Equilibrium Made Easy: How to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems

Подписаться 90 тыс.

Просмотров 152 тыс.

50% 1

What is dynamic equilibrium? How can you easily solve equilibrium problems in chemistry? Learn this and more...
For a limited time, get $200 cash if you qualify! Check out:
www.referyourchasecard.com/18...
#chemistry #equilibrium #madeeasy #ketzbook #tutorial

Опубликовано:

27 май 2019

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 77

@Exemplary832 Год назад

Nonsense

@cryingbananajo Год назад

So chemistry is nonsense to you?

@AdyI.R 2 месяца назад

Hahhahaha

@lyra331 2 года назад

hi! I am dyscauculic with ADHD and I've been for like, 3 years without understanding chemistry trying my hardest, usually I don't watch youtube classes cause they don't make any difference, I normally don't understand, but WOW for the first time i got something, like, in my life. I even cried a little. thank you so much, you're a hero professor!

@ketzbook 2 года назад

glad to help!

@schneiderwanjia3433 Год назад

Wooow

@aissousamy 3 месяца назад

Same !!!😢😢😢

@khushisoam8068 3 года назад

I never knew that I could learn the topic of 5 hrs in 12 mins ! TYSM

@obama8573 3 года назад

The one who made this video is a legend 💯

@brianottenbreit871 3 года назад

I see below that someone pointed out that deriving the rate of the forward and backward reactions cannot be done by looking at the coefficients., but rather must be experimentally determined. The equilibrium constant can, however, be found by the coefficients. Kr and Keq are fundamentally different as can be seen if you do the work to find the units.

@rationalism_communism 4 месяца назад

I was very confused but after watching lots of videos and the same scenarios come up, I leaned quadratic equations and now I get it. It took a week.

@jeremiakasinda7695 5 лет назад

Thank you allot, this will really help tomorrow in my Chemistry 1A exam.

@damtewbogale6794 Месяц назад

The most comprehensive video about chemical equilibrium on YT

@luke5385 5 месяцев назад

this is so high quality and well explained. ty!

@taurus7261 2 года назад

I have a question regarding the last problem. Why is that the reactant gained the +2x as its change in molarity when the whole reaction is product favored based on the value of Kc?

@katherinelee2690 3 года назад

literally thank u so much, this was so helpful

@Nicole-tb6iw 3 года назад

thank you so much, it's brief and easily understood

@home-sauce 5 лет назад

this is pretty important for the AP chem test

@albertlonga6995 Год назад

I am enjoying , bcoz of what you are explaining it is easy to understand , thank you!

@bettan369 3 года назад

amazing explanation. thank you!

@saikumar.d7101 4 года назад

Thank u sir ur video is too good Please make up like this cideos

@chandrashekarhb9349 4 года назад

Excellent and nicely explained. You are a good teacher.

@ketzbook 4 года назад

Glad it was helpful!

@cartoon_world749 3 года назад

Can you please make a video about physics Topic: simple harmonic oscillation (S.H.O)

@kishamuringani9331 3 года назад

can you please make a video mainly on examples of questions on equillibrium

@respectanyone117 Год назад

After struggling so much I finally found this video

@lillymaewilcox31 2 месяца назад

Thank you so much, you're a life saver

@ketzbook Месяц назад

You're welcome!

@BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry 9 месяцев назад

For the last question, why wasn't the moles(0.95) changed into molar concentration by dividing by 10L?

@ketzbook 9 месяцев назад

it is a 1.0 L container, not 10 L. If it were 10 L, we should divide by 10.

@meebee5189 3 года назад

Sorry Im a little confused at 3:10 how did u derive the rate equation for the Haber process from the stoichiometric ratios? I see how you are trying to derive K from the rate constants but... the order of a reaction is not equivalent to the coefficients from the equation.

@ketzbook 3 года назад

most often the rate law can be taken from the coefficients of the balanced equation, although you are correct that there are many exceptions to that, and you need to do kinetic studies to determine it. However, I did not intend to go through exceptions in a video that focuses on the basics. Equilibrium is intricately tied to kinetics. One may incorrectly think, for example, that the equilibrium expression of an Sn1 reaction is different from that of an Sn2 reaction; however, both reactions include the activity of the nucleophile in the equilibrium expression because the true full rate law of an Sn1 reaction actually includes the nucleophile and the leaving group. That is just one exception.

@anni2165 4 года назад

Good & helpful explain👍 This video help me a lot to understand this subtopic more Thank you

@makaylahawkins9702 2 года назад

How do you get those initial molarities

@BoonkiCoC14 3 года назад

Jeez, did i just understand this? Yes i did, sir. Thanks a lot, my book has spent around 20 pages talking about this but it makes no fucking sense. Thank you!!!!

@user-uk7zv1ks8x 6 месяцев назад

Hi!I am chiamaka pls how did u get the value of x as 0.2 I means what was the quadratic equation you used to have the value of x.Thanks

@atanursaparbaev9691 2 года назад

Thanks very much!!!!

@andreazuliani7004 2 года назад

I am finding this way more complicate than how explained in my class.. I don't understand all the x and those extra calculations here

@nt-qb5pb 4 года назад

we want more and more videos

@rosemin1973 2 года назад

hey..with the last question i don't get why we had -x and not +x

@user-ce9ko6eg3w 7 месяцев назад

Why dividing the conc of NO2 BY N2O4 instead of other way round since NO2 a product not a reactant in example 2???

@taranjotkaur4831 5 лет назад

plz make a video on organic chemistry

@ketzbook 5 лет назад

what specifically? OChem is a very big topic.

@taranjotkaur4831 5 лет назад

@@ketzbook electrophillic nd nucleophillic subsitution reactions

@moengpasela773 3 года назад

how did u calculate initial molarity and equilibrium molarity

@ketzbook 3 года назад

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KLjWa9cE2uk.html

@user-ze3bc9yb9y 4 года назад

Can you please make a video on hydrogen and proton nmr spectrum

@cartoon_world749 3 года назад

Are you from which Country?

@anwarvictor9448 2 года назад

great!!!!

@pynthymmailangdkhar1403 3 года назад

Is this for class 12?

@chandrasai1990 3 года назад

thanks from India class 11 preparation for jee mains

@rajatdas5500 3 года назад

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

@jishakjishak4698 3 года назад

Thanks for such a fine class

@hunnidasiago746 2 года назад

Surprisingly...my lecturer watches your videos...uses ur concepts...and your questions too😂...I'm getting my fees back

@schneiderwanjia3433 Год назад

Thanks

@janetnkrumah542 2 года назад

Thanks a lot sir

@ketzbook 2 года назад

Most welcome

@Sanara_Singh 3 месяца назад

The equilibrium concentration of CCl4 must be 0.024 moles.

@rassimsimou1594 4 месяца назад

Good

@chamasayasianjina2081 3 года назад

Where is the 0.024 coming from??

@nnk2874 2 года назад

I feel like you confused the molarity of CCl4 to be .176 when in fact in appears to be the value we used to plug into X. CCl4 should be .024 molarity. Therefore, in the fraction where you have Kc = (2(.024))^2 / .176 ---> .176 should instead be .024.

@ketzbook 2 года назад

nope, 0.176 comes right from the data in the question. It is correct.

@pinkflower88 2 месяца назад

7:45 can somebody explain what he just did here, why 0.88÷5, please explain

@rishmakumar3644 Месяц назад

He did this to get it into the concentration, i.e. [concentration (M or mol/L) = moles (mol)/volume (L)], since Kc is measured using the concentrations of each reactant and product. If he did not divide 0.88mol/5L to get 0.176mol/L then he would've only had the moles. He also converted the moles of CCl4 to concentration in the beginning too. Sorry if my explanation is a bit all over the place. Hope this helps

@joy_boy37 2 года назад

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

@geralddemafilez4926 5 месяцев назад

i think you forgot to square the molarity of NO2

@joy_boy37 2 года назад

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

@cathystacy9810 3 года назад

Cleveland clinic

@feifeiiii 2 года назад

9:18

@aurangzaibkhan543 3 года назад

You are great but 2.8+4.4=6.12and you say that it is 2+2+1.6=5.6

@RebelRelatives 9 месяцев назад

Gimme the I30N thee 8 GTI/R Killer But how can u start 5:04 😂😂😂😂 and im with you 600K for a Hatchback 5:54 yooo😂😂😂😂 i rather get an old RS3 or old A45 with +/- 150k km