Decoding the Mystery of Mona Lisa | Perspective 

but what if your mother comes to know now that the gift she received was not of monalisa but some different named painting😄😄.. from jagadeesh pediredla

No offense. But do you wear glasses? because if this is ideal beauty to people, they must be blind because there's more beautiful women way better looking than the Mona Lisa.

500 years ago there was no mascara, brow makeup or lipstick-- different standards.

@@Elizabeth-yg2mg not really

@@Elizabeth-yg2mg as in there are women out there that dont need makeup to look beautiful.

😂😂😂

Not to me. I see an unattractive black painting dislike utterly. We saw it in 1965 without glass an again in 1981 . Disliked it as much years later

Does it ? how could you possibly know what is in the mind of few thousandths of an inch of paint ? All those emotions come from you. That is the magic of Leonardo

Ll

The ninja turtles would be proud

Did you notice the mole next to her eye?

@@appletongallery no

@@faizanlhr It’s in between the eye and the nose. It’s a new development.

I know right....

Yap! It didn't happen overnight, but it happened 7 years, a lot of sacrifices, but It's finished! It's indeed remarkable.

@@zhylviawardzon1933 Then you are challenging the forensics in the video that says it was painted in one session?

@@MrDXRamirez That's not what I'm talking about! That means you don't know the story. It's okay.

HELLO. Actually if the painting was really done in "one session" without many changes.. this is not such a good sign! In this movie they talk about a minor change only with a couple fingers. But I also read that there are in fact several other changes which occurred during the making of the painting. There is a book about this published by a french who scanned the canvas. They actually show some scenes in this movie where we can see exactly this camera in action.. but for some reason they do not mention anything about this laboratory. "Lumiere Society" in Paris. Maybe for copyright reasons? Or I did not notice.. Paintings which turn out to have been created without much or no petimenti at all (changes in the lay out which occurs during the creation of an artwork) are often suspected to be replicas of an original. You understand that an artist.. either the author himself or a copier will just paint exactly what he can already see. Because he will have a sample right in view to make another painting. By the way it is exactly the same when the original author of a painting is making a double for himself or another client. He will not have to start from scratch and there will be less changes of course.. visible under the finished surface. Example is also Vincent van Gogh who definitely painted several times the same portraits. There was developed a kind of algorithm technology for art expertise which is able to differentiate the movements of the artist's hand by scanning the brushstrokes of a painted surface. And it turned out that the Artificial Intelligence was able to differentiate the painting done as the first original creation from the other versions where the artist was moving his brush in a different way.. because his attention focuses on another painting which he just needs to replicate. Most interesting development's thanks to some teams busy in the Netherlands doing this kind of research. This can even help in the future to discover the background stories of paintings by getting the brush stroke profile of a certain artist according to certain periods of their creative life. So maybe the Mona Lisa of the Louvre just turns out to be a duplicate made by the master himself of another earlier version which should have probably a couple petimenti under the surface.. something which can still be discovered. I think there are already some rumors because of the reduction of certain elements in the composition of the Louvre painting in comparison to some other painting where a wall or something like this appears. Window frame or such.. don't remember precisely now. But definitely there are more stories to be considered here and that book can give much more info than the film we see here. Book author is named "Coste" Maybe Patrick Coste?

@@zhylviawardzon1933 Maybe you can explain the story? Many of us here know only what is in this video, which clearly states it was painted in one session. It seems unlikely, but it is repeated three times in the length of this - if there is a further story, as you assure us there is, we need a link to the follow up video, or for you to enlighten us here.

True🤪

That's exactly why I'm wondering why this video isn't about that right from the start

Fake news! Delete this!

Saw it at Louvre. It was underwhelming. Puny, actually. Probably the most overrated work of art.

that is mostly BS, think about if it was nothing special its not worth stealing, it is true its was not really known by the general public but that was also the case with almost all paintings

I know a dentist who assures me her enigmatic smile is due to lack of teeth. 😊

I agreed

So do I heehee

Latest research is attributing the work to Leonardo, not a student.

atelier thanks for a new word to me :)

@@ripsumrall8018 Good news. I always hope that advances in technology and science will allow art experts to get additional evidence confirming or disconfirming the pedigree of artworks. And reduce the part of so called "connoiseurship" to the reasonable amount in combination with increasingly more clear cut scientific evidence.

In a video by the channel The Great Art Explained, they shows actual Mona Lisa with what may have been it's real colors. Its very beautiful.

Does anyone else notice all his portrait faces of women are similar. 1

yep it was a common practice to paint one self from boredom within the castle walls. you can say it has a transgender look. the king of france hired him and pretty much all painters in the region who had a nack for colors to stay and play inside the court yards while men found themselves admiring each other. they still dont know when he started or finished the painting somewhere around 1503 to who knows when. you could only imagine what else was presented to the young lad leo besides holding the gold in his hands running naked in the hall ways daily and the inbreeding tatics that was practiced throughout europe even right up to the royals we see today they are all cousins lol. if you really want to know who ruled that country france during them days it was the kings mother and sister. he bowed to them when he spoke on any matter that was worth saying. i love some mental women knowing how to use persuasive ways to happiness ;)

want more government conspiracies? dick gregory right here on youtube.

Lovely

Leonardo was gay, though. Idk if you know

Hmm, I guess it could have been painted over? I need to figure that out.

It is a BCC TV show. If you want a lecture, go to college.

@@Preservestlandry hahaha I agree

This is different presenter

Look at comment by rockalot. Obtain a poster of monalisa so u can cut it. Cut the women out at shoulders, leaving the background to look at, line the 1/2 circles. You should be able to see a number of things. If interested just comment to my public comment.

🤪🤣😂

Um, no. I think you mean perspective but you are incorrect either way.

@@cruisepaige I guess you know better than the museum which is where I learned about in Washington DC.

I was thinking the same thing !

painting is often called gioconda so answer is simple - sure waste of time i am skipping this one.

I agree!

@Jeremy Mettler that was profound!

@@user-xv9pb1fs5w 🤣🤣

lol lll

Did you notice the mole next to her eye?

its an actor🤣not actually Leonardo

Lovely

Actually, the painting that's in exhibition at the Louvre is an exact copy. The original is also at the Louvre, but they keep it in an other place to avoid any attempt of robbery, because it was once robbed before.

@@mitsuomits9077 @Edward Oneil and the only reason the painting holds 'such power' is because having being stolen from the Louvre in 1911, the sensational news story spread across the globe and the resulting hype surrounding the heist created a legend. Before then it was never singled out and received no special reverence among Da Vinci's other works on display at the Louvre.

@@nickmandleberg yes

Yes that's how I remember it

Sorry, no. It's not a painting of a real person. It's genius when you figure it out.

@@frederickgramcko5758 it is documented that the painter Raphael had visited Da Vinci’s workshop and did a sketch of a painting on Leonardo’ easel. It is of Mona Lisa. The sketch still exists and shows her between two columns so it is likely that it was the “ Isleworth” Mona Lisa, that version was painted in Canvas as opposed to his regular wood base.

@@walterulasinksi7031 What is hidden in the MONA LISA painting is what made Davinci a genius. He didn't want to be burned at the stake like so many in his time. EVEN the very name MONA LISA has meaning. First figure out what the name means and go from there.

@@frederickgramcko5758 Lisa has been investigated historically, it has been found that Lisa who became Lisa Giancondo grew upon the same street as Leonardos workshop. Just a few doors away. The historical evidence in the archives also do not have any type of contract ( a legal requirement) between Lisa’s husband and Leonardo. And since Leonardo was constantly being commissioned by D’ Medici that a quick canvass painting would not have been noticed as he did not have to buy a panel from a woodworker. Canvas as frequently used in workshops especially for assistants and was purchased in bulk amounts. As would be the wood for the stretchers. The term Mona was one given to respect her position. It is a cultural meaning, not a name.

@@walterulasinksi7031 incorrect, of course. If you can't figure it out, that is on you. Your theory, or someone else's your espousing, is not even close. Try again.

Sounds like you’re a fan of painting

Yes, but they don't change colour.

Why is this comment a copy of one from 5 months ago?

Wasn't a part of the art of Mona Lisa that some people see her smile and some see her frown? Your perception has changed as you got older maybe, where when you were younger you saw a frown now you see a smile.

Ì agree she never ever smiled

Actually, He did! UNTIL now a days, He's still fixing her ready for her grand Day. All I can say is that, " GOD is good! All the time! GOD is so good " AMEN AND AMEN.

Absoultley that still works for Rex (Trinosaur) we would not do anything that did not work for Rex. Rex can go to Uranus daily with either one of his boys or both on their indiviudal time. Anything base to top chair, means anything.. Let me tell you on Uranus- from the water subs, you will get to see dinosaurs diving, bears, dears swimming. Or Wales and dolphins flying. You will get to experince things that you never thought were possible. It all adds to flavor and the flare.

On tradditional Isadore, the bears, tigers can breath underwater. But they cant speed swim, so they dont spend as much time in the water. Uranus with their bionic suits they will be able to speed swim.

I’m sure there are many documentaries about the technique on here