8:08 Example Russian "bias", they took away the missiles and nerfed the maneuverability, thrust. Because of which he can't pick up speed so as not to fall.
@Abigail_Nikolaev I agree. I enjoy some aspects of it, but every other nation having a leopard makes Germany less unique for example. Or most nations having access to an F-16 at this point. I'd prefer seeing more unique vehicles added because that makes each tech tree more enticing.
The problem is that as we get closer to modern day, there is less and less variety because of the giants exporting their own aircraft for cheaper than making your own is@Johnson217
GBU 39 won’t be nearly as effective on the A10 because of it’s lower speed and generally everyone using it stays low altitude, but I’d still like to see it on other jets which carried it irl
Grom wasn’t OP for ground RB its OP for the air and sim modes where bases can be effortlessly eliminated and therefore free RP which we can’t have sadly
They put it in only to remove it because it would be op in sim. Proves that sim is just an afterthought, because anyone who plays sim and has an iq at least in the double digits would instantly know that this is abusable (i am not against it, they make grinding so hard we need something like this to keep up sadly...)
I want to see the Su34 with its Grom back, and the 15E with its 229 engines. Neither would be unbalanced and all removing these did was anger people from those nations
@@Twiggo_The_Foxxoseen this coming, I made a comment like this once and got so much hate for it…it really can’t be hard to ignore a comment on RU-vid smh
Su35 has a mechanical drive to steer the antenna and then because its PESA, it can reach even beyond 90° degrees to the side. Irbis radar is going to be the best one available to a fighter. Not mentioning the AESA technology, but Irbis should a perfection at PESA radar technology.
Where do you find this type of Information? Would love to write fiction based off of real knowledge but don't know how to get indepth knowledge like this
@@yujinhikita5611 The eurofighter we are going to get is going to get a PD radar because they still haven't gotten AESA in european service, only in like Oman and the UAE they have eurofighters with AESA. And the PD radar is kinda bad, it can only use half the meteors range and the tech documents compare it to the really bad N001 radar on the SU-27.
My buddy was right, they were never going to model AESA properly. AESA isn’t a left to right scan it’s literally multiple simultaneous scans in different directions. Gaijin is so full of it sometimes marketing AESA on a premium and then dishing something like this out
On both vehicles it dont give you any advantage. Cool, you can maintain lock 100km far away, whats next you gonna do with it? You have something what can hit AA targets that far away? Nope. The only thing is speed of passing sectors, which still dont give you THAT much of advantage compared to others. In F-15, F-16 you can just make your sector less wide and have quick updates
Tell me what you actually gunna do with AESA on an upgraded magical school bus, PESA that are practically just old radar with faster scan in game. Go play the current su27sm with it's dogwater of a radar. Other countries have better radars.
@@GanyusSimp bro. You dont know me, jumping to conclusions already. I have top tier on all Russia, Germany, US, and Britain, both ground and air. So I know what I’m saying. Also, I am a Russian main.
@@arandomfawn5289 “Everyone is getting Russian equipment” -> “It’s almost like nations bought a lot of Russian stuff” -> “It’s really that Gaijin hates adding non-Russian SPAA systems”
Since this is a new update coming out soon and new graphics the way how detailed the vehicles look now is really nice better than the 15 GB detail DLC (edit finally they’re going to make the F 20 go faster because it gets so easily It’s max speed now it will finally be easier to chase down someone at low altitude)
@bruhmomentum2901 Stormer is my 2nd best preforming AA in the game under the Type 81 with the Type 93 being 3rd. I'm one of few that actually enjoys that thing I'm pretty sure
@@bruhmomentum2901 Stormer is very good when it works, problem is when it just gets obsorbed and does no damage and also if there is any connection issues it will just phase right through the target
The UPAB bombs actually glide. No, they're not glide bombs in the truest sense. But they do glide a bit, allowing for some extended range. I havent been able to test the full extent of how far due to work getting in the way, but ill be interested to know how far i can fling them especially at lower altitudes.
i still hope for the unmaned turret for ICV, i think it will help it a lot. btw if that really is the final state of the AESA its badly modeled that looks nothing like AESA search patern, it might just be old tech or its just weird working one but normaly it would sken much faster
MatAWG for christ sake bro, AESA radar has already been in the game since ASRAD-R. Quit looking like a fool and do some research in your area of content creation man, I’ve been waiting for you and like 80% of the community to correct yourself but y’all can’t even do research on the history of the very game y’all are playing. It’s honestly worse with the other 80% since they say things like “Of course Russia gets the first new things, bias” when they don’t even know what they’re talking about, but you’re a CC so please do more research and take accountability.
mat why every time I enter the dev server I have to download everything again and when I return to the normal version of war thunder I also have to download everything again?
Yeah, i could see the Mig31 coming soon, problem is it wouldn’t be great because it wouldn’t have its best missiles, and that flight performance is depressing
soon meaning 2-4 years, the reason why is mainly due to dagor engine (thing that runs war thunder) needing a update to accomadate bigger maps and mig25/31 and maybe strat bombers
@@batlax18 ya I really want it cause its one of my favourite planes but unfortunately I'd say its the su35 next cause I can see people being unhappy with a plane that's not very manoeuvrable
Mat te recomiendo desactivar la teselacion desde el panel de AMD. Predeterminado vas a tener AMD Optimizado, y eso hace que el humo se vea bastante mal, mas precisamente en los misiles y condensación. Espero que te sirva, saludos...
You might consider looking how to pronounce stuff with a "ed" at the end like advanced or in another case when you say radar it sounds like youre saying "raider" these are just going you keep coming up. Great content though keep on doing what youre doing I enjoy videos like this
PESA and AESA radars should have this scan bar going from one side to the other? I mean, they are radars that use several sensors to deflect and focus the radio beams, right? So they shouldn't be going from one side to the other, in theory it should just be a screen where the targets appear in basically real time, and it should also be possible to lock on to more than one target at the same time, or am I wrong?
PESA is an inbetween, AESA however should have instant scanning because there’s hundreds of tiny little radars scanning different areas constantly. AESA is very unfinished currently
@@ThunderWT it’s not very stealthy, even older radars are able to lock it from like 8-10 km away, now yes it does have stealth but it’s not as good as it should be
