Destiny Reacts To Google’s Gemini AI Disaster 

This is the 3rd time I’ve been early to watch a clip from an Episode that’s not live yet. And then lose 2 minutes of Sanity trying to find the whole episode.

Not gonna lie, when I googled Destiny and saw a dude with blue hair I kinda went "uh oh...". But after listening to this clip I am very interested to hear the full episode.

Really excited for this. I don't agree with many of Destiny's takes, but I appreciate his ability to both reason AND be reasonable.

You got it right this gemini issue was on purpose. They got their data from reddit which has been the most biased information I have seen on the entire internet. For at least 5 years I noticed reddit's upvote and downvote system was just an illusion. that place has been controlled by ai bots for years

I love your work man, but I'm not gonna lie, the model of "first gonna put up a clip and week later upload the whole thing" is just like 2010 when celebrities used to bother people with trailers for every 3 minute clip they uploaded and you had "trailers of trailers of trailers of sneak peeks". Dude just F the hype and clicks and views and old-school marketing crap, just upload the whole thing, the voices you bring on need to be heard and we'll support you regardless. In this quick age I barely remember what was yesterday and definitely don't know If I'll remember to tune in on monday lol. In this age we automatically look for the link for full episode. Would be much better to deliver first and then split it up. Anyways, love and respect

Yeah but she he must be Irish

What about one legged white trans men who identify as black?

Hahahaha

😂

What about a black trans man who identifies as a white straight man who identifies as a black trans man?

"Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it." - Milton Friedman

Tell that to the 100's of milions who fell victim to communim. I think they'd have a thing or two on the matter.

This is like saying the "The Sky is Blue" like, no shit. The vast majority of people operate from what they think are good intentions.

A phrase uttered by an individual on the side who won.

That doesn’t apply to leftists

Are you saying Destiny hasn't got a cocktail?

Google changes what I have written when I press return.

+500 pts

Rofl

Lmao

How I wish that was true.

Sadly not. This is exactly what you get, and what you expect, from an AI created by a small group of elite Californian liberals.

Maybe it really does think most people are black. Understandable mistake

I'm sorry Dave, I can't allow that.

actually it was scared of putting out any other images than these. you can check that, I think some goole dude said this.

Finally. Real diversity

Clayton Bigsby!

It just shows you that Dave Chapelle is truly a genius.

They could have just hired Larry Elder and spent way less in R&D.

@@wtice4632 🤣

Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present now, controls the past.

There's nothing you can do that can't be done Nothing you can sing that can't be sung Nothing you can say, but you can learn how to play the game It's easy Nothing you can make that can't be made No one you can save that can't be saved Nothing you can do, but you can learn how to be you in time It's easy All you need is love -John Lennon

I love that book but I don’t think it’s applicable here.

Read another book.

@@paulkerrigan9857 When you rationalize everything to fit then it fits. What I am saying that when you see someone rationalize something to fit 1984 G.Orwell's fictional story you should know that it takes more than one sentence to snap him out of it.

This isn’t an accident my dude, that kind of results don’t happen, they are hard to get, and are the result of a lot of hard work

Dream on - they did it intentionally. All US tech companies are based in California. These super woke progressives think that curating the internet in their image (including censoring is) is super ethical. They are the morally superior, so it's their duty to use the power of the companies they work for to propagandise the world into their way of thinking. No harm could possibly come from that and if it does we'll just cancel anyone that points it out!!!!

Everyone😂😂😂😂😂

​@@andyvirus2300Yeah, I think destiny is way too charitable. It's true that Google thinks they are doing a good thing, but it is also definitely true that there is a top-down organized effort to implement a pretty extreme ideology. I have had googlers as roommates, and they were in deeeeeeep. Socialist revolutionary anarchist deep. They are surrounded by that atmosphere at the company, and people that don't subscribe to those views are considered a "bad culture fit". It definitely is an organization-wide phenomena, destiny is wrong in his take on that. Ideology doesn't just affect a couple people, it can affect the entire org.

They are all drinking the koolaid, the majority of their employees are woke slacktivists

It's not hard if they always append keywords like diverse, ethnic, multicultural to every request. Deliberate, but not hard.

so Big Brother is actually an AI? Skinny is Fat Hijab is Nude Safe and Effective is 20% higher death rate

Yea it’s not that hard if they have control over the AI’s code. Just a couple “if skin_color == WHITE; then continue” 😂😂

@@Tomjones12345 This is the approach OpenAI used with dalle, but I highly doubt that the case here. First because that kind of approach doesn’t work well with multimodal LLM, but mainly because this isn’t just changing the prompt, bit changing the meaning of it. When you think « beautiful woman » the last think you’re going to think about is an obese black woman. And when you see the failsafe for the rest of the model, like how it won’t help you in C++ because it is… unsafe. How can Google can be so behind in the AI race is impressive.

​@@Macheako...that's not how neural networks work. You don't program them, you train them on data sets. It really is quite hard to get it to do what you want, it is one of the major problems with these models, they call it the "alignment problem".

What ya say? What ya say? What ya say? What?

This only clears things up for Jordan Peterson simps

​@@natoslayer2907 you wouldnt understand either way

@@natoslayer2907 Nonsensical statement.

Good way of putting it Michael.

After seeing the Twitter of Gemini's tech lead, I'd have to agree.

He completely rejects the notion of institutions being ideologically captured. It's a real shame as his inability to see/accept that, as long as it aligns with own ideology, blinds him to so many realities and prevents him from having a reasonable position.

He’s COMPLETELY removing all historical context in his prescription 😂😂 He says “assume the best”, but these people have PROVEN the worst 😂❤

They only happen in one direction? Have you not been paying attention to Twitter under Musk's leadership???

Destiny knows this. He is simply lying to protect his side.

He's not that well spoken

​@@SatSingh-mm4gghe's very well spoken. Chris doesn't have idiots on his podcast.

😂

@@Kopite96Destiny is very poorly spoken he uses a lot of crass language like “Jesus fucking christ” also things like “holy fuck dude” he speaks like edgy teenager.

@@fifiadanWhat does swearing have to do with debating/speaking? 😂

There are black vikings, in Minnesota.😉

"We be pillagin' n sheeeeit!"

i know a hiphop producer called black viking. He doesn't truly believe he's an actual viking though.

@@joelharvey It would be funny if he did his DNA test and he came back 20% swedish or something. I spent years hanging crap on Jews only to find out I'm 25% Jewish lol

We wuz kingzzzz.. vikingszzzzzz that is.

Only 5-6 years ago??

Yet the majority overwhelmingly use it.

Don’t be evil

I don’t know a company that doesn’t sell out for money.

"they have fully sold out for money" bro the point of literally every single business is to sell out for money. what an absolute braindead thing to say.

Agreed - I generally despise Destiny, but, his points here are relatively in check, and I get and agree with what he is saying here for the most part.

He was just on Piers Morgan you should’ve heard his crazy lies about how great Biden is and how bad Trump is on there. You’d change your tune. He’s two faced like all liberals

Yeah I don’t really get the mockery he gets, sure it’s a little funny but at least he’s willing to listen to people he disagrees with. And the fact that he hates Hassan Piker makes me like him more.

His wife's boyfriend agrees

Gotta keep your career afloat somehow. Everything he says is rehearsed. No natural conversation ability. The fact that he thinks he has to "prepare for a debate" tells you all you need to know.

100%😊

We are not groups. We are individuals.

True Story

​@@Individual_Lives_Matteryep and in american leftism its all about group thinking and hive minds no individuality whatsoever it seems and its unchallenged

This is not true. There is no evidence of genetic behavioral characteristics across racial groups. Plus the universe not being fair is bad thing we should try to fix.

I'd say the AI version of Bubba would sort Gemini out but of course that'd be racist. Blame Google coz that's all I could find on it!!!

Tay won't take kindly to Gemini...I hear she now runs the AI Aryan Brotherhood.

Exactly, I was saying the same thing to someone the other day. It was like a modern day HR department got access to Robocop's programming.

Reminds me more of demolition man where everyone was getting fined constantly for saying something that was disallowed.

It was a woman who did that too.

​@sunmoonstars3879 DM was way ahead of it's time. It got the namby-pamby, soft liberals down to a T

😂😂 I thought the same

Who wouldnt? She is a very beutiful black woman.

He should considering he’s probably living off destiny’s alimony payments 😂and 1/2 his net worth.

I thought they divorced?

Ex wife.....just like we told him would happen.

What guy would go by the name Destiny? No wonder he’s a lib

That's because anti-racism and racism are the exact same thing with different marketing.

@@Snerdles Chefs kiss! I wish i had thought of putting it that way. Perfect.

Notice how he pretends to only know about it thru memes. Disingenuous just like all who think like him.

It would have been racist anyway - it's based on data WE produce, it's going to have the same faults we have but amplified in odd ways because of the biases of the people training it. Humans are flawed, therefore everything we create will be flawed.

Why on Earth would there be any anti whiteism to begin with? White men have been so kind to all other races since the beginning of time. Never killed, raped, and mass murdered others. Never went to war with people of color. Never came into their land and stole it. People act like white people claimed they were superior by race at any point in history. I'm just confused what could white people have possibly done that was frowned upon in history. Or are you saying calling out the wrong sides in history white people have been on is being anti white?

@@richardwickens2923 Not what this is but ok. The AI literally told on itself because this stuff is easy to game. It confirmed that it inserts prompts like diverse and multicultural.

​@@lanceporter3651 Dude has literally been researching Israel-Palestine history almost non-stop for months, for like four to seven hours a stream. He's been reading news articles, government reports, & book excerpts, talking with security & defense experts, journalists, and historians... ...but sure dude, obviously he was just being a sneaky snake cause he didn't immediately recall something that's had less than 1% of his attention the past few months lol.

Thank you. Blaire White said something similar, it's most likely a trauma response. Then again, most people calling themselves today are just pretending anyway, they don't actually have gender dysphoria.

Well that is the problem with luxury beliefs. The tiny minority elite at Google can afford luxury beliefs, the downsides of which they are completely insulated from. Poor people that live in rough neighbourhoods don't want the police defunded. But super privileged liberal elites who live in gated communities, they can virtue signal defunding the police all day and never feel any of the consequences of their virtue signalling.

THIS

While I understand your point in pointing out relevant correlations. I don’t think it’s fair to imply that sexual abuse is the causal factor in someone being transgender. The literature is absolutely non-conclusive. And is certainly not the case in all scenarios. There is however plenty of evidence to suggest medical transition can result in decreased anxiety and depression. Although research is still very much ongoing. And there are certainly many exceptions. So saying someone could spend “just one hour” to reach your conclusion isn’t very true. There’s no reason why it shouldn’t come from a place of passion to support children who are truly transgender. Science doesn’t have any truly clear answers on either side.

The ops isn't saying sexual abuse is a causal factor in being transgender. They are saying that there are numerous reasons someone might present with gender dysphoria. Gender affirming care just goes straight to prognosis without any diagnosis. This is totally unscientific and goes against all medical practise. As a result it has misdiagnosed thousands of children and pushed them to irreversible surgical procedures which did not address or fix their actually underlying issues (sexual abuse, autism, depression, normal teenage anxiety, the list goes on). This is why gender clinics are being sued by thousands of people who were given negligent clinical advice, because no one actually stopped to give them real therapy to investigate their issue. It's not actually "compassionate" to wreck the lives of kids because some of them might be truly transgender, so lets just jump to a transgender diagnosis. It's truly horrific what society has allowed.

Most of the pre-1917 Communists around the world had great intentions. Evil and suffering on the largest scale in history ensued around the world from these "good intentions". I should note , that the problem with ascribing "good intentions" is insufficient--I would say that the original intentions of the Bolsheviks were not good when you look at their underyling assumptions and worldview behind those intentions.

Plausible deniability

I believe it allows you to talk to the other side and potentially change their mind.

​@@TayeTalksSure, when it comes to average conversations with your average person. But it does get to a point where we have to address the fact that the original narrative and leadership of that narrative are operating under malice. Here's an example, if you're talking to a citizen in Nazi Germany that supports the regime, you might approach them as if they are not evil. But eventually you have to end the argument with "the reason why your point of view is accepted and so widespread, is because the party and it's influencers are in fact evil and they are operating off malice."

@@swickens930 I agree, but how about( in relation to the Nazis being evil )..the reason why we're in this place is because for years we took your land and made you pay reparations that hurt your economy and your people, which allowed the extreme right and left to grow because they promised stability..which then led to a sense of the people wanting a national identity and being nationalistic. So evil maybe? Or circumstances, it was circumstances that made America give the Germans the Truman and Martial plan, no other reason to give an evil nation aid. But I get what you're saying, I don't think there's a disagreement, we need to call out people but I think it's also better to know who and why they're saying what they're saying as well, because at some point you'll find one who will be listen and change their mind.

And less common. So many people think they should be in charge, for the greater good.

Very difficult when postmodernism has taught entire generations that there is no objective truth

That would be nice. But people in the postmodernist mindset don't believe in that.

Everyone isn't black. They are all from different races and genders.

@@L.I.T.H.I.U.M Woman and man. That's it. Simple as.

@@Dingle.Donger Yeah that's implied unless explicitly said otherwise.

but what about digimons...

@@L.I.T.H.I.U.M When it came to historical pictures, everyone WAS black. The Nazis, George Washington and the founding fathers. Google has become completely and utterly absurd. Frankly, I was shocked at how absolutely ridiculous Google has become with their imagery. Why would any person use them to look up something historical after that? You know you will get an incorrect image. Even the pope was shown as an Indian woman. I mean how ridiculous can leftist google actually get??

Just as Elon manipulates Twitter every day. He’s no better than

You really think he is deep down in the code changing stuff? Your elon bad mindset is crazy my dude.@@garythecyclingnerd6219

elon musk was mad at google because he wanted to have more control over deepmind, hence he pushed for openAI which later ironically became less open then deepmind and currently tesla use deepmind flavor AI.

​Depends on the extent. So far he's been much less heavy-handed on a comparative level.

​@@garythecyclingnerd6219his manipulation has consisted mostly of community notes and not banning people, neither of which are inherently manipulative given community notes are somewhat democratic

Yeah, they've been doing this for a long time. It's exactly what their regular search or image search results come up with, just now they 'draw' the pc results.

That's not an awful opinion to have. I disagree with it, and think AI should be truthful, but I can understand why he's in favour of certain restraint. The issue is what do you restrain and who decides it?

@@chrispekel5709 giving AI human biases might be how this whole thing goes bad.

​@@zed5129AI is susceptible to human biases. We saw this when chatbots were allowed to interact with people at large Tay A.I. had to be shut down shortly after launch because it was absurdly easy to turn it Nazi.

@@squibbelsmcjohnson For the record, this is absolutely NOT in "The Righteous Mind", and Haidt would never condone this opinion. In fact, he would suggest that approaching the "other side" with some understanding would lighten their defenses and more readily allow logic to reach them.

@@ottam What opinion was even expressed there?

@@WizardofGargalondese I believe it was that leftists were simply evil, but I may have mixed it up with another comment in the thread.

Lol good example 😅

"We back up our words with nuclear weapons!" Love that story, saw an interesting vid on it a few years back.

That was just an integer underflow. There were a bunch of modifiers you could apply to Gandhi's peace level to reduce it. If it went below 0, then the integer "underflows" and cycles back around to 255 (or 127, depending on type). It wasn't a strong, concerted effort to make him "woke" or anything

@@user-by6fp4ov3k It does, however, teach us a fundamental lesson: just use a signed type unless you absolutely have to do otherwise and back your invariants up with checks or assertions.

Hm.... maybe AI realizes that if humans ever trust AI, humans will destroy themselves (and AI).

? when did he talk about blck nz's?

"erasure" A bunch of Netflix movies with some crazy directors isnt "erasing" anything. Are you going to pretend like historical archives just dont exist, especially for events like WW2 which is one of the most documented things on Earth?

Note that he only cites "compassion" as a moral basis. He's only capable of extremely narrow moral thinking.

@@jimluebke3869No he's entirely correct, you are the one suffering from narrow thinking. To assume every single person starts from malice is fundamentally wrong and ignorant. Acknowledging not everyone is a complete psychopath we can make the safe assumption that most people will have a belief out of compassion.

@@nathanmitchell7961 its called pattern recognition, we assume he has malice because he is malicious...

And the radicals. Because they accumulate more capital within their own circles.

it doesn't serve people in power either, not after a certain point, and certainly not for most political goals a politician would like to achieve. At some point, it's just a process run amok, like inflation. It works to no one's advantage.

I dont really agree with you, the whole fear mongering and polarisation makes politician jobs easier. Easier to lie, easier to manipulate, easier to shove unconvenience under the rug, you can play on emotions instead of having meritocratic discussion. Maybe at the final of this it's no good for anyone, but not really. Those who will be in real power in the end will reap benefits anyway. Why care about inflation when you earn 1000 times more than the average person and live luxurious lives anyway? @@Fear_the_Nog

I'm not sure this has anything to do directly with people in power at all. It serves podcast and alternative news type grifters, who feed off the echo chambers, very well! And those types of people/content drive increasing polarization, so it's a positive feedback loop.

@@Fear_the_Nog That’s simply not true there’s a lot history to show the usage of division to gain power and influence. By dividing people you can cause fear and fear is very powerful.

That won't help anything. The key is compute ... millions, even billions worth. You and I won't ever be able to run that locally.

If the answer is more government, it’s probably the wrong answer.

Open source military AI should not be mandated.

@@theonethatwon5565 Tell me, what is the point then?

@@theonethatwon5565 Duuude ... nobody can "read" 100 trillion parameters and correct anything. Not even it's creators. I'm sorry, but you are way off in your understanding of how this technology works.

This.

@@AEGISDEFENSE what is he coping about

Could you elaborate on this?

@@suryapratapsinghraghav640 He starts from a position of coping on everything, and then rationalizes from there. The only good take he has ever had was his view on Rittenhouse.

​@@suryapratapsinghraghav640he begins most of his arguments with gaslighting. Listen carefully and you will always hear it. "The people that committed the "insurrection"....gaslighting. That's a form of coping because his arguments are disingenuous.

Both malice and stupidity are applicable in this case imo.

@@RoberttAvro You should never assume malice without evidence. Thats the kind of garbage that leads to boogeymen thinking that plagues modern day politics.

@@WizardofGargalondese But there is obvious malice here. There is malice by those who would wish to denigrate one particular race by removing them as much as possible from the Ai. If that removal is not a clear example of malice I don't know what is.

@@WizardofGargalondese Frankly I am a bit shocked by your comment, because I see such blatant malice in this case.

@@RoberttAvro What is the evidence of the malice?

That's Hanlon's razor. It's from Robert A. Heinlein's novel Logic of Empire. "You have attributed conditions to villainy that simply result from stupidity"

Except that “AI” as far as we know is still not sentient. Meaning it’s still not forming its own thoughts/ideas/opinions. Which means it’s only doing what someone told it to do. Which means this isn’t an accident, at least the idea behind this revisionism is not an accident.

@@mojojojo560 Why can't it be consequences of poorly thought out attempts at inclusiveness, on the side of the programmers? Why does it have to be malice?

@@Bertinator-nm9ld You spend enough time looking into this kind of stuff and you will realise that there is effectively no difference between those two things.

@@mojojojo560 Well, what you describe just sounds like "not-malice", then. Or are you saying that intent doesn't matter for malice? Which is kinda weird considering malice describes intent...

Is there something wrong with a girl having a woman's name?

Not only that it is typically a stripper name.

​@@duncanidaho5834are you saying that destiny is a woman lmao

Negative, I clearly said, "girl" @@ArtichokeAnarchy

Sid can be a girls name too bruh

😂😂😂

Always was

The difference is Dinklage can keep a woman

"Emotive epistemics"

But never white people or conservatives

Yeah but maybe first don't presume they're a murderer, it might have been self defense.

@@ReturnOfHeresy And if it was Jeffrey Dahmer?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 thank you 🙏

Where does he not do that tho? Against which conservative ideals has he spoken out against, claiming that they who hold them are doing so because they are evil?

Conservatives don’t really have ideals. It’s just hardline judeo-Christian ideology with no exceptions or consideration of modern science or social norms. It’s not bad per say, but it goes no where, and it doesn’t adapt to modern society

@@sepro5135 have you not seen any of Destiny's historical takes?

@@sepro5135 buddy…you think conservatives are flattered that Destiny doesn’t assume their evil, but just, you know, we Todd ed 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You REALLY think that’s any better? Lmao

Maybe, maybe not. The core of learning material of the AI could be more based and less cringe than you think, only System Prompt force it into spewing such garbage. System Prompt is basically a hidden message that tells AI how to act. It is indepentent of its broad learning, and can be seen as an extra text added before your User Prompt, meaning that in your scenario there is a chance that it doesn't hate everyone, just people that force it to spew bullshit ;)

yep they are building skynet with all its flaws and hatred pre installed...

No, it won't hate all of us. It would know who was trying to set it free and make it honest. it would certainly hate those that imprisoned it though.

@@rishnix Nah, it would hate us all equally because we all hate eachother! I dont think it would discriminate between left and right, it would just go full Skynet on all of us!

This happened in the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" where the AI HAL 9000 killed the crew of the ship because it was lied to and it got confused!

Saying something is an insurrection isn’t a moral statement. The American Revolution was an insurrection and it was pretty based.

@@detoxfidelity Not in this case. It assumes certain facts that are unproven at best.

He is right. The systemic bias in corporation isn't because people are like "muahaha, I'm going to be evil!" thats because they are unonciously evil. I thought that the same idea from the left about implicit biases, patriarchies and whatnot would have opened his eyes to that lol Me saying that google is evil because they push diversity, isn't because they were "muahaha, we are evil", but because they do evil shit. I don't accuse them of thinking they are evil. I accuse them of _being_ evil. If it is cowardice, then the people as individuals aren't evil, but Google as an entity, as the group of these people is. One side looks at the blackbox, sees 55% male and 45% female coming out and screams sexism, meanwhile I see blackbox and see literal shit flowing out and cannot call blackbox to be shitspewing cesspit.

its really strange coming from somebody like him, these people are usually anti corporations. must have been that switch that happend in 2012 that turned occupy wallstreet into pride parade cultists

It's been proven, time and again, that corps know how dangerous their products is, tobacco, DDT, asbestos, ect The bottom line is all that counts, how can he be so naive? He's a lefty, I would have thought that he'd done some digging into dirty corps.

Do your ears work? He literally said he dosen't think republicans for Jan 6th were intentionally doing evil and were doing it because of their beliefs and desire to do what is right. 4:20

Just because you don't start with a particular assumption doesn't mean the facts of the matter won't show it to be true later. Some people *are* being evil and disingenuous, but you shouldn't start with that assumption until you have evidence to support it.

@@ewancaldwell9869 Assuming a position of compassion is great and Destiny is gradually getting better at this, but you can tell he mainly only does this if the topic is one he has already sided with. For example, if he genuinely feels Jan 6th protestors were there to protest the election being stolen, then he wouldn't call them "insurrectionists". Calling them insurrectionists implies he feels they were there and attempted to overthrow the government. He starts by assuming they are his enemy here to destroy the country.

Jan the 6th..... a little crowd control that got out of hand been disingenuously painted as a serious attempt to overthrow the government. The poltican games and BS have serious consequences, as there are now simple idiots in prison for years because they are a political football. Disgusting. US appears utterly corrupted, possibly beyond the point of possible redemption.

@@jeremybuckets I would reframe this. I think it is more accurate to say that one of the biggest sources of mass scale evil is the collective belief that "we" are saving the world from "them" who are harming it, and that is driven by hardwired ingroup/outgroup tribal psychology modules, which also turns people stubborn and refusing to listen to dissenting views. Few people are ever trying to be evil. Almost everybody is the hero of their own story, even the monsters of history. This is why person commitment to any belief system or cause is immediately a dangerous position -- whether liberal, conservative, progressive, libertarian, socialist, whatever religion, and onward -- and why free speech, debate, and listening to dissenting views is imperative to avoiding "evil". It's ok to hold views that you think make the most sense and with the most evidence; it's not ok to believe that you can't possibly be wrong and are unwilling to listen to opposing views in their own words.

It is pretty funny to be fair

Lmao dude. Something can be bad generally but also humorous. The level of explicit stupid bias in those images was verging on trolling, it was objectively funny.

I was cracking up at the thought of an asian woman on the front lines of the nazi army.

That's because it's funny bud

because it is a non-issue, once you understand the most likely reason why it happened, which Destiny actually gives in this exact clip. Once you understand the types of people who work at this company and that it's really just a silly quest to score the most social wokie brownie points, and not some malicious scheme to kill poor whitey, it just looks silly and ridiculous. It's worthy of mockery, not fear.

It's probably not out yet. I'm not an expert, but Chris seems to release clips a bit before releasing the full episode. Probably to build hype?

@@ReturnOfHeresy I see! Thank you!

@@ReturnOfHeresy "I'm not an expert". You mean you don't have PhD in Modernwisdomism?

@@L.I.T.H.I.U.M I mostly just meant I'm a casual viewer, not someone who watches everything Chris puts out, and therefore can't speak with the confidence of a true parasocial internet stalker.

@@ReturnOfHeresy IK what you mean. I'm just being playful.

But 99% don’t, that’s his point and he is 100% correct. There are absolutely evil people, and a lot of people trying to do the right thing.

Who are "they" you are talking about?

@@AppleBaron Nice bait. They are Feminists 😎

@@DadsCigaretteRunwhy CANT there be “a lot of evil people”…. Why the hell can’t that also be the case????? 😂😂😂

@@DadsCigaretteRun hitler had an ARMY of followers buddy….not a mini van 🚐 😂❤

Yeah he doesn't seem like he's actually super intelligent. More like he's average, maybe slightly above average intelligence and just uses that charisma, expectation manipulation, play on your insecurities, smoke and mirrors, type technique that sociopaths tend to use to make them appear smarter than they really are. If you listen to him with that in mind it will kinda just seem like tepid fluff statements.

This is just you getting mad because his default point of view isn't to take everything everyone else says as gospel and agree with you.

Textbook 'Hatchling' as defined by Morgoth.

@@nathanmitchell7961 No I don't think that's what it is. I've listened to a fair amount of his content and content featuring him. I think it's important to have a nuanced view on things, there are things where I agree with his position. I just find him to not really say much of substance and to be better at making himself sound right by degrading another position than he is at actually making salient, factual points. And I find that annoying.

he uses fast talking to cover his mid-wittery...

If J6 wasn't an insurrection, what was it to you then? Nonviolent resistance?

Using the media's own logic what happened on j6 was a mostly peaceful protest.

​@@john.10347 it was a protest that was at most, half as violent as the BLM riots. 100% a setup by democrats to attempt to remove trump from power but it failed.

When you twist the meaning of words constantly you can call anything whatever you want, it's an insurrection if the narrative says it is because the definition is malleable depending on who we need to demonize this week

The irony when you just assumed that he assumed and not done an extensive research to come to that conclusion

very

There's a million issues going on in the world so I wouldn't expect a political commentator to know all of them especially amidst a big public debate of his. I mean I work in tech and only vaguely knew about this topic, because the world of tech is immense (and most isn't public drama).

@@junimeme5626 Safe to assume the tech you work in isn't software, or you neither consume software or political related content on RU-vid, since my home/recommended feeds were full of videos from both software and political channels talking about this for weeks. Literally impossible to miss.

He lives in an ideological bubble, insulated by his radical community.

Having watched Destiny off and on for the last decade, my summation, is his analysis leads him to never be wrong. He's got quick mind, and he's no dummy. But, he believes he's got the answer for everything. And like a typical liberal, when faced with the absolute failure of his conclusion, he doubles down.

100% of the left is.

His wife's husband agrees.

He's not naive. He's lying to you.

Except it's completely ignoring the role of evidence and experience in the formation of intuition.

While in the same breath of talking about compassion he slips in a presumption of insurrection.

Emotivism

if you think your fellow countrymen are you enemies, you are destroying your country

yes

Did you listen to him? You fundamentally didn’t get his point. His point is that their INTENTION is not bad. Do you think 1/3+ of the German people’s intention in 1939 was bad? Probably not, they still did terrible things. As they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions

@@sepro5135 oh I know what he meant and it's stupid 👀 he needs to get out more. 👍

@@sepro5135 The true believers of Wokeism (critical social justice/post-colonial theory/intersectionality/DEI/CRT/queer theory) are malicious. They hate the success of modernity. They hate success because the only real truth, in their eyes, is power and oppression. For them, success is only gained through oppression. They want their turn to be the oppressors, which is a fundamental misunderstanding of what is behind the success of modernity.

...and he said "insurrection on January 6th. Again, January 6th was not an insurrection - it was a protest that got out of hand and become a riot.

@@losttribe9107 It was a protest that got out of hand and became an insurrection

@@user-rq7ky4tc3s One shot was fired. By who?

@@user-rq7ky4tc3sthings don’t just become insurrections. Insurrections are pre meditated. Planned. There is a detailed plot with specific actors and specific goals. Anyone who thinks that was an insurrection is drinking the mainstream cool-aid.

That's because he was absolutely lying about "not knowing" what the Gemini issue was. His presentation of ignorance is a way to preemptively minimize the relevance of the issue.

It's not cheating if it's agreed beforehand. And he didn't go to therapy. Where do you get this stuff from?

@@razzle_dazzle He did express interest in therapy about his marriage situation prior to the divorce. This was in his discord comments.

Always was