Don't Teach Me, Sai Deepak Snubbed in SC  

😂 just a convincing tone.

I can understand that u can't even comprehend what he is saying in one go

It's ...snub? . It only shows the mi lords arrogance, as Sai does not address the bench repeatedly mincing "my Lords, Your Honors" etc. frequently, so the grouse ....the secret is, they are hearing all these arguments for courtesy sake . the Judgement is pre determined...like in aSabarimala case....😂

​@@krishnabaalupoliticaltalk1262 yeah that's the first time I am seeing an advocate.That tone is incredible

Law chakra, why are you soo much homophobic.Most of your thumbnails are misleading and homophobic😅

Aacha 👀 according to u judges r chutiya , wo wahi judgment de skte hai jo constitution me diya ho

Sir, bhai bhatijaawad should stop

You think he is intelligent doesn't mean he is intelligent

@@parth3679 he is at least smart enough to realize the problems while judges turn a blind eye

@@parth3679 Are you ?

I dint know why SC waste time on these frivolous matter. Getting Money of as Salary of Hard Earned tax payer these SC judge dont have common sense which matter they consider which thy reject candidly the i believe they dint even deserve post of Driver or CHaprasi. This shows why coloseium system Rotten. EE SARA judge ZANDU or SADAKCHAAP he hai age aise matter par TIME DE REHA HAI

@@kvishwajit sab ke sab chore hai salle 😡😡😡

Also when someone says don't teach me..that person is beyond learning....

Agree

All judges are like 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

But got humbled and toned down

IF SO they are not FIT to be in THOSE SEATS

@@viveksehgal8502 Who is bluffing?

It's not outsmarting ...it's called beating around the bush with out any substantial points 😊

​@@simplensample2724 when you do not have the capacity to comprehend someones multilateral explanation ... you end up saying beating around bush... because you do not know how to counter his arguments...

He'll lose the case 😂

I Don't and I am part of the society.

6:35 the guy in the back ... He seems to share the same sentiments of mine about this whole useless argument.... 😂😂😂The fellow was yapping on and on about the things he himself didn't even understand completely... He was pointing out the concerns the society has for its idea of marriage as an institution losings it's core reason if it gets extended to sublimate the same gender mrital proposals ... But in the same breath he talks about total lack to concern on the part of the society for the well being of the people who prefer conjugal relationship with the same gender ... 🤣🤣 The fool is a douch bag ...only fools will think he has an argument

@@Renaissance861 eek baat bata mulla Abdul cha-cha tere Ghar paar aaata thaa yaaa Teri Ammi Abdul k mohalle main jati thi.... Jo tu paida hua.

These Judge know everything But It's lawyer duty to submit his point . Judge say He know these points . So mr. Judge please give us list of subjects about which you know everything. We also don't want to repeat the points you already know . These Judges are spoiled kids .

Absolutely right👉✔

No. It is like a parent being snubbed because his kid grew up and now earns more than his Baap.

@@Dhruv_Dogra Who is parent?

Yes. True.

Perfectly said.

That and his homegrown natural analytical brain. There are umpteen number of lawyers who practice in the supreme court but not everyone is as articulate and effective.

Speaks sooo fast, even hearing attentively, i can hardly understand each & every word. He is against same sex marriage, that's all i could understand.

@@shraddhashah4924yes u r right..mostly South Indians have same practice of speaking since childhood as either they speak their regional or English language. Ma'am ,it's all about ambience one is in and the practice.

@@vaibhavyadav9912 yes that's why information with good communication skills is like an efficient tool to get the work done.

आपके शब्द बता रहे हैं आपकी उदात्तता के संदर्भ में।🙂

​@@stuv_wx Ram Rajya is a moniker to show *an ideal form of governance where the rights of every living being is preserved while natural conservation are upheld i.e even prevention of wanton tree cutting , hunting etc. taking into account the right to life of every living being and allowing "all traditions to continue" .* In case one hasn't lived under the rock for centuries, India has had centuries old tradition of marriages between intersex couples which has been a tradition since ancient times. There is an entire festival for that matter where the intersex come together and perform marriage ceremonies taking blessings of a Naga deity called 'Iravan' (thought to be son of Arjuna and Ulupi in Vyasa Mahabharata). Such festivals have been legal since time immemorial. Of course *colonial times were illiberal and our constitutional laws follow colonial laws hence the word 'legal' hasn't been inserted yet for such marriages which are happening despite anyone's interference.* Hence it is time to wakeup to reality that *Indian culture doesn't ban anything of the sort but it does uphold natural laws that a new born infant needs heterosexual parents to grow up in a conducive normal environment. It is the right of the child as much the parents have to marry another of their own sex.* Marriages aren't the problem as same sex couples don't reproduce. Their intent to reproduce takes away the rights of the next gen. to live a normal life and the after effects have been seen in American society let's be open about that. There are identity crises and severe trauma faced by children of such couples. Hence marriages may be legalized but their further actions must go through legal norms that protect the human rights in this country. Medical institutes and centers for artificial insemination/fertilization/conception etc. must understand this and then they must make decisions sensitive to the issue. This three parent, two same sex parent invitro fertilization or artificial fertilization etc. must be marked as a project equal to human - animal hybridization and treated as the same. This herein lies the problem. After marriages LGBTQ+ will ask for their right to bear children. Think a hundred times before replying what type of society would you want to see ? Genetically impaired or a Normal society ??

Yes the title is misleading. JSD spoke very well and the SC judges too heard him out without interrupting. JSD was also respectful to the bench.

@@learningislife1818 Your private parts automatically decide whether you are biologically male or female and it is through this natural adaptation that humanity and every other mammalian groups have flourished. For 99% of the population their behavior, gait, mentality etc. are influenced by your chromosomes that determine your gender. *It is a biological fact.* Now try to counter that point. Definitions are not what one makes but what one observes in reality. Try interfering with nature and you create abominations. History repeats. The West is great at creating abominations - join them and watch the entire world fade away in front of your very eyes.

Yes and Indian radicals are forming opinion on one sided argument by him

Engineers do Everything 😂😂😂

6:35 the guy in the back ..... He seems to share the same sentiments of mine about this whole useless argument.... 😂😂😂The fellow was yapping on and on about the things he himself didn't even understand completely... He was pointing out the concerns the society has for its idea of marriage as an institution losings it's core reason if it gets extended to sublimate the same gender marital proposals ... But in the same breath he talks about total lack fo concern on the part of the society for the well being of the people who prefer conjugal relationship with the same gender ... 🤣🤣 The fool is a douch bag ...only fools will think he has a point, no he does not.

He is an epitome of the purpose of Bharateeya vidya vidhana. Our core principle is Dhaarana(Grasping and memorising) PrakaTana - expression. If you are seeing a roaring lion in him yes I see he is that dharmic force and voice we can look up to.

​@@sonukumarchoubey4510especially from mechanical field

Mechanical & Electronics engineer always end up doing & taking up other jobs. 😂😂

Jay Jagannath Bhai ⭕❗⭕

Enemies...who are your enemies? There are no enemies here Bhai..

@@JeetD191 Shtrubodh is most importantly

@@JeetD191 Aankh band karlene se gandhi ka bandar ban sakte hain, par sach jhooth ni badal sakta

​@@sandeepkumarsarangi9203 Uske question ka answer to de, dialogue to chl ho gya tera

But that was quite unnecessary i feel. But the judges heard his arguments without interrupting is commendable! JSD is the epitome of clarity of thoughts and expressions.

Yess absolutely 💯

​@@lunalisapotsangbam5194doing the bare minimum is not commendable. People need to stop incentivising basic decency.

6:35 the guy in the back ..... He seems to share the same sentiments of mine about this whole useless argument.... 😂😂😂The fellow was yapping on and on about the things he himself didn't even understand completely... He was pointing out the concerns the society has for its idea of marriage as an institution losings it's core reason if it gets extended to sublimate the same gender marital proposals ... But in the same breath he talks about total lack fo concern on the part of the society for the well being of the people who prefer conjugal relationship with the same gender ... 🤣🤣 The fool is a douch bag ...only fools will think he has a point, no he does not.

Gem? I would say he is a germ.

Fine discrimination between cause and case..

Absolutely!

​@@TheSaud007 mulla doesn't understand anything ...he just laughing reading headlines...

silly caption maybe for eyeballs

@@raul9403 lol yes

6:35 the guy in the back ..... He seems to share the same sentiments of mine about this whole useless argument.... 😂😂😂The fellow was yapping on and on about the things he himself didn't even understand completely... He was pointing out the concerns the society has for its idea of marriage as an institution losings it's core reason if it gets extended to sublimate the same gender marital proposals ... But in the same breath he talks about total lack fo concern on the part of the society for the well being of the people who prefer conjugal relationship with the same gender ... 🤣🤣 The fool is a douch bag ...only fools will think he has a point, no he does not.

agree with the second sentence of yours sir. I suggest that you, as a citizen of this country, should try to know the law of the land, that is the constitution. Because ignorance of law is no excuse. Maybe you can try to read the fundamental rights? Thank you sir

@@omnamahshivay970 like ur moma is a dancer there.

You claim to not know constitutional intricacies but yet you claim his arguments are precise. How does that work? You're indulging in hagiography. It's nauseating.

Absolutely… he is always like this 👍

@@ramani11 yes n there is also fundamental duties in part 4 A art 51 A... You should read that too

It is NOT the duty of judges to counter him. That is the duty of the lawyers on the other side.

@@YakuzaSRC yeah only if he could read

Why would any judge counter a lawyer ?

As per what's app university judges can counter lawyers

​​@@sadikshaikh8380 madrasa educated are not eligible to comment here. Go give your bs at muslim personal law board hearing secession.

I think those judges are a bit biased

Saying that, "I know how to read and you don't have to teach me" is the exact point where someone's ego creeps in and the person will lose all respect in my eyes to a point that I'll no longer be interested in debating with him.

Similarly argue with police will end up with false case against you

Sabyasachi tu kachchi pina band kad

It's the job of opposition lawyer to counter and argue, judges are not their to counter or argue lolzzz 🤣🤣 they are their to pass judgements, it's not some Bollywood movie in which you are expecting a judge to argue the case himself, first learn something about court proceedings 🤣🤣🤣

​@@sabyanilu social issues need analytical arguments more than facts, facts are also necessary but the way you form and represent your argument is more important. And you are asking wrong question we all police also comes under judiciary, so it doesn't matter weather you have false cases or not, you can just simply fight for your freedom through courts and judiciary.

#BanCollegium

Excellent. You have hit the nail on its head. I endorse your statement 100percent

True

lmao..you think he makes the judges uneasy. The ones sitting on the bench have seen thousands like him

You are absolutely correct. The judges felt insecure.

​@@feitantan8355 yeah Chandrachur must have seen thousands like his father who sucked balls to get his son promoted similarly he'll do it for hia son😂

6:35 the guy in the back ..... He seems to share the same sentiments of mine about this whole useless argument.... 😂😂😂The fellow was yapping on and on about the things he himself didn't even understand completely... He was pointing out the concerns the society has for its idea of marriage as an institution losings it's core reason if it gets extended to sublimate the same gender marital proposals ... But in the same breath he talks about total lack fo concern on the part of the society for the well being of the people who prefer conjugal relationship with the same gender ... 🤣🤣 The fool is a douch bag ...only fools will think he has a point, no he does not.

Yes.... 🔥

Aspiring morons.... I mean if advocates have been more active in other cases like... . India would have been better... Following wrong idols brother... Hindi ,tamil,telgu...i mean native language speaking lawyers have done some phenomenol jobs as well Don't get moved away with fluent english

Those were utter garbage arguments by a clown called Sai. How about that?

not brilliance or cogent at all but just a bunch of stylish words instead of any actual relevant substantial argument. He is talking about societal and moral norms and the concept of 'dampatya's objective' (conveniently forgetting puranic thought of 'relationship') but forgetting about the principles of individuality, humanity and dignity in general which form the building blocks of those social norms. Also the arguments are full of obsolete understanding of human matrimony as that between persons designated as husband i.e. a biological male and wife i.e. biological female , which refuses to see matrimony as an alliance of 2 human beings as equal partners (sadly same is the case with various personal laws). In the end, he resorts to malign the discussion by steering away from the topic to Talk about problems like trafficking as if one person faced by any LGBTQ+ member can be juxtaposed with another. What's at stake in this case Here is the question of having a relationship with a partner of your choice in future (of what he 'thinks' he is arguing about nonchalantly) with legal validity. It directly relates to multidimensional human development of a substantial portion of the population which the privileged 'social conservative' RW section loves to, albeit ironically, call 'urban elite'. Those arguments should have invited a loud chuckle by all present in that courtroom.

A comprehensive idiot. Produced by the low level ecosystem that Modani and Hindutva have created. If things change in 2024, then Sai Deepak will be back to selling chai.

Then you should be the one arguing XD. Chumma commenting things won't help

Exactly this guy is waffling af. Procreating like an animal is purpose of marriage lol

I dint know why SC waste time on these frivolous matter. Getting Money of as Salary of Hard Earned tax payer these SC judge dont have common sense which matter they consider which thy reject candidly the i believe they dint even deserve post of Driver or CHaprasi. This shows why coloseium system Rotten. EE SARA judge ZANDU or SADAKCHAAP he hai age aise matter par TIME DE REHA HAI

सही बात है भैया

I support your views

@@dhananjayjogdand5792 जय हो 🌹🙏🌹

Yes… let’s put the power of accountability in the hands of *checks notes* politicians……….. the moment you do that it’s game over for fair law practices.

@@Youdoyouyeah no in such cases it should be decided by elected jury not some egomaniacal judges.

​@@thescienceguy30 can you explain what he said in this video?

Atleast you can kick out politicians. These guys are just invincible. 4 guys and a lady itself is discriminatory.

time sabka aata h... inka b aayega

Indirectly he accepted that he is been taught😂

@@klvgupta3131 😄 and exposed his arrogance

@@चेतन_महाराष्ट्र Arrogant sanghi deserves counter arrogance

@@sauron2000000 before calling sanghi...one should give their own identity out

@@krillin7876 Arrogant Sanghi call other Abdoul. So what identity😆😆😆😆😆

he literally said I am sorry in the first 60 seconds of this video.

he said sorry , what are you listening ?

​@@dilshadalam7458 that's just a formality else they would not allow him to complete

@@omnipotent3955 than one should not make this type of show off comments even if its just a formality.

@@dilshadalam7458 then how will milord allow him to speak?

They do partiality in judges appointment through collegium system😏😏😏

they are gods. their sons will be gods, their daughters will marry gods. all the democracy and election drama is to create laws that these gods can put aside and modify or even stay. these gods will have no power and flee the country when sharia becomes the law in 2050-60.

facts

Agree

Sati also part of customs ,so you should demand it

Exactly! ❤

Correct.

Tabhi to beech main roka ya bola nahi samjhney main time liya hoga baad main

Very true.

😂😂

Because they only know about Americans judiciary knowledge

That is exactly when these fickle judges feel threatened hence they try to caution JSD so thqat they can get their breathe back..

CJI is not made by doing comments. One must needs to follow procedure.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 BJP scheme

@@Jain_Mahima Procedure only nepotism works to become CJI😂😂😂

​@@akhileshpatro8707nah, if only nepotism worked, we wouldn't have got the current CJI. He is a pain in the arse of the ruling BJP faction. They would never have allowed him to be the CJI, if they could.

Wish everyone feels the same

Not only insecure, but most of our supreme court judges are full of ego and incompetent of understanding Indian cultural Fabric and lack foresightedness.

Chandrachud himself is the biggest example of nepotism his father was a cji before how do we think he has the merit? What if he was not the son of chief justice ? Jai sai deepak is a self made man no connections no nepotism hes reached there by his hardwork this 😂colonial harvard minds wont understand what it is to reach there without family connections and shifaarish. Chandrachud himself is a big time leftist hell snub jsd for his views only na what else do we expect from him

please enlighten me. what are the problems?

Please explain briefly what he said?

​@@ruoyunshen plz study the western country and all the problems they are facing because of same gender marriage

@@SS-ib1lr since you claim to be aware of the problems, I'm asking you to explain them to me because as far as I know there are NONE and I've no clue what imaginary country in the 'west' that you're talking about. gay marriage is not a problem, you guys make it one. if you guys kindly step out of our way, it won't be a problem anymore. It's that simple.

yes sai speak well, does not mean he is so smart... same way he will talk for the opponent he could still sound right.. . note judges patiently listening ... judges are come to their post because of their past experiences .. they know one thing for sure, when you argue with a fool, two fools are arguing

lol the judiciary is a nepotism

Speech without valid substance in his presentation..blabbering just

​@@srv262 May be u cant relate to the judgements😂

@@srv262 seems to me Mr. Sai was too fast for you....

@@raviranjan-hb8fl exactly 👍

@@gayathrinaidu9735 maybe Bari he has an axe to grind with Sai , or probably just a dumbo 😂😂

The reason why he was snubbed.

Well observed 🎉 I think this is unprecedented in history of the Supreme Court!!!

No need to call those 5 scoundrels as Lords

@@TheKrish1972 why scoundrels???

Omg good observation

Probably it will be lopsided because self anointed lords will snub Sai deepak more to insult him

A comprehensive idiot. Produced by the low level ecosystem that Modani and Hindutva have created. If things change in 2024, then Sai Deepak will be back to selling chai.

😂❤ brother they're supreme court judges. You'll hardly find more capable men than them in the entire country.

@NexGen Techies there's nothing a citizen can do.... .. heard of contempt ?

​@NexGen Techies he is complaining atleast

@NexGen_Techies Voting BJP🤣🤣🤣🤣

Then, do you think they have faith in Govt ?

@NexGen_Techies RU-vid destroyed my freedom of speech

Every single person stays silent when someone is speaking in the supreme court. It is not your village's chawl

@@baburavganpatravapte It is not about silence only but the way even the whole people in the room are focusing on him so peacefully without being busy with their work. And for your knowledge, there are courts at the village level too, they are not chawal but the lowest level of a justice-delivering institution supported by district courts . Feel pity on you that u don't read the newspapers that how sometimes there are things that go wrong in SC also.

@@sparhi1776 Har murkh hoga na ki har murkho hoga ….chutiyon ka confidence level high ni hota h ye v sach h …

​@@baburavganpatravapte nothing to be so rude about

@@singhsatya6747 when a lawyer is arguing his point in a place like the supreme court, people listen to him. There is nothing extraordinary except for people like you that hang on to nuts of others because they either never had strong figures to look up to or never became a person who had the focus of the room for more than 10 seconds. It's funny how you hinted that in SC there is going to be any sort of commotion or constant interruption during argument without judge taking action

Yes now one more name it is our EAM Jai Shankar ji.

😂😂

😂😂

toh bahi fir jeevan pura barbaad hai ,tu corporate slave hi rahega

@@shloksharma3105 Tu apni chinta kar bhai

Sai Deepak would be the best person to lead that change. I hope and pray that he joins BJP, become the Law Minister & change the system of judges' appointments! Now, the judges are 90% corrupted working for the coloniser!

​@@mathaveuplands4395 and politicians are all honest good joke 😅

​@@mathaveuplands4395 he will never join bjp......he loves his profession very much. And he said himself I'm not capable of being a politician

​@@alphaindian2847 😂

How exactly?

Itni dikkat hai to china bhaag ja

The judiciary system is corrupt for years and when a youngster explains those listening are not able to digest

Lordships can perhaps appreciate their own selves.

I have seen then CJI Sathasivam throwing the file away towards Kapil sibbal who was then defending CSK's fixing case.. I was in the court.

I am sorry to say designation doesn't mean he knows everything he may be cji knowing law also a woke so to speak but that doesn't make him know everything about society

​​@@omnamahshivay970I doubt that he learned science from woke tiktokers. Surely he learned some divine knowledge to say there is no absolute concept of man or woman. You know that's not just wrong scientifically, it's also wrong logically. May be some rapist would say just because I have penis doesn't mean I am a man, so I cannot be charged with rape according to IPC 376 (hope I am correct with IPC). See how gender biased laws are in India. Read the law. And this joker doesn't understand the consequences of his stupid statements. The judiciary should be made accountable.

​@@omnamahshivay970 You mean bhai/behen nepo kid chandru?

This is how I debate but only in my mind... At least this is how I see myself debating in my mind but when I open my mouth nothing comes out of it. (Introvert's daily struggle 😆😅)

​@@rajendradangi2585 so true 😂😂 i watch him daily and imagine in place of him but nothing comes out 😂😂

The Chief Justice, I say, was dignified.

No it's just that no one has made an argument for the security of such people rather than arguing the point that there are no gender, which is baseless.

​@@SamvedIyer exactly

They are mia lords

​@@LIT_FAM369 😂

Nothing to do with particular religion. It should be stopped getting legalized without fail. It will ruin our society.

Homosexuality not part of Hindu culture?

Hahaha hindu is a joke

​@@tjkarna2998marriage of homosexual people isn't part of Hindu culture

@@Yeagerr9 it is part of my Hindu culture. Coz it's natural. If it's so wrong then why God created them?

Most of the judges now a days are there due to caste based reservation. They are just misfits

You think so 😅😅

If a law student says so then he is definitely great guy in his profession.

We need such fire in lawyers who stand for the right wing.

What he told is about the society and not the individuality

What are they 'forcing' you or the public to do?

​@@gatikgarg4007 They're allowing same sex marriage in Hindu Marriage. It is against Our marriage system. They should marry but not according to any religious system.

@@saurabhKVS You are forcing the same sex couple no to live.

​@@saurabhKVSi don't see who is forcing who, in your argument.

​​@@saurabhKVSou started with some WhatsApp knowledge and switched to interesting arguments. I also believe that no religion need to accept same sex mariage. Civil mariages are here for this type. But there is some 🐄💩 in your arguments also. No courts can force any religion to accept anything. Because courts faith is Constitution, not any holy book. So there arguing for same sex mariage, without any religion in it.

Trust me you are living in a pond. If u can't understand his points that doesn't mean those judges also don't.

Supreme court ke judge nhi samajh paye, aur Bina gupta jee samajh gyi 🤣 Ise kahne hain bhakti me satya dekhne ki takat kho dena

😂😂😂 I don’t think milords understand it they lives in a fools paradise, if it’s in Muslim community milords will simply dismiss the case site law and order or religious matter

The judges can understand even Technology related issues such as Aadhar , privacy ,etc. And you think they cant understand law?

They were just counting the no of times he said MiLord and when it was not as per their ego, they started crying

Achha what is the criteria of good advocate

Yeah, it doesn't. But it does help a lot.

​@@anshulturker7768understanding of the law

​@@shanbhogueand how many cases you have fought?

@@shanbhogue thanks bhai accha ho ga tumne bata diya aur according to you he doesn't have it

U find this rational?

@@soumyadeepsengupta9797 oh this is rhetoric for you?

​@@soumyadeepsengupta9797 grow up child

You wouldn't know rationality even if it crawled up your leg and bit your ass. That's the reason you have piles.

​@@soumyadeepsengupta9797 You must be a dirty poor bongali. Bingo bingo bongoli.

Nd u r the genius here who can understand everything,🤣🤣

​@@Dream-rh5qi and you're the pitiful one who can't

lol he is not in the court for first time you fool 😂

@@adish7839 do you understand English 🤔

You can argue that what happened to jews was right with same argumemt

majority views of a society do not always align with good amendments just like widow remarriage act...and being liberal do not yeild good all the times too...its just being whatever the fuck to be ...to uphold the rights of people and equality .

Majority can be wrong as well...and unfit to collectively decide. 99% of population have no clue and understading capability on Einstein's Relativity theories....so majority cannot decide whether E=MC2 is correct or not....

The viewpoint of the majority cannot and should not be misappropriated as justice. Hope justice is carried out as per Article 21.

​@@alexcotton4658 are you telling us that majority of the Christian Germans were Nazis who willingly collaborated to commit the holocaust and all the other things that they did?

Do you see any sr adv in the frame ?? 😅

😂😂😂घंटा

both judges and lawyers take notes .. judges do so that they can write in their judgments what each advocate representing each party argued so that they can deal with the arguments properly, opposing lawyers even if they are senior counsels take notes so that they can rebut when their time comes, supporting lawyers take notes so as to be able to file written submissions. Also senior advocates don’t like their arguments repeating somebody who has already argued, so they keep track.

Only andhbhakts

Supremacy 😂😂😂 joker

Kaun sa bhagwan? Shiv Vishnu Ganesh ya koi aur?

​@@user-jy5sn2nl8s they are one read the scripture

​@@user-jy5sn2nl8s mohammad noobie of fairytale chuslam

He deserves to be snubbed

Nonsense, sai Deepak is only arguing for the society to decide the fate of individuals. The world is changing, and India should change with it. It cannot denie individuals right to happiness just because a few conservative pretend to be ostrichs.

​@@marshadesouza7977 you know what else is a joke? Homosexual couples raising a child.

Ridiculous, his arguments is so narrow! He is only conferring with what he has been asked to.

Honourable MyLord Judges are Positively Quota Driven ASSHOLES so are Jealous of Others INTELLECT.

​@@marshadesouza7977 so called non conservative western individuals or society have no family values they share their wives with each other. you may also have orgasmic feelings after thinking of sharing your wife and become part of a non conservative cool society 🙂🙂

you are easily impressed ... lol

Indeed😂😂😂

sure hope the following isn't too uncomfortable a subject for y'all - if it is I won't be offended if it needs to be deleted from the post. In bhakti yoga , madhurya bhava is the type of love for Krishna a devotee have towards his husband and this can be performed by men too So according to google definition a homosexual/bisexuall man is someone who is physically and emotionally attracted to a man(on the contrary a heterosexual can never view another male as a lover and himself as a wife); and this type of problem is observed among hare Krishnan's too where males are sometimes not able to develop madhurya bhava towards Krishna because of their heterosexuality. So my question is how come chaitanya mahaprabhu was able to see Krishna as as his husband and himself a woman if he was born heterosexual?

Kaise koi prove kare. He got minions😆😆😆😆😆😆

It's a shame that bigots and fools like you are trying to become lawyers. Do you even understand the concept of impartiality?

Irony is he call himself a law student and has pfp of Yogi 😂

​@@semiconductor5 why, can't he...??

​@Cobra Tate he is accused not 'proven guilty', there is a difference. Even your father(Andrew tate) is also accused of human trafficking does that make him a criminal?

​@Cobra Tate chup suwar bilkul chup

Toh kya !!!sunke hi decision Lena hai judges koi bhagwan nahi hai ok.