Тёмный

CycloTech First Flight 

eVTOL
Подписаться 28 тыс.
Просмотров 3,5 млн
50% 1

Check out the first flight of the CycloTech technology demonstrator. The Austrian company based its "CycloRotor" propulsion system on the Voith Schneider Propeller design, which has been used in maritime applications for decades. CycloTech believes it could be used to create compact, maneuverable small drones and air taxis.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

9 окт 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 6 тыс.   
@jonbuilds
@jonbuilds 2 года назад
I wonder how they work calmly and effectively in that lab with the dramatic music so loud?
@moonones
@moonones 2 года назад
all former Red Bull lab techies, nothing phases these guys anymore
@visible2anyoneonyoutube
@visible2anyoneonyoutube 2 года назад
After a while, you don't even hear it anymore.
@parkershaw8529
@parkershaw8529 2 года назад
Earplugs, or ANC headphone.
@frijoli9579
@frijoli9579 2 года назад
@@visible2anyoneonyoutube under rated comment
@rodmact6548
@rodmact6548 2 года назад
😂🤣
@cr4zyg047
@cr4zyg047 2 года назад
Incredible! I just wish the music was louder.
@welytonpaz4235
@welytonpaz4235 2 года назад
🤣
@SirUncleCid
@SirUncleCid 2 года назад
HUH?????
@rualert1602
@rualert1602 2 года назад
I wish it was music.
@Adventures2U
@Adventures2U 2 года назад
👂 WHAT??
@Est.1993
@Est.1993 2 года назад
🤣🤣🤣
@phillingham3167
@phillingham3167 2 года назад
Now we can make 4 smoothies at once, this is a true break through
@allnatural1992
@allnatural1992 2 года назад
😄...on the way to your house!! 😆
@Totalinternalreflection
@Totalinternalreflection 2 года назад
Lmao
@alvaromorenoc.9427
@alvaromorenoc.9427 2 года назад
🤣🤣🤣😂😂
@kafanovine2315
@kafanovine2315 2 года назад
Crew: How to make this product look cool? Sound guy: I have an idea!
@murrijuana2842
@murrijuana2842 2 года назад
Every freestyle quad video ever.
@MrEazyE357
@MrEazyE357 2 года назад
Finally! I'm always telling people, "You know what these educational/science RU-vid videos are missing? Loud electronic music."
@wallytangofoxtrot4721
@wallytangofoxtrot4721 2 года назад
Sadly, that was actually the motor prop’s sound note.
@clayton9136
@clayton9136 2 года назад
Not a single second of that track could be considered electronic music.
@davelowets
@davelowets 2 года назад
Quit stealing other people's comments..
@jaakkopontinen
@jaakkopontinen 2 года назад
BAZZZOOWWWWWWAA
@Born2Losenot2win
@Born2Losenot2win 2 года назад
They put it there to mask the noise the vehicle/drone makes
@ControlAllDa1337
@ControlAllDa1337 2 года назад
Imagine all the hard work that has gone into this. Then they make a video and everyone roasts them for the music in it 😂
@nommy8599
@nommy8599 2 года назад
@@stp4tiger exactly. It's 100% hype 0% on why this iw even worth doing. I would like just 1 reason why/how it's anything but over-complication for the sake of it alone. Maybe you don't see that and that's why you criticise those who do (and have more idea how truly absurd the carry on is). Think about it or point out just 1 significant advantage for me over existing simple props or turbofans/jets please.
@BD-lq4id
@BD-lq4id 2 года назад
If the product/technology was worthwhile or captivating, no one would be commenting on the music. It's because the music was so intense and the actual performance so lackluster that people are commenting on it.
@fredgervinm.p.3315
@fredgervinm.p.3315 2 года назад
Everbody wants to build a better mouse trap...
@vessbakalov8958
@vessbakalov8958 2 года назад
@@nommy8599 what struck me is that the way these fans are attached, it would be easy to have wheels slip on them and use the same drive train to operate as a ground vehicle. I know too little about their efficiency, noise level, etc. It is more compact than other flying vehicles for sure.
@nommy8599
@nommy8599 2 года назад
@@vessbakalov8958 yeah good point about the wheels. Might be able to put some thin ones there. Would need a lifting mechanism to spin them for takeoff though. And gearing for any power (pretty different rotation speeds for land vs flight). And suspension. And steering. But maybe good to get into garage something. IDK about other stuff either and do wonder if a similar size vehicle with same lift could be done with props. My impression was things are made larger with wing for efficiency, but maybe these are good for compact lift. Would've thought they'd say if it was compact and efficient but IDK.
@brettnorthey7557
@brettnorthey7557 2 года назад
My company is developing e-Vtol in a different direction.. but i just love this ..one of the limiting factors to e-vtol is environmental particle dispersion ie FOD .. and rather than focusing trust vectoring in one direction , this has a radial factor and clearly would reduce the dust and drama associated with the future of e-vtol.. great work guys!
@daniellevy4104
@daniellevy4104 2 года назад
when your invention is so loud you gotta find music thats even louder...
@jerryg9207
@jerryg9207 2 года назад
Every aircraft is loud.
@daniellevy4104
@daniellevy4104 2 года назад
@@jerryg9207 yes but this one is 4 times louder and the sound is 360 around the pilot
@Leo-ws3bp
@Leo-ws3bp 2 года назад
@@daniellevy4104 you know how loud a car is to people next to it? Now think of how it sounds inside. Smae with a plane, same with a helicopter,same with a cyclocopter
@uneektalent
@uneektalent 2 года назад
It looks great. I wish I could hear it without the extra background noise.
@mattd1188
@mattd1188 2 года назад
ok, I'll do my best impression of the deafening noise that you would hear. WHUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
@Dmanning11
@Dmanning11 2 года назад
What did you say? I can’t hear you!
@davidswanson5669
@davidswanson5669 2 года назад
Yeah I want to know how it compares to a quadcopter that has to lift the same amount of weight. If these are more quiet then it’ll be a huge step towards assimilating them into cities.
@benedictroberts678
@benedictroberts678 2 года назад
@@Dmanning11 *Drumming intensifies*
@uneektalent
@uneektalent 2 года назад
@@mattd1188 That's better.
@MeditationMotivation365
@MeditationMotivation365 2 года назад
I want to see the system in a smoke tunnel. Very curious of the fluid dynamics going on here.
@longshot7601
@longshot7601 2 года назад
The Voith Schneider Propeller design has been used in tugboats for a few decades. The pitch varies as the blades travel around the cycle. Because of this the thrust vector can be in any direction perpendicular to the rotation axis. This can be very advantageous for tugboats that can move in any direction. The only advantage that I can see for aircraft is being able to more up/down and fore/aft with no pitching of the aircraft. If I remember correctly the efficiency isn't as good as a conventional propeller.
@cytixify
@cytixify 2 года назад
Because you watch Smarter Everyday
@smallaxe255
@smallaxe255 2 года назад
Wouldn’t that be aerodynamics?
@jesseb0rn51
@jesseb0rn51 2 года назад
@@smallaxe255 in physics you can treat air as a liquid
@BarryMDHo
@BarryMDHo 2 года назад
Looks like a lot of thrust wasted due to 360 degree open design.
@voodooinc7935
@voodooinc7935 2 года назад
I could literally film my cat taking a dump with this music in the background, and it would seem epic
@Capttainn
@Capttainn 2 года назад
Magnus effect? Stellar work!! Congrats on your hardworking paying off!!
@humanistwriting5477
@humanistwriting5477 2 года назад
Regular wing lift. It's a cylogyro.
@thejesuschrist
@thejesuschrist 2 года назад
it's like a miracle
@circle4106
@circle4106 2 года назад
Jesus approved.
@senfdame528
@senfdame528 2 года назад
Sh*t´s called physics
@obe22099
@obe22099 2 года назад
He doesn't know
@darrellhiggins4206
@darrellhiggins4206 2 года назад
You are verified as jesus
@deltaxcd
@deltaxcd 2 года назад
A miracle that someone provides funding for that
@alanwatts8239
@alanwatts8239 2 года назад
The loud music must be to mask just how noisy this thing is.
@BoopSnoot
@BoopSnoot 2 года назад
WHAT
@stewartpidasle6165
@stewartpidasle6165 2 года назад
I covered my speakers
@davelowets
@davelowets 2 года назад
Anything that flies will be "loud". Wise up.
@alanwatts8239
@alanwatts8239 2 года назад
@@davelowets Then how do you explain my joke flying over your head without you hearing it?
@linkbond08
@linkbond08 2 года назад
Yes it's basically a drone with extra steps, they'll go into obscurity in about 5 years.
@hemangsaini610
@hemangsaini610 2 года назад
When the sound guy is a hardcore gamer but hes allowed to go balls to walls on the edit.
@BogdanWeiss
@BogdanWeiss 2 года назад
It's just distortion with ZERO dynamic range
@13031983
@13031983 2 года назад
it could also use as a air raid alarm device in terms of the sound.
@gp8666
@gp8666 2 года назад
Yeah I wonder how they can figure that out...
@mister_needles
@mister_needles 2 года назад
When the music is so loud it renders the whole investment sus af
@phenylmusic
@phenylmusic 2 года назад
bro the music is just an action movie trailer version of the amogus trap remix if you can hear the melody
@taggerinc2652
@taggerinc2652 2 года назад
When they try this hard to hype up something that's pretty straightforward, you have to wonder why. Good products sell themselves.
@eb4305
@eb4305 2 года назад
Congratulations, configuring the blades so they actuate correctly during the revolution is an achievement in itself. Making a craft that follows these principals is something else entirely. Well done
@NICEFINENEWROBOT
@NICEFINENEWROBOT 2 года назад
High rotor speed, high actuating speed, high wear. Durability questionable. (Then - who asked me) ?:o)
@Matsci101
@Matsci101 2 года назад
This is a Voith Schneider Propeller invented in 1929. Nothing new here but is now possible for aircraft due to composites and the power of the motors we have today and the lightweight batteries. Still cool.
@snomx2809
@snomx2809 2 года назад
your whole life depends on each and every belt not breaking...
@1arbuzik123
@1arbuzik123 2 года назад
"Configuring the blades during revolution"... have you heard about helicopter?
@kovendanr.k.1108
@kovendanr.k.1108 2 года назад
is the configuration differ from those in helicopters
@danielwhyatt3278
@danielwhyatt3278 2 года назад
Now that is just craaaazy.😲👏🏼 Really didn’t think this was possible.
@Jason-gt2kx
@Jason-gt2kx 2 года назад
FINALLY, a true flying car! This proof of concept could lead to a car that runs on the road AND has the ability to hover and fly without a ton of propulsion pointed downward. Bravo!
@daspecialist1220
@daspecialist1220 2 года назад
Yes the wheels should be to make contact with the ground, be a car the turn in inner blades to fly
@dr.origami4991
@dr.origami4991 2 года назад
Bullshit! That is not a flying car, but something... loud
@Axiomatic75
@Axiomatic75 2 года назад
What I want to know is how efficient this is compared to normal propellers.
@skyrex4694
@skyrex4694 2 года назад
exactly and the noise level too🤔👌👍
@jan-hg9vi
@jan-hg9vi 2 года назад
Not efficient compared to propellers. Way to much waisted energy. It will have to depend completely stability management systems. Great effort but it will never be more than an experiment. This looks like it would be better in the water than the air.
@Axiomatic75
@Axiomatic75 2 года назад
@@jan-hg9vi Thanks for the answer. Makes no sense to build it then as even with propellers quadcopters can't stay in the air very long because batteries aren't energy dense enough.
@NicholasRehm
@NicholasRehm 2 года назад
@@jan-hg9vi you sound like an expert that has built one before; have you actually?
@Av-vd3wk
@Av-vd3wk 2 года назад
Besides lack of efficiency, this thing has a major problem when it comes to losing RPM on just one motor of the four. It would surely spin out of control. Or imagine losing power to just one of the four. It would snap itself apart.
@diamondcreepah3210
@diamondcreepah3210 2 года назад
As one random dude in the internet once said: "the more moving parts an object has, the more they can fail"
@ScienceChap
@ScienceChap 2 года назад
Or as Captain Montgomery Scott once said, "the more you overstep the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain".
@kevinjpluck
@kevinjpluck 2 года назад
Mechanism is surprisingly simple ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ub563Yc3xls.html
@paulrun111
@paulrun111 2 года назад
@@kevinjpluck even that is too complicated. Could have them only able to produce upwards lift and then change the power between the motors. I think varying the blades is the part that makes it too complicated. This things works in the same way a bird flys. The blades should only be able to move just enough to produce lift on down stroke and move just enough to make no lift on the up stroke. That is how birds do it.
@justincavinder5504
@justincavinder5504 2 года назад
I mean we already 4 prop airplanes, multi engine jets, as well as a whole host of other complex things. Like nuclear subs and ships. This is no more complex then those? Not to diminish the innovativeness of this design.
@barrythompson6936
@barrythompson6936 2 года назад
Woah! Way before the internet that was said.
@harliethomas1378
@harliethomas1378 2 года назад
As far as sound, what is really amazing is how quiet this machine is compared to anything else out there!
@parrishwest
@parrishwest Год назад
Yes but can it be used to for the motorized destruction of other countries? Because that's what man does with his best technology.
@marioparra78
@marioparra78 2 года назад
This is fantastic keep up the great work
@billykyle
@billykyle 2 года назад
This looks COOL
@IdahoQuadcopter
@IdahoQuadcopter 2 года назад
It looks cool, but I'm not clear on why it's better than a conventional prop. It's certainly more complicated, and I would think that means more points of failure. 🤷‍♂
@cheroso1000
@cheroso1000 2 года назад
@@IdahoQuadcopter it's safer and more compact.
@davidblalock9945
@davidblalock9945 2 года назад
@@IdahoQuadcopter for its application, its far safer for the rider (not so much for bystanders). Remember that Russian hover-bike with the 4 open props spinning at high rpm inches from the riders legs? If I recall correctly, the pilot suffered severe leg injuries when he crashed. This thing in a similar crash situation will eject the high speed moving parts away from the rider.
@davidblalock9945
@davidblalock9945 2 года назад
@@cheroso1000 the real question is efficiency, how much more energy is this system using to achieve the same level of lift?
@thyhaggis7139
@thyhaggis7139 2 года назад
It looks aweful like a flying shoe
@nickcautrell2514
@nickcautrell2514 2 года назад
Well that's interesting. I see a of comments about not being as efficient as a helicopter. Which is true but look at it this way. A fixed wing aircraft is more efficient than a helicopter. Can travel faster and farther but requires a runway. Helicopters are less efficient and carry less generally but can land in smaller areas. Down side is contact with the main rotor and trees or power lines end badly. This design is much more compact than a helicopter with simpler mobility. First thing I thought of was aircraft for urban areas. Looks like it's still in the early design stages but I see potential.
@TLHarris17
@TLHarris17 2 года назад
Precisely!!! Couldn’t agree more, thank you for putting forth a different perspective. I do hope your profession allows you to exercise dynamic thinking regularly. Cheers!🍻
@CapriceV6
@CapriceV6 2 года назад
I agree also! great concept and hey it works. This is what inventing is all about!
@user-gq9qh2kw6h
@user-gq9qh2kw6h 2 года назад
it is a waste off money and time
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD 2 года назад
That doesn't make any sense. Efficiency is all in the design parameters, such as the Concorde throwing efficiency out the window for the sake of shorter flights. If you tried to compete with the Comcorde with rocket powered engines... everyone would tell you that's a bad idea. It's more compact, but also less safe. If you lose power in an helicopter you can use the drag created by the air to windmill the rotor and create enough lift to perform an emergency landing instead of dropping like a rock. Can't do that with this one.
@nickcautrell2514
@nickcautrell2514 2 года назад
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD it's not about a direct comparison of efficiency. Im looking at the gain in mobility at the expense of efficiency.
@freedompowerwashingllc6199
@freedompowerwashingllc6199 2 года назад
I appreciate someone doing something completely different no matter how good or bad the final outcome is..this is what i consider to be true innovation!
@dr.origami4991
@dr.origami4991 2 года назад
Inovation on what?? Noise power?!? Inovation.... pff
@freedompowerwashingllc6199
@freedompowerwashingllc6199 2 года назад
@@dr.origami4991 send us some links of new stuff youre out there trying to do! Personally im still trying to figure out how they directionalized the airflow of the 4 squirrel cages downward...
@helicocktor
@helicocktor 2 года назад
You know who doesn't need a raise? The editor.
@sandspar
@sandspar 2 года назад
All it needs is a helmet sticking out of the bottom and it would be an upside down F1
@embers_falling
@embers_falling 2 года назад
That’s what I was thinking lmao that’s why I decided to watch the vid because I didn’t read the title so I thought it was an f1
@Topn08_
@Topn08_ 2 года назад
Shh...
@ziasong
@ziasong 2 года назад
Don't forget a halo.
@f_USAF-Lt.G
@f_USAF-Lt.G 2 года назад
🤔So, you're saying... "Nice luggage rack, F1"?
@oldestries
@oldestries 2 года назад
Dont get too attached to things. Its even more than that.
@walter2990
@walter2990 2 года назад
Finally, the first step towards an actual Star Wars "Speeder"!
@olddudeonaducati3153
@olddudeonaducati3153 2 года назад
Fuck yeah..
@Jeff55369
@Jeff55369 2 года назад
@@olddudeonaducati3153 someone made a flying car years ago... with 8 jet engines. And of course there's been a few attempts with duo and quad copter rotors.
@The1trueDave
@The1trueDave 2 года назад
@@Jeff55369 Those barrel-shaped rotors make it a lot more compact though. Fits the 'form factor' of a speeder or speeder bike a lot better...
@The1trueDave
@The1trueDave 2 года назад
My first thought was 'speeder bike' but yeah :-)
@stc2828
@stc2828 2 года назад
When motors get too powerful, people always find creative ways to build inefficient designs that barely flies XD
@payton1284
@payton1284 2 года назад
Thankyou for pointing this out
@chuckthebull
@chuckthebull 2 года назад
they do it with computers..make faster processors then load it down with buggy flashy software,,back to slow again..
@gugugaga5867
@gugugaga5867 2 года назад
Ohh boy another ignorant guy here.
@chuckthebull
@chuckthebull 2 года назад
@@gugugaga5867 yeah yeah rotating blades and all, we get it.. it's like little kids that walk flayling their arms and legs in all directions but don't get far,,, lots of movement no progress. but it's fun huh?
@dr.origami4991
@dr.origami4991 2 года назад
@@gugugaga5867 Who?You?!
@georgiekamaratos6939
@georgiekamaratos6939 2 года назад
Congratulations on breaking the boundaries!!!!
@TheOneRiv
@TheOneRiv 2 года назад
If I remember correctly, there were some very similar designs to this one from the early days of flying machines, sometime in the late 1800s. I didn’t expect to see this design come back and work!
@meatfruit1123
@meatfruit1123 2 года назад
Jeez how old are you?
@meatfruit1123
@meatfruit1123 2 года назад
Like 150 or something. Stay strong and keep on going old timer 💪👨🏽‍🦳
@WMithrandirXbox
@WMithrandirXbox 2 года назад
Meat Fruit, maybe he remembers it from an old yt video, smart guy
@TheOneRiv
@TheOneRiv 2 года назад
@@WMithrandirXbox I don’t think it was from a yt video, I think it was a Wikipedia article
@TheOneRiv
@TheOneRiv 2 года назад
@@meatfruit1123 Also, I’m actually 17, although I may as well be 150 sometimes
@devdeclan
@devdeclan 2 года назад
Finally what everyone's been waiting for. Hovering Cars!
@royilevy7322
@royilevy7322 2 года назад
@ I think they just skipped a part
@andy-the-gardener
@andy-the-gardener 2 года назад
not everyone. i've been waiting for banning cars
@snuggiebear01
@snuggiebear01 2 года назад
Those have been around for sixty years.
@alexluckes6563
@alexluckes6563 2 года назад
they would work great in London nothing goes forwards
@ianhinds3480
@ianhinds3480 2 года назад
Yeah, exactly. I was immediately thinking of Blade runner.
@Spazattitude
@Spazattitude 2 года назад
Not every single technology is revolutionary but when harnessed and combined by equally talented minds we can create things no one thought possible.
@deltakilo5797
@deltakilo5797 2 года назад
Nice start. Keep up the good work
@punkbloater
@punkbloater 2 года назад
The flying vehicles from Bladerunner looks more believable after watching this, nice work!
@Beardodoomus
@Beardodoomus 2 года назад
Exactly what came to mind when I saw it.
@andyeunson270
@andyeunson270 2 года назад
Can it “auto rotate “ like a helicopter or will it come down like a beveled brick if it loses power?
@petedavis7970
@petedavis7970 2 года назад
I think the problems are a bit more complicated than that. It has 4 motors. If 1 dies, what's going to happen in that corner? If it completely loses power, it won't be able to auto-rotate like a helicopter because, unlike a helicopter, it's not going to come down with the blades above. It's going to dive either forward or backwards (depending on where the weight is, looks like the back) and be as aerodynamic as it can as it plunges to the ground way faster than any helicopter. Driver is definitely going to get a fatal dose of ground poisoning. Parachute would work if you're high enough.
@evknucklehead
@evknucklehead 2 года назад
@@petedavis7970 Never heard the term "ground poisoning" before. Brings to mind the saying "eat dirt", which can be applied to some of the same situations. Made me chuckle, at any rate.
@dxbonnar
@dxbonnar 2 года назад
@@petedavis7970 Computers driving the motors are helpful here. Quad drones do well on three rotors as the computer can oscillate the 'across' blade to balance. I expect feathering of the cross blade assembly plus & minus could balance during a single motor failure. If another fails, time for the BRS.
@chrispridemore5562
@chrispridemore5562 2 года назад
What about just as a hover bike?
@davidwebb2318
@davidwebb2318 2 года назад
I wonder if the answer would be to have more rotors to allow some redundancy. if the machine has only just enough lift from it's rotors when they are all working then it would seem to be very dangerous.
@triynizzles
@triynizzles 2 года назад
voith schneider propellers have been around for a while interesting to see in action.
@shannono.5835
@shannono.5835 2 года назад
This tech reminds me of the Fanwing R&D
@humanistwriting5477
@humanistwriting5477 2 года назад
@Khaliil bin Ammar the propeller design these engineers are using was invented in 1908. They are well established, and also called rotocycloid propellers.
@ralphcalzada4767
@ralphcalzada4767 2 года назад
can't wait for this to develop into something we'll use in the future
@jerichojoe307
@jerichojoe307 2 года назад
I could see them eventually making this a multi terrain vehicle being air, water, and land. The blades are already wheel-shaped so add some rubber on the perimeter for land travel, encase the motor mechanism to make it waterproof so that it can act as paddlewheels for water travel, and well we've already seen that it flies. It could be an emergency Supply delivery tool to get lightweight supplies anywhere that they need to be whether land, water, or air.
@hightidelowtide6380
@hightidelowtide6380 2 года назад
Those wheels would make the best margaritas on the planet!
@CausticLemons7
@CausticLemons7 2 года назад
Larger with a chute on the back and you've got a flying combine harvester! That was a really cool tech demo, and I'm excited to see where this goes!
@f_USAF-Lt.G
@f_USAF-Lt.G 2 года назад
(... Back into the field, probably)
@coryarmbrecht
@coryarmbrecht Год назад
Wow, propellers that spin in a different direction. 👏✊
@IanSebryk
@IanSebryk 2 года назад
great start! at some point, the horrific noise is going to have to be dealt with. it sure is an exciting take on VTOL! keep going! :D
@geriazriel
@geriazriel 2 года назад
Never thought humankind would actually finally 'reinvent the wheel'
@darkracer1252
@darkracer1252 2 года назад
did they? looks pretty round to me
@darkracer1252
@darkracer1252 2 года назад
@Alt Persona and what shape is a wheel?
@ajax5622
@ajax5622 2 года назад
@@darkracer1252 i think its kinda wheelie shaped. I could be wrong, 1 second now...... just looked at my car most def wheel like. Hope i helped.
@darkracer1252
@darkracer1252 2 года назад
@Alt Persona i think we all agree. that they are wheels and the OP is wrong
@uniuni8855
@uniuni8855 2 года назад
It's a Phoenician sailing technology
@rickl4952
@rickl4952 2 года назад
Amazing... congrats everyone on a great first flight!
@lancebbowman
@lancebbowman 2 года назад
I can see the string holding it up!;) Seriously, nice job!
@ValmisFilm
@ValmisFilm 2 года назад
Okay, that is wierd... and AWZOME!!! I hope this goes somewhere big
@timeis247
@timeis247 2 года назад
That's an interesting concept. Now make the inner and outer rims of the drums lined in rubber and you have an electric flying car as well.
@kapitievs
@kapitievs 2 года назад
Very impressive. Looking forward to seeing these really take-off!
@bushramukthar1488
@bushramukthar1488 2 года назад
I see what u did there 😂
@glennalexon1530
@glennalexon1530 2 года назад
This is going to revolutionize the market for large, slow, loud, unmanned drones that don't need a payload.
@lazarduke6596
@lazarduke6596 2 года назад
This is a "rerun" Today's' scientist are unable to invent anything. They just recycle old ideas. Look this "revolutionize the market for large" at Anton Flettner (November 1, 1885 - December 29, 1961)
@ifarted6422
@ifarted6422 2 года назад
@@lazarduke6596 Recycling old ideas is how inventions improve... Therefore the inventors are inventing..
@lazarduke6596
@lazarduke6596 2 года назад
@@ifarted6422 therfore improvement of one invention is not "invention" but "impruvement" Nikola Tesla invented AC, MRI, Remote control, and around other 1000 different patents.All of them were improved, but those who improved those Teslas' patents WE CAN NOT CALL INVENTORS of those Tesla patents.
@ifarted6422
@ifarted6422 2 года назад
@@lazarduke6596 You called scientists inventors.. I think you need to go look up the definition of both lmfao.. Love how you spin off the subject of using somebody as an example when you don't make sense at all
@lazarduke6596
@lazarduke6596 2 года назад
@@ifarted6422 just the opposite. Scientist are NOT necessarily inventors, but they could be. Learn to properly read and think to properly understand whats written.
@yardy88
@yardy88 2 года назад
Crucially: can I ride it while firing a phaser at some ewoks?
@Booper1978
@Booper1978 2 года назад
Thanks. I've been waiting to see a thought come to life. After I saw the Dyson products I was sure someone would think of this, and also the semi bladeless wind turbines!
@stephenlittle7534
@stephenlittle7534 2 года назад
Well that was different. I will be looking at this more. Good luck.
@Darius17090
@Darius17090 2 года назад
Omg that is awesome!!👏👏👏
@gdibble
@gdibble 2 года назад
🤩 _Simply Amazing!_
@bitsmart...
@bitsmart... 2 года назад
i would like to see those as F1 race - that would be spectacular crashes!
@vordag
@vordag 2 года назад
this dude can fly over it
@DGENexMACHINA
@DGENexMACHINA 2 года назад
Is this how speed racer starts?
@ChironZore
@ChironZore 2 года назад
Phantum Menace racing pods
@noreezy4991
@noreezy4991 2 года назад
wow, I have been looking for these guys for like 5-10 years. I remember seeing this technology in a video from some German or Austrian technology conference and could never find it again. Looks very interesting.
@jmflip7
@jmflip7 2 года назад
A start of something great!
@trevorgwelch7412
@trevorgwelch7412 2 года назад
50 years ago I remember seeing a kite with the same configuration as the spinning props
@peterwootton9302
@peterwootton9302 2 года назад
I had one!
@nuranbintangsabihat4032
@nuranbintangsabihat4032 2 года назад
investor : how many moving part you'll need for this project? cyclotech : yes!
@Zigmmaaaaarrssss
@Zigmmaaaaarrssss 2 года назад
Yeah I still don't get why invest in this, it's never going to compete against a simple electric motor and a efficient propeller.
@XxXDOMINIONXxX
@XxXDOMINIONXxX 2 года назад
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss Yes, please tell us the differences in inefficiencies derived from your extensive aerospace engineering degree and years of study and application.
@AIWorks2040
@AIWorks2040 2 года назад
They are “youtuber” .. just to get some views
@Heathh49008
@Heathh49008 2 года назад
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss And is efficiency the only consideration? Hint : no Now consider the differences.
@Incalvideo
@Incalvideo 2 года назад
​@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss imagine this product in 10--20,yrs it will be wow, a prototoype for someone to make an air-bike like in star wars!!! In the near future the hypodroms will be filled watching these things race, you will be able to travel long distances, etci tell you =)
@merkantelismo
@merkantelismo 2 года назад
Great! Those blowers make pretty loud EDM music
@Henkerthequality
@Henkerthequality 2 года назад
You bring the Voith Schneider water propulsion system to air, with a 90 degree twist :) Nice idea :)
@yellowstone2ndtrumpet304
@yellowstone2ndtrumpet304 2 года назад
Smart thinking... You need to cover the wheel inlet so it also creates vaccuum (low pressure) above it and higher pressure below it. Its at the same time protection, to parts that could brake of.
@MrJrange
@MrJrange 2 года назад
to the development team: keep up the good work! You are onto a winner here.....
@Freakoutski
@Freakoutski 2 года назад
Pretty cool! It's like Magnus effect craft had a baby with a paddle boat. If those blades could be designed to fold in on themselves, then you got yourself some wheels!
@DANTHETUBEMAN
@DANTHETUBEMAN 2 года назад
Going on the ground is for old ppl. :)
@soulscornsentinel-7124
@soulscornsentinel-7124 2 года назад
Or instead of the blades folding, you have an outer rim tyre that’s folds back to the body revealing the bladed wheel
@hemiacplurge3572
@hemiacplurge3572 2 года назад
I saw the thumbnail and thought "Cool! A magnus effect doo-dad". Its a bit weirder, which is always fun.
@danhnguyenmd9635
@danhnguyenmd9635 2 года назад
Just add rubber along the rim and you got wheels that can go from road to air. First of its kind.
@mattmustarde5582
@mattmustarde5582 2 года назад
This is technically NOT the magnus effect, but rather a "cyclorotor" - similar in function to a Voith Schneider/Kirsten-Boeing Propeller, but on it's side. If this was lifted by the Magnus effect, you wouldn't need the smaller vanes inside the cylinder, but instead would want a smooth cylinder for the air to "stick" to as it spins. I'd love to know how this cyclorotor setup stacks up against traditional rotors, as it seems to add more noise and mechanical complexity, while reducing power efficiency. Maybe it's purely for a smaller footprint and resistance to impacts?
@andrewjacobs7860
@andrewjacobs7860 2 года назад
That’s incredible.
@MrHeuristics
@MrHeuristics 2 года назад
Well done! Before military or civilian application, the engineers have to tackle the blade loading noise that sounds like hardcore industrial techno.
@marcv2648
@marcv2648 2 года назад
Yes, that loud rhythmic noise issue definitely needs to solved if this is ever to garner public acceptance.
@Adamcfyfe
@Adamcfyfe 2 года назад
Sick! looking forward to see some real world flights with this thing.
@janholland2224
@janholland2224 2 года назад
In a Voith Schneider the center of rotation can be shifted/changed. By the looks of it this center of rotation is fixed which makes it a Kirsten-Boeing type propulsor. Both quite classic cycloidal propulsor design patterns which haven been around for a century or so.
@atalazs
@atalazs 2 года назад
True. But great achievement anyway! I've never seen a big drone using that principle.
@gurgleblaster2282
@gurgleblaster2282 2 года назад
@@atalazs there are a few youtubers who have made drones like this.
@atalazs
@atalazs 2 года назад
@@gurgleblaster2282 True. So when boeing showed their deamliner, have you commented "its a plane, I've seen that 100 Years ago!"? To use such an uncommon propuslion system is a big risk and deserves some appreciation for the involved entrepreneurs ans engineers. And for all tec: we're standing on the shoulders of giants.
@daycred
@daycred 2 года назад
@@atalazs Agreed. People just want to disagree out of principle smh
@antonnym214
@antonnym214 2 года назад
It looks to me like the blade angle is adjustable. Assuming that's done under software control, and not just centrifugal force, then I was originally thinking it could be more of a Werner-Klemperer design. But now I think you're right. Kirsten-Boeing.
@edmeraan2
@edmeraan2 2 года назад
Holy shit!!! Here we go, the first step to flying cars!!!
@darrelleaf
@darrelleaf 2 года назад
That's pretty freakn cool
@fusionmechanic1
@fusionmechanic1 2 года назад
Finally something revolutionary for flying it's always been more blades for helicopters style or more wing. This is something new
@dumydummies8514
@dumydummies8514 2 года назад
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclogyro
@rachmawansaputra2491
@rachmawansaputra2491 2 года назад
First they already testing cyclogyro from 1940+ Second that not efficient as blades and to lift a copter you need cyclogyro the size copter and at least need 2 of them
@CH-pv2rz
@CH-pv2rz 2 года назад
Without blades there is no autorotation to the ground to survive a power/engine failure. With this setup you just crash and die…
@DmitrySabFo
@DmitrySabFo 2 года назад
Bruh there are blades inside rotors and this tech were made more than 100 years ago by one russian engineer. Now in Russia they're also developing "Cyclocopter".
@noname-xo5mp
@noname-xo5mp 2 года назад
I want anti gravity alien tech.. Tired of all this spinny stuff
@patrickm.4469
@patrickm.4469 2 года назад
I'm really excited for where drone tech is going to be in 10 or 20 years!
@brucerideout9979
@brucerideout9979 2 года назад
Am Canadian 63 not too excited about that siggh Nonetheless this is exponentially more fascinating, daily.
@MrArkBrian
@MrArkBrian 2 года назад
Watch the movie Terminator. Those Ariel HK’s are pretty much the direction they’re going.
@mattiacenacchi726
@mattiacenacchi726 2 года назад
war.
@supportbmf9113
@supportbmf9113 2 года назад
I ve been looking around something that is practical, affordable, simple to handle/operate etc etc and so far nothing beats Opener's blackfly
@ketchcoreyvideos
@ketchcoreyvideos 2 года назад
Truly what an incredible blip of time to be alive
@arealivreProjeto100k
@arealivreProjeto100k 2 года назад
Of all, this is the most similar to fiction film vehicles, I believe that's the way to go!
@giamamillionaire
@giamamillionaire 2 года назад
Yes...this is the future
@buttafan4010
@buttafan4010 2 года назад
Another indication is that those look like wheels and so hypothetically ... they could also be designed to roll on asphalt ... or a surface somewhat less _car sin ogenic._ It would be 4 wheel hub motor drive. That is what the Delorean should have been equipped with in Back To The Future 1 (and will be if a remake is even still possible in the future. Both the franken virus and mRNA sequence are from Ft. Detrk.)
@Deshelton10
@Deshelton10 2 года назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EAJM5L9hhBs.html Jet Suit by Gravity Industries
@missionmarkone7484
@missionmarkone7484 2 года назад
If they added some wings it could be far more efficient hovering across water using ground effect.
@charliepearce8767
@charliepearce8767 2 года назад
Have lots of mice running around in the fan and we go !!
@OnizukaGTO
@OnizukaGTO 2 года назад
They use these vertical tube "engines" on sailing ships and cargo ferries for years, only surprised it took this long to put them horizontal to make things fly. Such a simple mechanism but seems to be very delicate when it comes to flying. Nice one!
@FrozenHaxor
@FrozenHaxor 2 года назад
Probably because you cannot possibly perform an autorotation with this system, resulting in a vehicle loss if a failure of any of the four rotors should occur. It's unsuitable for human transportation.
@s.hoonsdot97
@s.hoonsdot97 2 года назад
AWESOME!
@Flakwell
@Flakwell 2 года назад
thats pretty cool. i watched it muted and then read the comments and was glad i did.
@nevermindmyname9153
@nevermindmyname9153 2 года назад
First Responder uses for that as Logistical Support would be almost everything. From Surveillance to dropping first aid. Larger the scale the greater the possibilities.
@marshalljulie3676
@marshalljulie3676 2 года назад
Trust me they will weaponize it
@neomrelyt
@neomrelyt 2 года назад
Can’t they already do that with regular drones
@makc3383
@makc3383 2 года назад
Vice versa. Everything for civilian use was developed for military purposes.
@nevermindmyname9153
@nevermindmyname9153 2 года назад
@@neomrelyt Yes, but this could, for instance, lift an injured person in a Closer area fast than abseiling for instance. If it can hover Horizontally, then it could hover Vertically.
@nevermindmyname9153
@nevermindmyname9153 2 года назад
@@marshalljulie3676 I did say "First responders" which would include Armed Response. The Military funding of something like this is how civilian life gain the benefits.
@StoicOutlaw17
@StoicOutlaw17 2 года назад
Now if that thing could carry a normal sized adult it would be beyond mind blowing.
@διαβόητο23φάντασμα
Hold your ponies its a prototype.
@TronSAHeroXYZ
@TronSAHeroXYZ 2 года назад
Just don't get a leg caught in the turbine, or kiss it goodbye.
@scottheaton8469
@scottheaton8469 2 года назад
And hundreds of pounds of battery......
@RandyTWester
@RandyTWester 2 года назад
And eardrum-blowing.
@etherealicer
@etherealicer 2 года назад
True... but I have to say, that was a very smooth take off.
@SimpleBasics95
@SimpleBasics95 2 года назад
Wow, I am amazed at what is the Physics behind the rotating "propeller?" it's the first time I see it, not the usual propeller
@baronvonkaiser9912
@baronvonkaiser9912 2 года назад
Aw no fucking way. I had this same exact idea but scratched it as I didn't think it was practical. This is great
@stejer211
@stejer211 2 года назад
"We already have flying cars, they're called helicopters!" - Neil deGrasse Tyson, 2018
@theshazman
@theshazman 2 года назад
And they can autorotate on engine failure.
@Quarkburger
@Quarkburger 2 года назад
You can't drive a helicopter down the road
@thePronto
@thePronto 2 года назад
As usual NdGT is trying to demonstrate how much more clever he is than everyone else. The goal of a 'flying car', surely, is not to transport people on a super expensive VTOL craft flown by a 'highly trained full time professional', but to get the same utility from VTOL 'car' piloted by an 'average human being'.
@user-gq9qh2kw6h
@user-gq9qh2kw6h 2 года назад
@@QuarkburgerInfact you can it's called ''Pall-V one''
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD 2 года назад
@@Quarkburger Flying cars are usually shown in sci fi to not need any roads.
@edwinkania5286
@edwinkania5286 2 года назад
Cool, but seems kinda loud BUT the damn music drowns out the real sounds of awesome.
@jarniwoop
@jarniwoop 2 года назад
I noticed the people in the control booth were wearing ear protection.
@whatilearnttoday5295
@whatilearnttoday5295 2 года назад
There's a reason for that. It's so loud with all that wasted energy that no one would go anywhere near the thing.
@stephenstreet1045
@stephenstreet1045 2 года назад
Yeah planes and helicopters are loud too. That's in the nature of anything moving enough air for powered flight.
@whatilearnttoday5295
@whatilearnttoday5295 2 года назад
@@stephenstreet1045 When you have such a highly inefficient design more energy is converted into sound energy.
@Watz64
@Watz64 2 года назад
Great work guys i love it
@NoNameIdentity00
@NoNameIdentity00 2 года назад
If the lift of the cyclones are whats used then from there you can probably used them as separate control servo wheels and instant you have a car design from those speed racer except the wheels are meant to be open rather than have a grip thread
@Kiwin412
@Kiwin412 2 года назад
How energy efficient is it compared to regular mutlirotors at the moment ? At least space-wise and security-wise, it's a winner
@PhillipAmthor
@PhillipAmthor 2 года назад
Yes
@sectokia1909
@sectokia1909 2 года назад
Doesn't matter. This company has been around for nearly 18 years now, and despite never producing anything, they continue to have these demos every few years and somehow continues to get fools to throw money at them.
@Crushonius
@Crushonius 2 года назад
@@sectokia1909 exactly this brought us closer to flying cars about as much as back to the future 2
@OnizukaGTO
@OnizukaGTO 2 года назад
This technology isn't new, been used on heavy transport ferries and sailing ships as vertical mechanical sails. Very efficient and easy to maintain as they have few moving parts compared to screw propelled. However it seems like using them for flight is a little more tricky.
@landen99
@landen99 2 года назад
Unlike a quadcopter, this one has to constantly change the angle of the blades with every blade rotation. Not aware of any system with just a single rotor that can fly without auto-rotating and even a propellor is considered a rotor too.
@realvanman1
@realvanman1 2 года назад
Instead of playing the noise, how about telling us some interesting facts about the craft? How fast do those things turn? How much power do they require? How much does the thing weigh? I assume power is coming from the overhead cable for now. Will it be able to lift off with a battery? How long will it be able to fly? What happens if a motor fails? Etc, etc, etc.
@manp1039
@manp1039 2 года назад
I found this on it: "Cyclotech | Cyclogyro Principle" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gwsmKxDwgz8.html
@TanukiDigital
@TanukiDigital 2 года назад
Had to mute the video because of the awful awful "drama music".
@user-fly168
@user-fly168 2 года назад
@@TanukiDigital удали Ютюб у себя
@A-Milkdromeda-Laniakea-Hominid
@A-Milkdromeda-Laniakea-Hominid 2 года назад
The noise sucks.
@FishBaitBlue
@FishBaitBlue 2 года назад
Entitled much?
@MattIsLoling
@MattIsLoling 2 года назад
seems like a great flying cycle
@MrFiscality
@MrFiscality 2 года назад
If the rotor blades are tipped/curved at the outside you wont have that beast of a noise. Air horn practically work the same way. Also a safety feature here would be having an emergency coupler that connects front 2 and rear 2 together. So you can atleast go down in a straight line instead of spiralling out of control incase an engine fails.
@benbunch4159
@benbunch4159 2 года назад
All I see is like “wow they got a lot of 80/20 to build those shields I wonder what the lead time on that shipment was”
@MrHeuristics
@MrHeuristics 2 года назад
I kept thinking those shields looked slick and aspirational but would not stop the entire crew from dying a horrible death if there was any number of catastrophic malfunctions.
@moneymagnetismnetwork
@moneymagnetismnetwork 2 года назад
Now this is a concept that would finally make all those Bladerunner style floating cars and Star Wars floating land rovers come true. I know Star Wars used anti gravity but this is much better than prop drones as cars imho
@haldyordan2316
@haldyordan2316 2 года назад
We're a type class .73 civilization after all, give time we'll get there.
@MrClassiccarenthusia
@MrClassiccarenthusia 2 года назад
🧐 Well, no, I don't think so, not like this. Replace those stupid variable vane / wing things it uses, with four electric or propellant powered turbo style (car turbo) thrusters. Then you have four controllable nozzles that don't require such a ridiculous arrangement of exposed, electronically controlled spinning surfaces. But please bear in mind that helicopters can do an auto rotation if the engine fails, and land safely. Airplanes can glide, and land too. These things will fall out of the sky if the propulsion system fails.
@moneymagnetismnetwork
@moneymagnetismnetwork 2 года назад
@@MrClassiccarenthusia Makes sense. I just meant the design is making more sense in this direction than open prop drones claiming to be flying "cars" of the future.
@moneymagnetismnetwork
@moneymagnetismnetwork 2 года назад
@@haldyordan2316 I feel if past inventions were not suppressed we would have been so much further by now.
@haldyordan2316
@haldyordan2316 2 года назад
@@MrClassiccarenthusia inventors of the past did invent seemingly stupid things, and yet from these inspire evolvement of better ideas....
@classicfirepak-familybusin889
@classicfirepak-familybusin889 2 года назад
That's cool that no traditional wings and propellers, yet only compact , lesser space covering things, looks like flying car as in movies. 👍🙂
@user-vb5ui7lq7o
@user-vb5ui7lq7o 2 года назад
Great job
@codetech5598
@codetech5598 2 года назад
Note to viewers: *No narration; recommend hitting mute.*
@Aqzaqa
@Aqzaqa 2 года назад
or turn it up cause it sounds awesome
@robodabbler
@robodabbler 2 года назад
@@Aqzaqa I would have preferred to have heard the motor/prop sound.
@ccbcco
@ccbcco 2 года назад
Amateur hour production for a promising product. Why listen to what the rotors actually actually sounds like when you can listen to that RIDICULOUS MILITARY ACTION MOVIE MUSIC instead??
@innercityprepper
@innercityprepper 2 года назад
you can hear the motor/prop sound in the background. Sounds like a tree shredder, and all of the engineers are wearing hearing protection.
@tomellis4750
@tomellis4750 2 года назад
I did hit mute after a few seconds of the awful music. Turned it off to see if any facts were being spoke, but no, sound of the rotors at one point. Maybe you could say at the beginning that there will be no information, that way we will know to leave mute on.
@Fpvfreaky
@Fpvfreaky 2 года назад
eVTOL Now you have to make a DeLorean Shell for this. Doc would be proud of you guys👌🏼😉
@jattdaputt7196
@jattdaputt7196 2 года назад
can't believe they generated thrust from this design 👍👍
@furanku9506
@furanku9506 2 года назад
This video got me thrilled about athe future, I love the music!
@murrijuana2842
@murrijuana2842 2 года назад
Your inability to form a sentence without spelling mistakes got me worried about THE future. You would.
@furanku9506
@furanku9506 2 года назад
@@murrijuana2842 ​ @Murri Juana What an uncultured human you are. That was just a random youtube MEME COMMENT, well i'm not sure you even know what that means, you don't really have to be grammatically correct, i'm not writing a research paper here. about the spelling mistake that you are saying, that was a TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR. Please use your brain sometimes before criticizing someone.
@furanku9506
@furanku9506 2 года назад
@@murrijuana2842 I can only see one missplelled word, but you said "MISTAKES" which means more than one mistake, and that was typographical error, not really misspelled. Please reply Karen
Далее
The Engineering of ARF's Cyclocar VTOL
7:49
Просмотров 529 тыс.
Tesla Turbine | The interesting physics behind it
9:24
BABYMONSTER - ‘FOREVER’ M/V
03:54
Просмотров 25 млн
Bladeless Drone: First Flight
5:49
Просмотров 3,3 млн
CycloRotor | Start Outdoor Flying
2:46
Просмотров 233 тыс.
Flying To McDonald's On My Paramotor
12:27
Просмотров 48 млн
The Cyclorotor Is Now a Match For Propellers!
2:37
Просмотров 22 тыс.
My LAST flight of this homemade GyroCopter
5:23
Просмотров 58 тыс.
CopterPack First Flight
1:10
Просмотров 1,9 млн
iPhone 16 - БЫСТРЕЕ И НАДЕЖНЕЕ
3:57
Просмотров 29 тыс.