Engine Out Proceedures - How to Program the Secondary F-PLN | Fenix A320 MSFS 2020 

Glad it was helpful!

Engine out proceedures are usually airline specific and provided to pilots by the airlines.

EO proceedures are airline specific, so they are not on any charts.

Yes, I believe this is a slight drawing bug in the Fenix.

@@Easyjetsimpilot I followed this video along whilst in the simulator and noticed the the odd drawing so I drew a couple of radials using fix info and noticed there is actually no intersection between the 120 degree radial on the user defined waypoint and the 330 degree radial of SRN. I did a bit more testing and realised if there’s no intersection for two radials, it will draw the reciprocal of one of them until they do meet so in this case the Airbus drew the 330 degree radial back through SRN as the 150 degree radial until it met the 120 degree radial of the user defined waypoint (just south-east of SRN). I guess the procedure takes into account the distance you cover in the turn from runway heading to 120 after passing the 8.0 NM point and expects you to intercept the 330 radial from your position after you’ve finished the turn. To make the procedure slightly more accurate you could add another waypoint slightly further north of the 8.0 NM point and use that for the 120/330 degree intersection. That way you’ll arrive at the holding point from the north west which is much more suitable for an inbound course of 125 in the pattern.

This is your choice and you'd mention it in your pre-flight brief. You'd get yourself upto a safe Altitude at or above MSA.

You're welcome.

Just one.

Not all airports have this feature implemented. More are being added all the time.

On the SEC F-PLN page, you'd select the ACTIVATE button.

@@Easyjetsimpilot Excellent! Many thanks Gav!

I think it might have been the programming. And this might be just a bug. What Gav did was technically correct. Basically say I want that EFAIL waypoint to be 120° from the PRB04 waypoint and on the 330° radial from SRN. But it seemed to think that meant 330° inbound to SRN. Which would have been on the reciprocal radial of 150°. I’m not sure if this is just a bug or how the real aircraft works it out. I’d need to play and look. But close recognition of where these waypoints are being placed is pretty critical and yes, the EFAIL was in the incorrect place. The definition that should work would be “PBD-120/SRN-150”. This should place the EFAIL waypoint to the NW of SRN so you can then intercept and fly the 330° radial inbound to it (flying 150°) to take up the hold. Then just enter the hold in whatever entry that’s required. I’m not sure if this would be the correct way to define it or if there’s just some anomaly with the FMGC where you might need to use the reciprocal radial if you’re defining waypoints using bearings. 👍