Easter parade Sunday 27 Mar 2016 Irish Army military vehicles leave Cathal Brugha Bks Dublin 

Chris Mullen russia must be shiting themsevles

@@gailkerr7299 Well being an asshole you'd likely be an expert on shitting yourself .. so your expertise here is appreciated.

sledger2003 or maybe he was joking

@@AlexiRamirez2000 she

They are light reconnaissance vehicles that were used by the British army

We have Lav's not tanks

@@omgpotatos1 no we had Swiss ones they had their on ones

One was hospitalised with type 2 diabetes.

@@omgpotatos1 we had Panhard 60ml. and 90ml. Armoured car's Also Panhard Armoured Personnel Carrier's 🇮🇪

very same as the brits, 24hr ORP made by vesty foods uk

Sorry I don't know

Patravich O'brienski Cathal Brugha was killed by this army in the civil war. Why name barracks after an IRA man?

Joe. The signing of the one sided treaty caused the split which caused the civil war which caused partition were all a disaster for Ireland. It would have been better that war of independence hadn't taken place because Southern Ireland went into an economic tailspin that lasted for six decades following the signing of the 22 treaty. Even Collins realised this fact later that year but by then the harm was done

Patravich O'brienski Yeah civil war was bad but doesn't explain why this army who killed Cathal Brugha and who he died fighting against have a barracks named after him. He was in the IRA and fought for them only.

@@shredder9536 they were all IRA up until the split because of the Treaty. Personally i find cathal Brugha to be one of Irelands Greatest 🇮🇪 is it not fitting having an Irish Army barracks named after him?...

@@DublinDan the army in the barracks is the same one that killed Cathal Brugha. Why name a barracks after one of your enemies?

Asshole

He might be an asshole but he is right, an F22, or a Russian Mig could take out all that equipment.

@@micealmacadaim6550 i know that but they are only a defence force not a super power with a population of only 4.5 million mist of there work is with the U.N they are deployed at present in Lebanon, Syria,Golan Heights, Mali and recently have done missions in Chad, Liberia,Eritrea amongst many more they are a well trained well disciplined defence force and have good modern equipment for the roles they undertake

All the F22s in the world can't put down a few Afghan tribesmen with AKs & RPGs & the Serbs managed to shoot down a stealth fighter with antiquated AA systems. So I wouldn't get too caught up in the whole "high-tech stuff wins wars" if I were you. Winning wars is about murdering people on the ground, up close & personal. The side that's prepared to suffer the most & commit atrocities usually wins. Dropping a few bombs from a shinny jet... meh, doesn't achieve much. Never has.

@@ado75 well might not take out every single one but a few F22’s half a dozen A10’s and maybe a dozen attack helos could degrade pretty much any third world military until they were basically useless in terms of being able to control the vast majority of a country , then your into guerrilla warfare but most don’t bother , once you control the infrastructure and the major power generation systems you’ve won in all but name .

Andy Black I'm irish and I agree

Aussie Army is better that the British Army. Irish Gear is pretty cool.

What are you ... 4 ?

british army equipment is good but their infantry training wise is complete dogshite

Ye america is the best out of every army on the planet tho