DNA Results of Rathlin Man - Ancient Irish Genome 

You can test on GedMatch too in their Ancient Ancestry section.

Yes please

Sintastha are Russians , ivc bmac are aryan iranic and indic respectively, Tocharian is from andronovo complex also explains its affinity to east cwc languages

@@boiled_fish_with_rice I'm Irish, English and German but have Sintashta DNA. as well as Ust' ishim along with Central Asian and Iberian.

Yamnaya has caucasian hunter and gatherers too, not only e EHG.

@nxpx-pj1ol iberians are around 40% WSH, 40% EEF and 20% WHG

@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 girl no

@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 Iberians are around 50%-60% EEF, 25%-35% WSH, 10%-15% WHG and some influence from Mesolithic Iberomaurisians North Africans (5%)

@@heytheree same proportions of italians? Im not a fuckin girl.

and specially at Finland

He was average. Bell beakers were tall:

​@@minmodsefa bmac and ivc / ocp were even taller

Pontic steppe people has a lot of CHG too. Same proportion of EHG

@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 EHG is 70% to 75% ANE DNA and CHG is 25% to 50%, Modern Europeans derive ANE DNA 9% TO 28% ANE DNA via Yamnaya. West Siberian Indians up to 30% ANE DNA, Native Americans 11% TO 46% ANE DNA

@@eltecnico9541 CHG is around 50%

@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 EHG is the mixture of ANE with a quarter of WHG, whereby CHG is a mixture between ANE and Dzudzuana. ANE was a branch of humanity completely independent of the WHG ancient European and East Asian populations, the origin of Dzudzuana is unclear but they are believed to be closely related to basal Eurasians.

@@eltecnico9541 North and central europeans have more ANE DNA than south europeans.

he is 45% sintasha stepe , 27 % neolitic farmer l.ots of iranic baloch , afegani 7%, he got the same origins as iberian ,abkasian armenian georgian

because of the high amount of steppe ancestry (50%-60%)

It is DNA derived from Yamnaya (proto-Indo-European) from the Pontic steppe, the British Isles have between 40% to 50%, Norwegians or Icelanders have a similar DNA. Baltic DNA is actually WHG DNA belonging to ancient Europeans.1.5% Native American = ANE DNA that came from EHG

@@eltecnico9541 baltic is steppe ancestry too

Moreso to do with his lower EEF component.

Otzi was Anatolian neolithic man. So you have very low of their genes

In my case (Armenian) Ötzi is genetic relative 😂 (one of)😂

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat OTZY WAS A north afrikan iberomaurusian

@@lba6859 ratlin is abkasian 000000 distance he just got 45% sintasha like all iberians do he his iberian , tribes he carry 27% neolitic farmer only , because he is from halsttat early bronze age , he does not have Thracian admixes like today Iberian do

@@danythrinbell1596 Shut yo mouth, he was Anatolian Neolithic, mostly closely related to modern Sardinian

"Woke heritage?"

@@osiruskat That is, partly 'black' for reasons of political correctness..

@@andrewst9797 first off what is "black?" Not all Africans have "black" skin and many non-Africans have the color black skin like some South Asians, Andaman Islanders, Papuan New Guineans, Aboriginal Australians and Torres Straight Islanders to name a few. What you're talking about is more of a cultural identity. This is my first time seeing the Rathlin man... which is very interesting. This skeleton was around 4,000 years ago so it was way after the last glacial ice age when humans began migrating more into Central to Northern Europe...so it would have been quite a while after leaving the continent of Africa and those markers out of Africa would be at a very low percentage. It's very fascinating that Native American markers would appear and I've long suspected a relationship between Scandinavia's indigenous Saami people and indigenous Americans coming out of Russia to the Americas during one of the migration waves...both carrying haplogroups out of East Asia... possibly a connection with the mtDNA U5.

No, he has no Asian ancestry. The MyHeritage only says "Native American" because it detects ANE heritage. All Europeans have ANE heritage as do all Native Americans. But it does NOT mean Europeans are descended from Native Americans (or vice versa). It only means they both "branched" from the ANE people in Siberia like 20,000 years ago. As the ANE people moved eastward, they mixed heavily with East Asians before moving into the Americas. The ANE people who moved west into Europe never mixed with the East Asians. (Hope this makes sense).

Same results here with this Rathlin guy and the Saxon one, according to GEDmatch. MyTrueAncestry shows Gothic and Swedish Viking relations too and then in current times, many of my matches on MyHeritage are Swedish/Danish with 25% Scandinavian DNA result. As a Hungarian who once lived in Sweden and loves Scandinavia, it's just mindblowing to discover such things!

Weird reasoning. No one surpasses Eastern Europeans in Steppe blood.

@robertolang9684 Yes it’s steppe. Steppe as in Yamnaya and EHG. Eastern Europeans have the most.

@@bossschmutzfink9865 It's not true that Slavs (Eastern Europeans) have the most Steppe genes. Icelandic people, Scandinavians and Irish people has the most WSH dna.

@@dejantodorovski5222 It is necessary, to take Baltic-Drift into account when handling Balts, Finns and Slavs in G25. The populations I mention are all easily around 60% early corded ware and 80% late corded ware (Sandinavians are around 50% early Cwc). Sadly due to the Baltic drift, we have a lot of misinterpretations circulating.

​@robertolang9684Scientific data please.

I'm a DNA match too, hello cousin :)

İ think tarim emba is closest to mansi, khanty and tatar siberian in g25 distance

@@k1r4z. interesting. do they have native american affinities at all?

@@aniketanpelletier82 They're very close to Tlingit.

They Aren’t related to the french , English and Welsh you mean

And possibly agnatically! Weird thing is my ancestors are from Gascony!😮

He has at least 55% of hunter and gatherer DNA.

that's what i was thinking too

@robertolang9684 halstatt is mostly EEF btw and he lived in Ireland way before Celtic groups settled in the region

@robertolang9684 .

Isn't the red Indian mixture a surprise?

Let's put likes to this comment. I'm very interested on Tarim mummies

I don't think this information is a correct interpretation of the DNA analysis but I'd be very happy to be corrected via some further details I am unaware of

No, when these geneticists do surveys they only sample people who can prove they are natives to the area for several generations. In Britain this would mean they would sample the rural farming areas and not places like London. But even if you do only sample true "British people" it still won't be the same as a guy who lived in 2,000 BCE. Why? Because Britain has seen various immigration waves since then (Celts, Anglos, Normans, etc.) And then you've had a lot of internal movements within Britain since that time as well.

@@Wowzersdude-k5c genetic ancestry tests don't rely on surveys. They analyze DNA markers of modern people and compare them to reference populations. Your point about the complex history of regions like Britain is valid, though. It's more about broad estimates than precise accuracy. So that being said, we still measure how Irish Ireland is, by the modern data today.

@@oogabooga2581 the Irish samples have to be from a proven and unbroken 6 generations of grandparents living within a 30-kilometre region. Check out that GSI has a genome mapping lecture on their page.

red hair entered british isles with the bell-beakers, British bell-beakers were on average brown haired, they had blondes and gingers but with low frequencies, blonde hair spread faster in british isles bc of the vikings.

​@@PaleolithicTimesthat genes came from EHG and CHG people.

@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 wdym red hair?

@@PaleolithicTimes yes. Blonde and red head hair, blues eyes and pale skin genes came from CHG and WHG people.

​@PaleolithicTimes Vikings were various colourings, not just blue eyed and blonde

Native american and finnish is confused for ancient north Eurasian ancestry

Which dna analysis?

Also they put ashkenazi jew for the steppe culture😂

Because the first couple of migrations to America were from the steppes of Turkic land and are very ancient " Proto-Europeans" because the Aztecs, the Plain Indians , Southern New England Indians, and Incas have very "Aquiline Noses". Jusy like Modern day Europeans!

It relates to distant shared ancestry between Europeans and Native Americans. The original hunter gatherers of much of North Asia (Siberia) consisted of a group we call Ancient North Eurasians. Due to vast demographic shifts from Late Prehistory onwards, contemporary North Asians do not have a lot of their DNA anymore. There were some (Central/Northern) Asian groups in later Prehistory, like the people of the Tarim Mummies from western China from the 2nd millennium BC, that still owed the majority of their DNA (ca. 80%) to these Ancient North Eurasians. (Many) Native Americans owe a bit more than 30% of their DNA to these people, the rest being owed to the Ancient (North)East Asians (who are ancestral to contemporary East Asians). Europeans owe about half of that percentage of their DNA to these Ancient North Eurasians through a different migration in western direction. So all in all, there used to be a group of people that don't exist anymore, but both Europeans and Native Americans carry a fraction of their genetic legacy within their genomes. This shared fraction of DNA may cause confusion in the genetic results of Prehistoric Europeans.

😂😂

You are too funny 😂

M O N G L O I D S.

@@fillfinish7302 Those samples belong to a sister branch of East Eurasians related to Mongoloids.

Don't force decimali just make it by yourself,goloid

@@barguttobed Western Iranians are genetically quite close.

@@mybiscuit4680 trolling is what you always do

It is unrelated, why are European and Turk nationalists obsessed with the identity of the Scythians? The Scythians were Iranian tribes and spoke Iranian languages Ossetians, Pamirs and Tajiks are descendants of Scythians, Eastern Iranians

Irish and scots are celts from western europe. scythians come from proto-Indo-Iranians

@@RichardEdwards40 It is not related, according to your logic, we should consider the Iranian and Indian civilizations to belong to the Europeans, it is better to be proud of the achievements of your ethnicity and not to associate ethnic groups that you are not related to for the sake of pride The Celts did not have a magnificent civilization. This is not our problem. All people in the world are not equal. The left has brainwashed the Europeans with equality

​​@@Arya-vi5rqre you stupid? Im correcting him. i know they're not closely related. Scythians do indeed descend from proto-Indo-Iranians. and yes im proud that my English ancestors ruled over most of the world and that your speaking my language.

​@@Arya-vi5rq Tajiks and ossetian - not Scythians

There is a common ancestor for both in some of the Siberian tribes in Russia. A lot of native British people, especially the Irish and Welsh, carry a few percent of Siberian tribe DNA ancestry.

Japanese friend says Ainu are not native to Japan but immigrants. Greek friend suggests a connection between Ionian (as in architecture). There is a school of thought in the martial arts of the area that there were extensive ancient connections between Japan and the west via the Silk Trails.

You forgot to ask for Ainu results one another time friend

@@barguttobed oh my. Did you ask him at least 😅

@@maliha3305No.. Oops

@@barguttobed i will continue when his next video pops up

That probably means old migration and that one of the related haplogroups split and stayed in Americas. Myheritage confuses people showing geographic regions with associated music instead of representing actual haplogroups, that show much better population migration and history of nations

No, it is Ancient North Eurasian DNA but you confuse it with Native American, the Irish derive 20% of their DNA from ANE via Yamnaya and modern Native Americans are 40% ANE, Native Americans are more direct descendants of Ancient North Eurasian , currently the Finns, Carelians, Saml, North Russians are the Europeans with the most ANE and DNA tests often interpret them as Inuit, Mesoamerican or Native American

Yeah that why you have brown Europeans like Sami that look very American Indian

@@colinchampollion4420 That is cool.

@@colinchampollion4420 The Sami, the Komi and the Udmurt are very close to the Ancient North Eurasian, as are the Ket in Siberia and the Native Americans.

@robertolang9684 no

@robertolang9684 You're giving very inaccurate information. Rathlin is from an older population with more Steppe blood and even today Hallstatt do not match modern day Irish because they have a higher percentage of Steppe than Hallstatt did. Rathlin is a Bell Beaker from Food Vessel Culture.

That's what i've been wondering! And so many samples have at least some. The only thing i can think of is that the DNA history has come from Siberia somewhere along the years, just as some NA have ties to Siberia.

@@janedoe1146 If your assumption is correct he belongs to an ancient Siberian population called Ancient North Eurasian, ANE is the common ancestor of Indo-Europeans, Indo-Iranians, Siberians, Native Americans, and Jomon from Japan. Europeans inherited ANE DNA from the paternal side through the steppe peoples and are represented by Haplogroup R, can be considered as the grandparents of Indo-Europeans and Indo-Iranians, living humans with the most ANE heritage are Udmurt, Ket, Native American, Scandinavian Sami

@@janedoe1146 Native American Haplogroup Q is sister to Indo-European and South Asian Indo-Iranian Haplogroup R, there are no pure ANE at present, Siberians and Native Americans are a mixture of ANE + East Asia, whereby the Sami are a mixture of ANE steppe peoples

Solutrean hunter gatherers crossing the Atlantic along the ice wall?

@@gerardtimings5625 irish man is bronze age he is not solutrean he is indoeuropean from bell beaker culture indoeuropean and native american share common ancestor in siberia

He came from the Eurasian Steppes - he's a combination of different groups.

It relates to distant shared ancestry between Europeans and Native Americans. The original hunter gatherers of much of North Asia (Siberia) consisted of a group we call Ancient North Eurasians. Due to vast demographic shifts from Late Prehistory onwards, contemporary North Asians do not have a lot of their DNA anymore. There were some (Central/Northern) Asian groups in later Prehistory, like the people of the Tarim Mummies from western China from the 2nd millennium BC, that still owed the majority of their DNA (ca. 80%) to these Ancient North Eurasians. (Many) Native Americans owe a bit more than 30% of their DNA to these people, the rest being owed to the Ancient (North)East Asians (who are ancestral to contemporary East Asians). Europeans owe about half of that percentage of their DNA to these Ancient North Eurasians through a different migration in western direction. So all in all, there used to be a group of people that don't exist anymore, but both Europeans and Native Americans carry a fraction of their genetic legacy within their genomes. This shared fraction of DNA may cause confusion in the genetic results of Prehistoric Europeans.

No, this guy is from the Bronze Age. Celts are from Iron Age Central Europe, and didn't reach the British Isles yet. First indo-european to arrive were BellBeakers.

so Rathlin man is ancestor of Celts. cause he have high Yamnaya related ancestry as like Celts

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat He's ancestor of Insular Irish Celts, who were a mix of continental celts and monstly native british bell beakers.

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat original Hallstatt Celts were 38% Steppe and 62% EEF, Later Insular Celts had even more Steppe related ancestry.

@@ilfurlano1228 No matter, they are still Celts.

Well Bede was incorrect wasn't he? We now know the Irish mostly descend from Bell Beakers which Rathlin was which is why most Irish today are ydna R1b-L21. The Rathlin genomes were as follows 2 were R1b-DF21 and one was R1b-L21. So the Irish paternal line descends from these Bell Beakers. It is also why Irish today cluster with Northwestern Europeans and are distant from Basque populations.

It’s robot voice who pronounced this way lol

@@barguttobed Yeah an AMERICAN robot voice.

It's not that simple. There was an ancient population in Siberia they call "ANE." Some of these ANE moved west into Europe and some moved east into Asia. The ones who moved east into Asia ended up picking up extra Asian DNA and then migrated to America (and became Native Americans). The ones who moved west into Europe ended up mixing with the natives in Europe. So, it isn't really true that he has NA ancestry because the NA's hadn't yet migrated to America at the time. It's more like they are cousins and not "father/son" if that makes sense.

It has no Native American ancestry, it is just Old Siberian DNA closely related to Native Americans, Pontic Steppe Indo-Europeans share a common ancestor with Native Americans in Siberia called Ancient North Eurasian on the paternal side, the Yamnaya responsible for Haplogroup R1b in Europe share similarities with Indo-Iranians and Native Americans, Northern European Corded Ware culture the same, paternal Haplogroup R (Indo-European/Indo-Iranian) is closely related to Haplogroup Q (Native American/Altai)

@robertolang9684 Sure, Anzic-1 was discovered in Montana. I'm asking about the ancestry analysis for this Rathlin Man.

Native American and Finnish are his ANE genetics.

@@dejantodorovski5222 If you said 1.5 percent Mongoloid, I would accept that but not Native American.

@@redhen2123 But Native American is partly ANE and Mongoloid also 😉

@robertolang9684 Sure, I would accept that, but not Native American, that's simply impossible.

Gaels came from France - Gaul. Nothing to do with Iberia and Turkey.

@@johnpatrick5307 That's not accurate John Patrick. The Gaelic language spread to Ireland from Galicia in Iberia which itself probably originated from Galatia in Turkey (or shares a common origin in the Caucasus). It only takes a small but influential migration to bring a language so the arrival of a language tells us very little about migrations. The ancestral Irish are mongrels like the rest of us but at root - British people who have been around for 9,500 years longer than any "celts". This is what Rathlin man is showing you.

@@kubhlaikhan2015 The Irish aren't mongrels like the British. The British are basically Anatolians - hence their dark features. Galatia was founded by the Celts. The Gaels were a Celtic tribe from Gaul - as my DNA test indicated.

@@johnpatrick5307 John Patrick, you must have misunderstood your DNA test. Nobody's ancestors are from any one place. Everybody migrates. The Gaels came to Ireland (and Britain) from SW Spain but before that they were probably Anatolian. The earliest British (and Irish) came from Carthage and the Levantine coast. But if you go back further they both came from the Caucasus and central Asia. The darker people in Turkey today are mostly Iranian in origin. The people who lived there in earlier ages - like the Greeks, Hittites and Trojans - could have been blue eyed white people for all we know. In any case, skin and eye colour are constantly evolving over time as we adapt to different environments. They are not reliable indicators of ancestral origin. Eventually, all the black people in Britain today will have white descendants. Modern Irish people are by no means "pure bred Celts". We are ALL mongrels including the Irish. "Celtic" has never had any meaning other than to describe a language group and anyone can learn a language it tells you zero about their race, ancestry or origin. You want history and identity to be simple and definitive but they aren't.

@@kubhlaikhan2015 If Celts mean nothing then all your labels, like Greeks, Hittites and Trojans mean nothing. Twisting everything to suit your agenda means that we can't find out anything - which, I guess is what you want. In the case of early Ireland, it is simple an definitive - the Irish were Indo-Europeans, they spoke Gaelic and came from Gaul. They remained in Ireland, while Britain was colonised by Anatolian farmers, then the Romans.

1.80 in centimeters. 😀

yes but relatively low, the Iberian DNA is more EEF of the Neolithic farmers, this DNA is strongly related to the Anatolians and West Asians

​@@eltecnico9541You have to update, you are wrong. You have to read the most recent study done on ancient iberian populations, by Harvard University and Barcelona University, conducted by David Reich. The study lasted 10 years and scientists concluded when the yamnaia reached Iberian Peninsula the Iberian males practically disappeared, it was a surprise because scientists though the yamnaia genetics were low. So, most men and their sons and daughters descend from yamnaia. Source: Published in the journals Nature and Science in 2019.

@@mollydacostaCaleigh Yes that is correct but that is the paternal haplogroup R1b, 70% of the Iberian population is of Yamnaya descent through the Celts, but I am referring to the autosomal DNA (genetic load) is relatively low compared to the peoples of the north and east , 55.5% of the Iberian DNA is of Early European Farmer (EEF) origin, which has its origin in Anatolia, the Yamnaya autosomal DNA is only 29.9% in the Iberians. Yamnaya lived 6000 years ago in the Pontic steppe, gave rise to the Corded Ware culture in Northeast Europe, the corded ware culture mixed with EEF in central Europe giving rise to the Celts, the Celts arrived 4500 years ago and replaced the lineage Iberian masculine, but the Celts themselves were a mixture of Yamnaya and EEF, the Celts from the British Isles are more pure and have 45% DE Yamnaya

@@mollydacostaCaleigh The Iberian DNA is similar to the Mediterranean populations of southern Europe and western Asia,

Their North Eurasian (ANE) derives from their Indo European WSH ancestry

@@barguttobed what means WSH?

@@Sebastian-vg9nt Western Steppe Herder

@@barguttobed I know that, that is what I meant.

they do. Half.

According to my heritage. Every north European and central Asian is a bit of Finnish 😂

It is ANE DNA interpreted as Native American, currently the indigenous Siberians and Amerindians are the living humans with the most ANE DNA, then the peoples of Northeast Europe follow.

Haplogroup R is brother of Q both descend from haplogroup P south east asia papuan onge like people. Believe it

​@@eltecnico9541he propably not know about the ANE people DNA from siberia wich is common ancestry over mongolic and european people.

​@@eltecnico9541udmurts and saami are the closest living relatives of ane they aren't on my heritage who is terrible compared to other ancestry calculators anyways

@@kingofnpcs2547They are the closest but don’t necessarily have the most. Ket, Quechuans and some Amazonian natives have more.

Native americans and steppe herders have a common ancestor in the paleolithic siberian population of the ancient north eurasians, haplogroups Q and R come form them

@@luca-jminecraftxx9960 but aren’t the Siberian / Eurasian Steppe DNA signatures found in Bronze Age Western Europe discernible from those that contribute to the ancient Indigenous American? Maybe it’s just a quirk of the modern software being used in the video. (There is a written disclaimer thrown in there)

@@free2trudge Myheritage alogorithm has proven incapable of doing so, many turks score it too on their tests nowadays

@@luca-jminecraftxx9960 oh that’s interesting. Thanks for the info. I love hearing about all the interesting connections and unique mixes of genetics that are being found by testing ancient dna. Its confusing sometimes, but always interesting. It looks like Turkey and areas around the Black Sea are proving to be a very big part of almost everyone’s past. So cool!

No.

@@Egyptologist777 Yes, nubians peoples is origins of irish

@@assim2213 ok of which Irish then ? Because Irish is vague, lots of people have came through (normal it's a beautiful island) - Nubians where Black African (the original "Egyptians"). Don't see too much of that at first glimpse in Ireland, but I'm open to the idea IF you can prove it !