Does DZEEFF Know ALTERGEIST Rulings? | Yu-Gi-Oh Ruling Quiz 

Leaderboard: 1. Swagkage: 7/8 2. Dzeeff: 5/8 3. TeamSamuraiX1: 4/8

looks like dzeeff couldnt hang with the champ 💯

Yugioh player losing to not reading, a tale as old as time.

The Dream: -Farfa on BA rulings (especially end phase discard procedure) -Gage on Deskbot (dmg step and stat modification shenanigans) -Pak on something except Prank-Kids -Trif on Pendulums -Lithium for Monarchs EDIT: HOW I FORGOT MBT??!?!?!?!? And finally........... CODER VS CHAT on 8 super absurdly bizarre rulings we'll submit to the mods and then getting handpicked for the video.

The absolute troll on the damage step question was hilarious

Well, it doesn't work because Multifaker says "(except during the damage step)". It was so funny to see Dzeeff's reaction :)

If Multifaker was still limited, Doug would have ace'd this test, no diff!

i love dzeef he's such a nice guy

Oh, that guy that runs the pack opening channel.

Last time I was this early Dzeeff was still playing Chaos Max

This series has been so much fun, Definetly my favorite videos on this channel

Hey coder, just want to say your channel has gotten insanely fun to watch, love the new series that you've been doing and, not gonna lie, its fun being able to flex ruling knowledge after seeing so many videos. Great edits, well done man

I need a Does The DB Grinder know "......" rulings? video 😔😔

I know it's an old video, but I just finished watching it for the first time and got 8/8 perfect score lol. It was crazy seeing the amount of times Dzeef would second guess himself which was both harmful and beneficial to him, funny enough.

Rank10YGO on Ojama rulings Cimoooo on Black Wing rulings RevzCards on Tribrigade rulings Ruggles on Hero rulings Hardlegjoe on Crystron rulings MBT on Eldlich rulings Don Juan on Dino rulings Trif on Pemdulumn Magician rulings Mkhol40 on Geargia/gadget rulings Gage on Deskbot rulings

Hey Coder! Every episode has been absolutely fire!! This looks hella fun to be a part of and even though I’m still pretty much a nobody, I’d love to test my mettle against some Buster Blader or Red-Eyes questions some day :)

I love these videos and seeing the egos being broken down systematically

0:24 Solemn Warning, the best Altergeist card

This video, if nothing else, has reaffirmed my hatred of "and if you do"; a conjunctive in YGO that, by mechanics, must have the clauses happen sequentially, because the game checks that clause "A" happened successfully before allowing clause "B" to happen. However, in terms of timing, i.e. "missing the timing", the clauses are considered to happen at the same time, so optional trigger effects that had their trigger met in either clause can activate. Which means the clauses linked by the "and if you do" conjunctive exist in some quantum state where they happen both sequentially and simultaneously, and that always confuses me.

Yo I found this series half an hour ago! Perfect timing, this is great!

Can you make Does Farfa know Ba rulings

This one has me cracking up the whole time ! Good shit guys.

1. Chain link 2 TCBO1 activated, it sets the type to Spellcaster. Then Marioneter activates (TCBO1 doesn't limit you from summoning), "and if you do" is secuential, so first send to graveyard, then multifaker gets summoned. (Correct) 2. No, no battle damage, so no sending. (Correct) 3. Okay... didn't get to anser, but of course Meluseek is not an activated effect. (Correct) 4. Borreload is an ignition effect. Kenquery is a trigger effect. In this case, turn player doesn't matter. So Kenquery gets to activate first. (Correct) 5. Altergeist multifaker effect doesn't miss the timming (If>you can). It can activate. (Incorrect... so... monsters sent to the graveyard meet their trigger and activate at the end of the Damage step. Didn't know that) 6. Rock activation send altergeist to grave. Spoofing Chain link 2. Resolution: Spoofing returns Rock ad adds multifaker. Last things we can respond to include the activation of a Trap card. Multifaker can activate. (Incorrect. True, it felt bad since I know that is not a cost... so I'm gonna be more careful when on resolution) 7. Impermanence needs to negate a monster effect to negate effects on column (then conjunction), so impermanence won't negate Marionetter nor Protocol and Marionetter will resolve. (Incorrect. Omg that protocol is hard) 8. 4400. (Incorect. Omg...) 4/8

That imperm - protocol question was insane. Literally how?! I understand Coder says that Protocol doesn't prevent effects being negated, it just allows negated effects to resolve as though they aren't negated, but WHY?!? THE CARD TEXT LITERALLY SAYS "The activation and effects of "Altergeist" cards activated on your field *CANNOT BE NEGATED*".

5:02 The fastest judge on the west has a challenger!

Both printings of Multifaker have the “except during the damage step” clause. So either he has an exceptionally rare misprint or my boi be capping

Dzeef on newer archetype rulings: ok Dzeef on Frog the Jam meta: *God Tier*

Is there a Yugi tuber that is known for zombies? That would be my dream

Man, that infinite impermanence vs marionetter + protocol is making my brain explode. I gotta read them all again.

8:00 doug is one of us

nothing better than not reading the first line of text.

this was the beginning of doug not reading cards.

One real ruling about altergeist is the trap manifestation. I am an altergeist player and the mistranslation about the manifestation is a very intresting ruling to know about the archetype!

Tbh the multifaker one indicating it cannot be used in the damage step doesn't matter, it is just a reminder text, not a condition that prevents you from activating it in the damage step, it is put there because a lot of players don't know which effects can and cannot be activated in the damage step so they add this reminder text to avoid illegal activations during the damage step. There is a list of cards/effects that can be activated in the damage step which I am not going to post right now but one of the items on the list are triggers whose activation requirement is the card itself moving to a different location (like sangan getting to the GY, armageddon knight summoned from the deck to the field, etc.) and multifaker is not one of these triggers so it cannot be used in the damage step.

I knew those protocol rulings thanks to widow anchor working on it!

So basically Protocol does fuck all

Surprisingly, I did correctly predict the Memorygant ruling on the 8th ruling, but it's only because of this series!

Skill drain You mean Ding dong your effect is gone

For the last question that happens to me a lot with GB Vespasius and GB Darius in Duel Links, Vespasius will activate his effect (All monsters you control gain 500 ATK) when summoned by Darius and then the effect will be negated. The game show my monsters gain 500 atk for a brief moment

I actually got 6/8, got all the ones he got right plus the last one. Didn't know the specific reason for the last one though. Never played the deck actually but I always found it intriguing

This proves that Dzeef is indeed a Yu-gi-oh player.

Making fun of Dzeef of making videos about Altergeist when a year ago Distant liked Gem-Knights so much he even made a Deck profile in Cimo's channel xd (Also with farfa)

So this is the reason for not playing 3 skill drain in Altergeist? Nice! Now that I am enlightened I will not be playing 3 skill drain after this banlist.

I really like this Series!! Gage would be perfekt (Striker/Deskbots xD)

Farfa and BA rulings will come soon, i can feel it

There Kan Be Only One

Zombie RUILINGS NOW

Would love to see you test a madolche player!

Alternative title would be dzeef doesnt understand altergeist( based on his titles is funny )

Test Trif with rulings on Pendulum! :)

I didn't even need to read Multifaker effect to know it can't summon during damage step. It hasn't happened once in any of my Guru vs Altergeist matches.

An the Cali effect

Damn I play altergeist too. This was crazy for rulings.

Love how they always pronounce it as oltergoist

These are fun to watch. I hope to see more YugiTubers come forward to the challenge.

The reason why Doug doesn’t read cards One time he read his own cards, he got it wrong

Pendulum rulings with Trif he's gonna get 0 right

6:35 does that mean I can normal Tourguide and Chain kagemucha knight to chain lock because kagemucha is a triggered eff?

Does TomBox knows ABC rulings

Aerosol TCG on dozer control

Darkarmedduelist blackwing rulings?

Honestly I knew the attack gain under skill drain, because the amount of times I seen people, try to negate my churibini while I played PK, is out the ass.

I only knew the imperm+protocol/marionetter interaction because it was the first time I resolved witch's strike

Did anyone else have the video freezing up but the audio still going?

Yugioh players and reading, name a more iconic duo...

It's so pleasant to see M.Zeef, he's so mature , calm and funny , i like him and his RU-vid content a lot Chat, you should definitly follow him on twitch too

Please do Lithium with monarchs

U need to do cimo and cap g

6:16 So hypothetically in this situation, while Kunquery triggers before Borreload can activate, if there was a Silquitous on board instead of a Kunquery in the hand (and for some reason Silq hasn't bounced Borreload already), since Borreload and Silq are both quick effects, Borreload can activate it's effect first in response to it's attack, and then Silq can chain to _that_ ?

My favorite deck so I have to tune in

Ehi Coder, this question could be one for your next know your ruling videos: Why can't we resolve Faker after we striked the sangan's in grave eff? Why doesn't the damage step end after we resolve the strike?

Where’s Farfa!

I love these series!

Can we get The Don Juan on dinosaurs? :)

That multifaker one shouldn’t count! It was errated to say “except during the damage step”.

I think I did okay, I missed 1 1/2. I missed the Memorygant ruling, and I gave myself half credit on the Multifaker Sangan one because I did have the correct answer but my reasoning was incorrect (I thought Multifaker's effect would have to chain to the trap card, and therefore couldn't trigger when Solemn Strike activated since it's spell speed 3, but Multifaker's effect activates in a new chain)

You know, I kimda wanna be quizzed by this guy just to see how badly I suck at rulings, lol

MBT on HEROs!

Does Payne 96 know Volcanic rulings ?

HOUSE!

Damage step! Worst step in the game! Lol

hMmM....cOnTeNt....

Next Dzeef title "yu gi oh players don't know the damage step"

coder should get PhoenixFlareX to do a Dragunity episode. man knows the deck like the back of his hand

Hope bring cimooo for blackwing rulling and Gage for Deskbot rulling if possible

Don Juan on Dino rulings pls

Can someone explain the Borreload vs. Kunquery interaction? How come Kunquery is allowed to activate first? It is well known that Borreload can "dodge" Mirror Force by having the turn player hold priority and use Borreload's effect on attack declaration. Both Mirror Force and Kunquery have the "When your opponent's monster declares an attack..." PSCT, so how come these two scenarios aren't comparable?

Wanna see Trif

I would love to be featured in a episode of this as I am very confident I know all the rulings for the deck I am well know for gladiator beasts:) I saw on ur live stream you are looking for more yugituber to be part of this series and I would love to be

nicley played with link 4 altergiest ruling

My score was 6/8.

You should do something like acorn deck rulings lol acorno pinecono

Out of curiosity, is there any case (including cases involving cards that don't but could exist) where thinking of self-stat-modifying lingering effects* as being continuous effects that are added to the card would lead to believing that an interaction would work differently than it actually would? *to be clear, I am referring to all the lingering effects that fade when their host's effects are negated and no others. I believe "self-stat-modifying" unambiguously refers to that set of effects, but am not certain, hence this clarification.

Let's gooo dzeeff hype

this one was so good xDD

Please Trif next time

I'd love to see TheDuelLogs but either you use custom cards for the rulings or you use a bunch of niche cards that nobody has ever heard of before.

you and grinder should make up and do you know dragon link rulings

Great vid

@me_lolly after he spammed the wrong answer for the 100th time