Das Lied Des Volkes | "Do you Hear The People Sing?" in German | 

Почти посхалко

@@user-yj7oe7nv8h Unhöflich.

Why?

come on, it would be awesome. The German Revolution is criminally under represented, even in German Media@@rplay4447

​@@rplay4447cuz it is sick

​@@raynierjob8488 Du said it, mein Brüder. If only Boubil and Schönberg could read your reply right now.

@@rplay4447 cause everyone knows about the american and french revolution, but the german revolution was an important historical event which shaped the history of europe too

😂

Thought the same, lol

It would be cool if Disney made a movie about Spring of the People , but I think it's too violent to be "family-friendly" enough for them to do this

@@user-no4fq3dt7d yea we need an age of Disney movies about german history

@@user-no4fq3dt7d they did make the Hunchback of Notre Dame, so...

eyy dont kill my grandpa

​@@t.h5330😂😂😂

@@t.h5330He did it himself, don’t worry.

I need to play rt56 germany

Kaiser or Republic path?

Hi. Am trying to learn German so my question is from a learning standpoint. I thought the double S and the eszett could be interchangeable except in certain situations? Am i wrong or is this one time it cannot be? Either way, the double S is used when one cannot write the eszett, so is it really a spelling mistake?

@@moisesyome4058 I forgot the exact rules, i think its about the vowles lengh: after a long vowel its "ß", after a short vowel you use "ss" (and "s" if you don't hiss the s). "Hass" is the only and right way of spelling, "Haß" is simply wrong. But don't worry, they sound the same and these mistakes are common, even in germany: Did you know that until the spelling reform of 1996, when these rules for eszett were introduced, "Haß" WAS in fact the right way of spelling? So if you catch an older german using ß in words like "daß" instead of "dass" (the a is short, therefore "ss" is right), maybe you can correct them, which would be a very funny situation.

​​@@Cp.Chaos707Yes, that rule applies, but as a student in a German school who frequently has to write essays in German, I often do use the older forms simply because they take a second less to write (to save time in exams). None of my teachers mark them as wrong, some even continue to use them.

​@@moisesyome4058This is indeed a spelling mistake. Germany and Austria implemented a spelling reform in the early 2000s. Before the reform, the correct spelling was "Haß," but now it is "Hass." This change was made to make writing more phonetically consistent. The basic rule is that "ß" is used when the preceding vowel is long, and "ss" is used when the vowel is short. For example, "Ruß" (soot) is spelled with "ß" because the "u" is a long sound, like in "loot." Conversely, "Kuss" (kiss) is spelled with "ss" because the "u" is short, as in "foot." Previously, the rule was to use "ß" whenever the vowel was long or at the end of a word. Now, the rule is simply to use "ß" whenever the vowel is long. Therefore, the correct modern spelling is "Hass." However, people will still understand if you write "Haß," as many older individuals continue to use the old spelling, having never adapted to the new rules.

I agree

👍

Compared to when?

100 👍

Given by the Context of how Oppressive Capitalism and the State is. Yes, it's MORE Relevant than ever in the Present. Kapitalismus und Staat Abschaffen! Social Anarchy will Free Humanity! [In German:] Soziale Anarchie wird die Menschheit befreien! [In English:] Abolish Capitalism and the State!

He’s not wrobg

If Frederick Wilhelm IV had Accepted the Constitutional Offer as "Emperor of the Germans" It would of Caused a War between the Southern German States, the Austrian Empire, and even Russia as well, all Against Prussia and Maybe the Northern States as Well if Frederick had Agreed.

not Republicianism, as the 1848 germany was a monarchy with a regent of the house of hapsburg

@@TheTanveerGamingaber es gab damals eine Demokratische Bewegung in Deutschland

@@TheTanveerGaming That... is simply not true. I have no idea where you got that idea.

​@@lordedmundblackadder9321yes it is true. John of Austria was Regent of the government. But it was a Democratic state. Modeled off of Britain

​@@TheTanveerGamingDemokratisch ja, aber nicht Republikanisch.

NO hace falta ninguna traducción al anglosajón porque el anglosajón no tiene nada de la gracia necesaria para hacer traducciones 😮 en cambio el DEUTSCH es completamente válido para hacerse entender 😅

Ihr wilkommen!😊❤

I literally thought the same thing today

@@kacper2332 :)

If the Co-Imperial Administrator and King of Prussia = Frederick Wilhelm IV! had Accepted the Constitutional Offer by the Radical Nationalist Liberals as "Emperor of the Germans" into the Form of a Semi-Constitutional Monarchy into Making Efforts of Uniting the German States...It would have Caused a Conflict with Prussia and Maybe some of the Northern German States being Forced into War against the Southern German States, the Austrian Empire, and Even Russia as well, so the King's Decision to Reject the Offer was a Good Thing.

Tbf this is a very bad depiction of Großedeutchland

​@@flyingsquirrell6953 the Radical Nationalist Liberals were Independent from the Lesser and Greater Germania Solutions

German Confederation (Deutscher Bund)

Rheinbund is better and have an actual leader @@12tanuha21

​@@ommsterlitz1805Even tho the Confederation was a Decentralized Puppet State Owned by the French with Heavy Dependency Forced to the Napoleonic Forces with Barely any Autonomy to the Germanic States to Have any Centralization of Themselves, Yeah definitely a Better Version of the Confederation Used from 1806 to 1813.

that's that's the actual map though

It's a little bit like a mashup of the Deutschlandlied, la Marseillelaise and the Internationale.

Whats wrong with the localization of the song?

What do you mean?

As a German (Lower Saxony) i don't know what you mean? It doesn't sound more choppy than the english version

@@kamerafreak3492 is the translation wrong?

Yes but the People should Still Regonize the Monarch as a Divine Power that Serves Them and Deserves Infinity of Respect to it's Legitimacy because of that

It has nothing to do with the pride of being german. XD

​@@DerDrakoI wasn't being asked to be a German.😂

@@jasonfreitag5438 If you are not proud of being a German, do not worry; you are not a German.

​@@Sigmar_Unberogen_Heldenhammer genqu so ist es, ich bin stolzer Österreicher, Nationalstolz ist weder ein Verbrechen, noch unangebracht oder falsch. Unsere Nationen haben eine glorreiche Vergangenheit und manch düstere Kapitel dürfen sie uns nicht verderben, im Leben konzentrieren sich gesunde Menschen auch nicht auf das Negative sondern auf das Positive. Jeder der sein Land verleugnet muss diese Konsequenz ertragen

Рейхсканцлер Бисмарк зашёл в чат.

​@@user-ij1jr3um5n Bismarck wasn't Austrian

Reich Chancellor Metternich*

Frankreich the land of the Franks, Deutsch and Français were the same culture and people and the strongest in Europe

@@ommsterlitz1805 Must explain why they invaded us so often

​@@ommsterlitz1805 Wrong. The German and French states derived from Charlemagne's empire, but they never formed a common culture or even a people. Distinguish carefully!

Even to this day they are indistinguishable by DNA and form the Franco/German haplogroup, what is true is that the eastern part of Germany on the other hand is different with Slavic and Scandinavian influence what were called the Prussians, the war mongering people that took over Germany and caused so much trouble in Europe after Austria and France failed to contain the Prussians from governing the German people. @@paar130

@@ommsterlitz1805 As far as your ethnological remarks are concerned, I will not dispute them because I lack the expertise to do so. From the point of view of cultural studies, which I consider to be decisive in this case, your original assertion that Germans and French form one culture, even one people, remains false. It turns out that I myself am a historian. It is true that the first states of the German and French nations were fragments of the common empire of Charlemagne and it can be argued in many respects that he personally is an integrative figure for both nations. However, I think that the cultural differences between the German and French peoples are obvious, starting with the simplest and most fundamental of all distinguishing features, language. The German-speaking tribes in the Franconian Empire have always formed a more or less cohesive unit and already knew the self-designation „diutisc“ (=> „deutsch“). The self-identification of the population of the Gallic part of the empire remained mainly Romanic for a long time, but explicitly in contrast to the „barbarian“ Germans of the East Franconian Empire. All in all, I think that this question, and this can be regarded as a consensus within modern research, is decided from a cultural and not an ethnic, genetic point of view - of course, some of the Germans, such as the Bavarians, were originally a Celtic tribe, whereas the Western Franks, i.e. the ruling class in Gaul as well, were Germanic, but both quickly integrated themselves into the respective cultural group.

Basically what happened 1848

_gottverdammt_

It's a socialist anthem

​@@falloutdcit's a Radical Nationalist Liberal Anthem

@@hofnarrtheclown I Think it can be Implied to any Ideology like National Liberal Radicalism, Socialism, Communism, Libertarian Socialism, any one of them.

Wenn can mean when, if, whenever...

In Freibad um die Liegeplätze.

Its the borders of the german confederation established after the 1815 peace

ah nice, thank you. @@pradyumnabanerjee3333

It was supposed to roughly follow the borders of the Holy Roman Empire with Austria, parts of Italy, and Pomerania. The Netherlands, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Burgund, and Northern Italy are missing though due to being made independent or being annexed by France. That was until Otto von Bismarck dissolved the German Confederation and formed a unified German Empire.

Germany was bigger, so there's more land there than what is there now. Also this includes non-Germany German speaking regions

Its Germany Austria, Czechia, and Alsace-Lorraine

It did lol, idk if I'm happy about it or not, since on One side A lot of views yay, but on the other I am really unsatified with the video since i made it a long time ago and it just doesn't have many of the features my new videos have which kinda sucks... I am considering making a remake One Day.

because its showing the confederation of German nations after the congress of Vienna and what the lands could have looked like if the german movement for democracy would have prevailed against the aristocracy in 1848

Preußen ! 🇩🇪❤️

Mensch du musst ja auch dein Namen gerecht werden, was Monte?

@@Servus_Severin dein linker lutschi lutschi Kommentar beleuchtet bestimmt auch die dunkelsten Sozialisten

Voxxclub & Florian Silbereisen (That's atleast what is written under the source i got this sample from)

@@Silesian0 Ah I see.

Ja definitiv 🇩🇪🤝🇲🇫

Well, so forget this music

Weimar ✡️ Republic 🤢🤢

​@@LegiuneaAMThe Weimar Republic is Still a Thousand Times Better than the Current Republic Tho

Germanic*

@@hofnarrtheclown Yeah, correct

Yes, but it's not the HRE, it's the german confederation

@@schnitzel4584 the Structures are Virtually the Same tho

Ja ich finde es auch gelogen dass, Sonnenblumen von brennenden Tornados, in Deutschland, zerstört werden.

because these are the lands that are part of Prussia? The fact that the German confederation could become a constitutional liberal monarchy does not mean that the Germans would stop being patriots and simply give Poland these lands! moreover, Poland did not even exist then and it reappeared only because of World War 1

get away, troll@@Artur-qq1ef6zm1l

@@grzess123 What makes you think I'm a troll? you asked the question why would the Polish regions still be part of this free Germany? I answered! The fact that 1948 Germany could become a constitutional liberal monarchy does not mean that it simply gave these lands to Poland! It's absurd!

Because they belong to it

I'm not sure about that.@@deleted2446

NEIN WAS?!? WIE DENN DAS?

Soziale Marktwirtschaft war das Erfolgsgeheimnis der BRD und Österreichs. Ein freies und einiges Deutschland soll es werden!

Idealismus immer!

1984 was written by a s.0.c.i.a.l.i.s.t. lol

1984

was written by a

NPC

​@@schnitzel4584Sagt der der schnitzel4584 heißt und ein DE-Pb hat. Rede einfach nicht wenn der Kopf gerade Pause macht.

Das Lied ist schön aber ich unterstütze auch nicht die Afd. Ich mein, was soll denn bitte so schlimm an diesen Lied sein?

​@@schnitzel4584 Sagt der der Schnitzel4584 heißt.

Ich würde die Waffe nur für den Sozialismus erheben

@@linksrepublikaner Deinem Namen und Profil nach zu urteilen, überrascht es mich nicht. Ich würde meine Waffe für den Kaiser erheben

die zeit des kaisers war auch die der politischen inhaftierung@@EinDeutscherPatriot620

Ich verstehe nicht wieso man einem Menschen folgen sollte, der nur wegen seiner Blutlinie und dem "gottgegebenem Recht" an der Spitze steht. Und von der Freiheit, die du hier erwähnst, war im Kaiserreich sicherlich nicht viel zu finden

@@N0_1. Deutschland=Freiheit und Sicherheit. Deutsches Reich=Treue, Einigkeit, und Stolz. Sie haben Recht, und ich selbst mag die Idee, einem König oder Kaiser nur aufgrund der Abstammung zu folgen, nicht, ich bin vielmehr ein Befürworter einer konstitutionellen Monarchie. Aber letzten Endes glaube ich, dass der Höhepunkt unseres Landes unter dem Kaiser war. Nicht unter Angela Merkel oder Olaf Scholz und obwohl wir so viele Freiheiten haben, hat unser Land viel von dem verloren, was es großartig gemacht hat.

It's the map of the "Deutschen Bund"

Lmao a german port on the Mediterranean is absolutly crazy though @@marlonbar469

Nein, weil es auch im Faschismus verwendet wurde. Der Nationalkorporatismus ist gegen Hass und Frieden zwischen Klassen und eine systematische Hierarchie die für die Nation kämpfen und nicht für die eigene Klasse, wie Sozialisten oder Kapitalismus

Immerhin hast du Humor.

Was ist mit Sozialem-Anarchismus, Anarcho-Kommunismus und Anarcho-Syndikalismus?

@@SPAnComCat Der Anarchosyndiaklismus ist ja auch die einzige Syndikalismusform die noch irgendwie nennenswert exstiert und ohne Tyrannei und Hass existieren kann. Anarchosyndikalismus wird von vielen Anarchisten auch einfach als Strategie gesehen wie man den anarchistischen Kommunismus etablieren kann und sozialer Anarchismus ist auch schon integriert. :P

@@DerDrako Danke dass du es Klargestellt hast, Kumpel!

Non, tu es très bien comme l'Allemagne! Et le reste! Sois adulte, on te veut pas de mal.

Ja weil die Leute schon damals im Jahre 1848 sich Gedanken wegen Umwelt und das Klima gemacht.