Feminism is like a pandoras box of evils against families and society. That is not our Creator's plan for us. His plan is a balance between male and female that works together to build strong families and in turn societies based on His moral standards which bring blessings.
And the really sad part is that feminism does NOT make these women happy, loving and affectionate. Quite the opposite. They forever suffer from a strange kind of "agitation and restlessness" and are never content. I am 65 and I have a mother like this. And we are Muslims. Go figure!
“What we so often forget is that God has honored the woman by giving her value in relation to God-not in relation to men. But as Western feminism erases God from the scene, there is no standard left-except men. As a result, the Western feminist is forced to find her value in relation to a man..."~Yasmin Mogahed! The 2 genders are created different since the day we are born! We neither thinks the same and after puberty our bodies change differently! We hv different responsibilities not the same! God created us, we do not know everything but Allah does!
0:44 who defines women rights? 1:47 discussing masculinity 4:26 gender roles historically 5:56 feminism: a depopulation agenda? 6:44 single motherhood side effects on child 🚸
If the job is meant to serve other women, its completely alright. In fact, it could also fall under Fard Kifayah. However, if the lady has a husband and children, serving her husband and taking care of her children is still a greater priority.
@T3M Clips, i truly appreciate and admire all the great work that you guys do. You guys are such good role models for young Muslims and your guests are great. Daniel seems like a really smart guy but I don't support how he publicly attempted to humiliate and discredit arguably two of the most prominent and respected second-generation scholars in the west (Yasir Qadhi and Omar Suleiman). These two are very knowledgeable and amazing individuals and Daniel, for whatever reason, seems to have an agenda against them. there are other scholars that he has called "heretic" and accused of spreading false knowledge. First of all, I would like to mention that Daniel is calling out people that have much higher credentials than himself. Even Dilly Hussain and Gabriel Al Romaani have voiced support for Yasir Qadhi, yet Daniel seems to have something against him. Perhaps he is sincere and believes that he's doing the right thing, but I just found it a bit odd that he would be a guest on this podcast. May Allah guide us and have mercy on us all.
Jazakalahu Khairan for the kind words. You would have to message Brother Daniel about this topic. But here is what he has said: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7qNs1dvcRBw.html
@@The3MuslimsClips Jazakallah for your response. I truly appreciate it! After watching Yasir Qadhi's videos for over 8 years I can say that I believe he is truly sincere and believes in what he is saying. I think some people don't understand that Shaykh Yasir is NOT calling for a Martin Luther Protestant Reformation- esque reform. He is not attempting to challenge the fundamentals of Islam. I believe this video would highlight his actual viewpoints and what he is trying to say (this is a deeply intriguing lecture overall): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jJmrPh2sRuw.html Watching Shaykh Yasir's videos have been instrumental in me renewing my faith and really understanding the religion of Islam. I feel that there are some people who view videos like Brother Daniel's and that is the only sample they have of Shaykh Yasir. I would **strongly recommend** anyone who doubts Yasir Qadhi to actually dive deep into his content (perhaps watch a couple of his series) and then come to their own conclusion. I don't think we should attempt to cancel people simply based on an out-of-context clip and some commentary that is posted on YT. There are even some people who claim to have been against Shaykh Yasir after watching such videos but then have changed their minds after actually watching his FULL lectures and explanations. So again, I would implore anyone who has a negative view on Shaykh Yasir to actually check out his channel and watch his videos in-depth: ru-vid.com/show-UClUa7-iHJNKEM2e_zWYSPQg And my fellow brothers at T3M, it would be great to see Shaykh Yasir as a guest on the show as well, if possible.
I thought i could counter his polygamy point by mentioning that we even have the instict of making people slaves but then i realized that he also supports slavery.
@Ravana was the real Hero. Ram is a suar what about low value men? what about places like where due to generation of female feticide the female population has dipped so much that a female needs to share multiple male? does it apply too?
@Liberalism was a Mistake even the men are ready to be the second or third husband of rich ladies like kardashians.They are called low value simps.The ladies you are talking about are the low value gold diggers.
Slavery was in the culture of people before, Allah swt wanted slavery to go, so He would make people but the slaves and free them later. Freeing slaves was encouraged for rewards and used as punishment if people committed major sins. Slaves were not treated like in the west, the Islamic way was to be kind to them. That was one of the last words of the prophet Muhammad saw.
Toxic masculinity is real, it's not a mere feminist's agenda. Lots of men in traditional upbringing feel superior over women and/or over other men considered weaker, resulting in injustice.
The problem is associating toxicity with musculinity. Lots of uneducated and educated men feel they are superior to women. This is arrogance. It has nothing to do with musculinity. Arrogance is a negative trait. The conversation to better yourselves is shut down when you associate toxicity with musculinity. Musculinity and feminity are positive traits. Adding an adjective to it only serves for political purpose.
@@salekhossain1582 the reason why the adjective toxic is added to the word masculinity is because in reality, there are men, a lot maybe, exploit their masculinity for their own benefits in the society. I am a man myself, but I experienced it first-hand as I became a victim of such society growing up. I agree that the word masculinity and femininity are neutral, but rejecting the term toxic masculinity itself won't solve the problem because it does exist.
@@khoirulamin2461 it will. Cause there needs to be conversation. You need to engage people in positive conversations. I don't you will understand why words matter.
Bad behavior doesn't have a gender; as alluded to in another respondent on this thread, prefacing masculinity with "toxic" creates a non sequitur fallacy. It would be like saying "toxic happiness"; its logically invalid
