Тёмный

Energy Savings using Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) 

VFDs.com
Подписаться 27 тыс.
Просмотров 12 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, learn about how to save energy and money by using a variable frequency drive (VFD) with your system. Check out our extensive inventory of variable frequency drives at www.vfds.com.
Facebook: / vfdscom
Twitter: / vfdscom
---------------------------- Video Transcript --------------------------------
Today we are going to talk about how VFDs save energy.
I'd like to refer to the diagram on the screen. This is a diagram that shows a typical fan application. Let's say in a commercial building, the bottom line is called the system curve. This represents how much pressure it takes to circulate a certain amount of air through the building. If the building is dark, there is no one there, maybe you don't need any flow and therefore you don't need any pressure. 0% pressure uses 0% flow. On the other hand, if you need a 100% flow, then you're going to need 100% pressure. But the fascinating thing is what that curve looks like in between. You can see that if you only need 50% flow, you'll only need 25% pressure. If you need 70% flow, you only need 50% pressure. And this is wonderful for giving us energy savings.
Let's assume that we need 75% flow, just as an example. There are two ways to do this: (1) we can use dampers. Dampers go in front of the fan and those dampers basically restrict the air flow. When you put dampers in front of the fan, the pressure goes up a little bit because you are restricting the air flow out of that fan. So at 75% flow, we ended up requiring 107% pressure. As you can see, a good percentage of that pressure is dropped across those dampers and then ends up being wasted pressure. So you can see the amount that is wasted, and you can see the amount that is used. On the other hand, if we use a variable frequency drive, we can simply slow that fan down. We only need 56% pressure to get 75% flow rate. So we slow down the fan down to 75% speed, and that will give us just the 56% pressure that we require -- No waste.
Next of all, let's take a look at a pump application. The pump application works pretty much the same except for the fact that we have what's called static head. Assume that you have a reservoir in a big tank that is used for water supply to a city. It may take a certain amount of pressure before you get any water flow up into the tank. So in this case, I just picked a value of 50% as a nice convenient point. We don't get any water flow until we have 50% pressure. And then everything else looks just like the fan curve in the preceding graph. Now in this case, we're using a throttling valve. So we'd use either a throttling valve or we'd use a variable frequency drive.
Let me tell you about a recent compression application that we did in the eastern part of the United States. It was a bio gas situation, in which we were taking gas from a land field, and that gas was then put into a compressor and then used to drive turbines to create electricity. In this case, the compressor was operated at full speed and they were wasting a great deal of power. We installed a 2500 Horse Power, 4000 Volts variable frequency drive. That drive then was used to slow down the compressor to produce only the amount of pressure that was actually required by the turbines at any given time. In this way, they were able to achieve an excess of $100,000 dollars per year in energy savings. So they actually paid off the drive in energy savings. This is actually very common to see an application where you pay off the cost of the variable frequency drive in less than a year with the energy savings.
Be sure to check out our extensive inventory of thousands of variable frequency drives at VFDs.com or give one of our knowledgeable sale associates a call.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

18 июн 2014

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 5   
@biplabacharjee477
@biplabacharjee477 Месяц назад
Great explanation Sire
@berairelnour6146
@berairelnour6146 5 лет назад
It's just that we needed today. Economic in every things.
@pneumatic-generator2022
@pneumatic-generator2022 8 лет назад
thank you Craig Hartman
@nicvanengen9545
@nicvanengen9545 8 лет назад
While a VFD can save energy in pump & fan applications, the graphs shown where restricting flow and increasing pressure results in higher energy use are incorrect and this is a common misnomer because it is counter-intuitive. You need to differentiate between the type of pump. When airflow through a fan is restricted while RPM stays the same, the energy used does NOT GO UP, in fact current draw of the motor goes DOWN and energy is saved. Same goes for centrifugal pumps (which most are). If you restrict a valve and increase head pressure on a water pump, current draw of the motor goes DOWN and energy is saved. What the presenter is explaining would be true for a positive-displacement pump (NG compressor mentioned at end of video). There can be substantial power savings in slowing it down vs. restricting flow because when flow is restricted and head pressure increases the energy usage goes UP because the motor is working harder to compress the gas to a higher pressure. You can ask any HVAC person who's installed furnace fans 30 years ago. On a new installation they would check the current draw of the squirrel cage fan and if the current was TOO HIGH they would RESTRICT the flow in order to bring it current down to an acceptable level and prevent overloading the motor. At the same time, the refrigerant compressor (positive displacement pump) would draw too much current if pressure was too HIGH it would work harder.
@nicvanengen9545
@nicvanengen9545 7 лет назад
VFDs.com: "Nic, please examine the graph again. You will see that we did not claim that restricting flow results in higher energy usage, only in higher pressure. Power is equal to flow times pressure, so energy is saved in either case, but more energy is saved with the VFD." I understand the claim was not made, but the video is misleading because this important point is not explained: higher pressure does NOT = higher energy usage. I appreciate educational videos and thank you kindly for making it, but it only tells half the story. For example, you cannot claim that a hybrid car gets 150 mpg and is therefore 5x better than a car that gets 30 mpg, while leaving out the fact that it does so only after charging with electricity overnight, and can only do 150mpg for the first 100 miles. Granted, the electricity is much cheaper (but not greener) but it was used nonetheless. One of my customers pointed out this video to me and was prepared to make a $25,000 decision based on energy savings of 20-30% because, hey, his water pumps only run at 70-80% flow most of the time. But, he was not considering that his power consumption was already significantly reduced due to the restricted flow. He would have spent $25k on upgrades, and then ongoing maintenance costs, would need to provide an air-conditioned space for the VFD's (or significantly over-size them due to high ambient); and then maintain that additional building etc. It is poor engineering to add cost and complexity in the name of theoretical energy savings, when all factors are not considered in the calculations. Thank you.
Далее
How Variable Frequency Drives Work in HVAC Systems
13:38
Иран и Израиль. Вот и всё
19:43
Просмотров 1,3 млн
What is the Difference between VFD and Soft Starter?
7:30
How to troubleshoot and diagnose a non-working VFD
8:49
iPhone socket cleaning #Fixit
0:30
Просмотров 18 млн