Do Looks Affect What You Hear & Feel? - Andertons Music Co. 

Lol yes

genius

The sound of the amp would give it away

He'll work it out when Lee's voice comes from his right instead of left.

rofl yes please I need to see that

This wouldn't work. His hands and body would warm up the neck and body on a guitar he'd just used, and he'd be able to tell the difference that way. Good magician's trick, though.

Does he often dime them? I've only seen him dime amps in a few videos, the rest of the time it seems modest

same

True

I have to disagree partially because a great sounding guitar can blow your mind and inspire greatness. Looks are important but i'd rather the better sounding. I can relate because I have 4 Les paul's and they sound totally different to each other. There was this heavy white and gold burst Paul in another store that shall not be named, £7,000.00 and it sounded awesome. Looked like a lemon mu rang pie though haha

Andrew Lock like i said, it does depend on the person. Of course nothing beats a good sounding guitar, no matter the looks. But I think when you look at a guitar that you really like the look of, you immediately get inspired to pick it up and rock out. Basically, if your guitar looks good, you feel good, you sound good.

I mostly disagree. Yes, looks are important because, when you're at a store, you tend to get drawn to guitars which you think look good, and I agree that owning a guitar you like visually makes you pick it up a lot. However, if for whatever reason you end up playing a guitar you wouldn't normally go for based on looks, but you love the way it sounds and feels, I believe you will still bond with it and end up playing it a lot. In that respect, looks can also just be an acquired taste. If you don't like the look of a guitar at first sight, you can still grow to like the look of it because you notice certain detail about it that you like or just because taste can change. It's a bit of a shame to let your eyes convince you to (not) buy or even try a guitar, even though it ticks all the other boxes. Two examples: - I bought a used P-bass even though I didn't really like the look of it right away, but I immediately loved the way it sounded and played. The body is made of maple with some really nice bits of flame to it in some places, something I didn't notice until much later. I have thought about having it refinished in some shade of light blue because that would make it visually more appealing, but I never did because I was worried it would change the sound and make me stop loving it as much as I do now. - I was at a local store with a friend who was looking for a new guitar without having a clear idea what he wanted, Les Paul, Strat, Tele, whatever. He tried an Elite Thinline Tele, natural finish and tortoise pickguard, a guitar which visually didn't appeal to me personally. I like Thinlines but it's unlikely I would've ever tried it just because of the looks. My friend asked me to try it because he wanted to hear what it sounded like when I played it. Lo and behold, it felt great and sounded absolutely massive, making me forget all about the looks.

And just by smell

Knowing this man, he would probably be able to do that

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BtvsVg3GzEk.htmlm30s

Edward He can smell colours without acid, that's an amazing mutation lmao

Everyone knows red guitars sound better :)

Craig Fussell I 100% agree with this challenge.

It goes much further. When you like the looks of the guitar, your mind can actually trick you that it sound good...

Man I so agree with you. I got in a mini debate with someone over that with an amp. Sound is only half the equation for the player. It’s all the equation for the listener typically but as the player I want to be inspired with visual art.

who starts school mid august?

Mr Thirty High schools in California mah dude.

You'll go far, young Cody! Guitars>School..... Music>Sleep...... Chappers>Your Teachers.

@@gerryjamesedwards1227 This^

Same bro

You mean "biased towards"...

Yes, however, Rob used the word "prejudice" so I reflected that wording.

The squabins prs invented go a LOOOOONG way towards making uncovered look good

But "prejudiced" is (always) a negative, kind of like "discriminating against". Unlike a bias, which can sway towards something. - Rob said he had something against covered pickups. - But you sort of said "you're against for covered pickups". XD - Not making fun of you, just informing...

1000% they look better, classier, more pristine.

Guess I should have watched the whole vid before commenting lol, Rob noticed the covered pickups too...

Worth noting it's also the only one with a maple neck. He did say that it had more treble frequencies too.

But with the other pickups and chrome covers.

There another color in their artist range called Leprechauns tooth. That one's a beauty.

Yeah lol. I've got a se currently. But the first thing I'm going to treat myself after I become financially independent is a core prs

LOL. Haven't you guys learned anything from this video? Looks are deceiving :D

Noah Marchais if he could tell one was a 10 top over a core series theres no way he wouldn't immediately recognize an se just based on quality alone, let alone the different parts and design. They actually have done exactly what your asking in another video though. He liked the cheapest se standard made in like Indonesia better than all others including S2 I believe. Obviously he immediately recognized the core series 24, the quality difference is immense

yes that's all true. but the blind sound test is what i would be after