DUTCH FIREFIGHTERS - TRUCK ON FIRE 

Thanks mate!

❤

They are very good, well trained and safe.

Now go watch some videos from the NotJustBikes RU-vid channel and see what else you're missing from our great country! ;)

@@MichielKlaver To be fair I'm more interested in firefighting.😀

the truck was lost anyways, so the building needs to be saved. Another job well done here.

😂

😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂🤣

Onze vrachtwagens Verbranden heel weinig 🤣

Ons vlees is vast voor u voorgegaard.

As far as I know it is standard procedure in the whole of Europe.

We use high pressure hosereels in the UK on the vast majority of fires. Most structure fires are dealt with 2 hosereels and a few CABA wearers. the hosereels are easy to move around inside and we get to work very quick on arrival.

In this case two high pressure lines wouldn't have been enough due to the risk of extension. The fire had grown beyond the point it could be handled with one high pressure line and the other would be reserved to prevent extension. And there is a common misconception about high pressure hose reels. The pressure at the nozzle isn't the same as the pump pressure. Due to the length and bore of the hose the pressure at the nozzle is only about 6 bar (88 psi) at 150 liter (40gal) per minute.

@@mennoregts208 Do you use the same high pressure hose reels as us because we use ours at between 20 and 30 bar pressure and the fact the hosereel is a solid core and 19mm in diameter there is very little pressure loss from pump to branch.

@@mennoregts208 Yep i think thats a really good call that if the fire is too big for 1 hosereel and the other is being used for firefighting on another exposure it would make very good tactical sense to do it. The cab of the lorry is destroyed so you might as well get straight on and fight the fire on multiple fronts. Nice work.

Ja lijkt mij ook. Moest meteen aan Amerika denken. Na aankomst zijn ze daar enorm aan 't kloten om eerst die knikken eruit te halen en recht te leggen voordat er water doorheen kan. Lijkt mij geen vooruitgang eerlijk gezegd.

Ze zijn er ook mee begonnen, je ziet ze onder de andere slangen liggen

There are only 3 attack lines laid. They needed one to prevent extension and two to battle the fire. The standard length of an attack hose is 20 meter (aprox. 65 feet) so it may look like much. It's better to stretch an extra line and look back to say that wasn't necessary than losing control of the fire.

Have you not seen any videos of US fire fighters?

@@scottdd2 yes I have and fyi I’m a retired fire/medic from a metro Atlanta. So the answer to your question is yes

Hi Fire 24/7

Op Urk

Sligro rijdt niet met eigen wagens maar met vervoerders.

Its depending the equipment in the firetruck. Most likely this department has an “older” truck not yet equipped with a foam installation.

I lf you use foams it give to much trash.

Why use foams on a truck fire when there is no oil or fuel puddle burning? You have the same effect with only water and lesser environmental damage (most foam can destroy the bacteria in your local purification plant). It would make sense after the fire is put out if there are fire nests where water can not reach the spots so you apply foam on there. Also (I can only talk about foam in Germany, do not know which is used in Dutch fire departments) a vehicle of that size has maybe 120 litre of foam on board and the foam has to be 3% mixture to water then you have a work time of 10 minutes or less to put the fire out before you ran out of foam. Using water after that time nullifies the effect of the foam.

A lot of departments don't use foam in general. They have some onboard, but often prefere water. Foam is absolutely not the standard.

@@markusb.2850 Foam has a better cooling capacity than regular water, preventing reignition. The foam used in most of the Netherlands is also biodegradable and does not cause environmental damage.

Vergeet ook niet dat brandweermannen zijn continu aan rookgassen blootgesteld. Ze zijn aandachtig aan lange termijn risico's. Brandende verf en kunststoffen laten serieus sh... vrij.

Don't need to and you have more visibility of what your doing

First responsibility of a firefighter is to come home safe. Why risk your own health to come to the same result as to fight the fire from far away? Also the whole truck with cabin, engine and parts of the superstructure were on fire and you could not exclude the danger of a bursting tire. And there were three lines in use and the danger of hurting your fellow firefighters with your line were given.

Agree with Markus and the other thing was that the structure / house had bigger priority to cool down

Why do you rarely see US fire fighters arrive with masks on ready to go, walk around with ceiling hooks when there is no need for one, vent a roof that is already self venting? I'd suggest you don't look at US fire fighters as the best of the best when many of their practices are questionable.

@@scottdd2 they would have cut the whole truck and trailer in bits and pieces

Op zich maakt het ook niet echt uit in dit geval. De truck staat waarschijnlijk toch op naam van het bedrijf.

Waarom mag het kenteken niet in beeld eigenlijk?

@@lukas7417 mag wel gewoon

@@jbverheij waarom dan blurren?

@@lukas7417 idk. Kan zijn uit respect ofzo idk

shame you only can understand English :)

EUROPA

this is in the Netherlands (это в Нидерландах)