Here's my review of the Carbon Z Cub. Really good plane.... just not as good as the Carbon Z Cessna! Questions or comments? Leave a comment on this video or email us at all.rc.air@gmail.com
Left torque is only on take off. Just like most tail draggers. Not really an issue. The Cessna was better. Mostly comparing stock v stock. Doesn't really bother me.
I have flown one for 3 years and you must coordinate the rudder at low speed like the FULL size. The square wing keeps the aileron control right to the stall with the help of the vortex generators. It is a true STOL aircraft. The interplane struts stay on on derig ! In my opinion the rig is very quick and NO tools required. 4 safety pins on main wing struts and four hand screw bolts is hardly taxing. I can't agree with your comments on tip stall.I don't agree in my experience of many flying sorties.
Feel free to disagree! I'm just comparing it to the Cessna 150T. The Cessna is so easy to break apart and put together Compared to the cub. That's not an opinion it just the way it is. 1 pin and one bolt per wing and no servo connections that you need to manually attach. I tried leaving the struts in place but i didn't feel comfortable with the struts sticking up (felt it may break if loads shift and something hits it) and i didn't like the top surface of the wing facing down so that it may catch something and scratch. But that's just me. The Cessna slows down easier and better than the cub. I didn't say the cub was bad it was my experience comparing it to the Cessna.
@@all_rc I try to be fair and have flown the Cessna and Cub full size. The experience was world's apart and I haven't flown the e flight Cessna, but I can't agree with your comments on the tip stall on the Carbon Cub Z. Happy flying.
I had & liked the V1 cz cessna (tricycle gear) & the 2016 version cz cub. Flew both up til the foam around the wing bolts deteriorated beyond repair 🤷♂️... Now our big field is a FedEx parking lot
