I don't fully agree with Asif here. He said that its not in a mans nature to be monogamous, nor should he be hedonistic. In a man's nature, he is able to be both monogamous OR polygamous. This will depend on the man, the culture they live in etc, but to say men are not also naturally monogamous is ridiculous. The prophet (PBUH) had a portion of his life where he was monogamous, and a portion where he had many wives. Both are fine. When Adam AS was lonely, he was given one woman, not four. BOTH ARE NATURAL AND ACCEPTED
Don't agree with Asif Manaf. He seems to be all talk. You talk about the house mates (who by the way are majority non Muslim) talking unislamically. For one Asif, you live in a non Muslim country, do you expect non Muslims to speak in a manner which is Islamic only? No! You are literally calling out the Muslim sisters and that is wrong, plain wrong. You are blaming your non Muslims housemates. I highly doubt you would have left the process on your own initiative as you suggest. You were gutted! Gutted when you got fired. Your trying to act as if you arent bothered that you got fired in the third week. Had you indeed wanted to read jummah, then if you had asked and spoken to the production team they would have allowed you to. But did you ask them? No, I don't think you did. Another thing, you bang on about housemates talking 'unislamically', however do you deem the way you dress as Islamic? Tight tight trousers and blazers - is that Islamic?
Edward Montagu (Only Jewish Member of the Cabinet at time Balfour Declaration) was strongly opposed to Zionism, which he called "a mischievous political creed", and opposed the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which he considered anti-Semitic and whose terms he managed to modify. In a memo to the Cabinet, he outlined his views on Zionism: ...I assume that it means that Mahommedans [Muslims] and Christians are to make way for the Jews and that the Jews should be put in all positions of preference and should be peculiarly associated with Palestine in the same way that England is with the English or France with the French, that Turks and other Mahommedans in Palestine will be regarded as foreigners, just in the same way as Jews will hereafter be treated as foreigners in every country but Palestine. Perhaps also citizenship must be granted only as a result of a religious test.[11]
It was all fine until he starting talking about polygamy 😕 I wish these people would stop talking about their private life, these topics are sensitive. He should know better.
My guy, we believe Prophet Moses (Peace be upon him) was a Muslim and so were his followers. This argument is ridiculous... So what now? Are you gonna allow us to use the same argument and get Palestine back?
@@s.adnansami5106 I believe pink pigs can fly but that doesn't make it true . If the Qur'an was revealed to mohamed then how is Moses a Muslim ??? Is jesus a Muslim ??? Are the zoarastrians Muslim ???. It is Muslims like you who make a mess of islam . The Qur'an was revealed to Mohamed . He is the one and only for Muslims . The shahada only mentions Allah and Mohamed !!!!. The Torah is for the Jews and the bible for the Christians !!!. Next you will say Adam was a Muslim and Eve circumcised Adam !!!!
Correction Doctor - Judeo-Christian is a new terminology which seeks to eliminate the Pan-islmaic golden era of the Ummayads in Spain and other parts of Europe. Prior to that - you had the Gheghis Khan - the spread of the Moghual Empire and it's long history and its influence in West and East of Europe. In this regard - Europe always had an Islamic identity and influence whether the Europeans admit it or not.
This interview doesn't flow organically. Sorry, but let's be honest. Just because the guy sells perfume, it doesn't make him good at interviewing. He's all over the place, interrupting, trying to force info out like a typical, nosey, desi aunty. Stick to your day job and leave interviewing to the professionals.
You could have said that in a more constructive way instead you sound jealous The interviewer could have done a lot more research and not interrupted so much Mayb the podcast could have flowed better instead of jumping from one topic to another
The interviewer could have done a lot more research and not interrupted so much Mayb the podcast could have flowed better instead of jumping from one topic to another
Interms polygamous there is a different between having sexual intercourse with more than one women and being in a commited relationship with more than one women which includes looking after her financially physically and mentally and the same for having children.
Polygamy is beautiful and acceptable. Unfortunately these guests are doing injustice to this topic. When he talks about polygamy he makes himself look cheap. Why is that?
