I don’t think Endymion puts up Omni negates though? He is specifically spell/trap negates. I’ve never played against the deck so I don’t know what their end board is but it can’t put up Omni-negates with in-archetype cards and while secret village of the spellcasters is really fucking annoying it kinda invalidates Endymion’s turn 2 negates? He can’t negate anything since your opponent can’t play spells in the first place.
also the problem with ultimateness one kaiju ruin ur board already and had to rely on hand trap if it happens while in endymion has seperate negates that ur opponent has to deal with
_”When your opponent would Special Summon a monster(s), OR activates a Spell/Trap Card, or a monster effect (Quick Effect): _*_You can send 1 Fairy monster from your hand to the GY;_*_ negate the Special Summon or activation, and if you do, destroy that card.“_ He can’t activate Herald’s effect if he can’t send the cards to the GY. I love tiny details in cards which reveal their ultimate weakness.
That's what I love about Yugioh, exploiting some weaknesses of cards to turn it around late game. In DM anime era YGO, this video right here reminded me on Yugi trying to flip the tables against impossible decks by bringing up the small weakness.
@@TheGundamDude8045 This legit reminded me when Yugi defeated Golden Castle of Stromberg in the anime, by using the small weakness to get rid of a seemingly indestructible card.
- "I activate Macrocosmos." - "What does it do?" - "It adds 1..." - "Say no more! I'm gonna Ash it." - "Uhm... Ok, I guess." The opponent was literally a fourth rate duelist with a first rate deck. That your deck can put many negates and do crazy board presence doesn't mean that the player knows how to use it effectively. It hurts to see but also shows how some players are like "Look at all these amazing cards I have but don't know how to use them.".
to be honest, most players doesnt even know how to use most cards, and just follow the meta in braindead manners hell, most players doesnt even read the cards in play
@@lolialf And that's because yugioh has a very steep learning curve and most people in Master Duels are new. What choice do they have other than to follow meta? Even seasoned players in the TCG don't know how to use most cards.
@@N0noy1989 I mean they could do what I did, build two shit decks learn why they were shit and then build a rogue deck that ntrs a ton of meta decks. Why look up meta decks that you don't know how to play when you could just learn how to play?
Drytron Player: "Ahhh yes my opponent is playing a monster effect light, beatdown deck. Let me link off my 2200 attack Unicorn for a 2 negate 1600 attack Appolousa"
These meta crutch players think their cards have a response to everything but as soon as they see an unconventional deck they can never adapt and just keep trying to negate stuff lmao
@@Ilgazzoo lol you're totally right. I was running Gingerbread House and it was amazing how many people didn't get rid of it and let me get 2+ board clears with it when using my stall deck.
@@Ilgazzoo Not quite the same vein but a while back I remember some albaz player being confused that me using his Fallen as tribute material during his turn meant Albaz's effect didn't resolve and he couldn't fuse away Erebus
I have a great replay of a match where I lucked into going first with kind of a bum hand as thunder dragon, still managed to get out colossus and a 3 mat apollo You can see them absolutely fuming trying to get colossus the hell off the field so they could use one of their 40 searches.
I remember a while back at a locals I did that with subterrors by flipping summon limit and TCBOO. Pretty sure he wasn’t slightly happy about that judging from his expression
I started my duel having my Maxx C negated. Then ended my duel with a Zeus double strike on their stupid ass field spells. Finally, the asshole had the gall to negate my duel pass rewards by negating his internet connection.
For anyone else who may wonder, around the 2:54 Mark Dryton used Ash Blossom on Macro Cosmos (it has an Effect to SS from Deck) so it only negated that summon. Because Macro Cosmos is now active, Herald of Ultimateness cannot use its effect, as it needs you to send a Fairy to GRAVEYARD as Cost, which isn't possible due to Macro Cosmos.
I love how they had lethal through the macro cosmos @ ~7:30 by attacking with borrelsword into the storm monarch to pump it to 4200, attacking into the DD survivor with Zeta, and then turning zeta and attacking again with borrelsword for game, but were so tilted off by the macro cosmos that they didn't see what was a very basic line
@@lamofjldgm6230 Too bad he can't do that then, since macro banishes all cards that would go to the graveyard and ultimateness clearly states, "send to a fairy monster from your hand to the Graveyard" in it's cost. Because of Macro Cosmos, he cannot fulfill the cost condition and thus can't activate the effect. Essentially, by not negating Macro cosmos' activation, only it's special summoning effect, he couldn't negate anything else either.
Ash Blossom the Macro just because it has a SS from the deck effect, even though almost no one plays Macro for Helios and Ash does not destroy. Damn, is that what having 5 omni-negates does to your brain?
I had the same thought, but i remembered myself that Cosmos SS is Helios and because I knew Ash couldnt do anything to MCosmos My guy didnt read, keeping the meme that YGO players dont read cards anymore alive
Had a match with an Eldlich player today, He tried to ss Eldlich using the trap card when I have a magician's left hand, twice. The meme is more alive now.
Lol. I loved watching you win this. But that was seriously a mind-blowing number of mistakes from the opponent. Missing obvious lethal with Borrelsword, thinking Ash destroys, getting rid of a 2200 to make a 1600 ATK Apollousa _for no reason_ ... I'd even think getting rid of Borrelsword for Unicorn was a misplay, he had no practical resources left that weren't banished anyway.
@@ValunarTonix I've seen people use Verte for other things, like E-Hero decks and Pendulum FTK. Pend FTK uses it to use Instant Fusion to get out Independent Nightingale, since Supreme King Dragon Starving Venom is not banned in this game.
@@ValunarTonix Verte is far from meta-defining but it does fit some decks. Fluffal uses it, Shaddoll uses it, E-Hero uses it but few people play them since it's so expensive, and I could use it in my Thunder Dragon deck but Thunder Dragon Fusion is already so easy to tutor without it that it feels like a waste of a slot.
this video realy shows that most of master duel player play certain decks bcs they heard they are op and its working. For example this drytron player who obviously doesnt know how to play his deck nor does he know how to play yugioh in general since he is missplaying all the time, and he can still bring out a 5 negate board.
I will forever love that one time i beat a Drytron deck with my Aromas. How did i do it? Well apparently you can't negate infinite things and pretend to have a hand or graveyard later. I never won again with that deck, they destroyed me.
I had a drytron player scoop after stealing my Metaion, no idea why. Since I was playing exodia and they played right into my Maxx C, I had enough cards to entirely drain their hand.
I instead pulled a uno reverse on a drytron player...so, turns out he banished with called my best combo piece, I did exactly that against his herald. And for good measure, I went abyss dweller on that play too. He surrendered instantly
I remembered beating drytron with my f2p pendulum magician Opponent summoned ultimateness in 1st turn In my turn, he ran out of monster card to negate, and his ultimateness is destroyed by purple poison's effect (I ran electrumite) He ragequitted in next turn Feel so good
This dude doesn’t read a single card just play blindfolded and probably didn’t know what otk is, i can’t believe how baffling this guy action is by sacrificing his own borrelsword, unicorn and everything for an Apollousa with 2 negates
The reason they couldn’t negate The Monarch from bouncing Harald is because Macros Cosmos auto banishes cards….but Harald of Ultimateness requires the card you discard to be sent to the graveyard. So if it can’t be sent to the graveyard then it can’t negate
@@suisui5930 You don't have to be playing a pure Kaiju deck in order to play Kaijus. And even so, it's usually Luna-Kaiju, which most certainly uses monster effects.
Agreed, the only reason I won against a banish deck with synchros was by using my opponents own Maxx "C" for Synchro plays as all other cards were banished.
One of the strongest, the best is return to deck. Some deck like banishing while others don't care and many others get crippled. In comparison nearly every deck hates being returned to the deck besides a select few(excited Madolche noises).
Prime example of why not to surrender turn 1 when u see meta, i beat full power VW with a deck i built to gain lp for the challenge and they lost because of lp difference burn card after like 60 turns, was crazy.
It is still UNBELIEVABLE how you manage to win that. Insane luck to be honest, that Drytron player had everything to control you and he didn't use it, still baffles me.
Herald of Ultimateness is my favorite card, but I don't play anymore cause this game is just not fun, but since when is Herald being used? I love the card art and I feel its fair since you have to discard for each negate and is a level 12 ritual, how tf did the meta make a deck that makes me feel guilty for using that card?
See before, Ultimateness was just a cool super gimmicky card with a strong effect that was impossible to summon. However, several keys mistakes were made that made the card so oppressive in Drytron 1. Meteonis Drytron is generic, the biggest mistake. It gives Drytron the ability to summon whatever they want without having to use other ritual spells, allowing them to completely abuse certain cards never meant to be played in a combo deck, such as Cyber Angel Benten or Ultimateness 2. Meteonis Drytron can ritual summon cards in the graveyard and recurs insanely easily, meaning that one card can Ritual Summon Benten and later Ultimateness in the same turn. Consistency is way up because you literally only have to run 4 ritual monsters, every other card can be a hand trap or resource generator, something that no Ritual Deck has ever had. Even if you don’t draw the Ultimateness, sending it to the graveyard (via Foolish Burial or Beatrice) and then Ritual Summoning it out is just as good 3. Eva allows for extremely easy searches of Combo Pieces, but also Ultimateness fuel, every Eva is essentially two more omni-summon negates. Along with Union Carrier, which significantly helps to activate Eva’s effect, the deck is absurdly consistent. 4. The Drytron Cards allow you to not have to genuinely expend massive resources to summon Ultimateness, meaning you still have huge field presence to make other XYZ or Link Monsters 5. The Herald Cards have support cards, just as Diviner of The Herald, which lets you send Herald Of The Arc Light from the extra deck to the grave to immediately search a Meteonis Drytron and Herald Of The Orange Light, which is a monster negating handtrap, which only improves their consistency and disruptive capabilities even more Drytron is a deck with almost perfect consistency, as this is easily possible by just opening 2 Drytron monsters, Incredible Field presence, immense resilience to distruption, the means to easily summon a card that will almost certainly win them the duel if their opponent doesn’t draw 1 of like 5 cards and allows for a “Ritual Toolbox”, things unheard of in a Ritual deck until now. That’s why Ultimateness went from gimmicky to absurdly oppressive and hated boss monsters
The engine for Ultimateness was the problem here, not the actual card itself since it is supposed to have limited negates depending on your hand and because Dryton enables it, it should be obvious the problem is the combo pieces, like Duel Logs said, They should do what they did for the tcg hit for stopping Herald. It won't totally cripple Dryton and won't make Herald as much as degenerate as it is now.
Uhhh Drytron's gimmick for ritual summoning is to use the Machine monster's attack points instead of levels to ritual summon And... Guess what Herald of Ultimateness' attack points are?????
I play a hero deck and the interaction between Masked Hero Dark Law and card effects that need to be sent to the graveyard in order to activate is pretty interesting, dark law counters those kind of decks that rely heavily on it. My friend and I was testing out to see if cards like forbidden droplet worked but nope :D because card cannot activate effect since cards cannot be sent to the graveyard since they were going to be banished instead due to dark law's effect.
This is why first turn for HERO is very important. Dark Law might not prevent hand trap to stop them due to 'discard' but at least it protects the board from droplets, and disrupt Drytron and VW.
I considered teching in Dark Law into shaddoll-invoked since mask change 2 just makes dark law into a generic extra deck and a extra deck Macro cosmos but i only have one of each so not too consistent.
The first time I played against Drytrons, I went first and got Dark Law on the field. They banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their herald synchro monster out (something about changing the level of a card to the level of a card sent to the GY). I didn't realize I had accidentally just beat the deck everyone was complaining about until later when I saw the full combo.
He couldn't negate since ultimateness needs to send a card to the graveyard and since Macro Cosmos is on the field cards are banished instead of hitting the grave.
macro cosmos and other continuous banish effects means they cant use herald ultimate effect.. As they have to send to "grave" for its effect and they cant do that as the card will be sent to void instead.
Didn't they already have lethal on summoning Borrelsword, or is there something in Herald of Ultimateness/ the way Herald was summoned that keeps it from attacking directly? If not they could've changed Herald to attack position, swung over Survivor with Borrelsword, attacked with Herald, then changed Herald to defence for the second Borrelsword attack right? 3900-900= 3000, +2000= 5000, +3900= 8900
drytrons : check ecclesia profile picture : check platinum border : check kys as username : check you got yourself a edgy teenagers that always plays solo in an MMO and picks the dual wielding class.
Great game. Loved seeing the power of old floodgates against a bad meta player. Imo the Ash was an okay move but the plays after that were sloppy imao. Unicorn wasn't that terrible a play but he should have stuck with it and stall with a 2200 beatstick. Personally I would have kept the Borrelsword and Knightmare Phoenix and go for old-school beatdown. Keep the win-con, even if it's riskier.
My first ranked duel ever in Master Duel (I'm a returning player who hasn't touched yugioh since 2008 but been watching duel logs for 2 years now) was vs drytrons and they also got the herald out. Managed to stall long enough to get my combo's going in an AWFUL T.G. synchro deck meant to summon Shooting Quasar and the guy ended up rage quitting on the 9th turn, played through enough negates and stalled just long enough. There's no way I should have won that LOL.
The first time I played Drytrons, I had summoned Dark Law turn one, and they accidentally banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their plays going. I didn't even realize it was Drytrons until later because the guy pulled out so fast.
The drytron missed lethal on second turn by not attacking with herald of ultimateness then used borrelsword on herald to attack face twice while including 200 dmg from herald
He missed a shit ton of opportunities, he's really bad at playing the game in general but also his own deck I play pure Drytrons and trust me this deck can do incredible things
basically once macro is activated, any card that needs to send itself or another card to the GY is useless since it will get banished instead (which isn't included in it's cost) thats why herald is useless once macro is face-up, most hand-traps are too...
