Every time Bredehoft speaks, I have vicarious anxiety for everyone in that room. I feel like I'm back in Elementary school being aggressively condescended to by a burnt-out teacher who realizes halfway through their rant that THEY were in the wrong, yet embarrassingly digs their heels in deeper anyway (and further takes their error out on you). She's so abrasive that even the audience is feeling attacked 😬. I feel like her style makes it darn near impossible to take her points to heart even when she's wholly in the right.
Honestly, Amber's lawyers come off so angry and rude to the witnesses that it makes me want to stick up for them. It completely defeats the idea of her being a victim. A softer approach when the witness is not being snarky would go much farther.
This whole "Mutual abuse" angle that some people are taking is really not floating my boat. Guess what, If someone was abusing me I'd yell at them too and the words I'd be using would be extremely colorful. It doesn't make him an abuser to yell at her, and frankly I think people are more comfortable taking that stance because he's a man. If it was a woman yelling at the person beating the crap out of them they'd be called brave for standing up to their Abuser. (And I say this as a Woman and a Feminist, one who believes in actual equality between the sexes). The trial isn't over yet but so far, all he's done is call her the C word and send douchy texts to friends about her. She's faked injuries, punched him, Took his finger off with a vodka bottle and stubbed a cigarette out on his cheek, I'd be yelling too. I'm not saying he's some perfect little angel, because guess what, those don't exist. Verbal abuse is real of course, but chicken and the egg people, come on! What came first, her tormenting him and him defending himself which then got loud, or something else. So far there's no evidence of anything other than Johnny trying to get away from her and the madness.
@@salladnageam5557 The whole tone from some quarters has just been very victim blamey and I'm not a huge fan of it. The "It takes two to tango" line of thinking just seems emotionally and intellectually lazy based on the evidence provided thus far. That's all.
he's not a perfect little angel? I think actually, most people are not the mess that Johnny Depp is. He probably shouldn't have married anybody, and what did he see in her if he wasn't a mess? Johnny Depp is charming and talented, and a mess. Amber Heard is a mess. So, they have something in common.
I am officially naming myself the replay queen. . . I am listening to the entire replay of the Depp playlist. I already saw the trial but now that I found you I have to see how you react and/or explain certain things
@@bevroyal9731 thanks so much for replying! It’s good to know I’m not the only one stuck in this rabbit hole. I have finished Emily’s playlist and it was worth every second. I’m now listening to LegalBytes replay of the trial. The girl who owns the channel always has a bunch of different people mostly attorneys as commentators and it’s some incredible perspective. I had never heard of law tube before this trial but I’m loving it! Take care
I really like JD’s attorneys, especially the female attorney. His attorneys are respectful and their voices are calm. AH’s attorneys are so aggressive and her female attorney’s voice is like scrapping fingernails on a chalkboard.
His witnessing that punch was huge for his case, though. If he'd prevented it, and the testimony was that he whisked Depp out of the apartment at the point of escalation, or kept Heard at a distance from Depp, I think it would be a minor blip to the jury, at best. At least this way, the jury gets to consider what kind of person would choose to punch someone in the face while their professional security is present; I think that's massive.
@@lisakukla459 yes, that is true... really important for his case. Goes to show what's shes actually like!.. Because if Travis and Johnny are being 100% honest, then she was in ZERO harm! Because travis was in the middle and he turned Johnny away from her and started walking. So what's she got to say about that!?!? Lol (And I dont disbelieve JD & Travis, I think the event that conspired is true)
@@angelaray5375 It's clear she's lied to her attorneys, a heap. I have to wonder how much of that bruising, redness and swelling in the photos were from Botox and filler. I worked as a medical assistant and OR assistant at a clinic that did cosmetic procedures like injectables and lipo, and bruising like that is super common, especially on very fair skin. We know she cares about that bc she was taking Accutane, and doesn't seem to be struggling with acne, so I would assume it is for the purpose of fine lines etc. Just a thought. I haven't seen the whole trial. Do you know if Botox bruising or Juvederm etc on her cheekbones has been brought up?
@@lisakukla459 I work at the hospital in medical field myself! So shout out to you! And I dont think weve even gotten to her makeup regimen yet. But heres the thing... all these pics with "bruising" dont actually look like it (to me) I can give myself those same marks. In some pics she has darkness under her eyes which could be lack of sleep it looks like to me. And redness on cheeks dont mean anything lol And let's be honestly here, she is so fair skinned that if she did have an actual bruise, it would be extremely hard to cover completely. And then if she was successful in that, what about the swelling? You cant cover swelling. And as a medical prospective, her "broken nose" is not broken. You can bump a nose and make it bleed bad w/o breaking it. They attacks she is describing sound very violent and would most definitely leave injury. If you can take pictures of your dark circles under your eye... where are the pics of you bleeding? Cut up feet? Other injuries? Where is the SA report? And that would need medical intervention. Did they test any bottles for vaginal secretions?... I'm sorry but there are just to may holes! Her "busted lip" looked like skin was peeled off ffs! And all those rings would do alot of damage. Maybe even break a tooth? A news station reached out to Elaine about the pallet not being available until 2017 lol and she tried to back petal bad lol like omg... As a medical professional who works at the hospital, I have Soooo many questions. As I'm sure you do as well
@@angelaray5375 Hey, alright! 😄 Medical nerds, unite! ✊💙 I had the exact same thoughts. All of them. I'm still catching up, just now getting to Heard's forensic psychologist, and I haven't seen Depp's entire testimony. Going to circle back to that when I can actually watch, as I've mainly been listening as I do other things, usually at 2x speed. I want to give his testimony my full attention and see his gestures and expression. And hers, I guess. 🙄 I fully anticipate theatrics and histrionics, and will try not to vom. A clip came up on my feed shortly after I left my previous reply of Depp whispering to Chew I think during Heard's testimony, and reading his lips (although I am far from an expert) it appears he says, "Those bruises on her eyes... Botox." Idk if it was a real, undoctored clip, but I'll be watching for it when I get to that part. It's hard for me to believe that Depp wouldn't have already pointed that out to his counsel during discovery. They would have seen all the photos Heard would be showing the jury long ago. You'd think they'd want to subpoena the cosmetic physician and at least see if the marks in the photo coincide with her appointments or something. You're right about too many holes. My god this woman is such a rotten piece of shit. Sorry not sorry. 🤭 🤷🏼♀️ If Depp actually had laid into her even a fraction if what she describes, she would be incredibly fucked up in the photos. ::Trigger warning:: I have photos of what I looked like after it happened to me and it is very, very apparent; No squinting or magnifying glass required - one quick glance is all you need to know I got beat up, and I wasn't even punched or slapped that time. (Face pushed into furniture and wall caused my cheekbone to swell, strangled with my own forearm - I'm still puzzled by that one - fingernail gouges on my wrists, his gum in my hair, tops of feet bruised from him standing on them, etc etc.) The first cop I encountered, within half an hour to an hour of the event, took pictures of me literally on the spot, as my injuries were so apparent; Tulsa cops are not known to be particularly sympathetic to anyone not middle class white male, so that's saying something. (It's okay, I'm fine now, it was a long time and a lot of therapy ago. 👍) All that to say... This whole thing so far has felt to me like when my little nephew tried to sneak cookies before dinner. He swore up and down he didn't, and he thought he'd outsmarted his mom and gotten away with it, but we were all dying trying not to laugh because _his teeth were still all black from the Oreos!!_ 🤦🏼♀️🤣
Replay Crew member here -- this legal coverage has been fantastic. Not a lawyer, but raised by one, so trial coverage and legal commentary is always fascinating to me. It's so much work on your end and your mods, so I'm eternally grateful! S/O Mods!! Thanks for being you!
I find the first guy very reliable because he wasn’t shying away from the fact that Johnny called names too, he yelled too, he threw her clothes around & down the stairs. And he got mad with the guard. He says all of it.
Yeah, but I would’ve used different words in describing the evnt. He said Amber and Johnny were “verbaly abusive”. That’s still abuse that the defense would capitalize on.
I like it too, but people are going to use that against Johnny. Because the only acceptable victim to them is one who doesn't get angry or fed up with dealing with abuse. Johnny retaliating in that way is normal and I wouldn't consider it abusive
@@idakristinedemesa5234 Travis didn't actually say verbally abusive when giving his testimony. Rottenborn asked him on cross if it was correct that Depp and Heard were being verbally abusive to each other, and Travis confirmed. There's a big difference there.
@@ashleydixon6122 And as we saw, Rotten...born twisted Travis' words on closing arguments. Although Travis did say that "Johnny rearranged her closer for her", he very clearly followed it up by saying that Johnny overthrew almost every rack of clothing, and threw one down the stairs (38:39 onward), and didn't try to pretend that Johnny wasn't angry too or cover for him. However, Rotten...born was then in closing showing the photo of her closet* saying that that was abuse and "they" called it "rearranging her closet"... forgetting to mention that Johnny was paying for maids, servants... who would clean up the mess and put everything back in place so "the little princess" and her freeloading friends wouldn't have to deal with it. During the depositions of those freeloaders one of them admitted they couldn't even be bothered to keep an eye on the dogs when the "principals" weren't around and would just let them shit on the beds, floors, wherever... All that said, and though Travis is too cool for school, I liked the Scottish security guy (Malcom Connely/Connoly?) even better. His tone when talking about Amber... priceless😂🤣! Another very likeable guy in decades-long Johnny's security. Too bad Emily missed *him* . *which, BTW, seemed somewhat larger than the whole apartment I lived with my boyfriend until I finished my doctoral thesis, but that's beside the point, just saying... "closet", yeah, right.
@@BlackQback Well I mean, Rottenbottom's job was essentially to twist the testimony in a way that framed AH as the victim of abuse. Can't really take fault with him for just doing his job lol. It wouldn't have mattered what verbiage Travis had used, Rottenbottom still would have twisted it to have a more nefarious connotation. But I think the fact Travis was so honest REALLY lent to his credibility with the jury. I think if he had tried to say that JD did nothing wrong in the arguments and it was ALL AH, it wouldn't have played as well to the jury as it did.
@@idakristinedemesa5234 they meant the jury is (probably) caring less and less what AH’s team is saying because they’re doing it in such an abrasive way. they’ll stop listening to their points
Yes! I was just searching “depp trial day -“ each day while I had time to listen, until I found this one!! I’m absolutely loving it!! Loving the learning, Emily’s commentary, and hearing the fantastic questions/answers! Also replay crew! I wish I had time to make a live!! I’ve got a couple questions I’d love to answer!
Emily, I retired from the field in 2003. Thank you for confirming “my” thoughts on the Judge’s rulings. I thought I was losing my mind. Perjury has to be taken seriously. In today’s climate, in watching live Trials; and being more exposed, Lawyers are lying, we have false or coerced confessions leading to too many innocent people being convicted, and committing perjury during depos and Trial. Yet, none are being Prosecuted.
It says so much about the relationship between Johnny and his staff that, even with everything that has happened, they can find levity after all these years in moments that must have been absolutely awful for both parties at the time and could have fractured their relationship permanently. It really shows the respect and trust they have for each other.
Yay! Thank you for shouting out the stenographer! I’m currently in court reporting school and it is tough even when people aren’t talking over each other. It is an EXTREMELY difficult skill to learn.
Listening to the nurse testify and reading her notes shows why Johnny can't let this go. Who wants to sit tight while their life is ruined if there's something they can do about it
So she claimed in her deposition she only punched Johnny because he was making a motion to push her sister down the stairs and she was “protecting her baby sister”. She said she stepped between Johnny & her sister & mentioned no one else. But in fact, the security gaurd was between them and she punched Johnny over the security guards shoulder. Also it was a stair in the loft, not some giant staircase. Damn 👀
It's also funny that Amber never mentions her sister in the audiotapes when discussing this very incident. She brings up Travis but not her own sister who supposedly was in danger of being shoved down the stairs. Very interesting.
I think AH will claim that Travis wasn’t there on the staircase - he said, she said. I hope she’s been caught in enough lies for the jury to doubt her integrity.
@@chantallennox1201 i bet she will but i imagine the jury will think the security guards wouldnt perjure thenselves whereas AH has a clear history of thinking shes right so it means shes not lying even if she is so may be capable of doing so even under oath?
Nobody takes the tabloid publications seriously and it’s ridiculous that Heard’s team is trying to equate checkout line tabloids with major publications like the Washington Post…I hope the jury sees through that BS.
I hope so too. Didn't they try bringing them up to Keenan Wyatt, and he brushed them off saying he never paid attention to those things? Possibly in regards to Depp being violent on set or something, and how 'oh, so you HAVE heard about those accusations?!'
I think they may be doing that also to plant a seed in the minds of the jurors. Even if there is an 'objection/hearsay etc', words being said are words being heard. They may be trying to convince the jury of something by just spouting out negative coverage of Johnny. As in: 'See, lots of bad things being said/written about Johnny, must be some truth to it then...'
Rolling Stone and Forbes aren't online tabloids. Both published stories (in Rolling Stone's case, two) on how Depp's behavior meant he couldn't get viable roles anymore and was facing financial ruin, well before Heard's op-ed. His own agent testified in court that he had become impossible to work with over the past 10 years. He was finished before the Post came along. Then there's the fact that London’s High Court previously found allegations that Depp was a “wife-beater” to be “substantially true.” He'll lose this case in a similar manner. Of course he doesn't care either way, in fact the repeated lawsuits (he also lost an appeal against Heard's requested restraining order) are part of the same pattern.
It is an embarrassment to watch the lawyers of AH blatantly talk down as if the witnesses are stupid,they ridicule their answers ,just pure rude not letting the witness answer and the sarcastic remarks!! This judge does not have the control of the court to demand some classiness in her court!! I've seen many judges having their courtroom run smoothly when their in charge ,not letting Narcistic classless lawyers run the court!
I 100% agree with you. This judge allows AH lawyers to make a mockery of this case. She needs to tell these lawyers to be more respectful of these witnesses time and testimony. Very disrespectful
I kinda feel bad for my boy Travis, that's gotta suck knowing someone's safety was your responsibility and they came out of the situation with a black eye. He still seems to feel really guilt about it
I think he knows he did his best to get Johnny out of there but that he couldn't stop him. Its very difficult to get the victim out of it if they are in it. I think he's regretful that any of it happened but I think he knows he couldn't have done it. Like you cant stop an alcoholic drinking you can't stop somone whos tied into a relationship get out of it till they want to. Johnny wanted so bad for it to turn around and not be a shit show he kept doubling down for way too long.
I know it's AH's legal team to try to discredit JD's expert witnesses, but the way they do it is so distasteful. It rubs me the wrong way, and I think the jury will feel the same. I hope the jury does the right thing.
AH wanted JD to put a tattoo of her nickname on him. He eventually did putting Slim on his fingers. After the divorce he changed the name to SCUM. 😂 JD - such wit.
This mini Rottenbum is trying to be a big shot, yet he objected to himself and that will never be lived down. This expert is holding his own, interrupting him is not gonna score points. There are so many random articles that are used at hit pieces that have no bearing…plus how is this relevant? The re-direct was artfully done. Also, great job with the stream I’m so proud of you Emily and your family for being able to cover this it’s definitely intense! God Bless 🌸💐
Wait - the one who objected to himself was babyborn, not rottenborn himself? I confuse the two of them, both sound like bullies and their questions are aggressive and about dumb stuff. Like of course johnny's reputation wasn't ruined by AH, it was all because he wanted to kill the president and he has a tabloid headline to prove it.
Part of me feels like Depp’s addiction issues actually “ saved his life” ( figuratively of course) because had he not had those issues, these concierge doctor and nurses wouldn’t have been in the picture on a regular basis. Erin Fellati RN testifying that she did not see any injuries on AH says a lot.
I have ADHD, raised 3 kids all w/ ADHD, & am a licensed psychotherapist who routinely works w/ clients w/ ADHD. I also work closely w/ a psychiatrist who specializes in treating this population. It’s typical for people who have ADHD to respond quite differently to any kind of stimulant, including caffeine & nicotine. Due to the fact that the ADHD brain filters & fires differently - neurons in the brain fire - stimulant medications, the most commonly prescribed meds for ADHD, have almost the opposite effect on most people w/ ADHD than they would on someone who’s neurotypical. These meds reduce the over-firing of neurons & therefore slow a person w/ ADHD‘s head down, so to say, & they appear externally calmer/less hyper, & can focus & hold attention more effectively as their brain internally calms down as well. If you give a prescription stimulant such as Adderall, which is methamphetamine or essentially, pharmaceutical grade speed, to someone who doesn’t have ADHD, they will likely speed/feel much more awake, animated, & may even seem to be more physically restless &/or act in an externally hyper way. In those w/ ADHD, the external presentation of the hyperactivity almost always decreases w/ the use of stimulants in general. For example, a large percentage of those w/ ADHD can drink a cup of coffee, strong tea, or even a Red Bull before bed & still be able to fall asleep w/ out much difficulty if sufficiently tired. They usually don’t experience the jolt or rush that neurotypicals get from caffeine who use caffeine to wake-up/be more alert. Many w/ ADHD who either vape or smoke nicotine (cigarettes) - Depp also smokes or used to - will often describe that it helps them relax, calm down, & even improve concentration & productivity if engaged in a task. Using myself as an example, when I have lots of clinical notes to complete in one sitting, I’ll often vape more during the period of time I’m writing/typing as I get the task completed much faster than if I didn’t. The rest of the time, I only vape occasionally. When it comes to a stimulating drug like cocaine, those w/ ADHD often experience minimal effects as compared to neurotypical peers ingesting a similar amount … or no effect at all in smaller quantities. It can have a similar effect as stimulant medication does in those w/ ADHD, causing a feeling of relaxation/calm & “chill,” as JD’s personal security, Travis, described in court today. For someone w/ ADHD to get externally hyper or ramped up on a stimulant like cocaine, most would have to take an inordinate amount, & most w/ ADHD don’t at all like the feeling of “speeding” as their ADHD causes them to feel “racy/speedy” on a regular basis w/ out appropriate medication. Speeding does not tend to be pleasant for those with ADHD, so if they use substances, they tend to prefer substances that wind them down a bit like alcohol, opiates, weed, &/or benzodiazepines (Xanax, Klonopin, etc.). In fact, so many people with ADHD love weed as it slows their head down, & in many cases, improves mental clarity. This is consistent with Depp drinking & especially using weed often & becoming deeply dependent on opiates, as they likely slowed his head down, gave him more of a feeling of calm, as well as resulted in the “euphoric effect” common w/ opiates, where life doesn’t look as stressful or hard as it may actually be outside of opiate use. I hope that someone explains to the jury that Depp has ADHD & why he may be affected differently w/ substances like the ones I described here in the stimulant category.
This is what I have been wanting to say.^^^^^ You have a great way with words 🙂 I used to live on coffee, red bulls, I have a prescription for weed. These substances definitely effect me differently than neuro typical person would feel them. I would fall asleep on coffee, weed just helps me focus a bit better, it doesn't change my personality. I have found non prescription drugs kind just make me feel more alert so less distracted I guess. So I don't really bother with them anymore as coffee pretty much does the same thing and who wants to be alert at a gig, lol. I have diagnosed ADHD Tangent over, 😊 thanks, have a nice day
@@GenieLiz - So glad you shared your personal experience as a fellow person with ADHD as it just reinforces the point that I was trying to make. I can also drink anything with caffeine even right before bed and fall asleep. I’ve even gotten tired and fell asleep after I had taken my prescription ADHD stimulant on a weekend and was bored with nothing to do at the time. I’ve also heard that same type of thing happening to other people with ADHD.
You know I really loved the expert witness who specialized in PTSD. She went through how people with mental illnesses can be incredibly well functional, likeable, and nonviolent individuals. As a woman diagnosed with CPTSD, Depression, ADHD, and Touretts, I get stigmatized often by people. It also doesn't help that I'm a member of the LGBTQ community. This doesn't change my effectiveness at work or with my friends, family, and partners, it just means I work very hard to be at the level I am in work and a reliable person to those I care about. I'm a manager of a library, the president of a handful of organizations, a member of my city council, and a DM for a weekly D&D game. And I'm (usually) happy, and always proud of where I am in life. I just felt really valued as a person when she testified, and though I'm new to this community, I've felt nothing short of welcomed by the Law Nerds. This feels like a safe place to me, and I appreciate that Soo much ❤️
it breaks my heart JD had to take valuables with him when he left. My father in law had to do that. His wife was abusive. She took a porcelain family heirloom given to him by his deceased father, put it in a pillow, and smashed it to 1000 pieces so he couldn't put it back together. I'll never forget it nor his pain.
I putting this in before I watch it. This nice old man is partly responsible for the SpongeBob movie, Care Bears, Star Wars, little bear, Rocky, The Voice, American Idol, Disney movies, George Forman grills, etc. I feel like he’s the guy who made my childhood, I automatically love this guy. If they go hard & harsh or condescending on cross it’s going to be like a personal attack. If the jury is younger men, like myself, my guess is they’ll feel the same. He’s like a super baller grandpa. It would be like attacking Stan Lee. Yeah. I didn’t like that. I feel bad for him, I’d want to stand up and flip them off if I was in jury 😆
Still rewatching xD I find it kinda funny how her lawyers are obsessing with the fact that JD pays his people. I know it's because they try to say those employees are biased and stuff but with the whole "pledged" thing from later in the trial, it sounds a little like "what?! he actually pays you?! Are you sure?! Damn, I only got a pledge of payment from her >.>" xD
I would really like to see his team start to ask what drugs they’ve seen her use and her demeanor when drunk or high like they do with Johnny. They could easily trash her argument because she was using mdma, coke, weed, mushrooms & drinking as often as Johnny. Also if these cans of soda she’s frequently throwing are full, partially full or empty. An empty pop can is WAY less threatening than a full one, and they haven’t clarified that any time that I’ve heard them mention it.
You’re right about empty vs full can, I hadn’t even thought about that. I didn’t really take the can throwing that seriously but a full can would definitely be dangerous
I can't believe I'm watching again in September! :) Every time something new comes up, I need a refresher. Thank you Emily, for your all around awesomeness 💜
Umbridge makes a good point. She asked the witness “wouldn’t a document as important as a pirates 6 contract be in writing?” Just like AH should have pictures and medical reports to back her many allegations of DV and SA. I mean bc it’s important
I missed the live but I wanted to address the possible diagnosis of Heard with BPD. Her outfits could be mirroring. A great deal of her behaviors are consistent with BPD. I am not a psychiatrist but a behaviorist and also a spouse of someone with BPD. We both are in agreement. The psychologist for JD was on point.
I decided to go back and actually watch the trial coverage now that everything wrapped up. How crazy to see how Emily's sub count has exploded even since this day. Been here since Tati, well before 100K and not going anywhere
Rewatching and this is way better than other legal livestreams. Commentary is kept short and to the point/educational, there isn't constant giggling so you can actually hear the trial. Her ADHD came out during the recorded depo 😅, so a lot of that got talked over lol i had to jump to a different vid to catch the nurse's testimony but still worth it to have the rest of her legal commentary.
Elaine is absolutely grating. That has to have an impact on the jurors and I do not see it being positive. She sounds like my mother trying to catch me in a lie. It's just not professional sounding.
Right? But it makes me wonder if there are cases where her demeanor works really well. I can't imagine it, I think it would be super interesting to observe a trial where she comes out on top.
I would pay a ludicrous amount of money to have Richard Marks walk around the retail store I work at and just tell sh*tty customers exactly how he feels and why 🤣
After watching you for so long now I finally became an official Law Nerd! Absolutely love your commentatory during this, missed you so much last week I can’t wait for tomorrow!
Love how you added time stamps and called us the rewatch crew😂 in Guam, we’re a day ahead and the trials usually start around 12am-1am :’) can’t wait for her to take the stand! Read articles about her firing her PR team.
Really glad we heard from Jack Whigham. He was so much more likeable and helpful than Christian Carino. After him I was honestly worried whether someone would ever bring up which films specifically Johnny was doing at the time and the (quantifiable) damage the op-ed did to his career. Jack Whigham did a very good job finally giving that information. Richard Marks was also great. So engaging and passionate about his work. He seemed like the guy who could fill hours with fascinating stories. He was a very credible expert on the topic and his cross was hilarious :D Both seemed very nice and down to earth, they were giving none of the out of touch Hollywood guy image.
You are GREAT! I am a paralegal and as I’m screaming to all of the objections I hear you doing the same. You go girl I love watching you and you are explaining everything so everyone understands. Keep it up😁
And most lawyers, when they've been objected to, take a pause to think about how to rephrase the question, but Ben Chew just immediately comes out with it like a reflex. He also thanks the judge after every ruling, regardless of whether it goes for him or not, which is quite endearing.
Replay!!! Trying to satisfy my withdrawals from watching the trial. I tried watching the other lawtubers but favored your commentary and energy. Keep up the fantastic work.
Wow-what a train wreck listening to Nadelhaft question Banna. During the trial, I only watched portions of the testimony. Each & every time Nadelhaft actually lands a good question, he ruins it with poor delivery, belligerent questioning, general rudeness, etc. Camille lands a question, gets the answer she wants and moves on. Nadelhaft just keeps going & it’s totally ineffective. It certainly doesn’t help that he is audibly nervous & his voice constantly waivers.
By the time this trial end’s I’m gonna need Johnny to give me one of those Xanax’s 🤣🤦🏻♀️ Lordy all I’ve learned is Hearsay,Couches,Amica Cream and that my cat 🐈 may be googling Johnny Depp 🤔
I’m your new follower Emily. I love how easy is to follow this case because I don’t know the law lingo. So thank you Emily for being so cool. I regret not watching the live days since the beginning. And justice for Johnny Depp.
OMG I love the Mean Girls reference - "She's trying to make Fetch happen and it's not gonna" or Legally Blonde "you washed you hair after a perm. . . ??? " I am waiting for a Gilmore Girls quote - "coffee, coffee, coffee" maybe?
I would love for all court cases to have the option to live stream them. Especially big celebrity cases, since they have so much to endure from the media, they should be able to let the facts speak for themselves.
AH’s team is making his case for him: yes there were negative tabloids prior to the allegations/op-ed…. But he still wasn’t let go from the films from two different studios. Shortly afterward, though, he was. It doesn’t take a damn genius to put this together! YOU’RE PROVING DEPP’S TEAM’S POINT.
Emily’s so sweet! Speaking of Umbridge: “She sounds patronizing. She doesn’t mean to but she sounds patronizing.” Oh you sweet sweet summer soul. She absolutely, indubitably, unmistakably, incontrovertibly, unarguably (though I’m sure she would try it!!!) means to be as patronizing as possible!
I want to know why it is that AH lawyers can keep bringing up articles like TMZ which is nothing but hearsay however when someone says I was talking with an agent that's gets ruled as hearsay. A gossip mag/website is nothing but hearsay but that's allowed in court.
What and who was Amber before meeting Johnny? That’s the question, also when they got married she moved the whole village into his Pent Houses free of charges.. I don’t think she lost anything she got way too much from JD.
Yes!! That bugs me too!! The fact that all of her deadbeat friends were freeloaders (including her sister) and took advantage of Johnny's generosity is so irritating. These are the same deadbeats who will now be testifying against Johnny because he is no longer supporting them. 😖
I’m a bit curious as to why the attorneys would ask complicated, long-winded questions when this may not necessarily help the jury to understand (assuming the jury are made up of lay-people like myself who are not trained to understand the questioning tactics)
They hope the witness gets confused and respond incorrectly. They do not care about the jury understanding and will bring it up at closing statement. They hope the jury will take their word then. It is slimy.
Did you ever upload a video reaction to the cross portion of Dr. Curry (the forensic psychologist) and then the police officer after her? If you missed it, there was some really juicy moments and I would love to see your opinion
Reply crew 💜 Thank you and your team for all the hard work during this trial. It seems the whole world is following this case. And you do a wonderful job covering it.
I've been watching Legal Bytes, (I find the multi-lawyer commentary interesting, as everyone has their own way of looking at things). I get SO excited when you pop in over there! Thanks for all of the entertaining education!
I also have been watching Legal Bytes but I have missed Emily's views, the no bullshit and Emily also says what's right morally is not the same in law. I don't know if I like Emily's style because she is a criminal DA . I'm in the UK and am dealing with a criminal case and civil case
Elaine is killing me … could she be any more unlikable? She’s so condescending, way too loud, & just feels like attack mode during her cross. If the jury doesn’t like her either, can’t that influence the jury’s ultimate outcome, even if they aren’t consciously/purposely voting against them because they don’t like the attorney? Can it still influence their decision or which attorneys they tend to believe more?
Elaine probably feels the need to carry the team since one of them object to their own questions.. I still dislike her but she seems to be fighting one heck of an up hill battle between her team and Amber's behavior.
My sister is great atty. She says juries hate good looking female trial attorneys, except when they are DAs like Em here. She said they want middle aged angry chubby female attorneys. 😂🤣🤣
I love how Heards lawyers kept bringing up that no one saw a physical contract for pirates 6 as though that means there was no guarantee Johnny would’ve been in that movie. Like…..my guy…Depp is the only reason pirates got to a sixth installment!!!! Who else were they gonna cast?!?
Elaine's only card is The UK trial, she doesn't have anything else. And she still complains that the ruling didn't come in-but she was sly enough to slip it in piece by piece. And still they lost, as they should have.
She hasn't been consistent. They scream hearsay all the time but read articles and things from RU-vid and bloggers all the time. Why isn't that hearsay ??
From what I understand, they can read articles and such because they’re submitted as evidence and the pieces essentially speak for themselves. But Hearsay is when a witness tries to testify as to the words/opinions/feelings of another person who is not on the stand. Everyone can read an article and come to their own interpretation regardless of what the lawyers say, but if someone testifies that another person said blahblah that’s not fair because we have to take the witness’s word for it and their interpretation of what someone else said.
It is heresay, but they aren't being included for the truth of the matter but to make a point, so the judge allowed it. When Depp was testifying, his lawyers did object.
Attorney in Texas and first time viewer/lover of your channel. The contemporaneous analysis is so helpful to myself as a pretrial, 3rd year attorney. I would ask that you consider that the legal intelligence of your audience has grown, mostly due to your amazing ability to relate to both layman as well as legal professionals. We, and I mean attorneys, if I can be so bold to announce representation, are so pumped that you represent a practical and relatable mentor/cypher to the miasma that seems intentional on the part of the defense. Can you discuss at any point when you see the defense intentionally making any situation more complicated than the facts presented? Is there an angle for the P that should be analyzed in closing, I.e. such as your commentary on the D making the witnesses all “yes men?” Thanks 🙏🏻
