Edifier S3000Pro vs Swans M200 MKIII+ || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison

Подписаться 71 тыс.

Просмотров 23 тыс.

50% 1

Edifier on amazon DE: amzn.to/2PCWdZr
Edifier on amazon UK: amzn.to/2OcmJv5
Edifier on bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2CSBVow
Swans on amazon UK: amzn.to/2XT4SxM
------------------------
Follow me on instagram for the latest updates and behind the scene look: / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral

Наука

Опубликовано:

19 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 97

@JEG6919 5 лет назад

Great comparison videos!

@Yohuan 4 года назад

Would like to see an M300 on the channel and against the S3000.

@quananginh9446 2 года назад

M200 sounds fuller, but it also emphasizes nasal vocals (as noticed from the Castarays track). S3000Pro sounds thin (because of the V-shaped frequency response) and overly bright.

@maxsunz3703 5 лет назад

Wow Emezing... Thanks you very much

@emilpopa96 4 года назад

What sound settings you used for the Edifiers? (there are few presets).

@francise.1653 Год назад

Sound signature of swan is so good to listen. It is warm, more emphasized and engaging👌

@iikatinggangsengii2471 8 месяцев назад

they like upgraded version of everything below

@BOOSTEDLASER 4 года назад

I think 3000s VS M300 is a better test

@enkibumbu 4 года назад

I'd like to know if M300 is really better than M200 MKIII

@BOOSTEDLASER 4 года назад

@@enkibumbu Yes,I have both

@fangsidian 4 года назад

MKIII is more close to the original track

@aid2629 3 года назад

Which one better between S3000pro and M300?

@aid2629 3 года назад

@BOOSTEDLASER Which one better between S3000pro and M300?

@gggg-yw3jv 3 года назад

S3000PRO vs M300 MKII plz

@hiddenshadow-5570 2 года назад

I did comparison of my new Swan M200 III (cable) with the legendary Epos ES14 and smile, smile (driven by old Exposure too), Sony old Hi end player.

@photovideooz4084 Год назад

just close your eyes when listening, and open eyes when you find the music pleasing, for me most of the time it's Swans. The Swans M200 MK3+ has warmer and richer mid great for vocal /songs, S3000 Pro has better highs and deeper base, but sounds dry & thin, probably great for listening to instrumental musics.

@tobacco118 3 месяца назад

Swan for adults, S3000 for kids

@efhasjim 5 лет назад

Finally Swan is here after so many has asked.Edifier put to much ingridients to the sound, while Swan sounds more neutral, no wonder it claims 'as a reference monitor'.In my ear it is one of a pleasant speaker to listen.Not a flat sound &Has some warmth.

@GOLFADDICT65 7 месяцев назад

To anyone that has either one......Which one do you think would be best for TV speakers for movies / sports / and everyday TV......having a hard time deciding...the swans are hard to find up here in Canada......thx in advance....cheers from Vulcan Canada

@dschinn6748 4 года назад

Is there a chance to get the midtones on a better level so it sounds more like the original on the Edifiers? The highs and the lows are a bit too forward for me. It's nice to have it that way, don't get me wrong. But most of the party always go on the mids.

@leonardoacuebos174 2 года назад

on SACD Swan M200 mk III almost equal the famous Epos ES 11 fired by exposure amp!

@jakemarzini9138 5 лет назад

Would love to see a comparison of some of the Behringer monitors

@stevechapman1060 4 года назад

Again, I have to go for the Edifiers. While I find their treble to be just a tad too forward, the Swan's boxy vocals are even worse to my ears.

@Spinelli__ 3 года назад

Swans are generally known for incredible vocals / mids. There's nothing boxy about the vocals. It's just the video / mic. In real life, vocals / mids are an area (of many) where the Swans absolutely shine. I have the Swan / HiVi M300 and the vocals are gorgeous.

@stevechapman1060 3 года назад

@@Spinelli__ I ended up buying the S3000PROs last August. They are absolutely the best powered speakers in their price range IMHO. They continue to impress me even now. Prodigious amounts of clean non-boomy bass, natural vocals and a top end that among some of the best I've heard at any price. Edifier really hit a home-run with these.

@GOLFADDICT65 7 месяцев назад

@@stevechapman1060 do you still have them ? how did or do they sound as TV speakers for movies and everyday TV ?....thx

@stevechapman1060 7 месяцев назад

@@GOLFADDICT65 I'm running them. I do hook them up to my TV via toslink when I watch movies and such. 95% of the time they are being used for music. They make for a fine soundbar alternative

@rickgarcia8481 4 года назад

Jeez, the edifiers for sure... They are impressive, I thought the swans were great, but the S3000 is better

@skatar01887 4 года назад

Swan M300 would be a fairer comparison to the Edifier S3000Pro

@KapucciMane 3 года назад

Classical preset on the edifiers ruins this comparison imho.

@skatar01887 4 года назад

What is the sound coming from when you are transitioning from one speaker to the other speaker< , as it sounds pretty good to me

@quananginh9446 2 года назад

that's the original track

@AldoRPX 22 дня назад

Es impresionante el s3000

@DSAUDIOreview 5 лет назад

*DISCLAMER* S3000PRo was recorded in "Classic" DSP mode, not "Monitor" mode as I claimed before. Classic mode boosts the treble significantly. I am sorry for the confusion. > 09:48 < Frequency Response Graphs > instagram.com/digitalstereophony < Follow me on instagram for the latest updates and behind the scene look

@BOOSTEDLASER 4 года назад

So the Swan M300s are 550ish. How much do you have to spend on amp/passive speakers/cables to sound this level? Are they as good as Zeos says? Always wonder if he is paid to say that stuff

@olegozon9818 5 лет назад

Китайцы продолжают штурмовать новые высоты высококачественного звука и надо признать, что это им удается. Правда вместе с ростом качества растет и цена, но это вполне закономерно. Swans M200 MKIII+ имеют более сбалансированный звук и звучат ближе к оригиналу, чем их конкурент. Каналу как всегда лайк и спасибо.

@MaksimRomashkin 5 лет назад

За такую цену можно уже начальные adam и genelec взять))

@olegozon9818 5 лет назад

@@MaksimRomashkin. за 500 долларов не взять, да и не факт, что они будут звучать лучше.

@evgeniyefanov1814 4 года назад

Сван звучат более натурально, собрано. Они более голографичны в звучании. Бас несколько проигрывает в глубине эйдиферам, но незначительно. Твитер эйдиферов делает звук запредельно детальным. Как он прекрасно передает звучание струнных и тарелок! Но он же и ахилесова пята эйдиферов. Звучание с вуфером получается худосочным, несбалансированным, как если бы с сабвуфером на 15 дюймов играл дюймовый купольный твитер. И направленность небольшая, из-за чего сцена получается узкой. Я отдаю предпочтение сван.

@vincer9960 4 года назад

It sounds like Swans have a more powerful mid-bass, maybe around 80 - 150 Hz? 80 - 300 Hz? Something like that. That makes bass hit HARDER even though it won't go as low as the S3000Pro. Does anyone know if the Swan M300 also has this elevated mid-bass like the M200MKiii? The S3000Pro sounds like it has the mid-bass recessed and then the sub-bass (70 Hz and under) hard again but that is the opposite of what I want. I don't care about sub-bass much but very hard (but fast & controlled) mid-bass & upper-bass is what I love...

@salami124 3 года назад

You can use an equalizer ! On my computer i use foobar2000 and with me cell phone i use Onkyo HF player. Both have equalizer.

@BagusSetyawan 3 года назад

Edifier more louder for treable but swan more good on all songs with good balance mid vocal and bass

@pedecia 3 года назад

S3000 VS SWAN M300 MKII??

@MattZildjian 5 лет назад

Swans sound more natural and closer to source. Edi's sound overly bright and missing midrange, they seem tonally similar to the AirPulse A100's. Hopefully there can be a comparison for S3000Pro VS AirPulse A100 as they seem to share a lot of characteristics. Swans win it for me on this one though.

@nguyenthaithach 5 лет назад

I wonder if something is wrong with the S3000pro that you have. Maybe it was overburned? I only heard treble and treble. It is obviously too bright, too much in treble quantity that cause the sound badly distorted. Other review showed that the S3000 was not this bad. Can you have some words on thiss situation?

@JoshyLats 5 лет назад

Yeah I agree. But all the samples Digital Stereophony did of S3000 I've heard sound lacking midrange bass. Maybe they have the equaliser set to a low bass setting. Because S3000 is supposed to have amazing bass and not require a subwoofer.

@rcrhino2148 3 года назад

@@JoshyLats He used stock settings. You can always crank the bass up as well as treble.

@thaison2345 Год назад

trước có thấy bác nói cõ chỗ bán M3A 18tr đúng ko nhỉ và giờ hhoj còn ko ?

@nguyenthaithach Год назад

@@thaison2345 đó là người dùng bán cũ, cái đó mình không còn rõ được sau đó người ta mua đi bán lại qua bao nhiêu nơi rồi.

@wilsongautama1688 3 года назад

I think s3000pro has a trouble eq setting in this test. Flat and bright, no stage 🤦‍♂️ or just my ears going wrong. $500 vs $1000

@eeio1000 4 года назад

ORIGInal Track is best. M200 near ORIGInal Track

@Frip36 3 года назад

I prefer the Swans. Seems like a broader sound with a misty warmth. Edifier seems more direct and transparent. Both good.

@Spinelli__ 4 года назад

Listen to "Deep" and "Retro Wave" ...The Swan M200 MKiii hits the bass HARDER than the Edifier S3000Pro. S3000Pro maybe can hit lower frequencies due to it's larger woofer but it hits SOFTER. I prefer a speaker that hits bass harder even if it can't quite reach as low. I am shocked that the S3000Pro's bass is so soft, who cares if it can reach a few Hz lower if it hits softer & slower.

@rdolle990 3 года назад

The swan has boosted upper bass where the S3000 is more neutral and providing way more detail in the low end.

@KapucciMane 3 года назад

Edifier is in a classical preset in this video. Which actually ruins this comparison.

@-MarkWinston- 3 года назад

So you like cheap upper bass boost. Mmmmmkay.

@Spinelli__ 3 года назад

@@-MarkWinston- No, I don't like cheap upper-bass boost. I like strong, punchy, quick mid-bass but I don't like if it's cheaply done via tons of boosting. It's all about the attributes of speakers. People majorly simplify how a speaker performs/sounds by using an EQ graph when there's way more to it like attack, decay, soundstage, depth, separation, imaging, transparency, etc.

@salami124 3 года назад

@@rdolle990 You can use an equalizer ! On my computer i use foobar2000 and with me cell phone i use Onkyo HF player. Both have equalizer.

@user-uc1dq6cs4o 5 лет назад

S 3000 Pro 👌👍✨

@quiltedquickerpicker 3 года назад

they trade blows tbh.

@chadwallace3598 4 года назад

Which product is better built? I’ve heard that the swans break down quicker

@DSAUDIOreview 4 года назад

Edifier felt better build and I tested dozens of other Edifier products and they never disappointed

@chadwallace3598 4 года назад

Digital Stereophony how do these s3000 pro compare to the airpulses?

@DSAUDIOreview 4 года назад

@@chadwallace3598 what way? Which model?

@chadwallace3598 4 года назад

Digital Stereophony say the a300? New to this and just discovering they’re both Edifiers

@DSAUDIOreview 4 года назад

@@chadwallace3598 honestly I prefere S3000Pro over A300. S3000Pro is more pleasing to the ear with punchier bass and less piercing upper mids. S3000Pro is also vetter value for money IMO

@gregd7842 5 лет назад

Which ones do you prefer DS ?

@DSAUDIOreview 5 лет назад

For me Swans present better value for money. Edifier after some adjustments to the sound do sound better than Swans, but out of the box it lacks balance IMO

@gullibleskeptic3237 5 лет назад

@@DSAUDIOreview could you please share what kind of adjustments you're talking about? love the channel btw!

@DSAUDIOreview 5 лет назад

@UselessHanzo basically trimming down the treble a buch plus some slight trimming to the bass would bring the sound balance much closer to neutral

@gullibleskeptic3237 5 лет назад

Thanks! I did turn down the bass by 3 db and the treble by 2 or 3. also i put some accoustic foam panels in my livingroom to tame the treble a bit.

@gregd7842 5 лет назад

I agree the Swans half the price in Canada/ amazon.ca. Cheers DS.

@ThinkDoTA 4 года назад

S3000 sounds a little bit thin while MKIII sound almost identical to the source and more deep. I'll go with MKIII for sure.

@rantao333 4 года назад

s3000pro dial up the mid - high frequency too much , it sounds too thin.

@whocares3132 3 года назад

you can up the mid

@vinylman6580 4 года назад

Verifier S3000PRO sounds overall better where as the Swans sound more flat!

@iikatinggangsengii2471 8 месяцев назад

true, but if one prefer fun/ wow sound then go other one but i too recommend monitoring ciem for such budget, they just do everything correct and 'safely'