Drone tour of Noah's ark with Ron Wyatt 

All glory be to the Most High. Thank you Jesus!

good work that honors Jesus!

When will the Spanish translation? Great video

@@Stevepdv Sadly I don't have any idea on that. If we had someone who could do a voice-over or closed captioning text for this video we would put it up.

How much has the base been hit with GPR? If I'm not mistaken the haul was ripped off by mud flow where it initially came to rest

Amen

🙏🏿

The natural rainbow has 7 colours. The rainbow as it's been commandeered today has 6. In Heaven, I don't know how many colours the rainbow has - more than we can fathom right now. It must go on for miles. Just observations.

Your Rich Aunt….Proof of what exactly,The story is a complete fabrication so what does a Myth prove??

Correct.

Amen 🙏

Just noticed that Dave's book is still up on Amazon... (Noah's Ark - the Evidence: Untying the Knott of the Gordurian Mountains) I used to live in Alabama many years ago. My introduction to Noah's Ark happened when a very close friend of Ron Wyatt came and spoke at the church I went to in Birmingham. His name was Corky Bell and he and Ron both ran a ministry in Gatlinburg, Tennessee called the 'Passion Play In The Smokies'. After listening to Corky's message I KNEW without question that Ron and Corky were legit and everything they said was 100% true. FYI I grew up in Fallbrook, Ca.

@@Halakah7 good to know thanks for letting me know I'll have to look it up. I lived all over North County after moving down from Orange County. I graduated from Ivy High above Fallbrook High in 92.

How About, Going To The Real Noah's Ark Site. And Expecting It. It's The Best Proof, I've Ever Seen. Ron Wyatt, Who I Love. Is Taking Credit, For Someone Else's Find. And is Find, Is Just Another Boat. Like Ark Insight's Boat. My Research Has Uncovered Three Different Boats.

Your head is a rock. Is your head Jesus? Hmmm.

No ,it’s a rock 😂

I believe that rock is between your ears

@@Fidelio3rdEye very true, He is always on my mind

@@bentonvillefamily at least you have a place where your fantasies exist.

Umm he is not god he is a special man of god

@@syedafajarzehranaqvi915 NOWHERE DID I SAY HE WAS GOD! Learn to read.

@Jay Only fools say in their hearts, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, and their actions are evil; not one of them does good! Psalms 14:1

🙏 🙏 🙏 Amen

This was proven to not be the ark, this guy is a fraud. Oh and God doesn't exist if he did he should be shot for crimes against humanity

Yes they do its in the muesum that the build not far from it you need to go there

There is a full video of this discovery you should check it out. This is just an overview

Keep searching his videos and you will see the petrified wood timbers and brackets

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oQwfU7DvUyE.html

You need to check your heart because you’re winded !

Just look up Ron Wyatt, Noah's ark. There is a ton of info on it.

Awesome! What convinced me was a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron (Corky Bell) in Alabama years ago. After listening to Corky for an hour, there was no doubt he was for real.

Devil hate god

I seen the same 2level video yu seen. However i seen a video of someone inside and yu cud see a very dark wood. And this was a older video from late 70s or early 80s. I was just a kid being born in 1974 and my mom was a devout catholic. So even at that young age i knew the great significance of this ARC. My Mom was obsessed with stories of Jesus's Relics. The Arc, The Shroud, The Holy Grail, Geesh and more stuff cant remember at the moment.

Me too! He's sorely missed.

there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites

Yeah, funny isn't it? He says there's ' way enough evidence that this is a boat. But doesnt provide any other than his conviction that it looks like a boat.

Wood that could have been trees at the time, the whole area kinda like looks the same in geography...This is just years of natural erosion nothing more.

All you're missing is the fact that this has long since been identified by experts to be nothing more than a natural rock formation.

@@cbdwarfer9492 Your "experts" are anything BUT experts. Stop listening to liars and you just might find the truth... FACT: Everyone who tells you Ron Wyatt is fake has no clue... My source is a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron Wyatt (Corky Bell). FYI he didn't try to convince me, but I KNEW he was telling me the truth...

Do a search with > Noah's Ark National Park, Turkey. Very easy to find...

Ron said he had found stuff there but we haven’t done any survey work to try to locate the exact stuff he saw there. We’ve been up to the area but haven’t covered it all.

Yes there are!

sorry im late but here is some info, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."

🤣

It's very possible that God gave Noah special knowledge on how to make iron just for the purpose of building a strong ship to ride out a horrible deluge

These folks will believe in anything without proof. Their need to believe in this outweighs their logic. Nevermind the fact Ron Wyatt has be proven to be a liar. I wonder if they'll ever go visit his museum which is closed permanently due to his false claims.

In the alleged time of Noah neither copper, bronze or iron smelting had been invented.

Bible says no man has ascended to heaven except Christ

No need to wait

no disrespect but that is wrong two people actually went up besides him Elijah and Enoch sorry I'm late btw@@billstetler6769

@@billstetler6769 LOL

Why not witness it here?. The Creator's handiwork is everywhere.

No he didn’t

He wasn’t alive yet

There was measurements done of this ark and they are exactly the measurements written in the bible and on the same mountain said in the bible

It's in 2 pieces as the flood waters receded and time went by the weight of the boat caused it to crack the biggest part rolling and falling and landing at this site. You would have to measure both pieces which they did..

@@angiebold2592 Seriously. Well it doesn’t look like half a boat. If it was half the rock pattern wouldn’t look like a boat. I know something that’s a novel idea why don’t they do an excavation. I’ve never heard of such an important discovery that it still hasn’t been excavated. Probably don’t want to destroy the “ tourist” attraction🤭

sorry im a bit late but in the bibel god told noah to build a boat 300 cubits long which is exactly how big this boat we are seeing here is its called Durupınar site btw

What about this rock formation do you find so ... compelling?

Yeah I should check it out . My parents are from Turkey but have never been here

@@sureyyaekinci4630 I dunno. If I were interested in naturally formed rock formations, I might go to the Grand Canyon or the Hawaiian Islands or one the several Chimney Rocks. But if given the opportunity to see this rock formation in Turkey, all expenses paid ... sure, I'd go. If I wanted to see religious sites, I'd think Jerusalem would be more ... interesting and verifiable. 😉

@@davidely7032 i believe that from the evidence that this is the true sight of the ark !

@@sureyyaekinci4630 Yes i would love to go to this place !

Perhaps you don’t know the story of Noah and the ark in the Bible the ark would’ve settled at this elevation, because the water would be receding from a world wide all encompassing flood, and the ark supposedly settled at this elevation as the water receded, you should go to the book of Genesis and read the story for yourself I wish you peace on your journey. ….ps…i’m not sure of the exact elevation that this site sits at.

@@armoredsaint6639, perhaps you should re-read my question. it's a technical question. What is the exact elevation? I'm curious. 5,000 feet above sea level? 10,000?

@@armoredsaint6639 Wasn’t it a stroke of luck that it landed on a mountain and not have to wait for the sea to recede on low level land. You would think it was bs. 🤣

6,430 feet or 1,960 meters...

...because they're all fabricated and noone with any self respect pays them any attention...

If you really wanna hear something new about Ron then watch “Ron Wyatt’s ark of the covenant fraud”

@@lpattenaude1716 That’s one of the arks. The other ark he so called discovered has the same outcome 🤭

Ole boy is climbing Mt Everest

I almost decided to leave a negative comment, then I realized it wouldn’t provide any value to my life

I know the Rives family that runs the Wyatt Museum which actually is in Tennessee. I have been to the Museum too.

Thank you Vivian!

@Jay Life comes w/ one guarantee - we will die ! Heaven or Hell Ready or Not ?

@Jay Gone where ? How did you get Here ? There is something or someone at work here greater then us... If the earth was closer to the sun we'd burn up, if futher away we'd freeze. If earth was 10 degrees off it's axis we'd fly off.. We can't live without Air, Water, Food, no way is any of this a coincidence... Read the New Testament which is part of history and get back to me.. It's Funny how a man could preach for 3 1/2 years and the "Whole" world knows him.. Some hate and some love him = Jesus. Who knows you ?

@Jay Where and when did science appear ? Science though petrified wood was millions of years old till Mt Saint Hellens blew trees into nearby lakes and they started petrifying 20 years later.. If there was never a flood (Noahs Ark) why are Dinosaur bones found at 8,000 feet.. & human remains in the Himalaya mountains called Himalayas’ Skeleton Lake -- 5,020 metres (16,470 ft)... Believe the manmade lies if you want to, but don't be stupid about it..

@Jay Science does not go against God. Plenty of scientists actually believe there is a God.

Wyatt was a huckster. He hustled businessmen and television producers to invest money in the Wyatt Archaeological Research for film rights. There were tens of thousands of dollars invested in WAR. None of those who invested this money ever saw a shred of actual scientific evidence substantiating Wyatt's claims. Where is the official lab report from the blood sample analysis of what Ron claims is the blood of Jesus Christ? Where is the Ark of the Covenant? Which museum is housing the ancient chariot wheels he claimed to have been from the Red Sea Crossing? There is no evidence because the videos are a fraud. On the Noah's Ark video, none of the so-called scientific data can be duplicated, a clear sign that what was publicized was false data. Wake up and stop being so gullible.

How? Just a little critical thinking. It doesn’t mean one is an atheist.

Amen.

It's pretty easy to look at a rock formation and think "hmm... looks like a rock formation." You should try it sometime.

So it’s been many years of it’s discovery and not been excavated. What happened there 🤷‍♂️. It’s already being said it’s Noah’s ark and tourist are going there. Can you imagine when it is finally excavated and there’s nothing there. What an absolute embarrassment. Should wait really.

​@Diddsdad Diddsdad man I want to see your face during the rapture 😂

@@Lingard487 You would have after the last 3 raptures. We’re coming up to number 4🤭🤣. Silly Christian 🤣. You’ve obviously been brought up in fear that if you don’t believe your going to hell. You become an “adult “ ( that’s a laugh if you still believe in the Noah myth) and the fear continues will a rapture. Let me know when it’s going to happen ( again)and I’ll come around ,we can have a cup of tea😂

They have been inside. It's a ship. The evidence is irrefutable now.

@@clarkridlen1966 same dimensions as told in the Bible also

Love how rock formations create a dimensioned shape as the Ark. always excuses

@@Jerrymc1975 except it doesn’t.

Because they don't exist...

Let me Google that for you... 11) Has any petrified wood been tested? "Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength). Plywood in ancient Egypt Jean-Phillippe Lauer, in his book Saggara: The Royal Cemetery of Memphis, makes this statement concerning the knowledge and use of laminated “plywood” in very early Egypt. “…..within the remains of a coffin whose sides were made of six thin superimposed layers of wood with the grain alternating as in modern ply wood.” (P.99 . Pub. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York) As we have stated earlier, an actual specimen from Noah’s Ark, presumably a piece of deck board is made of laminated (plywood). The use of the same method by the early Egyptians proves that this knowledge was available in the early years of Ancient Egypt, passed along undoubtedly through Noah’s offspring as they begun to settle throughout the world. It would probably stagger the imagination if we knew how much technology was lost by man after the Flood. In October 1984, when the Turks sent their own team of archaeologists to the site, their expedition yielded very positive results. Apart from four-feet long metal spikes and other metal objects, they recovered PETRIFIED WOOD. Then, on June 20th, 1987, Ron Wyatt had a day that he would never forget. A great discovery was about to occur. Governor Sevket Ekinci of the Turkish province of Agri issued instructions that the American crew was to stay upon the hill. They were not to film the event - it was his. He allowed some journalists, a Turkish cameraman, some members of the military, and other dignitaries only, to witness the next events. Setting up the radar, Ron made several passes. Explaining the printout to the group with one of his liaisons, Mine Unler, translating, he noted that one particular reading appeared to be very near the surface. The Govenor then ordered one of the soldiers to dig at the location Ron had indicated, which he did. There soon emerged what looked like a flat rock. As more dirt was removed, it could be seen that it was about 18 inches long and it was then removed. The sample was three feet under the surface. It took 30 to 40 minutes to retrieve. All captured on film, it was obvious that it was petrified section of a hand-hewn timber! Everyone was stunned, but most of all, Ron. For nearly 10 years, he wanted to excavate but had never been allowed to retrieve anything that was not on the surface. His dream had come true! Not only was it a section of a timber, but it was almost perfectly preserved, showing the wood grain and perfect symmetry. The Governor then did something that could only be directed by a Divine Hand - he told Ron to take it to the States and have it tested. The entire event was shown throughout Turkey on TRT (Turkish Radio and Television). The deck Timber Analysis. When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!"

sory im late but here is something, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."

also he has his own museum with more evidence there

What would be even better. They should do a proper excavation. I wonder why they haven’t done one.

11) Has any petrified wood been tested? "Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength). The deck Timber Analysis. When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."

Yes, that's right. And it would have no use for a rudder. It was a barge with a draft of about 70% which would make it very hard/impossible to be turned over by humongous waves!

The bible doesn’t indicate either way but the boat shape makes the most sense.

@@charliejones5430 No, it does not make the most sense as it had no means for propulsion. So, there would be no bow or stern to the ark.

@@haggismcbaggis9485 I disagree. A boat shape is more stable with or without power. It may have a had a fixed rudder or fixed sail like the “Are Encounter “ portrays. That would keep it pointed into the wind. That said I am not convinced that Wyatt is correct on this being the Ark..

@@charliejones5430 However, I do also concede that a rectangular box floating on water would not have sufficient lines for being seaworthy.

God bless!

Here is more. Ron Wyatt Discoveries [2022] Gomorrah, Red Sea Crossing, Mt Sinai, Noah's Ark, Blood of Christ.

How many years has it been discovered for, ? and they still haven’t excavated it. I wonder why. Tutankhamen tomb was excavated the same day. They couldn’t wait to find out what was inside. They already claim it’s Noah’s ark without proof. People go there to see where Noah landed and released 20.000.000 animals. If it’s excavated and there’s sweet fanny Adam’s inside,they would have to admit it’s not where the Noah’s myth ended. That would be a massive egg on there faces.😂

There is a tourist site there near the structure. There is footage also of Ron shaking the hand of the leading Turkeyish archeologist of that time , they did a type of Christening of the Ark and they did metal detector footage. And took samples of the wood to experts for tree type and dating. It was a kind of wood the beavers made their dams with in the area where Noah made it. Your comment has no research behind it. Just mean spirited. And that is your whole purpose of being on this video.. the Haters are the cannibals and vampires and pedo rapist for wizardry. Shame shame. Try Jesus😊

@@angiebold2592 So they’ve built a visitor centre and the Turkish government have declared its Noah’s resting place🤦.Did you know wyatt also discovered the ark of the covenant 🤣. Even Christians don’t believe that one. It’s not shameful to demand that the site should be excavated.. Don’t you find it just a little suspicious that it’s been this long. No other find has EVER taken this long. Wouldn’t it prove things one way or the other🤷‍♂️. There’s on,y one reason why it hasn’t been excavated. Christian’s will take literally anything if they think it will justify there beliefs.Try evidence 🤭

@Purr-fecto ! Do you also believe that there are other global myths that pre date the Noah myth or do you just believe because it’s in the bible 🤷‍♂️

​@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The Bible is the word of God so a Christian will believe what it says. Secular archeology is there to try it's best to disprove the existence of God even to the point of blatantly lying about finds to deceive. Do you just believe it because a fallible human archeologist who can make mistakes said so?

The Bible just gives its length, breadth and height, like someone would for any normal boat. It's too bad that this curious new theory that it might have been rectangular went from a theory to being considered as true, when it's not in the Bible. Now, it COULD have been intended to be pictured as rectangular, I suppose, but that's human guessing and supposing, not scripture! Genesis 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms* thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦. 15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦. 16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it. If a person got told in church that it was rectangular, then I could see them interpreting the scripture that way, but if they read it on their own without being told how to imagine it, most people would picture a normal boat. It's only recently that a couple creationists popularised the idea, and now it appears to have entered general Christian lore as a fact, people always asserting that it's the case without actually quoting the relevant scripture. I don't care whether you think it's rectangular, oval, eye- or almond-shaped. What I do care about is how scripture is represented, and there's just not even a suggestion about the particular shape of the ark, other than its largest dimensions in 3D space, and its three-level structure.

@TC-kf9zw Chapter and Vs please...

Ron died years ago. He was wonderful person, a man of God.

snake oil

@@oyenations162 And a little fibber 🤭

Ron found the Nephilim Ark. See God Culture for the truth on this topic.

It’s a natural formation in the rock. The Noah’s Ark story is as real as the Tooth Fairy and Easter Bunny. Grow up.

The Biblical account doesn't say it's rectangular: it just gives its length, height, and width. The people who insist it's rectangular puzzle me amazingly! The fact is, that's only one person's idea of what the ark looked like. But because that person made a good argument for why it could be rectangular and popularised it, people seem to have latched onto the idea, and keep quoting it as if it's true. I've checked six different translations, and even the least faithful translation say the same thing. Here's one that's very close to the Hebrew: Gen 6:14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms* thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦. 15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦. 16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to▵ a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it. It's pretty bizarre to get "rectangular" out of that. Any person who has seen or experienced a boat knows that if you give the length, width, and height of a boat, that doesn't mean it's box-shaped! I'm sure that the person who came up with this rectangular-ark idea had a plausible explanation for why he thought it was boxy, but it's not from scripture! Not trying to mock you, by the way -- I get that if someone has heard the assertion in church, or from someone who's an ark enthusiast and ought to be trusted, one might assume that's indeed what scripture says. Despite reading through the Bible at least once each year, I find new details I'd never noticed before in every chapter -- my amazement is that so many people don't open their Bible and check before asserting someone's theory about the ark as truth.

I'd like to see that. I've tried to google earth the place several times over the years and that area is intentionally blurry. Truth suppression is real.

@@27Zangle Really? I wanted to actually search it and look! Crazy how they block truth

Using the bible to prove the bible is circular logic. So your reasoning does nothing to prove the existence of either the ark or God. Faith is just belief in the absence of evidence. That's just the Church's definition, not mine.

@@dinsdaleseven1627 "Using the bible to prove the bible is circular logic" It's easy to prove the Bible through history. Do you know how the Roman Catholic Church came into existence, and why? Know that, and it proves one element of the Bible ... the teachings of Christ.

Some helpful info in this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IoTkguzRaCU.html

Metal detector tests taken numerous times over the years all reveal a very distinct organized pattern of metal beneath the surface, which is consistent with the shape of a large ship. Four intact metal rods have been discovered by the Turkish government, each measuring about 4 ft. or 1.2 m. in length. In June of 1991, an interesting object was discovered, which seems to be a large rivet with a washer around it. It was believed to fasten the large timbers of the Ark together. An analysis of the rivet object showed it was made of various metals such as titanium, aluminum, iron, and other metals. Interestingly, just centimeters away from the rivet object, there were no traces of iron in the soil. Aluminum never occurs in the metallic form in nature. The Bible affirms the knowledge and use of iron: "Zillah also bore Tubal-cain; he was the forger of all instruments of bronze and iron." -Genesis 4:22 Meaning Noah definitely had access to iron while building the Ark. During a radar demonstration, the scan showed what appeared to be a block. A Turkish governor ordered a soldier to dig where the block was, and a petrified piece of wood was uncovered. Thin sections have been cut from this deck timber for microscopic examination, It was later revealed to be organic in nature and appeared to be four layers of wood laminated together. This is believed by some to be part of a deck timber. Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood contained carbon proving it was once wood, but there were iron nails embedded in the wood! The Turkish government also claims they have found additional petrified wood at the site. Researcher Andrew Jones and lead scientist Dr. Fethi Ahmet Yüksel of the Department of Geophysical Engineering, along with Applied Geophysics Department of Istanbul University, believe that the results of scans indicate a man-made artifact beneath the surface that could well be the Ark, and are eager to continue studying the location. The team believes that the new GPR data shows parallel lines and angular structures 8 to 20 feet down and that these parallel lines and right angles below the surface are something you would not expect to see in a natural, geologic formation. creationwiki.org/Durup%C4%B1nar_site wyattmuseum.com/laminated-wood-on-noahs-ark/2011-685 discoveryupdate.com/discovery1.htm ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oQwfU7DvUyE.html

They did all that and took samples

Last year they drill out cores to same to find out what was causing the anomaly to show up on the scanner that wont appear naturally

@@Open-Minded_Christian perfect, thanks for the info! I’ll check it out.

D.H., No real span of time is given for building the ark. However, the Bible states that Noah was 500 yrs. old when he had his 3 sons, and 600 yrs. old when he ,and his, entered into the ark. So some time within that 100yrs. period it appears.....

Um. It's fake. Not Noah's ark. It has be proven to be a rock formation.

No proof

100% Pareidolia, zero physical evidence to substantiate the claim. You can also see the giant canyon in the southwest US where Paul Bunyun dragged his axe across the landscape

@@carlgray523 yeah sure...

@next level tech if you think the world's population was inbred from Noah's sons families of the Bible then your an idiot!!!!! So is every other Christian that thinks the same thing.

Thanks for the kind words and the prayers and support. God bless my friend.

Who's Andrew?

@@Hiyall_22 Andrew Jones is the brother whos running this channel, and working up at the Ark site. And much more.

When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."

You are so welcome

People these days are ready to believe in anything blindly

Agreed! If this was ANY kind of vessel people would’ve already completed the forensic work to confirm it and not just talk about what it looks like. They also definitely wouldn’t have been sending expeditions to the mountain to continue to look for it. Smoke and mirrors is all it is.

@@adarsh6857 these days? Lmao when was the bible written again?

@@platinumpepe8626 old testament at around Babylonian exile and new testament around 1st century AD. Does that satisfy you?

Thanks for so detailed an analysis. Please do one on the deck timber and fossilized rivet next.

Ive read it several times and I cant tell at all what you are saying in the analysis.

I wonder where the holes near the tops formed. That report does not give any interpretation on that.

Also the so-called anchor stones are of local origins, NOT from Mesopotamia.

No, earth and stone.

Maybe in the top of mount Ararat is the real one. And in this vid is just an unique geological transform

@@fwailu7322 This is Mount Arat its in Turkey

@@fwailu7322 the initial landing was higher in the mountain so yes, part of the ark is still there but the main part of the ark , the one we can see now, went down in its final rest. There is another video about this. There was also active volcano there which contribute to ark conservation, like I said, there are more videos about this

@@fwailu7322 people keep saying there is another one and this isn’t Noah’s ark but Ron Wyatt found some material apparently in the ark and went back and tested it and it matched the sort of wood that was the actual arks.

He is in heaven my dear.

@@michaelross1452 Yes I know. I made a weird post. I was I hope to see this place speaking in the future. Then I said Specially if Ron was there speaking in past. My post was just worded odd. Maybe - I hope to go someday but wish I could have been there when Ron was there.

You mean the guy who hoaxed and faked multiple other religious finds like the ancient chariots in the Red Sea?

He’s dead.

@@michaelross1452 No ,he lied 🤭

there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told Noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites

Naw, just dynamite and a whole lot of speculation. Oh, and drones. And more speculation.

Ron wyatt did watch his video

Except when it's false no matter what as it does not prevail, endure or is proven false, hornytoads!!!

Because its a natural land form, not a man made object.

Maybe, but to be fair the area was only written to have been under water once and that was during the world wide flood. During the time of the Vikings, Ararat would have been far above sea level. What's more it was written for centuries that Noah's ark landed on Mout Ararat. Finding any boat on that specific mountain would be singularly unique to Noah's arc.

@@Xtopher822 - There was NEVER a world wide flood. A global flood would have produce evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go to 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.

Just to be clear, Genesis 8:4 says that the ark rested "on the mountains of Ararat." Ararat was the name of the region in Biblical times. During the Middle Ages, the volcano now known as "Mount Ararat" came to be associated with the Noah story -- understandable, since it's the tallest and most magnificent in the region, but it wasn't previously associated with the story, from what I can tell. The site in this video is about 20 miles from the current Mount Ararat, which is why many creationists don't like it -- they're pretty attached to current Mount Ararat being the true site, though there's nothing to suggest that it was considered Mount Ararat at the time the flood story was written down, or when it was included at the beginning of Genesis. And then there's the fact that the Hebrew says "mountains" instead of "mountain."

The structure on Mount Ararak is indeed part of the Ark. What I'm wondering is, could this possibly be the other half of the ship because I read something years ago that said the Ark had broken in 2 parts. Could this part have fallen?

I am pretty sure they had boats and ships before Noah built the Arc. Of course it wasn't meant to go fast but that doesn't mean it wasn't built like a boat because of that.

Ron Wyatt is a charlatan. Don't put your faith in him. Even this presentation was full of B.S. like pointing at a rock outcropping and calling it a timber or a metal bracket.

I've heard of that theory too. Maybe. 🙏👍

@@DiscoveredMedia I actually saw a old church film describing similar area and on side of the hill in Turkey it was an old Reel to Reel film.

When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."

But it’s just a rock formation. Ron Wyatt was very good at convincing and fooling people into believing that things she found were of “Biblical” significance.

@@SerendipityPoint yes I agree with you and it has all the parts of a boat like David Fassel the marine expert concluded along with geophysicists back on early 1980's. This rock formation has been studied ever since ,please watch earlier videos.

@@riobravo1961 His other claims of finding the ark of the covenant and chariots of the pharaohs in the Red Sea have been debunked as well. It’s really heartbreaking watching people get duped into these false claims, giving them hope but only built upon lies.

@@SerendipityPoint Remember. Reasoning is the enemy of faith. You have the Bible as the Word and you have your relationship with Jesus. Even in biblical times people asked for signs to believe. Miracles happen everyday but we don't see them as miracles anymore. Your faith in God shouldn't be asking for signs or evidence. Shalom 🙌🏻

@@petrievandermerwe8736 Also in the time of Jesus, there were false prophets and false doctrines being taught. Ron Wyatt has been debunked as a Christian scam artist much like many of these fake healing evangelists. 1 John 4:1 “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.”

If the Bible is true, which I completely believe it is, then the story would have come down to you through generations starting with one of your ancestors on the boat. Noah would be all of our +great grandfather.

Used to feel bad when I was in school In south India when classmates used to tell you are not belonging to abrahamic religion. Now that we’re all related through Noah/ Manu , 👍 we’re cousins . I did live in turkey during teenage later. Always felt a strong connection with the place.

Your story about Manu, same as Gilgamesh is older then Noah

It's a natural rock formation known as a plunging syncline - there is no "inside.

Yeah , me to John !

It got put on hold because Shrek was going to sue for breach of contract if they didn't film his villa in Portofino first.

@@kraquin Nice.

Ron Wyatt Discoveries [2022] Gomorrah, Red Sea Crossing, Mt Sinai, Noah's Ark, Blood of Christ

@Manuel Gonzalez Were you????

He says the ark rested partly on the rocks and on the ground. They emptied it safely and it was sometimes later the hull timbers gave way and the rocks protruded through them. I don't know how long it took for this to happen. At a time months or years later? We don't know. There was no shipwreck but settling later as Ron said.

@@lizh1988 Ron Wyatt is a charlatan that has claimed to have found every major missing piece from Noahs Ark to the Red Sea crossing to blood of Jesus(recently.) He has no credibility, even amongst Bible believing scholars and historians. I wouldn't wrap to much up in the "findings" of this guy. Hes a joke. That doesn't mean Noah's ark story is untrue. This is a critique against the man. Not the Biblical accounts.

Nobody alive today was there people.. GENESIS 8:4; And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, "upon the mountains of Ararat". AMEN.

@@jamesm2256 Using the bible as proof that the bible is true is a circular argument and therefor moot.

they won't do any further tests with modern technician, because they know it's not noah ark

They won't do that because it's not the real Noah's Ark.... The real Ark is rectangular in shape as literally described in the bible....

This is not Noah’s ark. It could be the boat from the book of Inke. The nephilim boat that is.

@@TC-kf9zw This was somewhat rectangular. Now how can you expertly say it was or was not. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence that points at this could be. No one can say for sure, but the location, the records nearby, the measurements the size etc all point that it very well could be. For you to just quickly say no seems biased

@@shadricosuave lmfao..... The real Noah's ark will never be found, it would have been reused to build shelter over several generations..... As for this natural rock formation there has been no evidence presented to prove otherwise.... The shape of it alone looks like a modern ship design, this is something that wasn't around at the time of Noah etc,.... That's why it's described in the Bible as a rectangle in shape, this natural rock formula isn't remotely shaped like a rectangle...... If you need this to be Noah's ark to justify your faith in our creator then you lack real faith, unlike me.....

I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site in turky

What scripture gives is merely its length, breadth, and height, like you'd do for any boat. If I said that the USS Constitution was a certain length, breadth, and height, you wouldn't say, "Ah, so it was rectangular!" The idea of it being a rectangular prism got popularized among a few creationists who are very adamant about it (perhaps because it's really important to them that as many animals as possible could've been housed in it), and I don't mind if they posit it as a guess or theory, but when they claim that scripture says it, I have to object. I checked 6 translations, and they all concur on the dimensions. Here's one that's particularly close to the Hebrew: Gen 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦. 15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦. 16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to▵ a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it. If someone told you before you ever read the Genesis account yourself, "It's a rectangular ship," I can see how you might read it pre-disposed to picture these dimensions as forming a rectangular prism, like you might do in math class in elementary school. But if you read it without already being told to picture it as rectangular, you'd do what almost everybody in the last several thousand years has done, prior to the last two or three decades when this pet theory came to be, and assume it's shaped like a normal boat -- e.g., eye- or almond-shaped. Now, it's possible that the writer of the beginning of Genesis wanted you to picture a rectangular-ish boat - who am I to say not? I don't know! - but it's a weird reading of the dimensions, like if someone told you the dimensions of a basketball and you drew it as a box instead of as a globe.

@@ayishas4385 I agree with your idea that there is much detail left out in scripture and some of that detail cannot be explained in mere words, but must be either drawn out as well, or seen and memorized. Take the construction of the tabernacle, the menorah, The ark of the covenant, The altar of incense, the table for showbread, the courtyard altar, the curtains, the cherubim on the covering of the ark, etc., none of these could have been made correctly from just reading the Scriptural account. Moses saw them on the mountain in the Heavenly realm.

Chapter and vs?