Тёмный

Bonner Cutting - A Sufficient Warrant: A Closer Look at Oxford’s 1,000-Pound Annuity 

Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Подписаться 4,8 тыс.
Просмотров 12 тыс.
50% 1

On June 26, 1586, Queen Elizabeth signed a Privy Seal Warrant in which she instructed her Exchequer to pay an annuity of 1,000 pounds annually to her “right trusty and well beloved Cousin the Earl of Oxford.” Surprisingly, this large monetary gift from the parsimonious Queen Elizabeth to her supposedly extravagant courtier has been largely ignored by historians. This document was commented upon only once in the 17th century and then forgotten until its publication in 1928 in Captain Bernard Ward’s biography of the seventeenth Earl of Oxford. The historical quiescence is odd given that this large annuity was to continue indefinitely, and the inclusion of a non-accountability clause made it all the more of an anomaly. The implications of the Queen’s Warrant have yet to be fully explored, and new documentation has been found that may contribute to our understanding of these payments from the Royal Exchequer to the Earl of Oxford.
This talk was presented on November 4, 2016, at the SOF Annual Conference in Boston.
Bonner Cutting is a regular presenter at authorship conferences, and has researched a variety of subjects dealing with the Shakespeare Authorship Question. In addition to her work on the Last Will and Testament of William Shaksper of Stratford and her transcript of the will published in the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition’s Shakespeare Beyond Doubt? Exposing an Industry in Denial, she has lectured on Lady Anne Clifford’s Triptych, the Van Dyke portrait of Susan Vere at Wilton House, censorship and punishment in early modern England, and the 16th century feudal system known as wardship. Bonner holds a B.F.A. degree from Tulane University in New Orleans and a Masters of Music in piano performance from McNeese State University in Lake Charles, LA.
For more on the Shakespeare Authorship Question, visit ShakespeareOxfordFellowship.org.

Опубликовано:

 

1 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@JacquelineKeeler
@JacquelineKeeler Год назад
She should have done a mic drop at the end! Her presentation shows how exciting research can be.
@tonywilliams7147
@tonywilliams7147 7 лет назад
Fascinating talk.
@taihastings3097
@taihastings3097 4 месяца назад
Carrying protection from the Queen because De Vere was running a Bletchely Park style base at Fisher's Folly as much as creating positive propagander with his plays? Could it be...that possibly Burghley put Oxford up to it, for a number of reasons? We know (I think!) that Oxford was friends with Walsingham....
@johnbeattie5014
@johnbeattie5014 Год назад
Bonner this is outstanding work.
@joecurran2811
@joecurran2811 Год назад
She is always brilliant.
@RalphEllis
@RalphEllis 4 года назад
The name ‘Shakespeare’ referred to the goddess Athena, the spear-shaker. But Athena was Britannia - the symbol and icon of nation - and she is even depicted upon Romo-British coins of the 3rd century. What better an author of such works, than Great Britain herself? Furthermore, Elizabeth I dressed in the armour of Athena-Britannia, to repel the Spanish Armada with her fiery and famous speech. So these plays were actually dedicated to the royal patron of this famous but hidden author - Elizabeth herself. Ralph.
@joyplanta2402
@joyplanta2402 Год назад
What if the reason was because the Crown had taken Lands that had 17:34 belonged to him. Remember he was orphaned and became the Crown’s Ward.
@thomridgeway1438
@thomridgeway1438 8 месяцев назад
The more I delve into this time of history the more and more I love the period but totally despise Queen Elizabeth the 1st. She had many deeply unpleasant qualities, but the worst was her stinginess. She was so tight with money, she didn't even poop without depositing I Owe You's. The point to make, is that any money she gave, had to have return with silver bells on it. And knowing what a flamboyant spendthrift Edward Devere was; there had to be a very, VERY good reason indeed why she gave him any money at all - it was to run a propaganda program. It was to fund the QEBBC - (Queen Elizabeth British Broadcasting Company) and the 17th Earl of Oxford just happened to be The Director General.
@joecurran2811
@joecurran2811 9 дней назад
Great point. It is a very uncomfortable point for non-Oxfordians.
@roberts3784
@roberts3784 5 лет назад
If the annuity to DeVere was in effect to compensate for the propaganda value of his plays to the state, why would the author need or want to assume the Shakespeare pen name? The Queen was certainly sanctioning the activity. The notion seems to conflict with the theory that the pen name was used to protect the author from the ignominy and libel danger of playwriting.
@annascott3542
@annascott3542 4 года назад
Bc if he put his name on the plays it would be obvious that he was a hack for the queen thus defeating the purpose.
@joecurran2811
@joecurran2811 9 дней назад
To add to this, Oxford was probably the Queen's 'allowed fool' given permission from Her Majesty to criticise and mock her. He was no threat to her and was more useful as a propagandist and a messenger.
Далее
Bonner Cutting - Edward de Vere’s Tin Letters
42:18
Ютуб был хороший...
00:52
Просмотров 266 тыс.
J.R. Daniel Kirk | Patriarchy and Worth
46:09
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.
Niall Ferguson: After the Treason of the Intellectuals
50:15