fohstick mine too. Did not even imagine people hated it. Pure romanticism, and how can anyone hate whatever it might be after passing through the desert!
@ProtossHydralisk Blood Raven was the rogue The Summoner was the wizard And the Dark Wanderer was the warrior. Basicly, storywise, Diablo took over the Warrior in Diablo 1
There is a way you can have sword-wielding amazon. Build a passive-only amazon. That's one of the strange builds I tried, for shitz and giggles, towards the end of my D2 playing years (the others were an Inferno sorc and a Werebear sorc). My passive-only zon made a wonderful tank in PVM, and her Valkyrie summon (lvl 44) was capable of soloing Baal's minion in Hell.
For those of you keeping score at home, my new laptop with Windows 7 runs Diablo II: LoD perfectly fine straight out of the box. Windows 7 - 1, Vista - 0.
@LightBringerize Of course. Windows XP is still one of the most popular operating systems. Very few sane game devs are going to phase out XP support any time soon.
Im not sure about that. It is suggested that the storyline of Diablo 1 is told from the point of view of the Warrior class. So that means that whatever class you choose, in the end its the Warrior that gets corrupted by Diablo. And didnt Diablo kidnap and posses Aidan at the start of Diablo 1? After we kill Diablo, he needs a new body, so he takes over the player.
@Argo108 -.- D1? Sure... But what about D2? If you had a scrap of sense, you would realize that it's a much more in-depth and interesting plot than D1. END OF STORY.