I recently discovered and have been watching a lot of Dr Mike’s videos for his exercise knowledge and comedic quips, but now I see him talking about a bunch of my favourite writers and thinkers from a philosophical perspective too. Love this guy
As an Israeli who follows Mike’s nutrition vids, I was curious on his views on other topics and this video definitely provided that. He seems to have a pretty straightforward old-school liberal way of thinking.
"It has now increased exponentially." This sentence doesn't even make sense. Exponential growth is a process of contiues growth over time. A sudden increase is not exponential growth. If you mean your respect grew just say that. No need to try to sound smarter than you are.
@@nostalji75 You're right about exponential growth being a process of continuous growth over time. I know that, thank you. I like to indulge in a sloppy hyperbole now and then, that's all.
@@rubenpinamonti7125 Fair enough. I just wanted to be point out that exponential growth can be extremely slow. As you can guess I just prefer language to be precise therefor I tend to be pedantic about it. So sorry if I was to patronizing. Express yourself as it pleases you.^^
Dr. Mike’s depth and intellect were only scratched during this episode. His dry sense of humor is something I’ve always appreciated when he’s talking about everything from weights to governments.
@@mannymaciel8622while agree that Mike israetel is much more knowledgeable about fitness than the average person, appealing to someones academic credentials is not how you prove they know what they are talking about. Jeff Nippard doesn't have the relevant academic credentials (as far as I know), but is still on par with Mike israetel with the advise he gives. Just pointing that out because appeals to authority are harmful in the fitness space
Gotta love Dr. Mike! A brilliant man with an incredible capacity to focus on what matters in his own life. I consider a lot of his political thought useless but only because he is NOT a politician. His views instead reflect a belonging to the increasingly large group of intellectuals who's scientific and philosophical observations breach the overton window (as he put it) which logically necessitate a "libertarian" perspective. That said, it's a shame brilliant people like Dr. Mike feel the need to obfuscate their opinions and keep them lowkey when they are evidently capable of having arrived to such opinions in a reasonable manner. Very few have dared to brace and suffer the threat of cancellation, and the majority have failed. Those who do survive often lapse into a form of audience capture which reduces their original sentiments to ideological mush. I wonder why Dr. Mike-who is smart, strong, and disciplined enough to withstand both traps-decides to self-censor. He's either making really good money, or is really afraid of mobs! Perhaps an invisible butler could answer on his behalf.
"The probability that someone shares two vastly disproportionate ends of traits at a high level is a multiple of the occurrence". Dr. Mike spitting bars
@@limitisillusion7 if in a group there's 1/100 super strong and 1/100 genius, the likelihood of someone being strong and smart is the multiplication of both but in the video, she said most top bodybuilders are dumb, while most people in the general population are just average
@@robertschrauder7537 Ya, i listened to Dr. Mike explain it. The "two vastly disproportionate ends of traits" was not a helpful phrase. That made it sound like it was talking about different ends of the same trait that were ...disproportionate? So the probability of being very dumb and very smart is a multiple of the occurrences.... which makes no sense, because it's not possible to be very dumb and very smart at the same time. Mike's actual quote was "the probability that anyone shares two vastly _disparate_ traits at the same time is a multiple of the occurrence of those traits..." which actually makes sense.
For those interested, I believe when Mike is talking about the Gaza War (min 18-21 ish), he's referring to a podcast with Sarah Paine I believe with Dwarkesh Patel, it's a great watch
Hes extremely smart in sport science and self admittedly ignorant in historical events and theology, i appreciate his libertarian mindset but thats about it
@The-cyber-imbiber when a person declares their ignorance on a topic, believe them, which is what he did, therefore his opinion on such topics is worthless , have a good one 👍🏻
14:30 my armature understanding of 'why the enlightenment happened in Europe' wasn't because of Judeo-Christian values as much as the level of hypocritical oppression of historical Judeo-Christian culture. For instance, I'm agnostic, but I was raised Christian. So I tossed the religious aspect but kept the core philosophy: love, forgiveness, non-judgement. Why? Because it was useful and freeing. The religious and mythical qualities of Christianity are hypocritical and full of contradictions. Exodus 20 says thou shall not kill. Leviticus 20 is a list of people you should kill. I think THAT kind of obvious hypocritical contradiction and the European history of Christian Oppression and control, the Inquisition & the Crusades, THAT is a big part of why it was Europe. Dr. Mike had an incredible point about 'universal' values evolving in SE Asia. I think he's right. Social freedom feels good and works. It goes hand in hand economic freedom. It seems logical that a movement of freedom was born in a place of cultural oppression. I think it's that simple. TL;DR: It wasn't the religion that birthed freedom, it was the oppression.
Dr. Mike mentioned that he hasn't yet debated anyone on the Israel-Palestine topic. He seems quite intelligent. If he's open to debating someone equally knowledgeable, it would be great if you could facilitate a debate between Dr. Mike and Mohammed Hijab. To be honest, I believe Dr. Mike would face a tough challenge. I'll leave this for you to pursue if it piques your interest.
The Enlightenment occurred due to the reintroduction of Greek philosophy back into Europe. This happened via what was then called Al Andalusia and schools that were established by the then Muslim inhabitants, that got these texts from Syrians that were translating Greek texts into Syriac. They got these when the Arabs started spreading and conquering all the regions. It's what led to the Islamic Golden Age that lasted a few hundred years but was beaten back due to mysticism. In either case, Aristotelean philosophy is the ultimate cause of the Enlightenment and not Judeo Christian values.
Dr. Mike is awesome at fitness and getting big, but I think his social science instincts are a littel underdeveloped. For instance at 34:16 he is essentially saying that every intelligent person will more or less come to the same conclusion as he has. I would love to see him be a little more sceptical of his own views. In fact, many intelligent people represent vastly different political ideologies. I find his reasoning.very solid and convincing, but also a bit narrow and way too confident for his "level of expertise". I can almost sense his internal model of how the world works, but I think he has simplified away all of the important complexities and randomness that occur in the real world.
I think it was great that Zoe pushed back on Mike on his view on the Judeo-Christian religion because the term enlightenment presupposes a "dark ages" where everything stagnated which is historically untrue. Not to mention, the beginning of the englightenment that most people woudl refer started with Descartes who was deeply religiously and ended around of the 18th century with figures such as Locke who in his writings had deep Christian values. While the enlightenment may cover multiple values, the main value would be in value of the individual and this too grew out of Christiantiy. So contrary to what Mike mentioned in regards to religion being a method to create tribe, Christianity was actually the emergence of the value of the individual. I also think that it's clear that there are many secular/atheistic movements that are tribal despite not having any form of "spirituality" which is probably easiest seen in Marxism/communism.
Not to mention that enlightenment produced vacuum of values? that was filled with nationalism and other -isms leading to the most brutal times for humanity (19th - early 20th century)
Religion is very weird to me that people believe that stuff. That said, people have the right to believ what they like. It was a way to get people to buy into being human and why we are here, etc. Agree.
Wow a backwards Muslim apposing the truth, who would’ve thought! It’s honestly so sad, cause your peoples and majority Muslim countries could be so great and once were
23:45 sounds like he wants to say that Gazans do not possess the capacity culturally or intellectually to govern themselves in a prosperous manner. Not really a controversial take for anybody who actually understands that society.
23:00 sooo true what Zoey says about people switching religion for something else. As a basque, the comment about the Basque Country hits hard. Separatist movements in Spain are like deranged cults of the worst kind.
His weight lifting advice isn’t really that good. He’s more of a power lifter. I don’t really agree with his methods on hypertrophy. And his views on politics and economics is a joke. The dude isn’t really a intellectual
Woah - only just found Quilette because I'm a fan of Mike but he seems to sum it up perfectly at the start - I've been looking for somewhere that seems more centrist and balanced and Quillette really seems like that for the most part. Feels like almost everything is either full woke/left wing or crazy right wing these days.
I would love to see Dr Mike talk to somebody like Dr David Bentley Hart about religion and spirituality. I think he hasn’t heard from the best on these topics. I kind of get the feeling he is about as familiar with religion as far as thinking religion can be boiled down to the cartoonish fundamentalist types. I like him on a lot of political beliefs but h think he is wrong on religion.
Apart from Hart not sure who you consider "the best", but after hearing from the most popular, at least on protestant/catholic christianity and islam, nobody has been able to put forward anything remotely convincing, at least in favour of their religion being true, which is what I ultimately care about, and I suspect Dr Mike would regard truth also as priority number 1. As for the utility of those religions, they offer nothing I need or want, but I understand many people do find utility/meaning/purpose/hope in them... absolutely fine, long as they keep it to themselves
@@BubbaF0wpend That’s your personal opinion. What you find convincing is kind of a YOU thing. I was a hardcore atheist and materialist. Personal paranormal experiences “which I know you will dismiss” caused me to rethink all of my opinions of the world. I could no longer hold on to that world view. A lot of research into these subjects led me to the perennialist school of philosophy regarding religions and really all belief systems. Mike may walk away from a conversation with Dr Hart still an atheist but I guarantee he will have something to think about. Religion is deeper then many of these pop apologists understand. Somebody like a William Lane Craig mean well but they simply aren’t very impressive. I’m not here to evangelize really. It’s up to everyone what path the desire to take. But Dr Mike really does not understand these religions at all. He has a very basic understanding that causes him to view them with much contempt and see them with not respect.
Why did you attribute that experience to god x and why are you convinced it was paranormal? As far as not understanding religions goes, what do you mean? Chrsitianity for example, the guy either resurrected or he didn't. The miracles either happened or they didn't. And, absent of empirical evidence of massive claims like these, there's no good reason, for people like Mike and myself anyway, to believe them (faith is a copout), and that's all the understanding needed... if the core claims are likely untrue there's nothing left to "understand" other than some men wrote stuff down that some people find profound. I agree on one thing; WL Craig is certainly not impressive.
I like him on Training. And he is definitely not dumb. But his views on the big conflicts in the world right now are very very shallow. If he would understand the conflicts he could argue against following arguments made here and would mention them. But he doesn't even show a modicum of understanding of those: 1: RU-vid Titel: "Scott Horton Gives the Full Story of October 7" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-X83cP_huC6U.html 2: RU-vid Titel: "Col. Jacques Baud: the TRUE Origins of the Russia/Ukraine War" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1cHIyuBifY4.html
China has existed for thousands of years and it continues to do so. Saying Taiwan is better run and that they should run China, that's a bit shortsighted and narrow. Not saying China is the best, but if you want to look at evidence, then thousands of years of existence surely counts. Also, consider the size difference.
China has managed to persist throughout a long stretch of time. But the government 100 years ago, let along 1000 is completely different, and had changed frequently. Not to mention throughout history China has suffered unfathomable governmental and economic calamities costing the lives of millions of people. The current chines government over the last few decades had been utterly regressive (not that it was much better before) and has started clinging to Maoist principles again. There are core values of Chinese government that have persisted for thousands of years through. One of which being the vague idea of mandate under heaven which is currently being used to justify Chinese ethnic and national supremacy and a justification for literal world domination. Chinas hulking mass of a population is currently being very poorly governed. It has been the case many times over its thousands of years of history.
China has split apart and rejoined many times through its history. It’s been conquered, ravaged and faced sooooo much internal strife. The fact that it keeps re-emerging speaks far more to cultural cohesion rather than good governance
@@anthonycar5182 Okay, but governance and culture are intertwined, especially in collectivist societies. Good governance seems like it's our current idea of what we specifically think believe to be good government practices. I meant it from a pragmatc view without any priors as to what constitutes good or bad practices. You say its culture and I agree but I don't think it's that clear cut. I'm no historian, especially not when it comes to China, but I'm fairly certain they've been collectivist throughout and that informs a lot of their practices. Most Chinese people I've discussed these things with are all about those different dynasties.
The Asian successful countries have embraced Western ideals, so to say they aren't in a sense Western (or Westernized), makes no sense. Even China has done so, even though they won't admit it. To the degree Enlightenment ideals are embraced, to the degree the society is successful. Furthermore, these ideas are universal, so it applies to all human beings.
Great listen I always learn something when people just let Mike talk. I an a bit confused where Mike stands on religion, he is jewish, but I also just watched a clip of him saying that God is almost certainly not real, if you search up “Mike isretel God is dead” then its a clip that he posted that seems to point that he’s athiest, anyone know what thats about?
Many Jews are ethnically Jewish, but don't actually believe in the specific religion of Judaism. Many are culturally Jewish as well, where they observe holidays, but don't necessarily believe God is watching them or anything like that.
Just wanted to touch on the bible comment mike made regarding the fact that if you ate shrimp or were gay you were sentenced to death. Firstly, The bible does mention the punishment for being gay to be sentenced to death, but not eating shrimp or pig. There is only a godly punishment for that. Secondly, even though on paper there was a death sentence for being gay and for violating the shabat, very rarely were these punishments ever implemented. It is even stated in the talmud that a court who sentenced a person to death once every 70 years was a cruel court. The talmud was written historically at least 1400 years ago, way before any inlightinmint movement was ever founded. Further more, also mikes comments regarding slavery during those days are not precise. There are literally dozens of different mitzvahs (bible rules) regarding the special rights slaves had during that time. For instance you hade to release a slave after six years. You hade to make sure he has a pillow even if it means you only have one, you have to give it to him. You have to feed him before yourself and many more.
Yeah, no, I strongly and severely disagree with his optimism. I don't understand why he doesn't see the existential and inevitable negative trends that are happening. From radicalism, antisemitism, mentally illness, depression, etc. etc.
Th Judaism powers were fully active. For those who don't know Judaism powers are just super self-preservation (because everything including your body are trying to take you down)
19:04 oh man give me one verse or hadith that say this it's forbidden to kill anybody for no reason and forbiden to kill unviolent unbelievers that they're not attacking +kids and women and anyway he said ppl want to kill us again man who are ppl? How were jews living in the west Before 20 century? and how were jews living under Islam for decades in Yemen palastein tunisia eygpt and morroc? Do you know what Islam say abt treating the different faiths? How Muhammad behave with jews in madina and then in the bigger country?
Dr Mike might want to fact check in Canada lol. I live here downtown east side vancouver is one of the worst drug cities in the world. Nunavut has something like 10x higher violent crime than Detroit lol
I’m guessing you stayed in yaletown lol. should have checked out east Hastings and surrounding area. I’ve seen some documentaries on some Russian drug cities and they look terrible as well
Jesus man… as someone who’s a fan of your channel, your humor and your overall reasoning, learning about your views on Ukraine, is nothing short of baffling.
@@zeasdzAh! What a fantastic idea! Never really considered I could use my brain that way. Thank you kind stranger, your feedback has changed my life. Bs aside - this seems like a textbook case of false dichotomy. He came from Russia, and knows full well how bad it is and can be. Putin is their leader, and undoubtedly someone willing to get his hands dirty, to say the least. Therefore realistically- he is a bad man. A bad man attacked another country - clearly it’s bad man’s fault for doing bad things. However, life is not some cheap novel where bad people only do bad things and good people only do good things. Bad people can also do things that are good for those that they care about, especially when confronted by the bad men of other countries (US) who would like to see you and the people you care about “liberated” like Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria… while their leaders are getting Nobel Peace Prizes and not being subject to Hague war tribunal. So… while I appreciate your advice, I would recommend that you and Dr. Mike follow your advice and re-examine your views on this subject, as the reality of the situation might shock you.
@@peterdufault4477That doesnt make any sense, there are many russians with different opinions so with your logic they all know putin = what you said is bs
I wish he talked more about the natural ways societies decline once they peak. He really praised liberalism, but didn't mention how liberalism makes people depressed, it reduces the tightness of community, and it completely eliminates meaning and purpose. He touched briefly that there might be a value to religion, even though religion isn't true, but I don't think he gives this as much importance as he should.
So, this is one of those videos that made my eyes widen as I observed the thumbnail...a dream video. Love me some Dr. Mike. I wish it were about 3-times longer, but as I'm about 40% thru it, two things strike me...this woman is hot & she loves controversy in the form of relatively objective truths. Mostly the hot thing, though.
13:31 it is ironic how some "educated" people can pull out the evolutionary short cut to "explain religion" and declare that no "educated person" could take seriously anymore classical religions. This is like giving yourself the Oscar in metaphysics for having relieved yourself on a lamppost.
I'm honestly shocked how little he seems to have interacted with theism as a whole. It's profoundly inaccurate to say something like "no educated adult can really entertain classic religion as like a real thing, it's insane, and it's just, like, obvious." Dr. Israetel, how EXACTLY would you like to define educated adults? How about the theoretical physics chair at Cambridge for many years, Dr John Polkinghorne? Obviously, Cambridge theoretical physics is, to be frank, not a big deal, he's probably a moron? Ok, well, how about Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, Dr. John Lennox? Who likes math anyway? He's probably uneducated as well, and doesn't have a critical thinking mind, you don't need that in his position.. Or perhaps the former Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, Dr Francis Collins? Genes aren't even complicated, I don't know why I bring that up. Synthetic Organic Chemist Dr James Tour? Yeah, you know what, cells are just little bags of liquid or whatever, it's not that impressive to use chemistry to alter cellular structures and behavior.. let's see.. ok how about someone like Dr Stephen Meyer, of the Discovery Institute? Dr. William Lane Craig, and Dr. Sean McDowell, J. P. Moreland, philosophers? Dr. Michael Heiser and Dr Michael Brown, both ancient near eastern and semitic scholars who know upwards of 10 ancient languages? Dr Craig Keener, new testament and greek scholar/historian, professor, who wrote a massive 2 volume set on verifiable miracles? Dr Mike Licona and Dr Gary Habermas, both world class historians.. Maybe you'd want some people a little more oldschool.... ok how about everyone on the following list: Robert Boyle, Leonhard Euler, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, Gregor Mendel, George Lemaitre, Isaac Newton, Carl Friedrich Gauss, George Washington Carver, Blaise Pascal, Charles Babbage, Werner Heisenberg, Samuel Morse, Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin, Renee Descartes, Augustine..... You're going to need to explain how all of them are uneducated. Go Ahead.. I'll wait.
How many of them believe every word in the Bible is literally true? How many after Darwin don't believe in evolution? Theism is a very rich and nuanced topic, but what Dr. Mike is talking about is the naive silliness that no respectable person believes after first contact with science and other religions.
@@chaseblauvelt7008 I don't have an exhaustive understanding of each of their stances on correct exegetical textual criticism and hermaneutics, but most of the philosophers, scholars, and historians I've cited, and many if not all of the scientists and mathematicians have a high view of scripture, and regard the words as inspired by God, but not without respect to the boundaries of genre. For instance, no one thinks the trees have hands and clap them. That's poetic language. Many of these people believe that God guided evolution, for many reasons, one of which being that there's a mountain of mathematical difficulty in espousing that we have the bio-diversity we do by means of natural selection and random mutation. if there was one mutation per second since the beginning of the universe there still would not be enough time to produce the kind of genetic variance and speciation we see in the world, and that's less than 5 billion years old, not 13.8 billion. Random mutation produces noise, not new information, and especially not unimaginably and irreducibly complex, multi-stage, interdependent systems of structures and processes that had to concurrently spontaneously appear (because they rely on each other to be useful traits to have in the organism) for no other reason than randomness in multiple organisms who could reproduce at the same location, enough times for that to be passed down to offspring that miraculously didn't die off before producing offspring.. etc etc. It's much more likely there was an intelligence to guide and author things along the way, while still using evolution as a mechanism.
@@WillEhrendreich if you're genuinely interested in truth and not just propping up pre-existing beliefs you should reach out to Aron Ra, Forrest Valkai or Dave Farina about how the mechanisms of evolution actually work.
@@BubbaF0wpend I've seen the kind of interactions that Aron Ra and Dave Farina have, and I equate them to people like Ken Ham or Kent Hovind on the theism side. they're absolutely 100% not serious about engaging in good faith with those who have opposing ideas, and I cannot tolerate the rude, dismissive, uncharitable attitude that any of these men bring to conversations. Dave, for instance, had a "debate" with Dr James Tour (that you're able to go watch on youtube) in which he spent most of the time simply insulting Dr Tour, while Dr Tour was continually just asking for a clear refutation, to take the chalk and start showing the chemistry. Farina just replied with ad hominem and citations to titles of papers which Tour had also read and did not see any chemistry to prove the points in, so the challenge remained unanswered. Aron Ra is another bully, quite frankly, and thinks that by screaming at his interlocutor and claiming there is no evidence he can call that a debate, and showed how absolutely closed to having useful discussion he was when he was up against Michael Jones of Inspiring Philosophy. Ken Ham and Kent Hovind are just as closed minded and refuse to interact with the evidence, they're smug and wholly impervious to pleas to simply interact with the points being made to them, calling anyone who disagrees with their specific interpretation of scripture names, and accusing them of compromising on the word of God and bowing to "man's science" which is the most absurd thing I can think of, especially when the arguments brought to them at that moment have nothing to do with the modern scientific evidence, but simply trying to appeal to their supposed high view of scripture, citing from the text how the pre-existence of physical matter in Genesis 1 is not only implied but ASSUMED from the very first verses. Then you try to bring Scientific evidence to them and they're even further from hearing anything anyone has to say. If you want me to take someone seriously, cite someone who has some basic respect for those around them and for productive good faith argumentation.
so he can't discuss hypothetical solutions because there are other problems in the world? let's start with your room, then - is it clean enough for you have the audacity to comment on skid row?;)
@@hhumh6911 somehow you came up with extra meaning of my message mate :) I didn't say he couldn't discuss hypothetical questions, I'm commenting on his idea. As for me - I started cleaning my room way before Jordan Peterson preached the whole world about it, and still - I'm not walking around the neighborhood, banging on people's doors teaching them how to clean their room 🤷♂️
Both of these people have such a superficial understanding of geopolitics and history. Very good point about developed society being based on enlightenment values. Why is Putin invading Ukraine? Mike seems genuinely confused. NATO incorporating more and more countries across the European plain ring a bell? The totally non-defensible stretch of land that has posed an invasion risk to Russia since its inception. Does having a warm water port in crimea hold any value to frozen port Russia? China doesn’t care about its people and doesn’t do right by them? If you’d met a Chinese national or been to China, you’d immediately realize this is not true. A truly insane amount of people have been pulled out of poverty since the late 80’s. Chinese people love Xi, and Russians seem to like Putin although I am not as familiar with Russia.
@@Ignoranymoose typical us worldview is the Kamala quote, “Russia is a big country in in Europe, which invaded a smaller country in Europe. This is bad” If America hadn’t invaded so many countries that didn’t attack us, Russia would not have had such a strong precedent to invade a country that didn’t attack them.
The stupidity of your statement is exceedingly astounding. We joined NATO voluntarily because of Russia's imperialism! Nato has never attacked Russia. Putin himself stated that the war in Ukraine is not due to NATO expansion. Your imbecilic ignorance is debilitatingly spectacular.
He is free to be proisrael. That can mean a lot of things. You Can be Pro Israel and still critical of certain policies. I am more surprised by the “yea just exterminate the other side”-stance he has.
As soon as someone mentions Steven Pinker you know they're not a serious intellectual and certainly not a serioys philosopher. If he'd read some William Ophuls, Iain McGilchrist or even Hegel he'd know Pinker is woefully myopic
No you're not. He lost me the minute he parroted off his favourite "social democracies" What Planet is he on? Did he pay any attention to what Saul and Friedman were/are saying?
@@TheJezcol So you disagree with him on some points he made…so make a better, more articulate argument. But why do you DISLIKE him? He’s friendly, funny, open to ideas and debate. Of all the people to DISLIKE, Mike isn’t one of them. He would treat you with respect and warmth in person, but GOD FORBID he make a point you disagree with, SUCH an ass hole 🙄
Saying that Russia invaded Ukraine for absolutely no reason is completely ludicrous. This guy has a lot of strange opinions that are not particularly well founded. A very important foundation for the enlightenment was ancient greek philosophy, which was probably more important than the christian tradition. This gets no mention at all. Its also somewhat of a unfounded claim, that all westerners have the same idea of the good life. Currently there is a political conflict raging between nationalists and globalists in the western world. This cleavage is noticable in the realms of culture and politics, and the differences in vision about the good society are not negligible. The good doctor makes a big deal out of all his non-pc opinions that threaten to make him cancellable. yet at the same time he praises the west for being great with "freedom" and "democracy". He does not seem to understand that cancel culture is a direct assault on these very freedoms. His opinions on politics and philosophy are not impressive.
After living on both coasts, I prize my Texas hometown all the more. Principally the Christian traditions-with respects to the (long term) eventualities of the mind, body, and soul. Might say it fires up the indefatigableness of our “Friday Night Lights” and Sunday morning enlightenments. 🎚️ 🏈
