aisle, the a350-900 despite being much heavier doesn't even use it

@mh12-47 2 года назад

@@mmm0404 in a previous comment, you kept mentioning the A359.....The Landing gears on the A359 are more outwards towards the wings. The wheels also are spread further apart which distributes the loads evenly. It isn't about the A350 being being heavier and has 4 wheeled boogies. The A350s landing gears are heavier and can hold more weight because the Aircraft itself is bigger and heavier. The wheels of the 787 are now at its critical point. If Boeing wants to extend range/payload a new set of Landing gears will have to be designed for future variants.

@mmm0404 2 года назад

@@mh12-47 who said the the landing gear on the 787 was at a critical point ? Where do you get this info bro The the 787-9 is close to 15 tons lighter than the a350-900 ,the 787-10 is close to 7 tons lighter despite carrying more payload than the 359. The 787ERs will seat at around 265 tons ( MTOW) compared to 283 tons permitted by the a350-900.. In other words the 787Hgw's will have carry 20 tons less weight than the a350-900 at maximum payload. So why the need for a new landing gear? Some expert analysis based on confirmations from Boeing stated that a 265 ton 787-10 would have the similar surface loading as the 777-9/ 300ER. Landing gear specifications are mostly limited by Surface loading, there is no such thing as critical point . As long as the maximum surface loading of a particular runnway is not exceeded the landing gear is good to go and therefore there no need for a new one ... According to calculations from some some experts familiar with the matter the existing Landing gear will be adequate and there will be no need for a new one. If experts say there is no need for a new landing gear and then a random person on RU-vid says it does. Who should I believe?🤣🤣🤣

@indranimaharaj507 2 года назад

I think the Boeing 787-10 does need an "ER"

@barrielui 2 года назад

Isn't Boeing making a 787-10 with the same range as 787-9 for Air New Zealand? Still a few years before it will be delivered. Also, the scraping of 787-3 is the ultimate miss from Boeing, leaving them no good cards to compete with A321XLR etc.

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

It is true, the Air New Zealand B797-10's will have extra range. That is why the airline is buying them to the B777-200/300er's

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

there were no others of the 787-3(only ANA), but yes Boeing should live the 787-8

@barrielui 2 года назад

@@sergiolaurencio7534 JAL and ANA both wanted 787-3 and now since 787-3 isn't there, JAL turned to Airbus for A350 for their domestic fleet

@kennedyxhulu4933 2 года назад

I believe it would be really amazing if Boeing could expand the range of the 787-10 to an Er or LR it would give competition to the A350-900 or 900ULR in terms of range.

@joeyGalileoHotto 2 года назад

The boeing 787-9 already has the range to go from London to the west coast of Australia. The airbus a350 doesn't have the range to go from London to Sydney yet.

@sleepyg2011 2 года назад

No doubt.

@Turboy65 2 года назад

Range and payload are mutually exclusive goals. The long range version is never the one that has the most seats.

@art8311 2 года назад

singapore airlines flys an A350 from singapore to new york. at 18hrs 50 mins. i believe it’s currently the longest scheduled commercial route

@art8311 2 года назад

agreed. currently the A350 series has an advantage in range over the 787 series. both are impressively capable aircraft tho

@rezaalan3991 2 года назад

I think they should reactivate their plan about 787-3, because it suitable for high demand route on short haul trip. Especially all Top 50 busiest air routes in the world mostly can be covered by this aircraft, where the longest route on this list is Domestic flight between New York JFK to Los Angeles which is only 3982 km/2150 nmi

@gregsmith3410 2 года назад

Should help 787-10 sales!!!!needs a range increase...

@mh12-47 2 года назад

The 787-10 can fly between 12/14hrs. Great for the airlines that dont need the longer range.

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

@@mh12-47 a good replace for the 777-200er indeed

@szechunglui4898 2 года назад

If Boeing really wants to have a new 787 variant, that should be the freighter version. To replace the aging 767-200F and 300F, 787F shall be a good option. Based on 787-8, if Boeing can increase the MZFW to 175~180T (Standard 788: 161025kg/355000lbs), The -8F can take approximately 60~65T of freight with 8 hrs flight. It's about 15T more than 767-300ERF / similar with A332F. If based on 787-9, it can go even bigger, but it may enter the freighter market of 777F

@tamimatharemadi 2 года назад

Assalumualaikumvarahmatullahivabarkatu Try to pronounce this

@alioumaiga6116 2 года назад

Pretty easy for any Muslim or arab

@alioumaiga6116 2 года назад

Walaikum salam warahmatulah wabarakatuhu

@tamimatharemadi 2 года назад

@@alioumaiga6116 where do you live

@alioumaiga6116 2 года назад

@@tamimatharemadi Mali in Africa

@tamimatharemadi 2 года назад

@@alioumaiga6116 I live in Qatar

@bobdevreeze4741 2 года назад

They are still releasing variants of a 60 year old airframe, so why wouldn't Boeing work off an existing design. The problem is what people are saying about the Max. The design is old and stale

@rumpleforskin2705 2 года назад

Boeing Lost

@GeeBoggs 2 года назад

I believe a downsized Dreamliner makes the most sense in approaches for Boeing to take.

@ModelAviationStation 2 года назад

I agree a smaller narrow body 787 like a 787-200 version of the 757-200 which the 737-MAX was supposed to replace but is in no way as good as the 757 family would be the most advantageous for Boeing and I think airlines are looking for a newer version of 757 which a smaller 787 could accomplish.

@sainnt 2 года назад

I think that, on the high end, a 787-10ER would be appealing to Qantas and Air New Zealand, especially for Project Sunrise. On the low end, a 787-7 would be a great replacement for the 767. US airlines would order those by the hundreds.

@Christaus 2 года назад

I agree that a 787-10EXLR (nope not a spelling error ) would be great for both airlines . Curiously the video never mentioned the 787-3 . Designed never produced . Wasn’t right for the market 15 years ago but perhaps (??) cheaper to redevelop and put to the market than the NMA (??)

@sainnt 2 года назад

@@Christaus Boeing is in talks with Air New Zealand to build a 787 HGW, which would allow for a higher gross weight and probably a longer range as well. We'll see.

@Christaus 2 года назад

@@sainnt now that would be interesting . SYD-Auckland-New York

@patrickpeters2903 2 года назад

it's incredible to see that despite over 1,000 planes flying in the skies, the 787 programme is not yet profitable. And nobody knows when it will happen. Today's market is looking for long-haul single aisle aircrafts. The wide body segment should not recover before 2026. Or 2027. The B777X will enter a weak market. Boeing just needs to build the NMA to fight against the A321XLR from Airbus...

@khristianasaro1699 2 года назад

-6 and -7 maybe?

@kurbiscremesuppe 2 года назад

The 787 failed on so many sides. Why another type? They sold it as a dream with 8 abreast in eco. All airlines use 9 abreast. I avoid this type on all flights longer than 4 hours.

@Alex-lh6rz 2 года назад

Boeing is done. They been going down down down, like America. Nothing else to say.

@stevegiboney4493 2 года назад

🤡

@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 2 года назад

Yes. A 787-10ER because of the lack of range similar to the non ER 777-200 and -300. It would likely need a slightly bigger wing though, uprated engines to something like 85 000ibf and either a higher MTOW or a combo of that and bigger fuel tank

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

a 787-10er would be amazing to replace 777-200er( well is already doing it) and I also think Boeing should think about the 787-3 since that would be very good to compete with the a321xlr. With the best for its plans and hope to fly a Dreamliner one day.

@nagiwest4706 2 года назад

The B787-9 is the best variant in my opinion it can fly both high demand and low demand routes without having a big impact on the airline income taking covid19 as an example no need to the chang the airplane to smaller one just cause the booking is low 👌🏾👌🏾

@monnidesmonnides8554 2 года назад

You guys must be running out of subjects, Boeing has 3 versions of the 787 , I will be very surprized that they will ever consider a 4th version

@peterhancox5268 2 года назад

My vote is to go shorter, a 787-7?? The 737-10 is a dinosaur design, and twin isles is much more pax appealing on both short and long haul.

@sjvillar2796 2 года назад

Seeing how the 787-9 is the most popular version, maybe a 787-9ER will work. Trends in the narrow body points to long range, low capacity. This could also be the case for the wide bodies as well - longer range to connect thinner ultra long range routes. The A340-500 may prove this theory wrong, but maybe the -500 was ahead of its time...

@allanwico6314 2 года назад

The 787-9 is already long legged. I don’t see any reason to further enhance the range of the 787-9. A 787-9ER would be less efficient due to added weight

@REIBODERA 2 года назад

i think that Boeing should go for the freighter version and the smaller 787-3 to compete with the A 321 XLR

@michaelfinck5520 2 года назад

I think a shrunken 787-8, say a 787-7, would work against the A321XLR. I wouldn't enjoy flying on a narrow body for more than 3 to 5 hours.

@BinkBricks 2 года назад

That would work.

@3Tyanatanat 2 года назад

i want a 787-1000 bigger than titanic 100000000 passengers range of 0.0001 kilometer

@bignessgta5 2 года назад

Speaking about 787s, I've noticed Uniteds 787 flights have been replaced with the 777 like the Sydney flights, why would that be?

@TM-nu5vd 2 года назад

Might they have moved those 787 over to European flying? Believe one is goin onto their new Jordan route.

@bignessgta5 2 года назад

@@TM-nu5vd is United retiring some/them?

@TM-nu5vd 2 года назад

@@bignessgta5 Retired UAL guy here and my inside sources there say no 787 retirements. They're shifting aircraft around as the 777-200 P&Ws come back into the fleet 1Q2022. The FAA provided their directive this past Dec and UAL knows the expected fix -- which they've had a head start on already.

@talesfromunderthemoon 2 года назад

I think the concept of 787ER (-9 and -10) or 787-10LR is not a bad idea to be offered to other airlines which neither afford to order the 777X nor need the huge capacities the 777X offered.

@smurftums 2 года назад

A version of the 787-3 with the takeoff weight/fuel capacity of the 787-9 (and other recent improvements in fuel efficiency), could have an interesting range.

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

a 787-3 could be a good idea

@fatviscount6562 2 года назад

787-10 is almost at maximum pavement loading, so any increase of gross weight, such as extra fuel capacity or a further stretch, will require new landing gear design. 787-10 has not sold as well as 787-9, indicating airlines see fewer markets that can fill the extra seats. Few if any airline would buy a 787 smaller than the -8-it would carry 30% more passengers than an A321, but has double the empty structural weight.

@mmm0404 2 года назад

The a350 has a similar capacity as the 787-10 yet the a350-900 has sold close to 900 jets. The 787-10 ist popular because of its shorter range . An -10ER could be worth it . Look how the 777-300ER outsold the 777-300 a couple times over .

@bignessgta5 2 года назад

Btw I hate the 787 because the windows were all black and I couldn't see all the other stuff other than that I like the 787 when the windows aren't locked to the darkest settings

@chrismckellar9350 2 года назад

The B787-10 'extended range' makes alot of sense but Boeing needs to some thing in the 150-260 seat single aisle market to replace the B737 and B757, The B787-8 was suppose to replace the B767-300/400. Air New Zealand's new B787-10's will be have an extra fuel tank to extend their range.

@JFH-te4lu 2 года назад

I personally really prefer wide-body jets, but as long as the ride is smooth I can be happy!

@tdkleffman 2 года назад

Another bump up in size for the 787 would probably require at least major mods to wings, landing gear and engine thrust. Can't imagine it will happen. They are best to expand the capabilities of the current variants imo.

@mmm0404 2 года назад

Its not a bump up , it's just an improvement of range . Did the a321neo require major modifications to get the a321XLR varient?

@KingTriton1837 2 года назад

I think they should. It could possibly fill the space that the 757 is leaving increasingly vacant.

@danieldrayet2364 2 года назад

Boeing needs a 757 replacement more than anew 787 variant

@Hydraulic-em6uz 2 года назад

It all depends on the availability of funds Boeing has at its disposal. Boeing as yet to publicise on a viable competitor to the A321-XLR, the ongoing 787 manufacturing problems in SC, and the 777x have so far lost orders due to ongoing pushback fueling anger with Emirates (the largest customer of the type). Not to mention the recent recovery of the Max fiasco. That said, more than the 787, I would think a 797 could be more lucrative route due to the high demand in in single isle - extra range flight more than an expensive short 787 version.

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

the 777x is coming next year and the 787, well least hope they resolve the problem, but a 787-3 or a 797 should be the 2 thinking on my opinion.

@bikerguychris33 2 года назад

I think Boeing could do both a further stretch with increased range and also 2 smaller variants too. A 787-11(Aka the Super 11 or ER) and also a 787-2 and 787-3 which would directly replace the 757 series.

@mmm0404 2 года назад

Shrinked aircrafts have never really been popular with airlines. Might still be overweight or too heavy to replace the 757 .. Boeing will build the 797 eventually don't worry. We are only going to get a stretch , when the 787 gets re engined , maybe with the ULTRAFAN. That's when Boeing can stretch all varients of the 787 . The 787-10X stretch could have almost the same seating capacity as the 777-300ER

@azmike1956 2 года назад

One of the best arguments for a twin aisle nma is the potential for quick boarding & turn around times. Fuel contracts may also be a consideration (& one that we may not be privy to).

@songiization 2 года назад

Boeing definitely needs to develop the "ER" and "LR" Varians of the B878. For example B878-9ER, B878-9ER etc.

@davidtjahjadi5079 2 года назад

Absolutely, the 787-8 is for long thin routes.... As I was flying on one of them, I can't stop thinking that Boeing should do a variant of the 787-8 with range at least 15,000 km.

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

I think a short 787-8 variant should be the answer if we think

@sleepyg2011 2 года назад

787-10 Max LR won't be a bad idea Some of forgetten the previous the 777-LR don't hear much about.

@eduardovillarreal2261 2 года назад

A 787 shorter version will be fun to fly on

@29madmangaud29 2 года назад

I always like the "BIG PLANES", (ie: 747's), so I personally would like the 777, some type of that.

@nipafilms236 2 года назад

Same, I miss so much time when big airports was full of 747s :(

@haquekhan4271 2 года назад

I flew both 787 and a350 and found 787 to be a better plane. It's flies beautiful and a lot nicer than a350.

@stevegiboney4493 2 года назад

Less paint peeling off it too!🤣

@JestonSun 2 года назад

787X

@jamiebrowne6913 2 года назад

A baby 787 could be a good middle of the market type

@richarddastardly6845 2 года назад

I want to see a 767 max or something

@me-name-moques2 17 дней назад

Imagine a 787 double decker? Edit: or even a 787 the same as big of a e195 but 2x?

@JDFloyd 2 года назад

I would like a "ULR" version...

@brutaladr641 2 года назад

Its better to do a variant with more range for the 787-10, its so low on range compared to the -9

@commerce-usa 2 года назад

When all is said and done, Boeing would do well to respond rapidly to the needs of their own clients. Most often that equals greater range, carrying capacity and fuel economy.

@TheChiefEng 2 года назад

If it's a Boeing, I ain't going.

@we-hb4ni 2 года назад

The -10 from KLM is a lovely aircraft

@sergiolaurencio7534 2 года назад

indeed

@sportsMike87 2 года назад

This is what happens when the government clowns allow all this consolation Boeing has no reasons to build new designs. 🤦🏻‍♂️

@caltrain910 2 года назад

Boeing should cancel the NMA revive the 787-3 as a 757-300 replacement.

@selindenizcebi9952 9 месяцев назад

787-10ER

@clippernail625 Год назад

I actually wanna see a Boeing might make a Boeing 787-11 or 787-10er like you said

@arnaldoluisn1 2 года назад

I believe the 787-10ER will sell very well! Would love to see a shorter fuselage version, will die in less than 10 years. Just like the B767-200 and A380. Too risky, too expensive. Knowing how Boeing works, they might bring a newer version of the B737.

@theplanespotter2849 2 года назад

This would be a great concept however the 787 is Boeings version of the A330, making it too much of a push. Especially with range in the factor too. Since the A350-1000 is of similar length to and range to the 777-9 it would make more sense to even just extend the range on that. Also shrinking the 787 again is cool but shortens both capacity and range making it too expensive for what it is. Plus it will be easier to fill say 2 737 max 8s that are more frequent. Both ideas are really cool but the logistics around it aren’t exactly gonna do well

@gunnarsundman6828 2 года назад

Nope, No more Bigger like a380 it's old and gone. The market is for no wide body, yeah of course trans world fly. Like Australia - Europe aso. More and more it is becoming small planes with ER extra range, like something like a321 xER .

@satirthsarthak6887 2 года назад

Even if Boeing goes ahead to bring back 787-3 they should Launch it by renaming it as 787-7 to fit with the 787 nomenclature system like -8,-9& -10.

@garyhughes9649 2 года назад

If one of the triple sevens fills that Niche Boeing does not need to spend money developing another Dreamliner Boeing can figure out what kind of plane they need to develop although they should have been on the 79-73 years ago and it would be flying by now probably. The only thing I would suggest to Boeing is they need to get the triple 7X certified to carry passengers believe it's well over a year behind schedule now. It's pathetic. They developed and produced the 747 in approximately 29 months. I realize they've had trouble with the big engine but it's been well over three years. Is this any way to run an airline paraphrasing is this any way to run an aviation company. I know covid has wreaked havoc on the aviation Market and the 737 Max debacle has hurt Boeing but that was their own fault. Airbus has had to work in the same conditions is Boeing and Airbus seems to be thriving. Get it together Boeing.

@devanshrdhoot6028 2 года назад

i would like to see the 787-10ER with more range and with bigger fueslage and bigger engines and with more flying capacity

@نادرالیراحمان 2 года назад

I seriously doubt a B787 longer than the current B787-10 is aerodynamically possible or economical. Maybe im wrong.

@erwinkent1361 Год назад

I think the 787 should be more common in the upcoming years because it's ECO friendly aircraft and can travel more distance by burning less fuel plus very comfortable and silent Aircraft plus those windows that's tint with the touch of a button wow and also alot of pilots feel very comfortable flying the B787 dreamliner on long haul flights hope to see more 787 s 🛫

@peoplesambassadordm8279 2 года назад

Hmmm a new aircraft? Well to make a new aircraft there has to be a survey done and a potential market... do a survey then come back to ask that question... boeing has the 777 & variants 787&variants 737 and variants shelved the 747 ... but never made a new 757 version or a new trijet... but I'd have a survey done first as airbus has flooded the markets with stiff competition... maybe a supersonic hypersonic or an amphibious or a 757 variant but as I say survey first

@fiercedevil6955 2 года назад

Boeing needs to introduce a 787-10ER variant and an NMA (possibly a 787-3) to the market or else it would only get even more crushed by Airbus.

@noroy2 2 года назад

I fly twice a week and every single domestic flight is full, maybe a 787-8 or a shorter version as -7 could help, its better to fly on a twin aisle, or maybe a narrow body aircraft with a 2-2-2 config twin isle will be better for passengers, don't like the 3-3 config, hate middle seats.

@manenwan 2 года назад

2:14 I've seen that vietnam airlines a350 with the skyteam livery irl and i love that silver color so much

@davidwolf226 2 года назад

Why the hell would Boeing WANT or need to produce another variant?! They're doing just fine with what they already have. smh...

@nunobarros3629 2 года назад

This kind of plane is the future. We used to have a very intense daily maintenance here in GIG while receiving 772s and 763s. Now with the 788s we practically DO NOTHING all day long. Not even the ashtrays are being stolen....heehheheheehehe

@christopherhennessey8991 2 года назад

Why don’t they build the 787-3 which was one of the original versions ? That could be a simultaneous transcon/ transatlantic version.

@flypawels 2 года назад

Maybe B787-5 to replace B757. What do you think?

@andiscott8470 2 года назад

Till they improve the cabin build quality, I would rather they concentrate on getting the basics right first, before trying to build another variant of the plastic fantastic.