Like, there was once a time when Saoirse Ronan even auditioned for the role of Luna Lovegood in the Harry Potter series but instead Evanna Lynch was cast in that role. Years later, both Saoirse Ronan and Emma Watson would cross paths together in Greta Gerwig's 2019 adaptation of Little Women, which turned out to be a critically and commercially successful and a great movie in the end.
@@ajpat9620 they are my favorite actress ever when I saw this movie for the first time I was like hey there’s heromine and belle gave your week oride and prejudice Keira and Rosalyn are the best Jane Austin siblings
@@gracepuckett6506 That's quite a good comparisons right there. Overall, both 2005's Pride & Prejudice and 2019's Little Women featured the same costume designer on those films, as well other films like the 2017's Beauty and the Beast that also featured the same costume designer: Jacqueline Durran.
This sort of mirror me and my own sister lives. For years my sister wanted to be married and have kids while I didn't feel ready to settle down. I'm still unsure if I'll ever settle. I love being a free spirit like Jo with no one holding me back.
I also felt so weirdly identified with this scene. Trying to tie my sisters to my own dreams and aspirations for us its not fair and that its something so hard to accept. But we are all different people and we will never stop being a family ❤
And they most likely love you too. But they love their husbands or wives too. If my brother demanded for me to never marry or be a mom because he loves me so much, I would cut contact with him. He is my brother, I don't love him like I'll love my husband.
In my opinion actors should accept challenges, maybe She doesn't like roles like Meg, but if acting is your job , you choose to accept it or not! She did her job and it was a great one! Please stop the hating!
@@shannonwri ????????????? you can still meet your sister. cmon man. and if the only one you live with is your sister, then you will likely miss your parents too
@@scottwarren4998 I hadn't lived with her in 8 years by the time she got married. But it was a change in our relationship and in the family dynamic and there's a sadness that accompanies changes to your childhood dynamic. (Especially because none of us really liked the guy.)
Give her a break. It’s not entirely easy trying to change your accent or nationality you are. It’s like telling a Mexican person they can’t use their accent if they are speaking English. You have your right to your opinion but think about how difficult doing things like that are for people. It is also the castings fault too. Whoever casted her should have seen that it might be an issue and hired somebody else.
Totally absurd statement. Emma Watson's American accent *IS NOT* horrible. Furthermore, she's done American roles before prior to Greta Gerwig's Little Women such as Stephen Chbosky's The Perks of Being a Wallflower and Sofia Coppola's The Bling Ring.
@@justmyedits6596Totally absurd on your statement, not to mentioned that it's invalid, as well as null and void. Clearly, Emma Watson had done American accents before such as The Perks of Being a Wallflower and The Bling Ring. Like, you've got your point totally wrong, completely invalid, as well as null and void.
But this is feminism. A woman decides what to do with her life and she is happy. Jo wanting to work and be indepentent and Meg wanting to marry the man she loves are both about feminism.
Emma has literally said in an interview that there’s no one way to be a feminist and that this is what Meg wants, hence why it’s still feminist. “I want a family, I want to work and struggle, and I want to do it with John” - she chose it and lived the life she wanted.
@@alwaysahiccupandastrid Feminism is an insane idealogy. Women never find any interest in men who don't have very nice skills or very nice manly looks. There is a reason why girls never take trans-men as a partner, trans-men don't have the looks nor the skills.
Truee. She's not a great actor, she seems to never be able to get out of her Hermione character in all her acting gigs. Either she sticks to roles similiar to that like Belle or she retires. Which seems to be the latter, she seems self-aware but her fans just wants to see her face because she's pretty. I'm guilty of that, I love seeing her and her accent but even as her fan I really can't stand her acting outside Hermione
She wasn’t even supposed to be in the film. She joined at the last minute. Meg was originally gonna be played by Emma Stone. But she had to drop out due to be busy doing the press tour for a movie she was in, I don’t remember the name of it
Totally lying pathetic preposterous BS. Emma Watson *IS NOT* an awful choice for the role of Meg March. Furthermore, her acting work is once again *NOT TERRIBLE* And another thing, your statement reeks nothing but jealous hatred, and only indicates of how this preposterous garbage argument you made proves it as completely invalid, stupid, wrong as well, null and void. Nothing more.
@@justmyedits6596You stupid worthless insolent saboteuring piece of trash. Like, she can move out of her Hermione Granger character and her acting has been good and decent, of which you can't see it. Also, the fact that you tend to love her but in retrospect, hating her entirely, makes you all of that as a dirty wretched good-for-nothing insolent backstabber as well as a dirty treacherous traitor and features you like a fool you really are. Traitors like you, are to be given a condemnation and punishment, and shall be shown with no mercy and reprieve.
@@superjackster0165 Still, it was all for the best. Like, the role of Meg March suits well with Emma Watson. As for Emma Stone, she was contending with a promotional tour for The Favourite, of which she couldn't make it for Little Women for filming, let alone that she also filming at the same time for Cruella. In the end, both of the two had their own success stories in the end as their own movies were successful (Emma Watson on Little Women, Emma Stone on The Favourite then Cruella). Again, it was all for the best.
