Update: I mention BIMorph nodes being affected in this video. The author actually updated the package to version 5.1 to remedy this. More info here: forum.dynamobim.com/t/bimorphnodes-v5-0-0-for-revit-2024-released/92068/2#dynamogate-3
First of all, you are a LEGEND! Second, thank you for your package. I couldn’t live without it! Finally, I am beginning to LOATHE Dynamo updates. I’ve spent a good amount of time building scripts which need constant updating and run into issues with revit and dynamo updates, often issues with packages and nodes which no longer function. It would be really nice if I could choose a dynamo environment regardless of which version of revit I am using. Unknown the API changes, but there needs to be a little more stability.
Thanks for watching and for your comment. Dynamo is definitely an uphill battle, but it is still satisfying to work with. I am pleased to say I have patched the latest version of Rhythm, which loads appropriately for each version of Revit. I plan on having a video this week describing the change for other package authors to implement, (if they choose).
As a user your packages are pretty comprehensive. I wouldn't mind if past years stayed where there at and only got newer updates to your packages in the latest versions so you dont have to worry about keeping past years up to date. If I'm understanding things correctly.
Thanks for the comment! That’s definitely an option if the current implementation falls short. Right now Rhythm auto loads the correct version based on your Revit version. As long as you install from the package manager.
this is such a downer, Rythm is one of the foundations to most of my graphs. These are the things that keep Revit users reluctant to adopt dynamo or firm from investing in long term production strategies.
Hi guy. Dynamo for Revit is Broken for sure ! I'm having a problem using the FamilyType.ByGeometry node, and more specifically the "Category" entry. I want to create a conceptual mass (link from my templatePath) and the associated category is "Mass". However, when I launch my script, Dynamo reports the following problem: "FamilyType.ByGeometry operation failed. Category with name Mass not found". I should point out that I'm launching the Dynamo plugin from a conceptual Volume Family window. Do you know where this error could be coming from?
Oh, you should use that node from the project environment
Год назад
Would be a solution to keep using same package nodes but adding a conditions in the code to check the revit version and then executing the task differently based on the changes in revit API for tge corresponding revit version?
That doesn't work because the moment you reference a version of the Revit API, that's it. That's the version that is trying to get loaded. I already have a solution in place where Rhythm loads the correct Rhythm DLLs based on the Revit version and will have that video soon.
hello, I was wondering if you could add a bool input to your upgrade.applicationsfile node for rhythm that when set to false, does not create a folder? just like, keeps it in the same location 💚
@@DesignTechUnraveledhello, I mean the node that upgrades a list of files (or file) that can be either .rvt or .rfa files. I know that it is able to create a new folder but I was wondering if there could be a bool input to instead just simply replace the files? like if it were set to "true" it would replace the files instead of creating a folder with the upgraded files.
@@DesignTechUnraveledthe one that upgrades with inputs including (file path) (audit) (close worksets) etc to be more precise. I think it was called revit.applicatioms upgrade
Dynamo sucks. It's slow and it isn't that much easier to learn than Python or C#, not to mention issues with compatibility. For anyone interested in getting work done in Revit more efficiently I'd suggest learning how to create plugins.
@flipskater Dynamo is a lot easier to learn than Python and miles easier than C# from my observations of how technicans learn in the industry. Most Revit users don't have a programming backgrounds and Dynmao allows them to apply the same or similar logic to what they would do inside Revit. For them to actually pick up and learn real coding would take so much more investment and time.
In-line text programming is always better than graphical visual programming because computer instructions and algorithms are linear. Programming requires referencing, and text is superior way to represent references.
