Ep. 74: Terrance Crawford vs The 2000s Legendary Welterweights! 

Pac from 2008-2010 fought at 130, 135, 140, 147 & 154 - The only 5 Division Lineal Champ - The only 8 Division Champion - The only Boxer to won Championship in 4 out of 8 Glamour Divisions (8 Original Division)

As for the smartest fighter, Mayweather is #1 . For this fight Pacman is definitely 1st. He was a beast in the ring. I would put Floyd Mayweather 2nd, I'm not sure on the rest . Go old school find a lesser known good fighter/s 👍 great video!

Bud can do it all Manny wanted 20 then 40 million to fight bud. Bob arum said he stopped that fight cause he didn't want to see Manny get hurt. Freddie roach said he didn't want that fight he didn't want to see Manny run into something!

Manny Pacquiao has proven himself over and over again. Not too many fighters would want to step back in the ring after being out for over 5 minutes when he faced Marquez. Pac-Man possesses one of the biggest hearts in boxing. He's number one on my list for this episode

You guys only ones telling the truth about this, a lot of people hate on manny for whatever reason, to me Manny is the goat, the style, the heart, the resume, 8 weight classes, thats a record that will never be broken, thats a better record than floyds 50-0 thing, best resume out of all these guys, great pick, respect it.

2000-2003 Mosley was pretty special at WW. Vernon had different characteristics that made his matchup with Mosley difficult, such as length, height and great timing, Crawford has the last one but he wont have the height. I could see Mosley bullying Terrance a little like Porter did but with even greater speed and power. Still think Terrance figures him out but this is competitive. If Benavidez and Porter can gove Terrance issues Shane sure can

Great chat, in my opinion Terrance beats Oscar, Mosley, Quartey, Tito, and Paceman (all close but ai think he takes them) Terrance loses to Vernon and Floyd, Floyd just better and Vernon is a bad matchup

Floyd had a couple of close fights that he had to run back to silence the doubt!

Aww man. I knew this topic was coming. This is a lil contradictory bc I said that Crawford is definitely not a top 10....or even 25 p4p all time but I will explain. Here we go. 5. Shane Mosely: Sam explained perfectly especially using Vernon Forest example. 4. De La Hoya: To me, he lost to Quartey and Oscar gives up the final rounds. We seen Crawford crank it up in the later rounds vs Porter and Jose Benevidez. 3. Crawford: This is when the little contradiction begins but I will mild it down some. I said that Bud is not all time top 25... but might be able to beat both my #2 and my #1. 2. Pretty Boy Floyd: You're right Tre, Mayweather was still mostly "Pretty Boy" during the 2000s. I told many before that the one guy in the history of boxing who can beat Floyd is Tommy Hearns. To me, Crawford reminds me so much of hearns but just a better version of . So one would think I would pick Bud over Floyd. The reason I'm not is bc of Floyd's transition and out of respect for Floyd's legacy. 1. Pacquiao: Just like you two said, THIS IS THE 2000s PACQUIAO. Manny was so relentless and much crisp footwork than later on due to age. Crawfords only hope is if he uses his size more. That was Keith Thurmans mistake vs Manny. But then again, Thurman did not fight 2000s Pacquiao.

Got Terrance over Oscar, I think hes tailor made for Terrance, too big of a target too straight up. Love Oscar but his power wasnt the same at WW

To play contrarian, Pacquiao even in the 2000s struggled against Marquez. In 2004 Marquez got up off the deck and made it a close fight and in 2008 the same thing happened. Morales adopted the same tactics Marquez used but did it better. Pacquiao has always struggled with the counter puncher style. Crawford's game is counter punching. Crawford is longer than Morales and Marquez. He's faster than both. He hits harder than both (Crawford is way bigger). What's stopping Crawford from doing what Marquez did but better? I know the Gamboa fight was brought up and it is a valid point. Crawford was young into his championship reign at that time. That was his first title defense. Obviously Crawford got better. That's like me mentioning Pacquiao in the early 2000s when he was clearly a better fighter by the late 2000s.

Hold up Vernon Forest was way bigger then Crawford lol WTH

my two cents only two boxers i see givining crawford trouble is manny and floyd.terance got another gear don't get me wrong terance get's shook up some. but the real monster,dog come out. prove that manny times over.crawford comes out on top.hey forget about resume what he doe's in the ring that matters.😮

Not sure why you guys are showing clips of Shane in his mid 30s?? That aint prime Shane

Canelo-Mosely, guys Shane was 38! Wtf WAY past his prime.

He didnt fade against Ike!

I don’t think Crawford beats Mosley or de La Hoya

Where is Cotto

DLH really beat Trinidad

Imo Crawford surpassed all of them. And the "who has he fought" argument is so warn out man. He fought every style.

Crawford kills them all no contest

Jeff horn beat Manny but Bud Crawford crushed Jeff horn

Personally I think Crawford and Pac Man is a toss up tey would have had a trilogy because Bud and Manny were ruthless but Bud slow starts could get him KO1

Crawford would stop Pacquiao.

Easy. Crawford beats Mosley and De la Hoya. He would be in a fire fight with Pacquaio. Prime Pacquaio was a freaking energizer bunny. Floyd would outbox Crawford in a tactical fight. As good as Crawford is at boxing he would get potshotted all night. Mayweather is the best technical boxer of the last 50 years easy