Criminals and creeps tend to hide their evil acts by claims of deconstruction, its a very common tactic in Hollywood, and 90% of all deconstruction media does this.
"age is just a number" "consent is just a word" prison is just a room registered sex offender is just a title the death penalty is just an assisted power nap hell is just a place
@Incel Productions It was proven in the twitter files that prior to Elon twitter was ignoring/protecting CP accounts all while banning political accounts with the "wrong opinion". Elon has gone on a mad max mission to nuke as many CP accounts that the team can find.
I'm a rightwing guy and I think it's done more good than bad. It's brought awareness to the abuse girls suffer from all sides of the table. You cannot do this movie without the sexualization, it would be like doing a movie about the holocaust without showing the suffering in the gas chambers. It needs to disturb you. It happens in real life, but this is just a movie. A portrayal. More people are upset at a movie than they are about children actually being exploited.
The only acceptable way for this movie to exist is after the first 5 minutes the camera pans around to Chris Hansen with his iconic “why don’t you have a seat over there.” Followed by everyone defending the movie being put on a list.
The movie should start and the first thing that pops up is a message that says "You have been added to a list and the police have been sent to your location. You will not escape".
@@BR-ty3hx Not to mention that regardless of the message, the joker didn't ACTUALLY murder people. But here they do actually, 100% legit sexualized actual children. That'd be like murdering a real person for an action movie
It's crazy how the movie critics who were praising Cuties 2yrs ago when it came out are the exact same critics who are bashing Sound Of Freedom now. They really need to be exposed. What normal non pedophile would praise Cuties while demonizing Sound Of Freedom?
The problem is that you can’t execute an idea like this. A movie can show how murder is bad because it doesn’t murder people, it pretends to murder people. In order to show the sexualisation of children, you’d need to actually sexualise them, you can’t ‘pretend’ to sexualise them.
Matter of fact, Netflix specifically manipulated their algorithm into not suggesting Cuties to any users. so really the only way to find Cuties is if you search it up or get really lucky. The reason for doing this is so that people who really want to find it, can find it.
The original Lolita was a story of a villain protagonist trying to justify his actions, those actions being of course having sex with a 14-year-old. Even though Lolita is considered the... "good" isn't the right word, "successful" version of this idea, most readers still have trouble distancing themselves from the idea of "protagonist = hero" and feel the book doesn't demonize the villain enough. Cuties feels like it's several levels less successful than that. It feels like it didn't even get to the stumbling block, and cracked its head open at the starting line.
Charlie, I pray to god that your eyes be cleansed of the evil you have witnessed. Thank you for watching it and actually educating your audience on how bad it actually is.
Their explanation was they wanted to make it prolific on purpose and do all this on purpose just so everyone talks about it because in their words they want to bring light to how children are sexualized in the industry
the kids need to be taken away from those parents and put in protective custody. those kids will have to grow up the rest of their lives with this movie on their record. truly sickening.
"She probably would have been less grossed out if I told her I made out with her mother" is the perfect way to describe to people that you have watched even part of it
@@coquimapping8680 The fact that "Minor Attracted Person" is something people label themselves on Twitter without their home governments immediately going "hmm" from is in itself pretty reprehensible.
@High Definition Giving them benefit of the doubt is just having a good nature. However, there were a *ton* of different ways to handle this, starting from the first: There are a lot of young looking adult women who could pass as 14-15 years old. So she could've raised the ages slightly and went that route. They could've not had the camera man get "in character" for these performances and zooming right into the crotchal and ass regions (and I'm assuming it gets worse from the scene that OANN showed, I'm not brave enough to even try to stomach any amount of this trashy film). They could've chosen less suggestive "dances". They could've chosen less skimpy attire. More consequences for the kids could've happened throughout the movie. Artistically, they could've started it off with different actresses as adults talking about how traumatizing it is and how it destroyed their lives yadayadayada with intermittent flashbacks to childhood. The list goes on. It's nice to give them the benefit of the doubt, but at least Lolita's star was like 17 years old from what I read on IMDB, not fuckin' 11 or 12.
This is giving me PTSD-like flashbacks of Boku no Piko. I heard of it and thought: "It can't be that horrible, people must be exaggerating for likes and views." Boy oh boy was I wrong.
Western society seems to forget that 4 years ago most media houses in America and Europe published articles to normalize pedoph|lia. There was even a documentary piece on CNBC showing how pedos arent monsters but misunderstood outsiders. They tried to say how pedoph|lia isnt a crime but a "sexual preference", like the LGBT community. Media stopped pushing that narrative when there was a mass back|ash, but they obviously havent given up on the idea.
Exactly. There's degrees to issues that can be demonstrated to warn against them. Even that is to be done wisely and without indulging the problematic people. I'd still attempt to understand if the focus was not on THE SEXUAL ACTS PERFORMED BY FUCKING PRETEENS THEMSELVES and instead on the psychological trauma and like delving into their thoughts. The audience is smart enough to understand what they're having to do without you explicitly demonstrating it to them. You're not making it look traumatising by doing this.
This movie saying they speak out against sexualizing kids would be like making a movie saying murder is wrong and then you murder someone on camera to apparently prove your point. This film is disgusting and they need to remove it from Netflix, I am still shocked it is still on there.
There is this scene in rick and morty that i really liked where morty says i was just having fun and rick says so was Jeffrey Dahmer. It's literally the same thing. You don't have sympathy for sociopaths even tho they can't help themselves pedos are the exact same thing
the movie is a critique of how we already as a society sexualize girls from a very young age, this movie didn't make our world anymore dystopian then what it already is.
The media: Joker will be a horrible movie that will destroy society! It doesn’t have a message, it just wants to spread panic! Also the media: Cuties is a great film that with a message that really explores our society and beliefs, people don’t understand it and just want to spread panic!
@@torb1trick415 www.cnn.com/2019/10/04/entertainment/joker-movie-opening-night/index.html "The "Joker" hit movie theaters this week despite a wave of criticism that it glorifies a killer and could encourage copycat attacks nationwide." - CNN io9.gizmodo.com/u-s-military-issues-warning-to-troops-about-incel-viol-1838412331 "The U.S. military has warned service members about the potential for a mass shooter at screenings of the Warner Bros. film Joker, which has sparked wide concerns from, among others, the families of those killed during the 2012 mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado." - Gizmodo Would add more, but I'm not spending more than 5 minutes replying. FYI, there wasn't a single incident at a single screening of the movie. There's been more violence at an Ariana Grande concert than there was at showings of Joker. All of the articles and "journalism" was just shitty liberal propaganda. One the other hand, I'll leave it to you to find the plethora of pedophile sympathizers praising Cuties. (Source for that Ariana Grande claim.) www.nbcnews.com/news/world/deaths-injuries-confirmed-after-explosions-heard-u-k-concert-featuring-n763286
"You're supposed to be sitting there thinking.. 'Look at the blonde one.'" ....As a 15 year old girl.. who is naturally blonde.. and very blonde.. i almost threw up hearing this. How can people like this exist?!
@@DogshitArgument You're gonna say that.. With an early 2000s frog meme profile picture.. Sure man. Diss JoJo's all you want but it's a pretty interesting show lol.
@@magicshruums1014 Imagine trying to pull a cringe pfp Olympics with a JoJo pfp and trying to act like peepo is cringier. You know the solution, I told you already.
@@DogshitArgument Dude it's just a profile picture on RU-vid.. I'm not going to change mine. I like it. Just calm down and move on. People like you who are obsessed with memes and think they're superior over a person because they watch anime is why we can't have good things. I'm not going to commit suicide like you told me to because of the shows i like watching. What the hell..
The fact that Cuties is a “controversial movie” and not a “universally hated and deplored” movie means there’s something deeply wrong with our society.
And not that this is happening all over America in pageants and dance competitions? So you would rather it just go on and you get to ignore it? This is something we needed to stop it because everyone has been playing stupid for years.
The media is controlled by a select few people with money and those select few are fucked in the head. They are also controlling the opinions and messages being conveyed to our entire nation. This is why America is so divided right now.
@Daniela Flores Velez Complaining wont do much if you dont follow up with acting. Whatcha going to do - Nothing? Well, thats certainly Effective! But heres another suggestion: Flag! The Cuties-Trailer is only one thing you could repret or flag; just one. Honestly not even the best target, really. Animal-Abuse-Channel, as Charlie covered one, is also just a start, but not enough. Search up Porn, Nudity, Racism, Sexism, Spam-Bots - all of this is easier to find and easier to-be-reported than you think. Both. Do something! Dont make exucses like saying it wont do anything, cause duh: I know it can work. I did it myself. I got lots of Racists and whatnotelse removed, in fact.
Actually it is a good comparison. This movie is not simulating sexualization of children, it is literally sexualizing them. A simulation would be an animated picture, but these are real kids being creeped on.
What's even worse, they have to grow up with parents that made them star in the movie. This is not even child neglect anymore, this is literally selling your underage children for sortcore porn.
I’m sorry but I just imagined the heads of Netflix walking into their next boardroom and Chris Hansen just stood there like ‘take a seat’ and they’re all like ‘who are you?’ And he’s like ‘we’ll get to that’ 😂
the worst part about it imo is the people defending this by saying ”that’s just europe man, its a different culture”. yo let me just say, coming from europe: no that’s not normal
@@geico_drip9878 Ah yes because the primary goal of feminism is to film softcore child porn. That is the goal of feminism so clearly feminists wrote this. Go back to Reddit usdi watoli
@@darkaliebaba99 the point of the review guy saying that? That’s where I’m referencing. He should be investigated along with the production team working on the film.
@@asims5335 no what I mean, is that the point of the guy saying that was as criticism to the producers of the movie, for sexualizing children that way. If they weren't 'hot' no one would bat an eye, as it wouldn't be sexualization. That's what the guy was trying to say with "they're hot". He obviously didn't mean it in the sense that he now fantasies about those children, as that would make him a pedophile.
