Did Albert Einstein believe in God? 

The technical name is deist. He was comfortable with there being a God but was actually very scared of the idea of God being personal.

+Pain Gaming "Einstein believed in God but not in religion.." But Einstein is only using the term "god" METAPHORICALLY, NOT LITERALLY .. omg facepalm .. Its like when atheists say "mother nature is beautiful", they are NOT actually implying that there is a beautiful female spirit ruling the forests ... And if I say "oh my god you're stupid", I'm not crying to allah or jesus about the existence of stupidity, its just a METAPHORICAL EXPRESSION..

@@StingofTruth he was more of pantheist.

I dont get it tho

@@MM-ss9yd he is a deism he believed in a designer but doesn't believe in any religion in this world

You'll get there

I came to these conclusions on my own ideas and curiosity. I found spirituality in mushrooms specifically pantheism which brought me to Spinoza which brought me to Einstein which led me to know.. IM ON TO SOMETHING... FACTUAL.

are you trying to say the religious people ae somehow superior?

Wrong. That's Nikola Tesla. Albert said it himself.

Interceptor therefore, he didn’t believe

Really??

Spinozas god is not a person. It's like saying entire universe is god. It's an agnostic god. There is no use for praying to universe.

@Glenda Romero This is exactly what Einstein detested . He called such people primitive. He was indebted and thankful to the creation though .

@Glenda Romero einstein called this nonsense

Quran mai mention hai einsten theroy

What Einstein meant is that in order to be valid religion must conform its teachings to scientific facts. Science need never conform to religious myth or doctrine. that's why religion seeks support from science but not the other way around.

So he believed in God and in science but not in religion that contradicts modern science.

@@peaceandlove544 nop he didn't believe in God cuz in a letter to his friend he clearly said that he don't believe in God and God is weakness of humans and he also said that God stories are a bit too much childish to believe

What goes together is Genesis and the big bang theory. Both with ideas of some fictitious beginning to an eternal and infinite universe. Genesis is still better explained than big bang despite the absurdity in both

@@throwingcrabs ““Nop he didn’t believe in God” Erm yes he clearly did believe in God!! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence! Equally it’s irrelevant and is a non sequitur as it doesn’t prove anything as this is just an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy). A logical fallacy! Obviously Einstein comes across as very ambiguous if you cherry pick his quotes out of context as he was critical of superstition and unnuanced approaches to religious expression. Einstein’s justification and ground for his belief in a supreme ontological ground of reality/consciousness/mind/God was very nuanced and complex like Spinoza’s. Nevertheless, Einstein clearly stated… “I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. ... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe“ (Einstein). Reference: G.S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macaulay, New York 1936) p.186; Jammer, p.48. Equally, most theologians and prominent Christian apologists would agree with Einstein that the word “God” is completely misunderstood and has evolved into a childish image of an elderly man with a long grey beard sat on a cloud with a golden harp. Hence all the (Appeal to Ridicule Fallacies) from internet atheists. The fact is that the nuances of objective morality will always be most hotly debated by those who want to justify evil and depravity. The fact is that like Spinoza, Einstein believes that “God” is impersonal, intangible and inexplicable. “I believe in Spinoza's god, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world” (Einstein). Reference: In 1929, Einstein was asked by Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein whether he believed in God. Einstein responded by telegram. Jammer, p.49. However, when Albert Einstein was asked about the historicity of Jesus he responded...“As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene." Einstein was then asked if he accepted the historical existence of Jesus, to which he replied, "Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life.” (Albert Einstein) According to Einstein.... “every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.” (Albert Einstein) Reference: Quoted in H. Dukas and B. Hoffman, Albert Einstein - The Human Side (USA Princeton University Press 1981); Jammer, p.144. Furthermore, the French philosopher Martial Guéroult suggested the term panentheism, rather than pantheism, to describe Spinoza’s view of the relation between God and the universe. Which obviously includes Einstein as he clearly stated that he believed in the panentheistic God of Spinoza. The Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘panentheism’ as the theory or belief that God encompasses and interpenetrates the universe, but at the same time is greater than, and independent of it. So whilst panentheism sounds like pantheism both beliefs clearly are not atheism and Einstein and Spinoza clearly denied being atheists including Pantheists. “The view of certain people that I identify God with nature is quite mistaken” (Spinoza). Reference: Spinoza, Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza, Wilder Publications (March 26, 2009), letter 73. The clue is in the word Pan…(theism) Panen…(theism). Crucially it is the acknowledgement of something deeper and more profound than we could imagine, something right on the very edge of our understanding. The idea that this ontological ground of reality is both transcendent and immanent is also a major tenet of both Christianity and Judaism. It’s something beyond the edge of human understanding. Equally, Einstein clearly stated he was not an atheist and that he believed in the God of Spinoza making him either a deist or a panen…(theist). “I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a (Pantheist). The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. ... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe“ (Einstein). Reference: G.S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macaulay, New York 1936) p.186; Jammer, p.48. The problem is that the word “God” has been straw manned and anthropomorphised so much that the definition has lost its original meaning “that of which nothing greater can be conceived” (Anselmo d’Aosta). Which is why Einstein clearly rejected atheism for the (God) of Spinoza but disliked the unnuanced usage of the word “God”. So what does Spinoza have to say about Jesus… “The eternal wisdom of God … has shown itself forth in all things, but chiefly in the mind of man, and most of all in Jesus Christ. (Baruch Spinoza) “I do not think it necessary for salvation to know Christ according to the flesh : but with regard to the Eternal Son of God, that is the Eternal Wisdom of God, which has manifested itself in all things and especially in the human mind, and above all in Christ Jesus, the case is far otherwise.” (Baruch Spinoza). Hence why Spinoza was called “the God intoxicated man” I rest my case!! Einstein and Spinoza clearly weren’t atheists or (pantheists) and even if they were (pantheists) it’s a non sequitur, a red herring, an irrelevancy fallacy as it does not logically follow that this proves atheism is true as it is an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy) and pantheism clearly isn’t even atheism. Spinoza also believed that Jesus was the embodiment of truth and Einstein stated… "There is harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, yet there are people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me to support such views." (Einstein). Reference: Einstein in a conversation with Hubertus zu Löwenstein, in Löwenstein’s book Towards the Further Shore (London Victor Gollancz 1968), p.156; Jammer, p.97 Some schools of thought define Spinoza as a Pantheist but he was clearly more of a Panentheist as he clearly stated… “The view of certain people that I identify God with nature is quite mistaken” (Spinoza). Reference: Spinoza, Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza, Wilder Publications (March 26, 2009), letter 73. (Pantheism): “The view that God is in everything, or that God and the universe are one” (Oxford Dictionary) clearly not atheism!! (Panentheism): “The belief that the Being of God includes and penetrates the whole universe, so that every part of it exists in Him, but (as against pantheism) that His Being is more than, and not exhausted by, the universe” (Oxford Dictionary). Also clearly not atheism!! I rest my case!!

Brandie /A beacon of light have you? Lol

They say he did not believe in Jesus. But Einstein is quoted as saying "I am enamored by the Nazarene. Nobody can read the new testament and not feel the real presence of Christ when hearing his words. No myth is filled with such life." The interviewer replies "So you accept the historical man Jesus". Einstein responds "yes".

@@lauranolan4782 Believing that a man named Jesus existed is not the same as believing that a man named Jesus existed and cured the blind or walked on water.

@@TheAwkwardGuy read his quote back and pay attention. Then try replying to me

@@lauranolan4782 You do realize that if you don't specifically point out the issue with what I said, I'll never know what you're specifically criticizing? Don't be passive aggressive and state your point. I've read his quote quite well and you've even slightly adjusted it, although the same idea is still conveyed.

no, they not

Nope it was "Epstein didn't kill himself"

Shalj 𝗶𝗸

It was probably more along the lines of, "never stop searching "

You all are wrong Einstein's last word were do not do a experiment on my body

Amen

@@appleheadslatte facepalm

That's it

Doesn't matter a jot what einstein thought...if he thought there was a god it does not make it more likely

@@paulrichards6894 wdym?i think Einstein got that idea because theres no one can answer hes question he starting to think if theres an creator

kenneth DE Ocampo now u don’t .

•KiingGus• look at u crybaby you have no likes

Hxckz PMT I don’t need likes sir and not what I was looking for either. I was trying to say he put believED as in past tense. STOOOOPID

kenneth DE Ocampo ❤️

@@Opticify lol look the one u said had no likes has 35 more likes than you

He is not a universal energy , he is not like anything in this world , otherwise he won't be a god , we don't know what he actually is , we only know that is one , eternal with no begining nor end and there is nothing like him

master games the most high is beyond this reality even life itself, but when he created the universe he gave himself and his people a physical flesh and other beings he created as well and he is black skinned that might be surprising to you

@@proghboy6898 I think you're talking about Jesus , but let me tell you that Jesus is not a god cuz if he was there is no way a god would decide to transform himself to a human , cuz then he will be a matter so he cannot be a god , and he cannot give himself a physical flesh cuz then there is no difference between him and his worshipers , therefore there is no need to worship him

master games that’s false brother.. if the most high couldn’t make himself and his son Yahweh the real messiah flesh.. then he therefore is not omnipotent because the lord can do anything can he not ? But you can believe that brother after all the most high gave you free will to think

@@proghboy6898I am Muslim, but all follow you , yes god can transform himself to human , but if he does , then he will be like us , so what is the need for worshipping someone who is like us, he can but he doesn't want to cuz then he will be a human like us , someone who needs to sleep and to eat and to even die otherwise he is not a human, so god can transform himself to human cuz he is omnipotent but he doesn't want to or need to

That’s odd tbh because it would be relatively easy to find out who built the library 💀

​@@historysyourbestfriend5500 he meant knowledge. He can find the correlation between time and space but who tf create time and space?

@@maman7212 nobody knows. To say that it “must be God” or *must* be anything else, is dishonest considering we simply do not know. If we don’t have factual evidence and proof then we can’t make these types of claims. I don’t understand why people find such distaste in ~not knowing~ something. That’s part of the process. We’ll find out eventually, we just haven’t yet.

@@maman7212 it’s like when humans way back when considered tornadoes and hurricanes as an act from a God. Only to later discover how wind currents, temperature, and all those other factors create those weather patterns. We simply haven’t discovered how our universe came to be and it’s ok to not know. If one chooses to *believe* that God did, that’s a different story. Because a belief and faith imply that you still don’t know. But to say “that *must* be God” is like saying “that must be the Big Bang” when in reality we don’t know how it happened. I understand of course that ppl who are religious say it in that way because it’s their faith, but religion, unlike science, leaves no room for other possibilities regardless. I just feel that in the religious circle, it should be ok to admit that we do not know how it happened. That’s all.

The important thing is you acknowledge that since the library possessed organization & design, it had to be made with intention. I completely agree!

@Fenera Taye AMEN! ❤

@Generic Taye why can't you just shut up

Where tf did you bring this quote from??? Your asshole maybe?

I hope he didn’t really say that, that’s an incredibly silly assertion

Yk damn well he never said that

That's RIGHT.

I feel truly sorry for any person who doesn't know this. My life without God was so unsafe.

He sent his son he sent also 3 abrahamic religions Juddaism Christianity Islam

John 3:16

@@rylanferrier ???

Haha.. So true.

"Defining God" sounds a bit ignorant, God defined himself, defined us and all life an non life. God is a spirit we will never thouch, see or catch. He also never changed he is the same as he was before and will be the same. "The Lord of lords and King of kings " "I am alpha and omega" says enough.

A person claim to be wise and smart and said he don't believe in God is a fool.

God bless you

I

I don't believe in God..

@@gj9157 Bad.. This is why you are showing the middle finger Morron.

@@AndreiAndrei-rt4po Bad, because you're an idiot for thinking that's me in my profile.

“I love how religious people ignored every word in the video and just commented “He believed in God”. Ho the irony!! I love how atheists and so called sceptics blindly believe the opinion of one RU-vid post that was clearly based on conjecture regarding what Einstein really believed with out even researching the evidence. What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! The reason people have commented “He believed in God” is basically because Einstein clearly said he did believe in some kind of nuanced God of Spinoza and clearly stated he was not an atheist. Just because Einstein’s concept of God was very complex and sophisticated, it’s still God not atheism! This is comedy gold and is hilarious. Because he clearly wasn’t an atheist and this is exactly what you would expect from a very eccentric genius. A God that most people struggle to grasp. Have you actually read Spinoza or Emanuel Kants transcendental critique of Spinozas presumptions regarding the reach of logico philosophicus? The fact is that Einstein clearly did believe in some kind of God as did Spinoza. Equally, appealing to “metaphors” is just intellectually dishonest as all language is “metaphor” so we could just hand wave all knowledge and claims away by appeal to metaphor. The fact is that science is a constantly changing landscape regarding what (is) not what (ought) to be. Science is a constantly changing landscape regarding the best metaphor (language) for describing what (is) not what (ought) to be. Einstein clearly believed that he was using the best metaphors when describing his nuanced belief in panentheism/deism/mind/Spirit/God. Sorry but (Appeal to Hypocrisy Fallacies) aren’t evidence that one RU-vid post is a definitive account of Einstein’s nuanced beliefs. Furthermore, even if Einstein was without doubt a nature worshipping atheist it’s a non sequitur, a red herring, an irrelevancy fallacy as it does not logically follow that this proves that atheism is true as his closest friend Besso who was clearly also a brilliant physicist was a Christian. It speaks volumes and is comedy gold and hilarious that so many atheists are so triggered by the fact that Einstein believed in God because it’s just an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy) even if Einstein was a card carrying nihilist, fatalistic and atheist it wouldn’t even prove atheism as this is an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy). Evidence and citations to the contrary please not rhetoric and logical fallacies!! I’ll wait!! I rest my case!!

@@georgedoyle7971 Me too

“I love how religious people ignored every word in the video and just commented “He believed in God”. Erm it’s because Einstein clearly did believe in some kind of God and clearly stated that he wasn’t an atheist!! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence! Equally, it’s irrelevant and is a non sequitur as it doesn’t prove anything as this is just an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy). A logical fallacy! Obviously Einstein comes across as very ambiguous if you cherry pick his quotes out of context as he was critical of superstition and unnuanced approaches to religious expression. Einstein’s justification and ground for his belief in a supreme ontological ground of reality/consciousness/mind/God was very nuanced and complex like Spinoza’s. Nevertheless, Einstein clearly stated… “I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. ... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe“ (Einstein). Reference: G.S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macaulay, New York 1936) p.186; Jammer, p.48. Equally, most theologians and prominent Christian apologists would agree with Einstein that the word “God” is completely misunderstood and has evolved into a childish image of an elderly man with a long grey beard sat on a cloud with a golden harp. Hence all the (Appeal to Ridicule Fallacies) from internet atheists. The fact is that the nuances of objective morality will always be most hotly debated by those who want to justify evil and depravity. The fact is that like Spinoza, Einstein believes that “God” is impersonal, intangible and inexplicable. “I believe in Spinoza's god, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world” (Einstein). Reference: In 1929, Einstein was asked by Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein whether he believed in God. Einstein responded by telegram. Jammer, p.49. However, when Albert Einstein was asked about the historicity of Jesus he responded...“As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene." Einstein was then asked if he accepted the historical existence of Jesus, to which he replied, "Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life.” (Albert Einstein) According to Einstein.... “every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.” (Albert Einstein) Reference: Quoted in H. Dukas and B. Hoffman, Albert Einstein - The Human Side (USA Princeton University Press 1981); Jammer, p.144. Furthermore, the French philosopher Martial Guéroult, who’s specialty is the history of philosophy, suggested the term panentheism, rather than pantheism, to describe Spinoza’s view of the relation between God and the universe. Which obviously includes Einstein as he clearly stated that he believed in the panentheistic God of Spinoza. The Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘panentheism’ “as the theory or belief that God encompasses and interpenetrates the universe, but at the same time is greater than, and independent of it”. So whilst panentheism sounds like pantheism both beliefs clearly are not atheism and Einstein and Spinoza clearly denied being atheists including Pantheists. “The view of certain people that I identify God with nature is quite mistaken” (Spinoza). Reference: Spinoza, Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza, Wilder Publications (March 26, 2009), letter 73. The clue is in the word Pan…(theism) Panen…(theism). Crucially it is the acknowledgement of something deeper and more profound than we could imagine, something right on the very edge of our understanding. The idea that this ontological ground of reality is both transcendent and immanent is also a major tenet of both Christianity and Judaism. It’s something beyond the edge of human understanding. Equally, Einstein clearly stated he was not an atheist and that he believed in the God of Spinoza making him either a deist or a panen…(theist). “I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a (Pantheist). The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. ... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe“ (Einstein). Reference: G.S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macaulay, New York 1936) p.186; Jammer, p.48. The problem is that the word “God” has been straw manned and anthropomorphised so much that the definition has lost its original meaning “that of which nothing greater can be conceived” (Anselmo d’Aosta). Which is why Einstein clearly rejected atheism for the (God) of Spinoza but disliked the unnuanced usage of the word “God”. So what does Spinoza have to say about Jesus… “The eternal wisdom of God … has shown itself forth in all things, but chiefly in the mind of man, and most of all in Jesus Christ. (Baruch Spinoza) “I do not think it necessary for salvation to know Christ according to the flesh : but with regard to the Eternal Son of God, that is the Eternal Wisdom of God, which has manifested itself in all things and especially in the human mind, and above all in Christ Jesus, the case is far otherwise.” (Baruch Spinoza). Hence why Spinoza was called “the God intoxicated man” I rest my case!! Einstein and Spinoza clearly weren’t atheists or (pantheists) and even if they were (pantheists) it’s a non sequitur, a red herring, an irrelevancy fallacy as it does not logically follow that this proves atheism is true as it is an (Appeal to Authority Fallacy) and pantheism clearly isn’t even atheism. Spinoza also believed that Jesus was the embodiment of truth and Einstein stated… "There is harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, yet there are people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me to support such views." (Einstein). Reference: Einstein in a conversation with Hubertus zu Löwenstein, in Löwenstein’s book Towards the Further Shore (London Victor Gollancz 1968), p.156; Jammer, p.97 Some schools of thought define Spinoza as a Pantheist but he was clearly more of a Panentheist as he clearly stated… “The view of certain people that I identify God with nature is quite mistaken” (Spinoza). Reference: Spinoza, Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza, Wilder Publications (March 26, 2009), letter 73. (Pantheism): “The view that God is in everything, or that God and the universe are one” (Oxford Dictionary) clearly not atheism!! (Panentheism): “The belief that the Being of God includes and penetrates the whole universe, so that every part of it exists in Him, but (as against pantheism) that His Being is more than, and not exhausted by, the universe” (Oxford Dictionary). Also clearly not atheism!! I rest my case!!

@@georgedoyle7971 You're out of your mind if you think I'm gonna read the largest YT comment I ever saw. He didn't believed in God, he called God the universe. No matter how much you write. Edit: I didn't said he was an atheist, you invented that. You're clearly crazy

I agree as all the religious ppl I know cherry pick words that fit their narratives

God is real

You are 100% right about the reasons people beleive in god, its because they are not brave enough to face the truth so they make up convinient fairy tales but to answer your question about whether or not there is an afterlife........no. unfortunately its very unlikely for such a thing to exist, i mean there are literally 0 evidence that it exists so why would you beleive it does? In fact i would argue that there is solid evidence that it does NOT exist and that being that every thing you have ever though, every emotion you have ever felt its all in your mind so onece this mind stops working everything is over. If that wasnt enought to persuade you that there is no afterlife think about this, you have already expirienced beeng dead , what you dont remember it? Thats because there was nothing to remember before you were born because you were dead just like you will be onence you die. So if you were dead before you were born but you have no memory of that time it means that there was nothing to remember in the first place

If only he was an atheist

​@@TheBatmanWhoDoesNotLaugh very close minded take. Regardless of his religious stance, he brought light to the unknown.

THAT MEANS HE BLIEVES ON WHAT HIS CLOUDY BRAIN TELLS HIM CAUSE HIS HEART BEATS SOMEWHERE HE BLIEVES ON A HUMAN GOD THE TRUE GOD IS SPIRIT AND HE DONT WANT/BUY THAT

@@borromeodioscora4913 Spirits don't have human characteristics like intelligence any more than they have long white beards.

What is the point too believe in god when he did not believe in Jesus Christ the son of god What does a man gain the whole world but yet lose his own soul

@@castlewoods4753 childish

@@castlewoods4753 The Universe can be considered god.. Whatever creates humans is what we call god

he did not create the equation , he discover the equation

@@mahmouddridi2779 precisely.

Einstein didn't discovered gravity it was Newton

@God is Good The bible isn't "coming to life"-- if anything it is receding into the dim regions where old religions that have outlived their relevance go to die.

@The Lion of Judah I've read all those books, and they didn't shock me at all. They are just a bunch of vague allusions to then-current events, they don't mention anything specific in the present. You can convince yourself of anything though if you are willing to get 'creative" with your interpretations, or you just lack common sense.

@The Lion of Judah Grow up, get an education and do something to improve your mental heath.

@The Lion of Judah The bible is a musty old collection of ancient Jewish literature, it reflect the attitudes and preoccupations of the people who wrote it-- though you can put modern interpretations on it if you want to be deceive yourself.

@The Lion Of Judah I just read all 6 books, Daniel, the gospels and Revelation, and not one of them has a specific prophecy that any reasonable person would say has come true. They're good, entertaining reads, though.

Apparently you never heard of written statements?

You were made in God's image.

@@codeblood2000 Ah shit, here we go again.

​@@codeblood2000and you think you know everything

@@codeblood2000 _"You were made in God's image"_ You forgot to attach any evidence to prove your claim to be true.

@@upturnedblousecollar5811And neither did you. The premise of atheism is based on the fact that the universe was, by chance, just a huge accident. All of the fine tuning of our universe was created by something greater, which is God. The same reason gravity allows methane gas to release from the earth and oxygen to stay. By simply changing the matter of the universe by one single thing, intelligent life is impossible.

Send me the link

@@stephencredo8975 he probably pulled it out of his ass

Of course he isn't here to confirm this..... How convenient

He was overwhelmed by physical sciences

He did actually say this, there are multiple sources that confirm he had this "God Letter", even Neil Degrasse Tyson quoted it's existence at a event.

i don't see why it makes a god more likely...i think he was an atheist ...he would even more so if he was around today

@@paulrichards6894 Einstein specifically said he wasn't an atheist though, and was agnostic. He believed in Spinoza's pantheistic God which equates God with all of reality/the universe. You can literally look all this up and see for yourself

@@nathanfullinfaw7559 but does it make a god more or less likely??

@@paulrichards6894 Sorry what do you mean by “does it make it more or less likely”? From what I understand pantheism is just a philosophical belief that equates God with the universe and the laws of nature. Obviously you cannot scientifically test/prove the idea, and I would just suggest looking more into Einstein’s beliefs if you’re still confused

@@nathanfullinfaw7559 the answer is no

God controls with his mind

Could you provide a source for that?

His philosophy has some great deal with your mother 😮...mata ji ..ye bro ..ye r right 👍

God is there scientist can't tell ask to priest wrong person

I believe that too ,, we live in a fish bowl called earth everything from gravity to perfect nice worm sun to ozonosphere and many more cant be all there by coincidence,,

you understood nothing about this.

But he didn't believe in a god that turned people into pillars of salts or a God who becomes a boar and lifts the earth Einstein was a pantheist not religious

@@brunoqueiroz2759 Neither do you,, so shut up.

Here's the thing, how could the universe not add up? If anything, an inconsistency would prove god is real if it doesn't make sense, but even if the laws of physics were different, we would just consider them to be perfect.

Jesus pray to who?

@@m.ameng54 LFAOOO WORD how can God pray to God like Cmonnow

@@m.ameng54 He prayed to his Father. By the way, Jesus also stated that ''I and the Father are one''

@@safiullahbaig A man (or prophet) cannot save a man, sinner cannot save a sinner; only the sinless son of God could. Because the price of man's salvation was death, God decided to be a mortal for a while and died for us. Because He is God and sinless death could not hold him, He lives forever and He is the giver of life. This truth shall set you free bro!

@@fidelemusangile743 Why did god decide to be a mortal? He is IMMORTAL. Clearly Someone who has power over Heavens and the Earth Created death. He has no weaknesses. Clearly the Bible was God's Word before It got altered. Here me out : This is referenced from the Quran. The Jews say: "Ezra ('Uzayr) is Allah's son,"29 and the Christians say: "The Messiah is the son of Allah." These are merely verbal assertions in imitation of the sayings of those unbelievers who preceded them.30 May Allah ruin them. How do they turn away from the Truth? 29. Uzair (Ezra) lived during the period around 450 B.C. The Jews regarded him with great reverence as the revivalist of their Scriptures which had been lost during their captivity in Babylon after the death of prophet Solomon. So much so that they had lost all the knowledge of their law, their traditions and of Hebrew, their national language. Then it was Ezra who re-wrote the Old Testament and revived the law. That is why they used very exaggerated language in his reverence which misled some of the Jewish sects to make him ‘the son of God’. The Quran, however, does not assert that all the Jews were unanimous in declaring Ezra as the son of God. What it intends to say is that the perversion in the articles of faith of the Jews concerning Allah had degenerated to such an extent that there were some amongst them who considered Ezra as the son of God. 30. “Those who disbelieved before” were the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Persians, etc. The Jews and the Christians were so influenced by their philosophies, their superstitions and fancies that they also invented erroneous creeds like theirs. (See E.N. 101 of Al-Maidah). اِتَّخَذُوۡۤا اَحۡبَارَهُمۡ وَرُهۡبَانَهُمۡ اَرۡبَابًا مِّنۡ دُوۡنِ اللّٰهِ وَالۡمَسِيۡحَ ابۡنَ مَرۡيَمَ​ ۚ وَمَاۤ اُمِرُوۡۤا اِلَّا لِيَـعۡبُدُوۡۤا اِلٰهًا وَّاحِدًا​ ۚ لَاۤ اِلٰهَ اِلَّا هُوَ​ ؕ سُبۡحٰنَهٗ عَمَّا يُشۡرِكُوۡنَ‏  [9:31] They take their rabbis and their monks for their lords apart from Allah,31 and also the Messiah, son of Mary, whereas they were commanded to worship none but the One True God. There is no god but He. Exalted be He above those whom they associate with Him in His Divinity. 31. “They have taken their rabbis and monks as their lords”. The Prophet (peace be upon him) himself explained its true significance. According to a tradition, when Adi bin Hatim (may Allah be pleased with him), who was formerly a Christian, came to the Prophet (peace be upon him) with the intention of understanding Islam, he asked several questions in order to remove his doubts. One of these was: “This verse accuses us of taking our scholars and monks as our lords. What is its real meaning. For we do not take them as our lords.” As a reply to this, the Prophet (peace be upon him) put him a counter question: “Is it not a fact that you accept as unlawful what they declare to be unlawful, and lawful what they declare to be lawful?” Adi confessed, “Yes, it is so.” The Prophet (peace be upon him) replied, “This amounts to making them your lords.” Incidentally, this tradition shows that those who themselves set limits to the lawful and the unlawful without the authority of Allah’s Book, assume for themselves the rank of godhead, and those who acknowledge their right of making laws take them as their lords. It should be noted that they have been charged with (a) attributing sons to Allah, and (b) giving the right of making laws to others than Allah. These are to prove that their claim that they believed in Allah is false, even though they should believe in His existence. But such a wrong conception of Allah makes their belief in Allah meaningless. يُرِيۡدُوۡنَ اَنۡ يُّطۡفِـُٔـوۡا نُوۡرَ اللّٰهِ بِاَ فۡوَاهِهِمۡ وَيَاۡبَى اللّٰهُ اِلَّاۤ اَنۡ يُّتِمَّ نُوۡرَهٗ وَلَوۡ كَرِهَ الۡـكٰفِرُوۡنَ‏  [9:32] They seek to extinguish the light of Allah by blowing through their mouths; but Allah refuses everything except that He will perfect His light howsoever the unbelievers might abhor it. هُوَ الَّذِىۡۤ اَرۡسَلَ رَسُوۡلَهٗ بِالۡهُدٰى وَدِيۡنِ الۡحَـقِّ لِيُظۡهِرَهٗ عَلَى الدِّيۡنِ كُلِّهٖۙ وَلَوۡ كَرِهَ الۡمُشۡرِكُوۡنَ‏  [9:33] He it is Who has sent His Messenger with the guidance and the True Religion that He may make it prevail over all religions,32 howsoever those who associate others with Allah in His Divinity might detest it. 32. The Arabic word ad-din has been translated into ‘ways’. For the word deen, as has already been explained in E.N. 204, Al-Baqarah, is used for the ‘way of life’ or the ‘system of life’, which is followed in obedience to the supreme authority. Now let us try to understand the significance of this verse. The object of the mission of the Messenger is to make the guidance and the right way he has brought from Allah dominant over all the other ways and systems of life. In other words, the Messenger is not sent to allow Allah’s Way to remain subordinate to other ways in order to enjoy concessions from them. He is sent by the Sovereign of the earth and the heavens to make His Way dominant over all other ways. And if a wrong way is at all allowed to remain on the earth, it should be tolerated only under its own protection by the payment of jizyah under the limits conferred by the divine system as in the cast of the system of life of the zimmis who pay jizyah. يٰۤاَيُّهَا الَّذِيۡنَ اٰمَنُوۡۤا اِنَّ كَثِيۡرًا مِّنَ الۡاَحۡبَارِ وَالرُّهۡبَانِ لَيَاۡكُلُوۡنَ اَمۡوَالَ النَّاسِ بِالۡبَاطِلِ وَيَصُدُّوۡنَ عَنۡ سَبِيۡلِ اللّٰهِ​ؕ وَالَّذِيۡنَ يَكۡنِزُوۡنَ الذَّهَبَ وَالۡفِضَّةَ وَلَا يُنۡفِقُوۡنَهَا فِىۡ سَبِيۡلِ اللّٰهِۙ فَبَشِّرۡهُمۡ بِعَذَابٍ اَلِيۡمٍۙ‏  [9:34] Believers! Many of the rabbis and monks wrongfully devour mankind's possessions and hinder people from the Way of Allah.33 And there are those who amass gold and silver and do not spend it in the Way of Allah. Announce to them the tidings of a painful chastisement 33. These religious leaders are guilty of two sins. First, they devour the wealth of the common people by selling false decrees, and by taking bribes, gifts and presents on different pretexts. They invent religious regulations and rituals as tempt people to buy their salvations and fortunes in life from them and make deaths and marriages dependent on the payment of due price to these monopolists of Paradise. To add to this another sin, they debar the people from the Way of Allah by involving them into different sorts of deviations and by obstructing the way of every righteous mission with the obstacles of learned doubts and pious suspicions.

Are you sure this is true or is this something you wrote just to spread your atheism

@God is Good "Repent for the kingdom of God is at hand the bible is coming to life go read it for yourself." Why would anyone apologise to your deity for its mistakes? You have a silly superstition. "Repent and trust in Jesus Christ who died for your sins and if you repent he will forgive you" So... this is an example of how (in your fables) your deity fails to forgive itself by faking its own death after raping a 13 year old married girl. You buy this horseshit out of fear, and you need to grow the fuck up. Keep your superstition to yourself.

@God is Good "Repent and trust in Jesus." Grow up and stop beLIEving in fairy tales.

@God is Good "It's not fairytales the Idea of evolution is fairy tails." You are confused. With evolution, we have a 5 sigma certainty, you don't have anything that can be even discussed on that qualitative level. You can't even begin process. "God made us and everything on earth and space." And? That's still a myth. And the only thing you have as support is an old fable, denial, and fallacy.

@@frosted1030 FOOL!!!

He is wrong then.

@@politicalwrong3289 yeah you are much smarter then him to say that 😂😂🐸

I said "he was wrong", not " he was stupid", can't you tell the difference?

@@politicalwrong3289 so I guess the universe made itself then

@@ayham_352 That depends on what is your definition of "universe" and "made". Just like the word "God" without a fine definition, it don't have meaning.

Dr10Jeeps He believed in a Creator.

Leo Leyva No, he did not. His awe of how the universe was ordered had absolutely nothing to do with a supernatural being. Sorry to disabuse you of your false conception of Einstein.

Dr10Jeeps umm yes he did. He wasn't an atheist, which means he believed in a Creator Mind that created Creation.

Leo Leyva Please show me one instance where Einstein wrote or said he believed in a creator.

Dr10Jeeps “We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library, whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different languages. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend but only dimly suspects.” Who is this someone that wrote the books?? Someone is a persona, not a material. He even insisted that he wasn't an atheist. If you are not an atheist, then you believe a mind created the universe and its laws. He just didn't call him His God or He didn't believe in a personal God, but a creator of the universe he did, the Writer of the books, the Writer of the Laws.

People have a right to their own beliefs.

“Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. With such persons, gullibility, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason, and the mind becomes a wreck.” ― Thomas Jefferson

@Generic Taye are you stupid nothing exists out of space-time

So true Glenn. Everyone wants to paint themselves with their version of what they think he thought. They are the anything but god (ABG) crowd. I think Einstein did finally find god at his work.

Glenn Garrett Yes Glen, you're right. Einstein did not make it perfectly clear what he meant by God. I think he was talking about the integrated laws of nature & forces / fields of fundamental physics, as a "super ordering power" but Einstein did not come out and say that. He was fuzzy about pinning down his God to a measurable reality.

William S I agree with you, but Einstein did not write that much about specifically what he meant by God. He certainly was not talking about any supernatural god of any world religion, he made that perfectly clear. I am a believer who was inspired by Einstein's vision towards believing that the complete set of the laws of nature integrated with the forces / fields of fundamental physics compose the real all natural God.The core definition of God is "the creator & ruler of the universe." Scientific cosmology is based on the measurable reality that the integrated, self-activating laws of nature & forces / fields of fundamental physics launched the big bang, started time, inflated space, organized, originated, naturally evolved, maintain & rule the universe in the past, present & the future. This fact makes those integrated laws & forces the real creator & ruler --- God. You may disagree with me about this all natural Deity, but do you have a better candidate for the real measurable, verifiable God?

Wow you just give the answer to all their headecks

Palestine was the name that the Romans called for Israel to humiliate the Jews in Judah All those Muslims invaded to this land for prosperity. It is right belong to the Jewish people yes it's warm my heart

G= generalized, O= omnipresent, D= diety

@God is Good the bible? Don't make me laugh.

The fool always thinking who maid himself and there is no God.

deadend Who said he was trying to prove God is real?

deadend I see no proof shown in the comment, or did he try to show proof?

deadend so, he wasn’t trying to prove God was real.

deadend and you’re asking me this why? I don’t know everything.

exactly

_"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."_ - *Albert Einstein, Letter to Eric Gutkind, January 3rd, 1954.*

@@upturnedblousecollar5811 Good try but, Although it bears his signature, Einstein didn’t actually write the bomb letter. It was written by the physicist Leo Szilard, based on a letter that Einstein had dictated. And has been mistranslated. He was part of my family and he believed the laws of nature are the proof of God. Take it or leave it my friend.

Literally never did

That is, with respect, a flat out untruth, no he didn't.

Beverage Fissure he wanted life

@@jakesfrl-9925 Glad he told you that personally

how tf believing in God makes you smart

@@patrik6872 it's common sense

whatit isn't lmao no

Read the Qu'ran

@@insertnamehere1792, it is, god is a conscious being and almighty compared to the big bang, god had reason. jesus was also very wise, he believed in god. so, you can either believe in an unexpected accident that happened in some point in time without space or a god that created the universe, who is conscious and almighty. take in the odds, besides, if you do not believe in god you get punished, if you do believe in god you might step foot into paradise

Allah can go fuck himself

@@hole1623 ugh typical islamphobe

@@hole1623 🤣

@@Stillin-nw2hl dam str8 I hate terrorism and I hate Islams If I had a nuclear arsenal I'd erase Islam and the middle east with a blink of an eye 👁

@@hole1623 I’m glad people like you don’t have access to that type of weapons

Negative. One true God is Jesus Christ.

Heavenly Motivation he’s not a god also he didn’t say I’m a god and you have to worship me beside that how on earth is that possible to be killing the only son of god to wipe all humanity sins you tell me know how is that something good come out of bad???

Or he is trying to tell what is true because Einstein did not believe in god. If you read Einstein's letters to German philosophers. He criticizes bible and religion a lot. When this lady in video is talking about that lots of his quotes were about god. Yeah that's true and I can put here some quotes. “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”

I dont think so cuz he once say that god dosent use dices on the world ( talking about quantum mechanics)

And some one told him to stop telling god what to do!

Kalexo Marriba hahah what are you talking about he's talking about what einstein believed what's there to hide lol

@@einsteinwasgod big deal, Whatever he believed. He was not God. So... 👋

read more bro. yuo gonna be suprised.

0i0l0o I think he based on his quotes that he was a spiritual Athiest. He saw Buddhism as the religion of the future. Which pretty much the same thing.

@@michellesmith9256 Buddhism involves a God, i.e, Sree Buddha. Its not related to atheism. But indeed focuses on spirituality. If you meant single God for all, thats true

Allah

Yahweh

No it’s just nature that created itself.

@@gurbnation6755 everything have their creator, you will believe when you leave this mother nature.

But when Einstein referred to "God" he meant the God of Spinoza, which is _"the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator."_ Einstein made it abundantly clear he did not believe in God in the religious sense, he called such beliefs "childish nonsense" and called the Bible "Primitive legend."

@Fenera Taye shut up man stop forcing your belives to us I don't care so your saying God went from perfect to in perfect shut up and educate yourself stop being emotional aswell.

He believed nature was God. He was a pantheist

@@04dram04 He did believe in god but not religion

He was a jew so maybe he believe in God

+Sniper07 Bros well if you watch the video, its quite clear; he did not believe in god described by man and the bible (religions like christianism ect...) he did believe in a superior force, but it was nothing like mankind have ever described and hailed.

a superior force? he believed there was much to be discovered by man, he transcended the notion of natural reality after all. Never did he appeal to conscious agency, "superior force" is a very poor choice of words. Misleading and misrepresentative.

He never said that

only daft people believe in any of the Abrahamic gods...or any other for that matter

@@paulrichards6894 You sound too sure.

@@Axxxel_in_Harlem i know when i die that's it ....same for you...get over it

@@paulrichards6894 I already know. God exists...get over it.

@@Axxxel_in_Harlem prove it??

+Leo Leyva I think you have interpreted this clip wrong...

Bob Onitt Why? did He not Believe in God?? Oh wait, it wasn't the "traditional" sense right?? lol Science points to a Creator.

Al didn't believe in "god". Maybe a higher power like nature. It's the same as humans believing that a wave is more powerful that themselves.

Bob Onitt The point is He believed in a Creator with a powerful mind. Not abiogenesis. It is self evident that this universe was Created.

Created implies intelligence and design... A true statement would be the Universe began.

Act 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

But God doesn't need an explanation for his existence. How convenient

Awakened Soul Yes.

Proof ?

Anvi Rose God can not be proved by natural reasoning or he would cease to be god. He is a god of faith, it requires faith to believe he is. That is why a lot of very logical people don’t understand god and struggle believing in him.

Einstein didn't believe that god is real. Neither do most scientists.

bestchannelever you can’t just say that without prove

@@barzanalmandawi6914 In Einstein's own words: "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."

@Red Marshal Einstein was suing the word "God" in the mystical, transcendent sense, to mean Nature or Cosmos or Ultimate Reality, not in the way that born-again fundamentalist Christians use the word to mean an anthropomorphic father-figure deity who controls the universe through deliberate decision making.

@Red Marshal Einstein did not believe that god is real, but Nicola Tesla believed in a sort of god in the sense of a mystical reality beyond our understanding. Neither was in agreement with the literalistic doctrines of today's Religious Rightists who are trying to hijack science by claiming that it supports their claim of a personal god who is the "maker" and "king" of the universe.

Pantheistic god.

Nigus no