Division 2: Striker's Test Complete - The Sustain Argument. 

Same here. The attachments are really what makes SE shine. I wouldn't use it if it felt like a PM4 even if everything else remained.

Yes. That's why our world is wonderful with all the options. Nothing is perfect but accepting each flaw and adapting is what all agents should do. Fight well agent.

You said it best! I don't agree with any of these numbers AT ALL. I go to the lab and test these guns and talents myself and create my builds on what I see.

yeah, numbers are fake news

@@erinmorales5097 and confirmation bias is reality, am I right, I think so, so I am? wait what?

@@Thing0ne 😂😂😂

I would not go that far. But the Take away is quite simply, it is not OP, a Famas still beats it.

Interesting, when I got to loop 32 solo a few days ago, I also got a blueprint, albeit the Test Subject. However, when I got to 35, I didn't get one and I got less caches.

Almost use the same build except my chest is fenris with obliterate 5 reds 1 blue. Absolutely slaps!!👍

I would not go that far. I only look to Damage per Mag to ensure I actually have enough total damage to kill.

There is no 2:1 rule. You always have to be at 60CHC or close to it. 50CHC/100CHD results in lower damage than 60CHC/90CHD.

@@Baya86 what I mean is that an attribute will give 6% CHC or 12% CHD - that’s 2:1. But this is broken by 15% Grupo vs 10% Ceska. You’ll always get less out of Grupo overall unless you’re hitting the crit cap in other ways first. There does also seem to be a benefit from building 2:1 if you’re build isn’t focussed on crit and you can’t hit the cap. For example my headshot focused PVP build has higher DPS at 31%C / 69%D (2:2) than it does at 37%C / 57%D (1:5)

Yeah, there is no 2:1 Ratio. To show this is a rather blunt manner. You go 20 CHC and 40CHD. I'll got 60 CHC and 20 CHD. Guess who wins?

@@DodRegnbue The 2:1 relation I was referring to is about the values you get from attributes and how Grupo breaks that against Ceska. For example, a build running Grupo at 60CHC and 105CHD could squeeze out a little more by changing CHC attributes to CHD and replacing Grupo with Ceska, totalling 58CHC and 114CHD. In terms of the overall 2:1 relationship topic, I may be wrong as obviously you’ve done a lot more thinking on this than I have. Maybe I’m seeing something that has more to it than I thought, or maybe there’s a sweet spot in the middle - but there are situations in testing where I find slightly higher DPS by reducing Crit chance in favour of Crit damage, but that only really happens when the values are close together and not close to cap

@@scoobs9768good point. So when adding CHC to a DPS build the most bang for your buck is from Ceska and then weapon mods? Most weapon mods are either 5% CHC or 5% CHD so if you can add CHC via weapon mods and CHD via gear mods, you’re further ahead.

Imo burst should always be considered prio from this video. If you rely on s.dps, then look at the build or how you play it. It is more so an issue with the player than the weapon

@@KasperG87 Yeah I always go for burst honestly, killing them before they get a chance to kill me is the formula I prefer to follow, that's why I put "in burst DPS scenarios" in brackets, that's all I want haha :D

As Kasper said, Burst should be your main priority. The main trick with Fast Hands, which people do not realise, if that a lot of End Game players and Speed Runner use Fast Hands because the builds they use are full on max damage. They have ensured that even with Fast Hands (not being a damage talent) they are able to one mag pretty much most enemies, except maybe Legendary Chungas and obviously Raid Bosses. They have enough Bursty DPS. By using Fast Hands, they are able to flick between enemies slightly faster which means they have a higher Uptime on the Burst DPS saving them a precious few seconds. IN my opinion, Fast Hands is not worth it on the General more Casual player base as it quite simply wont give you anything.

Stay safe on the autobahn

@@KasperG87 best thing in Germany 🇩🇪💪✌️

If you reload while shooting the same target, yeah, Sustained DPS. If you reload to shoot Target 2 because Target 1 is dead. Burst. We use an EPS (Events Per Second) Equation. We do not just use these to track DPS in game, they are used to track light particles, for distance stars and planets, as well as the wave length of the light. This allows us to judge the distance of the stars. As you might imagine, we do not receive light from one star at a time. So they are calculated individually. IE Burst DPS. If we collected them all and equated it as EPSOT (Events Per Second Over Time) - Sustained DPS, we would be way off in the calculations. So, if you think you a better way to calculate it, then he should not be telling me, he should be telling NASA, LIGO, even Brain Waves are calculated using EPS and not EPSOT as it would give the wrong results.

@@DodRegnbue don’t you understand that if you’re shooting NPCs past the 50 famas bullets you need to take reloads into consideration when comparing? You cleared the NPCs with close to 70 bullets that’s sustained DPS on Famas

​@@elfmz That is not how it works. Each individual adds Damage taken Calc always start with Burst. It is only if you reload on an add that is still alive when you enter sustain. This is how EPS Calcs work, it is how they have always worked, there is no iff ands or bnut on this. If you have been doing it a different way, then you have been doing it wrong.

Not really, as that only shows your potential enemies killed per mag. The rate in which you can kill them is vastly more important

Ahh also didn’t have a damage talent on the famas tho

I am in the process of testing, though, I believe it is bugged.

That‘s exactly what I‘ve been doing. Cant be asked to have to check all the time the stupid distance….it‘s just annoying

You can, and it is a VERY solid middle group.

Daamge CC build.

Just bare in mind that the Striker's Backpack is the most powerful piece and I personally would almost say it is a must.

Take a Grupo or Czeska Chest and try to get your CHC close or to 60!

@@DodRegnbue how much is the dps diference, is It Worth It over the survivibility of the memento? I online play Solo. Can I hold on to the fenris chest piece?

@@Constantin1020 The DPS difference is over 20%, and personally I would argue 1 Blue core and some Armour Regen is not helping survivability wise. If you are really wanting to push the survivability . . . . mxswat.github.io/mx-division-builds/#/CzC0CZQZg0EZQAYkuW1HEC4qRshBADgXTM1SwFYE9YEQLzmsjoVSmuytwBOdgW7C0vAfngiRWOGzDhCkcMigA2UAHYBLZlOy6DlVUA 30% AOK, Potential for 40%. 1.1 mil armour , and still pretty high DPS.

@@DodRegnbue wow, 20%, didn't realized that, I would defenetly give It a try, should I Stick to my fenris chest piece or Do you recomande something else? Ist Godroll with chc chd. I'm also thinking swaping the striker holster for picaro's? Thanks

Diminishing returns when paired with Striker. Crit brand sets provide more benefit. With every Striker stack you get, the less the Fenris bonus matters - but crit will always scale the same with each stack

@@scoobs9768 thanks

Yep, welcome to actually knowing what you are doing. Everytime I play with Randoms on Legendary, I get called a hacker, or a cheater. It is sad really. I also agree with Preservation on Strikers, or Future Perfect. Great Utility Talents.

And the only differnece that will make is rather than killing 5 adds per mag is I will kill 2.

@@DodRegnbue show, don't tell. Video footage or it didn't happen

@@fountedakisbud, his four man and your four man are not the same. 😂

@@MedkitPush I know, I got to lift heavy to carry my team mates. No pain no gain

@fountedakis I think your point is only valid if the weapon can't kill one enemy with a single mag. You seriously think a FAMAS can't kill most enemies with a single mag? (I said most, not all)

I never said that at all. See, this is the issue, people do not understand what is being said and then throw a hissy fit because they do not get it. Be better.

This is silly. He stated worst sustained damage only. Having the facts about something doesnt take out the fun. It is a concept called knowledge. Scientists take the fun ouf of the world because knowledge is bad is your argument. Poppycock.