Тёмный

Don Rubin - A Critical Look at the Work of Taylor, Leahy, Florio, and de Vere 

Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Подписаться 4,8 тыс.
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
50% 1

The New ‘Field’ of Shakespeare Authorship Studies: A Critical Look at the Work of Taylor, Leahy, Florio and de Vere
The final chapter of William Leahy’s recent volume, My Shakespeare, suggests that “the authorship of the plays and poems traditionally attributed to Shakespeare of Stratford is an enormously complex issue, rife with uncertainty and ambiguity…it is a field in which it is difficult to speak with any kind of authority.” Long a believer that the name Shake-speare was actually a pseudonym for someone or some many, Leahy now feels that his view has been justified by the latest edition of Oxford University Press’s multi-volume edition of “Shakespeare’s Works” because the distinguished team of Oxford editors led by Professor Gary Taylor is now claiming these works were created by a multiplicity of authorial hands. Certainly Edward de Vere’s name remains strong in that conversation but, with other voices being proposed, could the Italian linguist John Florio have been involved as well? The fact is, Florio’s name has been getting a huge amount of attention in the last year or two in France. This paper will look at both this arguably under-appreciated sea-change in academic attitudes toward the whole authorship question and whether Florio-despite significant francophone support-should really be in the conversation.
This talk was presented at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Conference in Hartford, CT on October 19, 2019.
Don Rubin is Professor Emeritus of Theatre at Toronto’s York University. The Series Editor of Routledge’s six-volume World Encyclopedia of Contemporary Theatre and Managing Editor of the online web-journal Critical Stages (critical-stages.org), he is a former Pres-ident of both the Canadian Centre of the International Theatre Institute and the Canadian Theatre Critics Association. Until his retirement, Professor Rubin taught courses on the authorship question at York University. Elected to the Board of the SOF three times, he is currently serving as the organization’s Second Vice President. He is a Trustee of the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition.
For more on the Shakespeare Authorship Question, visit shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org.

Опубликовано:

 

31 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@HonkerTonic
@HonkerTonic 2 года назад
This is a delightful survey of the authorship question. Many thanks for uploading.
@billglaser8853
@billglaser8853 4 года назад
Fantastic! Worth watching several times.
@johnhodgkiss8788
@johnhodgkiss8788 2 года назад
What puzzles me is after the First Folio was published was there no financial records of how the man from Stratford's family benefited financially from its sales. It was a very expensive book. Perhaps they did not profit at all from it but I would imagine this would be worth researching.
@MrAbzu
@MrAbzu 9 месяцев назад
Florio, the simple answer. Florio's first patron was Robert Dudley during the heyday of Leicester's Men. Thomas North was also part of that circle. We know that copious amounts of both North and Florio material are in the First Folio. I doubt that North or Florio wrote plays, it was beneath their station. They could have contributed material to the playwrights for Leicester's Men in an effort to help Dudley woo the Queen. This suggests an earlier insertion of the Italian material into the plays that evolved over the course of the next 40 years. This may work better than giving Shakespeare an education for which there is no evidence. As for the editing of the First Folio, that was both Ben Jonson and John Florio as is born out by the presence of unique Florio words in the First Folio with more words being added soon. I would suggest that Florio may have provided foundational material for the First Folio to Leicester's Men and his fingerprints are all over the editing of the First Folio with some minor revisions likely. Shakespeare was a player and a bush league Peaky Blinder which is how he paid for his fancy house in Stratford. This is also why Lordly writers of the First Folio are highly unlikely. Most theatrical groups were thinly disguised criminal enterprises. A good article on the subject, William Shakespeare : Gangster by Mike Dash. I would post the link but it gets shadow banned by youtube's Propaganda Parameters. Good show, full of good, useful information.
@stevenhershkowitz2265
@stevenhershkowitz2265 4 года назад
Excellent presentation.
@fabiengerard8142
@fabiengerard8142 Год назад
Great research and lecture! 👌🏼
@andspecialjellies
@andspecialjellies 4 года назад
Fascinating
@abbietyler7868
@abbietyler7868 4 года назад
I really love and admire John Florio
@apollocobain8363
@apollocobain8363 2 года назад
9:16 epic summation of the Stratford theory / myth
@dominicgodfrey8015
@dominicgodfrey8015 2 года назад
Nobody gets it, it's a wild goose chase. It's a joke on life/death and immortality
@wynnsimpson
@wynnsimpson 4 года назад
DeVere wrote the Works with editing assistance.
@vivakimo
@vivakimo 3 года назад
Fascinating
Далее
Bob Meyers - Was It Really William?
47:04
Просмотров 12 тыс.
🌊🌊🌊
01:01
Просмотров 809 тыс.
Bart Ehrman: Revelations about Revelation... and more
2:10:20