Do US anti tank missiles work against Russian tanks 

Because they have already proven how effective they are against Russian trash

I have seen hundreds of our tanks destroyed by this weapon many of our best crews killed. We can build more tanks but training new crews is a big problem.

@@233tzr250 It takes minimum 2 years to train a crew to use equipment and learn to fight in it and as a unit

video games and hollywood movies

Nato losses 0. Russian loses 150,000 casualties. What a bargain this war is for Nato

@@layneparker7408 do you live in this earth, and this decade?? or you cant read and understand what is going on in the world??

The game of who can destroy the most Russian tanks

I mean I don't see any Russian tanks in kyiv anymore🤷

So you havent seen what is going on in the front for the last 2 years😂 dude witha javelin>any russian armour,

@@chaosmarine979 I saw everything. Where is the front line now? What happened to the Leopards? What happened to the Abrams? What happened to the Challengers? What happened to the other equipment? You put a good face on a bad game.

@@fenixcharodey eu to russian equipment losses are 1:1000 so wtf you jappin about leopard gets fucked the crew survives all they need is a new tank, anny russian tank gets hit its 50/50 you will participate in space program. you talking about ww2 stuff that makes no sense yeah leopards is more expensive yeah it can be destroyed but reihnmetal is 1/20 size of uralvaganzvod and they have made nearly 2k leopard 2a4 to a6 while comparable to russia has made like 300 t90 and since 1990 only russian tank comparable to leos abrams and challengers and pls don't tank about fantasy armatas in 10 years 20 something made and they broke down in a parade. javelin has been main demise of russian armour,patriot systems untouchable, himars fucking make russian shithemselfs,gepards 40 year old antiair is fucking up drones and low flying missiles,not to even talk about Bradley probably the most effective armour pice in the whole war (I haven't seen a btr bmp destroy a leopard abram and challenger but I have seen bradley disable t90 btw bradleys were med in lat 1970 50 year old fucks up ur main battle tank ) ukrine is getting scraps and in some cases bellow 1% of eu totally modern equipment and its giving russia huge problems(the abrams ukrain got does not have sep does not have latest sights does not have half of the modern electronics and to be honest the Ukrainian comanders that were using abrams were fucking idiots they were using them as bmps and bradleys they are not made for that shit and challenger to fucking heavy but still the tank got hit and ctrew survived nato equipment is made for crew survivability unlike soviet and russian death traps(because russia does not give a shit for human lives rather spend less and replace the crew than spend more and save the crew so pls dude open ur eyes. yeah the frontline moving back its not cuz of eu equipment its cuz indecisive retards in goiverments that cant send ammo to ukraine and if you say that ukraine eu weak for rellying on us ammo to ukraine didn't just russia receive 75k boxes(3mil) of 155mm from north Korea?

@@fenixcharodey how many leos aabrams and challengers lost 50 in total? how many t62/64/72/80/90 more russian tanks have been in space than nato tanks destroyed

@@chaosmarine979 The Germans also liked to count how much their heavy tank Tiger-1, weighing 56 tons, destroyed the T-34-76, weighing 25 tons. A very fair comparison of the heavy tank destroyer with the tank that led the Red Army to Berlin. I don’t know the statistics of tank losses on either side (and you, I assume, work in special services and don’t shout from the couch, so you are absolutely sure that the ratio of tank losses is 1 to 100500, of course.) But I know where the front line is and what the general state of affairs is on both sides. And I also know that that side stands next to the Nazis, whom, apparently, you willingly or unwillingly support, don’t you? If the war ends in Russia’s favor, don’t forget to run to the comments and talk about how ineffective the Russian army “filled up” the enemy with corpses. I’ve already heard this myth somewhere. And then the war ended in Berlin.

who asked ?

monsato and blackwater own them now

They were given not sold

@@cwolf8841nevertheless The military industrial complex of NATO owns Ukraine.

If Russia annexes Ukraine again, then Ukraine will not owe anything to Western countries. Taking Ukraine's debts from Russia is a dead end.

@@cwolf8841 The economy of Western countries is not in a state to give billions to someone just like that.

then I have news for you. The reason you barely hear about these anymore is, well, they running out of it but also they getting less and less effective due to the operator has to get into 3km of the tank. Russian tanks now usually accompanied by drones with thermal optics and many AT team got destroyed before they could get in range. With the fighting moving toward open plains. So yes, it can kill the tank, but getting into range is increasingly difficult

@@maxiejohnson8356 👍

Javelin are double explosion, the main charge might still hit the tank but it's expensive one shot one Ferrari.

@@ansonang7810 Yes 2 explosions but one chaped charge and a chape charge dont work when there is to much space between the turret and cage, a shape charge only works when the distance is smaller than 30cm and even then it lose a lot of power, the double explosion is good but not with a meter distance. The cage has also reactive armor he for the first explosion and shaped charge, it doesnt have a tungsten penetrator or so, just explosiom and straight on the tank and its game over for the tank but with enough distance the tank will survive, at least is has much more chance to survive

Drones can loiter . Missiles don't have that feature.

NATO not fight ther...

🇷🇺=🥩🥩🥩

nooo, is the oposite. russia capture and test western equipment's

@@nikxohs3925 His saying there testing multiple weapons on Orc’s.. like lab rats.. and learning from it😼

@@nikxohs3925 So Abrams M1A1 Tanks that are 30 years old will the new technology for the Orc’s😹😹😹

The Black Sea Fleet Doesn’t agree with you😼

in what movie??

@nikxohs3925 I guess in Russia, you don't get to see what is really happening in putinys war. What a shame your life must be living on, putinys propaganda lies.

Do you remember that photo of putiny In the fighter jet. That was in a simulator!😊😊😊😊😊😊😊lmao!!!!

Uhh, because NATO gave them more military aid than any proxy war in my modern military history l. Sort of like asking "Why didn't the US defeat North Vietnam quickly?". Vietnam had half the population than Ukraine now, and was far poorer, and smaller. Ukraine is going to lose this war, and there's absolutely nothing NATO can do.

We will certainly see