E1920 - Jurickson Profar & Mike Shildt Ejected After Thrown Equipment After Ramon De Jesus' Warning 

We're at 1,920 ejections this season? Jesus

I'm not surprised Don Orsillo was "accurate, [with a] good call." As a Sox fan who still misses him dearly, Don Orsillo is one of the best play by play guys.

Dang, we are already at 1920 ejections! 😜

1920 ejections? NO MORE HOLIDAYS LINDSAY. DAMN!

Well, well. We were waiting for a, “Getting Your Money’s Worth”; saying along with the Mario Coin Ding during this MLB season on this channel. And…well, we finally got it, courtesy of San Diego Padres’ Manager Mike Shildt (2:42-2:43-2:44 [Getting Your Money’s Worth]; 2:45 {Mario Coin Ding}; 2:46-2:47 [Getting Your Money’s Worth]; 2:48 {Mario Coin Ding}; 2:49; 2:59-3:00 ➡️ 😂🤣😂🤣); after he got tossed (2:38); because he was defending one of his players who got tossed (1:22); for basically showing up the home plate umpire in throwing his bat & helmet in disgust (1:20); after striking out (1:16); which is a no-no. Also, that was a correct strike call by the way.

Thanks for the report on the vacation backlog -- then we know when we get to the REALLY interesting one! :)

I love DeJesus robotic ejection signal

(#18/Ramon De Jesus) is the first MLB umpire from the Dominican Republic. My hat is off to him, and to his home country of the Dominican Republic in respect.

If the “point” the HP umpire does when Profar throws his helmet down is the “warning” it really should be visible to the batter. Profar could not see the “point” at all. So what good is that “warning”?

Thanks for the breakdown! I was pretty confused by the quick ejection and I still feel like it’s kinda bull. Was definitely handled by the rules by the ump, but I think it happened so fast that Profar didn’t register that he’d even received a warning. I feel like umpires should have more responsibility in making sure a warning is heard or seen, rather than gesturing to someone who’s turned around and tossing them out when they don’t have eyes in the back of their head

This one highlight a potential issue with the mechanic in my mind. Profar is mostly turned away from the the ump, he ran a stop sign that he might not have ever seen. If the warning is intended to help with game management and behavior self correction, what good it is to do it in a way the player is unaware of?

Question. Does the umpire have to verbalize the warning? There's no way Profar sees the point, so unless there's an audible warning, he is absolutely right to question his ejection here

I love the flags you put up on the logo.

This to me feels like the ejection version of replay calling someone out for getting shoved off. mechanically and technically correct, but the second throw could have easily happened before Profar registered the warning.

Can’t wait to see the mental gymnastics for the Boone ejection

I guess this begs the question: what is the non-offensively allowed way to be disgusted by a call according to the rule book?

I do want to know what it takes to get the 1-UP sound effect for "getting your money's worth" 😂😂

2:45 2:48 and 3:00 Shildt got his money’s worth cue the coin Lindsay

Broadcasters don't have a clue on the rules. Would love if MLB or someone made them at least study a cliffnotes version of the MLB rule book.

I know that not everyone knows all the rules, but this channel amazes me by showing just how many people getting PAID to talk about baseball don't understand baseball.

Throwing equipment is not automatic warning, it must be "in disgust." The problem here is that the batter is looking away, so we don't know if the umpire actually said anything. It looks like he waved a warning, but the batter doesn't see it (he is looking away)- so the batter can reasonably say he was not warned. fwiw I don't see where in that written rule it says that any post warning throw is ejectable (that may be the interpretation, but it doesn't actually say it does it?)

Waiting on the Yankees/A’s game two ejection. That’s two ejections I’m a row. Boone first game, Kotsay in the second. Edit: 3rd game of the series and a pitcher for the A’s got thrown out tonight.

I thought replay was suppose to lighten the ejection load. ha.

This video makes it seems like De Jesus was required to eject Profar. It's entirely within the ump's discretion i.e. "may be grounds for an ejection" or "may eject the offender immediately." There was no good reason to eject Profar and that lead to the manager getting ejected too. 2 ejections over what should have only been an equipment violation.

I think MLB needs to tell the umpires not give out equipment fines when it is the final out of an inning. These fans are paying to see these players play, and not to see umpires to kick out the players fans are playing to see.

“Any part of the ball passes through any part of the strike zone.” Anyone want to tell that to the Umps in MLB The Show?

I love the "What did I do?" look Profar gives, like he has no idea there's a rule against tossing equipment like that. Curious viewers might also want to check out Ejection P1 from 2022.

I agree with the equipment violation. Of course the ejection for the second piece of equipment is pretty much automatic. However, I agree with Lindsay that the two pieces of equipment should be treated as the same incident. Of course there has to be some limit, otherwise players could just perpetually throw equipment without facing any consequences. At the end of the day, it's a player throwing a temper tantrum like a toddler because a call didn't go his way. It's understandable for a manager to come out to collect his player so that he doesn't get suspended, but when a manager goes on a rampage like this, he has to go too. To me, this feels like a parent indulging their child's tantrum. I don't blame Ramon De Jesus for any of this. In fact, I give him a lot of credit for remaining calm when all this nonsense happened. I almost wonder if we treated both equipment violations as one event, if that it self would be enough to constitute an "extremely severe" violation. At the end of the day, actions have consequences and Profar and Shildt will get an early shower.

Players should know by now... slamming equipment is not acceptable... in lower levels.. that alone is ejectable.. (damage equipment that might be needed to save your life later).. walk away and just drop it.. or .. OMG.. actually take it back to the dugout...

Good for Shildt, this stuff is absurd

Since Shildt continued to "get his money's worth" for several minutes after he initially "got his money's worth," by continuing to spew whatever pointless vitriole he was vomiting, I would love to see MLB increases his fine and suspension to get their money's worth out of him "getting his money's worth".

Baseball is the best sport

I think I've been watching too many of these. I found myself pointing and tossing in rhythm with De Jesus.

Right call, just had this happen at a High School game recently and had to restrict the kid to the dugout.

A "That escalated quickly" in San Diego is pretty on point. 🤣

And you wonder why Buck Martinez didn't last too long as Jays manager. In 2001, he led them to a 3rd place finish in the AL East, then was let go only a couple of months into the following season. You'd think he would know the rules on ejections by now. I live in an area that's within Toronto broadcast territory (which is pretty much all of Canada), so I've had to put up with him for several seasons now.

Seems like this is making a case for MLB having too many rules, which then in turn make the umpires look bad, while also not being clear enough about the rules for umps, players, and announcers alike. Seems almost like a set-up to make umps look bad, and in turn save the league money by bringing in robo-umps.. manfred can’t leave soon enough.

Buck is right. Absolutely no reason to throw him out. Outright abuse or power.

If the first piece of equipment draws a warning/fine, the second will basically ALWAYS come with the thumb.

But was the disgust over the umpire's call or just frustration with himself? As he did not argue the call I would suggest the latter and thus the rule should not apply.

The rule says “may”. Therefore, an objection is not mandatory. The umpire had discretion in this case and went overboard.

That was clearly a strike. So pointless to argue at and to throw a tantrum about it was a pretty obvious ejection. Not to mention, this reminds me of the time when Profar threw a tantrum like that and got tossed by Hunter Wendelstedt.

Sensitive quickhook ejection but it’s expected with Ramon. I think the rule should be multiple violations/fines for each thing thrown if the umpire deems it personally offensive what was done with equipment instead of an ejection. Also, Johnson shouldn’t have joined in and put hands on Profar then get involved with Shildt. That was totally unprofessional. Only positive thing of this was the call was right.

Multiple Padre players with severe attitude problems which seem to be enabled by manager and front office. Not good for the game. Throw them out when they do this stuff.

Video 12 of Petitioning for an Ejection Pace Counter in the description of each E video! (Does this count as video 13 as well???)

I feel like Profar was probably more annoyed at himself, as he should be, that's too close to take, especially as it was a great pitch. I get why he was tossed.

Bump up #6. That's gonna be a 10 minute video right there.

Buck, the Bob Cole of baseball

Baseball has THE softest officials in all of sports

Sorry, but this is just stupid. Umps are WAY too sensitive and are actually looking for ways to eject players. They themselves antagonize the players at times. This isn't Sunday school, and what we just saw here isn't even egregious. The fact that "any" toss of equipment is grounds for ejection allows the umps to make the distinction as to a player's intention at the moment. Simply let them blow off steam and be done with it. Especially if there's no direct confrontation. Umps don't deserve unmitigated respect. We all know this is a game of inches, so empathy going both ways from ump to player and back is what should be the goal. Instead we have a distinct separation between the two with the umps beyond reproach. So of course the players and coaches are going to flip out because they have no other recourse.

How often is it that we just see the equipment violation? The ejections always seem to be reactionary on the players' behalf.

So these are grown men playing a boys game and acting like toddlers. What did he think would happen. I know its all just entertainment but...c'mon now. Are we still wondering why there is a crisis with regard to recruiting and retaining officials? The actual kids and youth coaches act up the same way because of these entitled brats. But again, entertainment. Got it.

Once again the umpire is right. Once again the player and coach are wrong. Once again the player and coach get to continue the argument after being ejected. MLB allows this because they think this is what baseball fans like to see. They are selling us this drama. Are we buying the drama? What is this…WWE?

This is one of those rare times where I might disagree. After he threw the bat, the umpire points. Then he throws the helmet. He shouldn’t have to play ignorant with the rules, no matter how lame they might be. If I knew I was gonna get tossed at two items, I’d go get the massive bucket of gum and seeds and toss that one for number 1, then s huge bucket of balls for number two. Now that’s getting your moneys worth. Da Ding!

Lucky catch up 6 more go now not count night game

Schildt needs a suspension

Like if you came before the title was changed

This is also called an umpire being soft.

Mike Schildt is easily among the biggest bums of mlb skippers out there. Him and the current Cardinals managers are just a pair or grade A A-Holes.

Petco is a dumpster fire.

The umps need to grow some thicker skin while the players/managers need to grow up more than a little

Equipment violation ejections are cheap. Change the rule.

The text that you are showing on the screen IMO is not something that HAS to lead to ejection. It says throwing equipment MAY be grounds for ejection. And then there's nothing saying that two immediate equipment throws in succession has to be treated as two separate acts. Then it goes on to say an immediate ejection can take place if the violation is "extremely severe" which I don't think anyone would deem what happened here "extremely severe." Not to mention it says that equipment violationS (plural!!) can be an intermediary step. Meaning that you can still treat two throws as one warning. (At least that is my interpretation). Once again talking crap on the broadcasters for no reason. This is a bad ejection in my opinion. I wouldn't say the ejection was UNWARRANTED. It was a REASONABLE objection. But in your video you are portraying this as a NECESSARY or REQUIRED ejection and based on the text you are presenting on screen, I wholeheartedly disagree with that take.

Umpires are a joke

Weak. The umpires in MLB are embarrassing.

Ramon De Jesus has a Quick trigger. That’s why I don’t think He’s the best umpire

Pretty sure Louisville Slugger manufactured the bat with the idea that it’s to be swung.

Pretty sure the bar was designed to be swung.

The players don’t know the rules of the game they play.

lmaoo Umpire make right calls..

What did I miss when did it go from 18 to 1920 elejections I kown I am brain dead from college I didn't know I was that brain dead.

It doesn't always get enforced. That's the issue here.