Could you do a full review of the Nika Et-4c, now that you have one that is tillered correctly. The bow appears to perform very poorly compared the Armin's review. Many archers ordered this bow from Armin's positive review but still waiting over 6months for deliver. Your review would be a great alternative point of view. I fear that Elongs change in production due to know flaws have completely changed how the bow performs compared to Armins original review
There wasn't any real change in the actual product, just change in their procedure and delivery. The bow really suck but it seems that Armin praises every bow anyway. I'll redo a separate video for the bow to include more details.
it doesnt matter western style archery (lack of better term) or eastern. They always say to get a more efficient bow you have to reduce weight of limb and keep the same draw weight. My question is how much does the weight from the added paint affect the bow performance. Is it is unnoticeable? I mentioned this since you mentioned there was a bow without paint for its carbon limbs.
The paint is extremely thin and is there only to make the carbon surface look even/flat black. The mass is very low (likely only 0.1gram) and should not register any difference on the chrono test. However, I prefer not to have it just because I rather see the natural color and texture of the material, even if there's any imperfect coloring on the actual material. It's more like, do you prefer with makeup or not?
@@user-gi4mz3qh2q there are 2 Mariners. The one with thick carbon on belly is 44# 28" (55# 31"). The one with thin carbon on back is 36# 28" (45# 31").
