I like how you're to the point without a bunch of fluff. I also like how you use the same example for both deduction and induction so I could compare. There's a lot of long-winded videos out there that don't help you understand the difference.
Thank you alot, precise clear and understandable. believe me so far I have watched two videos of yours I have never understood from any teacher at anything the way I have understood from you. Thank you again.
I have watched a lot of videos to fully understand the differences between deductive and inductive arguments, but this one is the most helpful. Thank you very much!
heck of a lot better than trying to read all this again. Reading about this stuff gets Pedro sleepy. Pedro is sleepy. Pedro just finish reading. D or I? Thank you Sir, for the great content.
1. Deductive argument begins with general principle and ends with specific provision. In inductive argument we begin with specific provisions or observations and we end with general principles. 2. In deductive argument the conclusion is necessarily certain given that the premises are true, while in inductive argument the general statement is probably true even if the premises are true.
Thanks, sir, but I still have a question. Suppose that I want to understand the process of expert judgement in clinical medicine and through a critical literature review, I consider that this process can be explained from the perspective of knowledge. However, this is my understanding rather than an existing theory. Can I based on it to do deductive research in clinical medicine?
Hi doctor, I have these questions, this statement is inductive or deductive (abortion is wrong, because all human life is sacred). And the other one (jon will proably be promoted soon, since he is working here for longer time than the others). I will be appreciated if you answered
It is like relationships between a scientist and an engineer A scientist finds the laws of nature by inductive reasoning Then by this natural laws which are discovered by scientists,engineers utilities them via deductive reasoning by expectations of validity of this laws in case if results was false it means that inductive reasoning failed and it needs to be corrected again by scientists
Example at world war 2 When German were building v2 rockets to hit London they use Newtonian laws of physic But the results was failure problem was they didn't consider aerodynamic laws which affect on speed and range of the rockets