Errors In The New King James Version Of The Bible NKJV 

Thanks and welcome

Somewhere....

Haha! Amen!

The everyone obviously applies to new believers, not everyone in Jerusalem but all those who had become new believers at that particular time.

You are very welcome

Thank you Pastor Steve you are so gentle yet passionate about our learning thank you so much.

Amazon and asv publications, and usually eBay have the. As well as evangelical bible many times.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Thank you so much!

read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asin=B000SEGJ80&preview=newtab&linkCode=kpe&ref_=cm_sw_r_kb_dp_KpGHFbWV8R7FD

Well stated.

I just did a video on my top 10 favorite Study Bibles you may want to check out. God bless!

Currently being reformatted and updated.

I’m not following your thinking my friend. Trying.

The other translations for me do not convict me of my sin, in the same way that the KJV does, I have the NASB MacArthur Study Bible 1995 and it just seems like it is another best seller not the Holy Word of God.

God bless you, brother! I love brother Steve but he does have a big fault and that is that he is "KJV only". You have nothing to worry about with most modern evangelical translation. For example, brother Steve mentions Gen 12:6. Gen 12:6 says, "לְזַ֨רְעֲךָ֔" which is literally translated as "descendants" and not "seed". Why would the translators do that you might be asking? Translators did that because it doesn't really matter what Paul later says in Galatians. When a translation is trying to remain faithful to the original, they translate what the text actually says. Not translate based on what Scripture says later in the Bible.

⁠@@RevDavidReyesWRONG!! KJV is the best and therefore should be the only one we use. There are SIGNIFICANT issues with other translations. They all attack the deity of Jesus.

Hey brother. Sometimes I struggle with this too because God is such a unique being. None is like HIM. Here are some verses to help you out and move forward on your walk and faith in Jesus Christ our Lord . "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one." 1 John 5:7‭-‬8 KJV "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1 KJV "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth." John 1:14 KJV

​@@TaskForceBWrong. Modern translations do not attack the deity of Christ. Just another lie from the KJV only cult . In fact the KJV attacks the deity of the Holy Spirit calling him an "it" four times denying his deity . Modern translations correct this gross error. Strange that the hypocrites of the KJV only cult never mention this

@Reprezent Teez They were brilliant men who knew multiple languages. The had a deep desire to have an accurate word of God in English..The history of it is amazing. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. God was truly with them. Many lost their lives to bring the word of God to us. Ask the Lord to show you.

+@@judyswiderski2682 Again you lie . . . NOT one person lost their life for the KJB - BUT it was used to justify the killing of 300,000 Irish - The lived lost for the BIBLE were LONG before the emasculated and state-sponsored KJB corrupted by the English Catholic church. The Geneva which the KJB was designed to remove from England - was an HONEST, PROTESTANT translation even IF its underlying texts were corrupted by Erasmus. "They were brilliant men who knew multiple languages. " They were second rate linguists who knew a number of languages - Greek was NOT the primary language of any of them. YES some were Brilliant- by HALF of them wanted to rejoin the catholic church, few were saved - and ONE of the Christian on the committees refuse to allow the completed Bible into His pulpit. Such was his animosity to the finished work. The greatest scholar of Hebrew in England MOCKED their work as amateurish. GOD SAVE the KING appears in NO other Bible ever-0 and NEVER in any Hebrew text - BUT its in the KJB. "The had a deep desire to have an accurate word of God in English..The history of it is amazing. " Rubbish - The ONLY reason was to remove the Geneva Bible which in a marginal note claiming IF the KING was a bum - remove him. James was NOT just a bum - he was a raging sodomite who justified his lovers by using Christ and John as his example. "Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. " CULTISH trash, fantasy and falsehoods - the Smith video by the MORMONS is more factual. "God was truly with them." NOT the KJB editors - they paid NO heed to honesty or reliability - BUT what pleased the KING. " Many lost their lives to bring the word of God to us. " NOT ONE had any relationship to the KJB - NOT ONE. IT was a state sponsored Bible - NO harm came from it - EXCEPT to the Irish - BUT people WERE persecuted for owning a Geneva - "WHY do you lie so much? Ask the Lord to show you." I have - the KJB is the second poorest translation in existence. A millstone about the neck of the Christian church. A cultic IDOL for the deceived.

@@judyswiderski2682 What Anglican KJV translators lost their lives? After all no translation can ever be perfect. Especially as the language is so archaic that the KJV belongs in a museum. Thank God for better modern translations.

@@martinbaker7032 They were Anglican and Puritan. The Forbidden Book video is old but fllled with information. But if you insist on an obvious false Jesus because you do not have to put effort into reading it, then that is your choice.

@@judyswiderski2682 What false Jesus are you talking about? The false Jesus of the Mormons? Or Christian Scientists? Or Jehovah Witnesses? All these cults who deny the deity of Christ, used the KJV to promote these false Jesus's. The Jesus who is my saviour and lord, is Almighty God second person of the trinity. Born of a virgin, conceived by the Holy Spirit the third person of the trinity. Without sin, who became sin for me. Crucified the perfect sacrifice, so there is no more sacrifice for sin, because Jesus paid it all. Raised to life and alive forevermore, the name above all names. Every knee shall bow, and ever tongue will confess that he is Lord. The Jesus who has sent the Holy Spirit, to lead us into all truth. The Spirit himself, not itself as the KJV mistranslate denying his deity. The Holy Spirit who witnesses to my spirit that I am a child of God,? Is that the Jesus that you are talking about? Where in scripture does it say I must read the KJV? Please show me the scripture. I know you can't, because there isn't one. You can rant and rave all you like, but you can't back up your delusions with scripture. In fact what you are doing is promoting another gospel, as a result you are promoting another Jesus. So according to the authority of the word of God, that is witchcraft. Cannot wait to read your next fantasy. But no doubt Satan as deceived you. Otherwise would not continue to promote the the idolatrous blasphemous cult of KJV onlyism. You are not Bible believer, but a KJV only hypocrite.

Thanks for the suggestion. I may do that!

Read the verse in the MEV where a woman says blessed is the womb that bare the and the paps thou sucked and Jesus says yea rather blessed are those hear the Word of God and keep it. It's in Luke 11. MEV mangles it and makes it look like Mary worship. Such a disappointment

KJVer

what is hard about it?

Simplified KJV is good also.

The KJV is amazing!! I find no issue with reading it.. study to shew thyself approved unto God. @@lav-719

How can I get simplified kjv?​@@lav-719

the nkjv relies on the alexandrian text you need to find the Cambridge pure Edition King James Bible that goes off the antioch text , the alexandrian school is the one that stoned Steven in acts 8. HELLO? ANYBODY HOME? HUH?

@@ryanmozert It's interesting that nobody raised him from the dead. They had enough faith to do it.

@@tedgrant2at times it’s Gods will for us to suffer persecution

@@overcomer749 Why would God want us to suffer ? He designed and manufactured us very carefully. If God built a computer, he would not want it to crash !

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@tedgrant2John 15: 20 “Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. It’s not because God wants us to suffer for the sake of it. This world system is anti-God, according to James 4: 4 - Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. This also works the other way around, when we follows Gods ways we’re turning away from the worlds system, and thus we become their enemies. This is why persecution is guaranteed to anyone who genuinely follows God, according to 2Timothy 3: 12 - Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. you have to be willing to pay a price to follow the Lord of All. It’s worth it. Remember the words of Jesus in Luke 14:27 “And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple. 28 “For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it- 29 “lest, after he has laid the foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, 30 “saying, ‘This man began to build and was not able to finish.’ 31 “Or what king, going to make war against another king, does not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? 32 “Or else, while the other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and asks conditions of peace. 33 “So likewise, whoever of you does not forsake all that he has cannot be My disciple.”

KJVer maybe?

I’ve done a review or 2. It’s on the channel. I did a terrible job on the reviews. I hope to do a better one. God Bless!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa do you think its good?

I do hope and pray that Pastors and Bible teachers explain the pure word of God we all read from various languages from the original Hebrew and Greek and Aramaic language so we could really understand what God actually said from the original tongues.

the nkjv relies on the alexandrian text you need to find the Cambridge pure Edition King James Bible that goes off the antioch text , the alexandrian school is the one that stoned Steven in acts 8. HELLO? ANYBODY HOME? HUH?

Probably, I just don’t think it’s been done yet.

Check out the Modern English Version

SKJV does a very good job.

The KJV. Ye is plural and thee and thou are singular in the KJV. It is reflecting singular and plural from Hebrew and Greek and has nothing to do with Elizabethan English. English is cohered by the KJV and Shakespeare. It’s modern English, which began in 1526 with Tyndales Bible.

Tyndale's New Testament is easier to read and doesn't leave Luke 17:34 up for debate.

Amen!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa You cannot use it like that to see how many errors the other translation had. You must compare it to the original manuscripts/languages, then you will notice that the kjv has many errors, more than other translations.

@@BloodBoughtMinistries Which ms Manuscripts are you referring to? If you are using the Hrbrew Greek Alexandrian manuscripts, therecwould be many errors. However they do not agree with each other and one does not agree with itself.

@@BloodBoughtMinistries Also, the proof is in the pudding. The NKJV denotes Jesus. John 1:3, all things were made through him. He cannot by definition be God,, the Crestor Being. NKJV counterfeit. NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV a fraud..

​@@judyswiderski2682A KJV only cultist a blasphemous idolatrous cult that Satan has raised up.

almost ALL of scripture is EASY to understand. you definitely do NOT need a degree in theology. discussion with free speech as iron sharpens iron also helps. although sadly, almost no churches allow free speech. definitely it is rare among pastors... WHY...? lol

Yes

KJVer, Akjv, MEV, nkjv

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa can I get those in book form anywhere? Leather?

@@Qhther Christian book or Amazon

It is fascinating.

The LSB is good if you like the NASB 95, plus it puts all the "missing text" from the TR, in brackets within the text where it belongs, rather than in a footnote. So everything is there. Plus it uses the Name of Yahweh, which I like and think we need to do more often.

Amen!!

Well the point is, Jeff Moore, that it does "matter what Bible in which [an individual] trust[s]"! It's got to be correct on the page for it to make the heart that embraces what is on the page correct! Except for a merciful intervention of Christ Jesus the Almighty to speak truths by His Spirit into the heart that the necessary realization can be had of what is truth from what is error, to use a supposed "translation" or "version" that is flawed is to make one's self hopelessly flawed in thinking & in practice. You are suggesting that a person can use a "Bible" that does not really faithfully represent what were the actual messages of the Almighty by terminology & phraseology that is actually equivalent to the original languages & yet still come away with correct information & doctrine & be alright, but this is simply not true! There have been over the years many Oneness Apostolic Pentecostals who were not content with delving sufficiently into the KJV to go beyond any linguistically, hermeneutically & ideologically challenging particular that is in the KJV to ascertain & gain what was exactly intended but rathered to embrace other so-called "versions" who have made spiritual shipwreck, them no longer believing much or any of the Scriptural fundamentals of Oneness Apostolic Pentecostalism, of the Church founded by Christ Jesus the Almighty.

888,888_ fiery_mercaba i agree with you, it does matter. My comment was not implying use whatever bible it was a personal coment in regards to his trust in the kjv and mine in the nkjv. While we hold the exact same doctrinal teaching. Not all bibles are the same alot of them are garbage in my opinion.

Let me put it this way, Jeff Moore. The hierarchy of trust ought to be Christ Jesus the Almighty, above all others, His Spirit, "the Spirit of truth," being present with those who have become His own to empower & to guide. He helps those who trust in Him & are very much inclined to His voice & wanting to differentiate what is truth from what is false, myth, fabrication, misunderstanding, fiction. As we must have a genuine written down representation of His Word in which we have to have a considerable degree of trust that it is a presenter of His Word, this need being obvious by His own indication of this by having said things like, "Have ye never read in the Scriptures....?", or, "It is written....", & so on, but also our humanity having limitations that make the demand for a physical sourcebook to which to refer for tenets, confirmations, instructions, & guidance, we are individually faced with the challenge of ascertaining which of all the cornucopia of "Bibles" is really the Genuine Representation of His Intended Communications, which is His Book by virtue of having accurately captured the original communications with the graphemic symbolizations of our own mother tongue. This is an extremely important matter & He has long had me involved in determining what is what in this matter, even from I was a little boy. I personally recognize it as an exceedingly important matter & it is in this realization & in the healthy fear of Him that I discovered the KJV as the most accurate written representative of His Original Communications. It has been by seeing the manifestation in my own life of what numerous things that are documented in the KJV & with obvious confirmation by & blessings of His Spirit that have not only convinced me that I need look no further than the KJV Bible for that which is attested to as being His Word but, by being also familiar with the NKJV, the NIV, & a few other "versions" that I looked into far less yet enough to know their errors, to dismiss & avoid the other "versions", except in the rare cases wherein referencing them a witness of the Lord can lead a person to the truths of the Lord by the smattering of accuracies in them &, ultimately, to the KJV, the sourcebook that has not only a smattering of accuracies but the same accuracies & more accuracies than are in the other "versions." In short, I would phrase it this way, for this particular situation, you, this pastor, me, & everyone ought to put our individual trust in the Spirit of truth, namely Christ Jesus' Spirit, & rely on Him to infuse us with knowledge, wisdom, & understanding FOR HIS GLORY, to help us to discern truth from falsehood FOR HIS GLORY. Ideally then will come a confirnation that the KJV is indeed good enough English translation out of the original languages for us English speakers &, also, for those looking to use a reliable English translation to inform their translation into a foreign language. It is not that we should ever "trust in" the KJV to the extent that we trust in the Lord Almighty Himself, but we surely can count it as reliable enough for the duties of reading, studying, memorization, meditation, & practice that we are called unto as Christians. Additionally, we are to not be so discontent or craving more "versions" as if the majority of definitely conflicting & confusing sources -- conflicting & confusing as the devil would desire it to be -- is going to secure for us more truth than the Lord Almighty can lead us to in & by the KJV Bible. To not heed this warning & do otherwise is for one to certainly subject himself or herself to spiritual food poisoning! One of my favorite passages of Scripture is this that Paul wrote to the Thessalonian saints by the unction of the Spirit: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (Quoted from memory, a thing that, incidentally, becomes far more difficult for those who delve into various "versions.)

+@@fiery.mercaba NO Bible in existence is as corrupt as the KJB save the NWT - and your assertion of having to have a reliable text while accurate is deceptive - for you present the KJB as the ONLY accurate one when in fact it is the least accurate and reliable Bible today. Its corruption began in its assembly by Erasmus of his 6 partial and corrupted texts - and never improved with the emendations of Beza and Stephanus. Given that corruption of the misnamed TR - and the political demands of the sodomite King James - HOW could it be a reliable text without a great miracle - and HOW could that miracle be from GOD? For IF God inspired the KJB - then no one before 1611 had an inspired Bible - certainly NOT the early church whose Bibles contradict the KJB - and THEY taught that their Bible was given under inspiration. I prefer to follow the evidence that the Bible was inspired - and then copied - being corrupted over the centuries in that process - The job of the Biblical scholar today is to get as close to the originals as possible - and that does NOT include 6 partial texts from th3 1200's. " . . . them no longer believing much or any of the Scriptural fundamentals of Oneness Apostolic Pentecostalism, of the Church founded by Christ Jesus the Almighty." Although I taught that for years - they is NO evidence to support it - nowhere nohow. Maybe , even with your massive revelations, spiritual superiority and profound ego - you MIGHT be wrong?

The Defined KJV or the KJVer, or a dictionary of KJV archaic words like Chick or Cloud have. No, I don’t agree w that

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa thanks

I don't speak 17th century English either... a lot of the words in the later editions of the KJV are normal letters and it makes sense. A lot of them are just words added together like whosoever... also, there are still going to be unknown words in the other Bibles too that you will have to look up and research. Second, we go learn new words and stuff in school/work... so, it should be more worthy to understand the Bible also in context... God bless :)

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Is that what you use Pastor Steve?

@@aaronroman8005 I use KJV

Go to Church Bible pubishers.

Thank you so much my friend!

How do you know your source, what you are calling the "original Hebrew and Greek", is correct? How do you come to the conclusion it is original or better than the English words in the KJB translated from H/G by it's translators? How does this come about? Is it only the KJV that is questioned, but not the H/G sources of the 19th Century Textual Critics?

+@@brianhaley4471 When has a translation EVER been better than its source? We have the Dead Sea Scrolls that were untouched for 2000 years - we have texts of the NT from 400 AD and fragments from the first century - BOTH skipping close to 1500 years of hand copying which ALWAYS leads to errors and corruptions. WHY would you have more faith in a known-to-be corrupt translation which contained 3000 errors when introduces and after 10 revisions STILL has a couple hundred, than the very ancient texts close to and maybe even copies OF, the originals? "How do you know your source, what you are calling the "original Hebrew and Greek", is correct?" Its irrational to expect the KJB to be translated "better" than the close copies of the originals - we KNOW that it came from 6 partial catholic Greek texts - assembled by a Catholic theologian, with insertions from the Vulgate and Vaticanus - at the request of a bishop - that the finished texts was dedicated by Erasmus to Pope Leo X - and approved for use in the Catholic church - and then when translated into English - there were amendments opinions and other insertions - all based on those same corrupted 6 catholic Greek texts - - just HOW could you assume that process to be more reliable than finding complete texts from antiquity? "How do you come to the conclusion it is original or better than the English words in the KJB translated from H/G by it's translators? " What possible motive could you have to suggest that the translation is superior to the originals? WE know the KJB is corrupted - it failed for political reasons to even stay true to the misnamed "TR" - NOT that that was a reliable text to go from. TODAY we have 5000 ancient texts - all more accurate than the texts from which the KJ was translated. OTHER than a second divine revelation (which would OBVIOUSLY contradict the first ) of the scriptures - the issue is one of fantasy and NOT fact. God isn't capricious - he was NOT confused when he gave the NT - BUT you are confused IF you think any man-made TRANSLATION is inspired - particularly the KJ corruption. Make an argument for the Geneva and I MIGHT meet you halfway - an HONEST translation from corrupt sources surely beats a DISHONEST translation from corrupt sources. The sources of the Textual scholars are constantly being questioned and have been for centuries. They are being questioned anew today with Dan Wallace's ambitious program to digitize every fragment known - analyzing each and fitting them to their date and textual sources. They stand up under scrutiny - the KJ fails at every examination. NO such examination of the KJ is considered by its cultist followers. They accept it by (blind, irrational ) faith. "How does this come about? Is it only the KJV that is questioned, but not the H/G sources of the 19th Century Textual Critics? " ONLY because the KJB has proven to be corrupt - and of very late date - while the H/G sources are very close to the originals whether Greek OR Hebrew - and in any game of telephone, the message is ONLY accurate for the first few repetitions. Furthermore, compared to the 6 underlying texts - none complete - of the KJB - which did NOT agree with each other - there are 5000+ Greek fragments - some 15000 or more in total - going back within lifetimes of the apostles and heir immediate disciples - from which a majority opinion can be formed.

+@@kingston163 "@Paul Robinson You talk about scripture and the influence of man upon it to the total exclusion of the role of God power and influence. " NOT at all - you utterly ignore that GOD allowed mankind to corrupt BOTH the perfect world He created and the perfect Word He gave - IF GOD chose to allow mankind to corrupt one, why not the other? IF God "preserved" His word and protected it perfectly for 1500 years, how do you justify the printing errors - some say 22,000 - in this? Are the translators protected but NOT the printers? LOGIC has never been the friend of the KJO cultist - neither has history, textual evaluations, scholarship and common sense. The issue is that you make that kind of irrational statement without any reference at all to reality - you make a Pharisaical assumption that YOU understand this fantastical God you have created in your own mind - totally apart from reality. YOU utterly ignore the REALITY that the KJB has major variations from the early texts - you utterly ignore that GOD allowed the Politically-dependent translators to first insert 14 extraneous books, then remove them - HOW can anything be "perfect" when bits are added and removed at the will of man? What possible justification can you even propose for GOD having a hand in the KJB but no other? WHY do you fight so hard against assembling the Bible originally given to the New Testament Church, rather than one with 1500 years of copying errors, additions opinions and politics? "For instance, you write, "Its irrational to expect the KJB to be translated "better" than the close copies of the originals" says who you." Says any intelligent person. WE now have Bibles from the 4th century - one would logically expect they - along with thousands of others from antiquity would be more accurate than 6 partial copies from the 13th century that had been filtered through Catholicism and copied poorly. " Too difficult for an ALL powerful God as well?" That's an utterly absurd statement. Its also a logic trap - for IF God could guide an accurate translation from corrupted texts - why then could He not guide an accurate translation from the more ancient more accurate texts? WHY could he not protect the printers as well? Is God's power and influence limited? YOU seem to make that case. God ONLY had enough power to protect the translation that turned out to be terribly corrupt - but could NOT protect the printers from admonishing "Thou Shalt Commit Adultery" in the infamous adulterers Bible? IF God could guide a group of political churchmen required to follow the rules set down by a sodomite king, using corrupted sources - by what stretch of illogic could God not far better guide a number of Godly and committed men whose ONLY purpose in translation is to bring honor an glory to God, to make the Scripture more accurate and make it plain and in common comprehensible language? YOU KJO cultist talk in circles - you never offer any evidence for your mythology - its all blind irrational and illiterate faith in something GOD never did - man-made dogma - guide corrupt political churchmen to produce a "perfect" Bible - TRULY, your faith is a parallel to the Mormon faith. It flies in the face of evidence and reality. WHY could God NOT guide the translators of the NIV, the EDB, etc? far more easily than the KJB? We KNOW their motives were purer, their sources more accurate and their understanding of the language far superior. NO politics were involved in those accurate translations. "Frankly you talk crap to mislead young Christians just as lucifer would like." And again you deliberately LIE to protect your cult. Lucifer does NOT want the Bible to be understandable, comprehensible, and effective. BY what twisting of Logic could the devil WANT a better, more easily read, more accurate, Bible to be made available? Satan uses religious tradition in an attempt to thwart God's purposes - it happened at Calvary, it happened in a vain attempt to stop the early church, it happens in vain when God produces accurate modern Bibles - it is your only argument against modern accurate Bibles - Man's vain traditions are always at odds with God's purposes. YOU utterly ignore the REALITY that going back to the most accurate texts available from the early church cannot be considered following the devil's lead - the blind and irrational faith you show in a demonstrably corrupted Bible certainly smacks of demonic influence to me. YOU ignore the fact that GOD could NOT possibly have inspired BOTH the Bibles if the early Church AND the KJB - for they have areas of contradiction - do NOT think it more likely tha GOD blessed the early church and inspired THEIR Bibles? WHY would you think that GOD preferred a Bible that has several hundred errors STILL after 10 or so revisions - 3000 at a minimum at its released - some say 22000? This is the Best God's guidance can produce? Sorry, my deceived friend - that's NOT My GOD. IF My God inspired a Bible translation, it would be perfect - free from man-made opinion and insertions - Like 1 John 5:7 - which if NO OTHER evidence were available by itself, proved an IMPERFECT and UNinspired KJB

+@@kingston163 Lets think about who's talking crap - YOU want to introduce young Christians to a new faith that requires learning a new language? WWJD? He spoke in plain and simple street language - and YOU put a millstone around their neck. Christianity should NOT require a university course in Archaic English. Christianity should NOT be expecting those looking for truth to read a corruptible and in accurate Bible . YOUR downfall as a "faith plus Works" cult is that very often people actually investigate the false claims you make about your corrupt Bible and find it's inaccurate and poorly translated - Then their faith is shipwrecked - IT is impossible for any new convert to be led astray by reading ANY modern and accurate Bible - and you have never even attempted to make a case for that. The KJB should be outlawed by convention in modern Christian churches - IF you want to keep it as an example of archaic textual chaos - GO for it - BUT stop putting millstones around the necks of new believers. FACT!! "Frankly you talk crap to mislead young Christians just as lucifer would like."

it’s actually pretty good. Just a few mistranslations here and there. It’s far better than most!

Respect the Teacher. He has lots of knowledge may God Help you not to be Haughty.

@@laurahennessy2893 he said nothing haughty. He disagreed. May God help you not to be so self-righteous

Ok is it ok to go against GODS will can u show me anywhere in the old king James thats says it ok to change the word of GOD or any of ur knock off counterfeits because they all come from the old king James they have just been perverted by man none of them same its ok to change the word of GOD but they do say DO NOT ADD TO OR TAKE AWAY NOT ONE FOLI r u ok with that or do u obey GODS word HIS true word keep it true and obey GODS word I can show u many scripture that say do not change these words not one foli what part of that do u not understand?

the nkjv relies on the alexandrian text you need to find the Cambridge pure Edition King James Bible that goes off the antioch text , the alexandrian school is the one that stoned Steven in acts 8. HELLO? ANYBODY HOME? HUH?

No

There's KJV study Bibles that help out a lot!

@@Cheryl64014 KJV study Bible helps a lot!!

There’s nothing wrong with the New King James. They use the exact same Textus Receptus as the basis. This video doesn’t explain anything without going back to the Textus Receptus and comparing. You can trust the NKJV, and for you, you’d get more out of it as it is modern english. There’s thousands of renown scholars who will tell you this, but this is the position of the King James only crowd. “No” Isn’t a helpful answer but that’s all he can give because he’s King James only but doesn’t want to plainly come out and say this. There’s problems with being a King James onlyist. Think about this. If the Textus Receptus is in Greek, and the King James is translated in english, FROM the Textus Receptus, then how is it reasonable to compare the New King James directly to the King James, regarding the King James as the basis of the original text when in fact it isn’t?

Amen!

The Poopsmith Amen!

Read your Authorized Version. The NKJV demotes Jesus. In John 1:3 they say all things were made through him. In the Authorized Version. All things were made by him. .The definition of God is Creator Being.

The words have meaning

Knowing that the Spirit of Truth will lead us into all truth, i submit this to you: Modern bibles continually challenge God asking, Did God say? Come on, really? God said He preserved His word. Psalm 12:6-7. Most modern bibles do not. In other words they are not admitting that God has a standard, His inspired word. His word is quick (alive) and quickens (gives life). His word is eternal. Most have at least one out and out lie. NKJB lies in Exodus 6:3. They began to call on the name of the Lord in Genesis 4:26. Others quote Jesus telling his brothers, i am not going to the feast. John 7:8. (Is he saying he is going to break the law of Moses?) He waits and then goes. Liar! BLASPHEMY . Jesus simply said, not going now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem, no lie. And blatantly they mock Jesus and unashamedly, constantly, with each change ask, Did God say? Did God say Mark 11:26? Absolutely. It is an essential part of our walk with God. A verse that makes us tremble was added????? Did God say? Acts 15:34? It shows God's divine providence. Silas was there when Paul needed him for a journey. Obviously Silas remained there. BRAZENLY, they change or remove a word that gives the believers true power! Matthew 12:31 and Mark 9:29! Some spiritual warfare needs prayer and fasting! Did God say eleven (11) times in the New Testament the word damnation, eternal burning? Yes. But not in theirs! Did God say? Did God give three witnesses to that truth? Mark 9:44, 46, 48. They however only have v48. The other two they ask, Did God say? This is important because we need to know the truth and those who preach Annialism, we cease to exist, are easily proven wrong with these verses. Jesus is God and Jesus is Man. Hebrews supports this with four verses, 3:3, 7:24, 8:3 and 10:12: "But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sin for ever, sat down at rhe right hand of God; v10:12. They do not use the clarifying words 'this man' at all. Again, Did God say? Every change they make is an insult to God and His word. God said He would curse those who add to or take from His word. Revelation 22:18-19. In the Old Testament those who honored a false prophet received the reward of that prophet. So the Alexandrian translators, the bible societies the publishers, the promoters, sellers and those who teach from them (showing those ear tickling bibles as God's word) or honor them will be held responsible. If done ignorantly, repent. God will not be mocked. This happened when the inspired Antioch manuscripts called the Textus Receptus were replaced by the Alexandrian manuscripts called the Codex B or the Vaticanus from the Vatican basement, and the Sianiticus from a monestary. They do not agree with each other and the latter has about 30 changes per page. Obviously inspired by their spiritual father who brings conflict, frustration, despair and DOUBT. King James Bible online Helpful tool: Noah Webster 1828 Dictionary online: Look up: REPENT, REGENERATION, BELIEVE, FAITH, REDEMPTION, PERFECT, CONVERSATION, PREVENT, PROPITIATION etc. Suppliers: Churchkjb.com Localchurchbiblepublishers.com Sources: Adullum Films Documentary -Tares Among the Wheat video Books: The Revision Revised and The Last Twelve Verses of Mark, both by William Burgon. Dean Burgon lived during the time of Wescott and Hort. Book: Look What's Missing by David Daniels Chick.com. If interested an old video called The Forbidden Book video. It has some American History also.

But if ease of reading is the justification for the NKJV, why obfuscate?

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Accuracy > "obfuscation"

Fascinating!

Ruthless and strong have the same meaning as a verb- do a word study on it before you label it error

Thank you for this verse. The Bible is the authority and I will follow it.

Amen!

I thought I had.

NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV counterfeit. NKJV a fraud.

Long story. Basically, the holier a people become, God entrusts them with His Word. God bless!

@Jeff Furrow you know NOTHING of history. First the KJV isn’t written in “Old English”. You wouldn’t understand old English. It was written in the language of the day. If you doubt it read the translators to the reader. If anything the KJV translators made their translation easier to read than the way scholars spoke then. Second outside of reports about King James written after his death being homosexual to discredit him zero actual evidence exists. The only LOL here is your lack of knowledge. And I am NOT KJV only. I much prefer the NKJV.

No, cause nasb takes out verses unlike the NKJV

Interesting take.

I suspect that pride and fear do indeed play a role, which is very unfortunate.

NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV a fraud. NKJV counterfeit.

Most of the time, the verses they actually do preach on with the other versions is the still the same as the KJV just with modern langauge and it didnt affect the doctrine.

Amen!

Well, it’d help. But many are not trivial. There is nothing accidental or incidental in the Word. Thank you for watching! God bless,

Devils are fallen angels, as is described in the KJB Bible; the devil and his angels, which are devils. He hath a devil is someone possessed of a fallen angel. Demon comes from the SECULAR Greek, "daemon", which is a spirit (could be wicked or good). Demon originates from paganism. So it is from mythology. Not the same as biblical devil in which the KJB describes. Simarily, many modern versions use Hades in the place of hell. Hades is not the same place as hell. Hades, again, comes from secular/pagan Greek mythology. Hades can be a not-so-bad place, unlike hell. (The river Styx flows through Hades). Modern versions do not update English so much as they claim, however they are weaving in more natural, secular and pagan words into the Bible. These constitute doctrinal changes, however subtle they may be. How does this occur? It is the manuscripts they use being touted as the oldest, so they must be the best. Also, Hebrew and Greek Lexicons. Greek Lexicons were first written to decipher the Greek mythology, philosophers, plays, science, etc; like Philo, Plato, Socrates, Hypocrates, etc. Afterwards they were used (plagiarized/compiled) to decipher the Bible. (you can research that). So, that is why you find so many secular definitions included in Greek and Hebrew in the back of Strong's Concordance. No other Lexicons are any better. They are not reliable sources for study or to find truth. The KJB words fit the context and make perfect sense as it is.

@@brianhaley4471 that's illiteracy. There is ONLY one devil. Please read your Bible

@@brianhaley4471 there is NOTHING in the KJV or any other translation that spells out the origin of devils/ demons. The Greek text says daemon and you seem to have a problem with that. Why? ALL Greek manuscripts use the words Hades and Gehenna. ALL. Hel is the Teutonic goddess of the underworld. You seem to think the KJV is better than the language that GOD chose to preserve His word in.

@@Nick-wn1xw @Van Guard none of what you are saying is true. You believe liberal, unbelieving scholars and commentators over the Bible. Daemon is secular Grk word not biblical grk. Devil is English for fallen Lucifer and his angels. The Greek work hades is a temporal place in Greek mythology, and an eternal place in the Bible...because the context dictates it and the translators knew that it was. Several prior English bibles also translate hades as hell as well as the KJB. Hades is a transliteration and Hell is a translation into English of what the word means. Hell is a place of eternal punishment made for the devil and his angels, and enlarged to accommodate his human followers...to be cast into the lake of fire. The teutonic word hel is from the tectonic language and pagan beliefs, not tbe same as the Bible. Many words in all languages have different meanings. When it comes to dead Hebrew and Greek, are we supposed to buy scholars cleaver claims that translators had ulterior motives because they tranlated a word differently in various passages? Obviously, there is context right in the surrounding verses within a passage. Elohim is plural to describe God's majesty and also singular to describe the Aaron's golden calf as a god. So Elohim can rightly be traslated God and god in English. Btw, as a recent language made up several other languages, English has more words than Hebrew and Greek. God preserved his word throughout Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, Latin and culminating in English. Two streams of manuscripts make up the kjv and all modern bibles. The kjv agrees with 6,000+ mss and modern versions are based on mostly 2 out of 5. The 5 are what most all modern scholars promote. That doesn't mean they're true. They are the most corrected, corruptions that no one denies, yet because they are believed to be the oldest that somehow makes them the best...based on a hypothesis that only the originals are inspired. This is totally opposite what the Bible/kjv says because they are based on totally different texts.

Getting there.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I want one. Sooners you get it 😃

A lexicon written by Roman Catholic Jesuits? Why put a man's book above Gods? Let God be true and every man a liar

I wonder if he believes Psalm 16:1 “preserve” & Psalm 16:11 “evermore” is the promise of the KJV 1611 edition. Yet majority of KJV are 1769. Matter fact a real 1611 Psalm 16:1 starts with “Michtam”.

@@JC-gu2rn I know this guy is not kjv only, but I hate hearing straw man arguments like this. It's very misleading. What people need to realize is that in Bibliology (what the Bible says about the Bible), the Scriptures are 100% silent on translation & textual matters. Preservation is a doctrine and is the very reason why we have the Bible today while translation is the work of man and the reason why the Bible has yet to be printed in every language...

@@328amwhy you be hating on the kjv I love it I’m not a kjvo I just love the translation and think the poetic language is buetiful but if you read the nkjv your still a brother in Christ

@@xxXQUICKXxx Hating? You couldn't be more wrong. I use the kjv everyday and it's what I preach from every week. I just find videos like this to be VERY misleading and kjv onlyism to cause great schism in the body of Christ.

The Ancient Historical Evidence For Jesus. I did a review on it

Thank you.

My friend, what are you talking about.

Would you name a doctrine, he mentions, from the KJV that you think is wrong and explain why? That would be helpful.

We are still awaiting your elaboration, Christian Lives Matter // Crews.

What problem? 50 well known scholars and expert linguistics wrote the KJV

@@tpham7632 That would be FALSE. Yes a few were well known one was perpetually drunk. They were not the best scholars available - they refused. And several simply didn't show up. Neither did they WRITE a Bible. They copied edited and corrupted previous Bibles to please the Sodomite head of the State Catholic Church. The ONLY purpose of the CATHOLIC KJB was to displace the Geneva Bible. An HONEST PROTESTANT Bible that infuriated the wicked pervert on the throne. To that end verses were twisted and corrupted to comply with the 15 rules imposed on the editors by the King. Try to find GOD SAVE THE KING in any Greek or Hebrew text anywhere. Or any other Bible. Like many corruptions of the texts ONLY found in the corruption known as the KJB

No one possesses the original Greek unfortunately.

Amen. Proverbs 13:13.

Never change? Seriously? Spelling, word order, removal of the apocrypha, even the Cambridge and Oxford versions are different. Five revision/corrections at least to date. Not saying the KJV isn’t the best but to say it’s unchanged is just not accurate.

@@Nick-wn1xw Oxford did become willing to follow the Wescott and Hort path to false translations. The Apocrapha was never considered as Holy Writ, but only history. We believe God, you do not. He said He preserved His His word, Psalm12:6,7. You and your bible do not. They use other words in Psalm12:6,7. We will continue to believe Godwe will continue to go through the narrow gate. Not the universal wide road

​@@judyswiderski2682 Found the KJV-onlyer. You and Omega Visual Branding up above. KJV is a great translation, but it's only that - a translation from one language into another. Meaning, it's not the only translation that is valid or the true Word of God, regardless of some differences from one version to another. He preserves His word, absolutely, but how anyone can believe that means only a particular English translation is beyond me and completely ridiculous. People holding the KJV up as the gold standard that is the only valid Bible is equally absurd, and does nothing but breed tribalism and division in the church.

@@stephenwilson0386 PS. Did not God know that little weak England would become Great Britain and that English would be the international language of trade? Would He not therefore make certain that all manuscripts that were inspired be in them? Also consider this: SALVATION IS A HEART ISSUE! Many believe that they are saved because they said the sinners prayer. Yet, "The heart is deceptive above all things and desperately wicked, who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9. That prayer may be from Arminianism which states that man can save himself by his free will. Calvinists say that God chooses and who can resist the Holy Spirit? Stephen told his persecutors that they do always resist the Holy Ghost. Acts 7:51. Scripture says, " The LORD is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart and saveth them that be of a contrite spirit. Psalm 34:18, Isaiah 57:!5, 66:2. Ask God to send the Holy Ghost to you, Luke 11:13. He will gently bring your sins to mind. This will be painful because pride hates it! As they come to mind, confess them to Jesus. Persevere. "Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light." Ephesians 5:14. WHEN you see your desperate need for a sinless Saviour, CRY OUT to Jesus to save you. That is His desire. Then call upon the name of the Lord. How? As Peter told the Jews who were pricked in the heart. Acts 2:38 and as Paul did. Acts 22:16. They were baptized, calling on the name of the Lord. "Jesus answered and said, Verily, verily I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. " John 3:5. John's water baptism included the confessing of sins. Mark 1:1-5. Proverbs 28:13. Jesus baptizes with the Holy Ghost. Luke 3:16. Meditate on Romans 6:3-11 and Colossians 2:6-14, Matthew 28:19-20, 1 Corinthians 12:12-14. King James Bible on line. Helpful tool: Noah Webster 1828 Dictionary on line. Read the King James Bible taken from the inspired Antioch manuscripts. Man does not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live. Deuteronomy 8:3, Matthew 4:4 and Luke 4:4. The inspired word of God instructs in righteousness 2 Timothy 3:16. It quickens (gives life). Hebrews 4:12. It shows the way of righteousness unto holiness. 2 Peter 1:2-11. Peter wrote to the Jews and non Jews. To those Paul ministered to. Modern translations continually asks, Did God say??? Did he say, Mark 11:26? Yes.it is imperative to our walk with God. Did God say, Acts 15:34??? How do they have the nerve to ask? It showed God's divine providence. Paul would needed Silas. Throw those Babylonian god inspired books out? YOU CANNOT DRINK THE CUP OF THE LORD AND THE CUP OF THE DEVILS. 1 Corinthians 10:21.Jesus must be your first love. Revelation 2:1-5. To put men or a man above Jesus is idolatry.

Haha! Good stuff

It would be a short video

Why don't you list here what you call "errors in the KJV" so that we can see & clarify them for you, guitarflame79?

An advocate for the KJV though I am, edmack4me, I do acknowledge the fact that there are some things in the KJV that require some extra study to get to the intent of the original communications of the Lord & there are some updates that can be rendered in some places that would only facilitate understanding & the immediacy of understanding (e.g. certain punctuation marks' usages were different back in the time of the KJV translators from that of more modern times & thus a faithful rendering of punctuation marks or the omission of particular punctuation marks would only aid in clarity of certain passages subjected to the English language; relatedly, there is benefit in accurate honorific capitalization of the initial grapheme of nouns & pronouns referring to Yahweh pre-Incarnation & since His Incarnation, being careful though to not use this convention in the cases wherein unbelievers are quoted, for, obviously, they being unbelievers means they are not thinking of Him as being the Almighty, especially in the NT wherein He in the form of the Christ was rejected either as an imposter or as nothing more than a mere human teacher; likewise, open & closed quotation marks to indicate the beginning & the end of each individual being quoted would be helpful; etc). But this guitarflame79 fellow is just biased against the KJV & is evidently on a campaign to descredit it entirely & that is a serious problem, one that indicates that something quite questionable, to say the least, is afoot!

There is too many to list. It would take too long to list them all but I'll give you one, "Easter" should have been translated "Passover" in Acts.

Many thanks!

Read it and see how you like it without comparing it to the kjv, when you feel it's too different to you then compare it to the original languages.

@@Nick-wn1xw Are you sure about that ? The Geneva calls Jesus " it " John 1:3-4 1599 Geneva Bible (GNV) 3 All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing that was made. 4 In it was life, and that life was the light of men.

Tim Campbell That’s absolutely crazy but although I prefer the KJV Bible over other translations, the KJV at times calls Holy Spirit an it which doesn’t sound right and I’m honestly not sure why they translated this way. In this particular matter when I’ve read the NASB they do a better job at exalting the deity of Holy Spirit by not referring to Holy Spirit as an it but to He, Him or Himself. Perhaps brother Waldron can explain why this is. Here are just a few verses: John 1:32 And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and [it] abode upon him. Rom 8:16 The Spirit [itself] beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: Romans 8:26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit [itself] maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. 1 Peter 1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when [it] testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.

I would use the kjver

@@Nick-wn1xw See; Counterfeit Bibles: Geneva Bible. NKJV and false KJBs.

Me too, I drew closer to God in Heaven and he drew closer to me, I am so humbled for the ability to study King James. Praise God

Dont' matter which Bible you use to be saved, but the Bible is like a trojan horse. you get the mesage of salvation in every one but some minor things can affect doctrine and lead you astray..

Cambridge Large Print Text only. God bless!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa why don't you trust the KJV teanslators original notes? Did they not know what they were talking about?

what original notes? most of the "notes" in the gutter columns are reference's with other scripture and short explanations of hebrew or greek words @@Nick-wn1xw

Great suggestion!

Darby was a trinitarian believer and his translation predicts that. We know God is a Spirit not a man and he alone created all things by himself and for himself after the counsel of his own will. (Rev. 4:2) one in heaven, Amen.....Jesus- Jehovah Savior, God with us (Matt. 1:23)

@@luelue3460 I have no problem with John N.Darby,in fact I have a copy of Darby's translation new testament.All I'm interested is a comparison of the KJV and Darby Bible translation.I have a NKJV Bible but read from it for comparison and commentary since in Philippines the Bible Commentary that is conservative and uses the KJV as it's basic text.

Which one you like the most?

King James Bible

Frank. God looks upon those bibles as an abomination. He said not to add to or take from His word. Revelation 22:18.

@@judyswiderski2682 Then go read it in Greek and Hebrew. I guarantee you won't though.

Which Hebrew and Grrek manuscripts o na.rss one.

Amen! I’ll try

+ Charles Doyle Just WHY would you love a corrupted and archaic text when there are so many accurate and honest translations today that are NOT the result of a Catholic theologian and a sodomite kings' rules . . . Makes NO sense to me that a Christian wanting to hear the Words of GOD would even accept anything coming through those filters. "This KJV Only review was more intelligent than all the others on RU-vid. Most of the others are done by morons who use idiotic ideology. I love the KJV for many of the same reasons that you do."

Not sure

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa God bless you Pastor, this knowledge is needed by such thirsty Christians today being deceived by these modern demonations.(I know that's not a word, you understand)

I was trying to talk to a Facebook teacher today about changes that affect doctrine and his reply to me was the doctrine is a word created by the Catholic Church. I literally broke down into tears. There is no talking to so many so-called pastors and teachers today and I see a version of the Bible in the future being created that will be completely ecumenical without offending anyone. If people do not understand that everything real was created in, by, for and through Christ as the Word as the cornerstone and foundation of our faith, and that he is Truth, and that all we can count on especially today is the Truth of the scriptures... there will come a time that they will have nothing to turn to if they have not loved and sought the Truth.

@@soundimpact4633 *_God Bless_*

@@soundimpact4633 Doctrine is in the Bible, that’s for sure.

Of course. I’ve gone over that ad naseum on the channel.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Good to know. I've only seen your study bible reviews before.

@@SaneNoMore Amen. We’re at well over 5,000 videos on the channel, plus the Biblical Archaeology Today with Steve Waldron podcast, another 1500+.

God is not double minded , we can not have two separate, different messages from God , One is true , the other is false a counterfeit , in the New translations its say that Elhanan slew Goliath. 2 Samuel 21 v 19 . That is a lie , an error, a big porky , understand its the corrupted manuscripts that produce corrupt bibles , you can trust the AKJV .

Perhaps first watch: "The New American Standard Bible Updated NASBU Compared To The KJV" *_God Bless_*

I agree

Only one is the Word of God , the other is the word of Satan , different is the opposite of the Same , God never gave us 2 separate manuscripts , only one , and only one is His true Word .

@@nzbrotrev9028 There are many manuscripts. The oldest ones are fragments, that often don't even agree with each other. There's no such thing as an "original manuscript" of any biblical book that exists anywhere in the world that we know of. The oldest we have were written hundreds of years after the original writing.

@@MysticRayBRV I agree with that statement , but only one is the Word of God , the other is Antichrist, we can't have two separate (different) Bibles . Sample of why I don't ont care for the new translations. NIV , ESV both say , Elhanan killed Goliath 2 Samuel 21 v 19 , that is a lie , we both know it was David , 1 Samuel 17 v 51 . We could find a million fragments of Manuscripts , but if they contradict what God has said , we should reject the them .

it sounds the same, but is it? I looked it up: evil seems to being the opposite of good and wickness. While calamity is when you have a great loss... those are two differnt words... hmmmm, stick with KJV.

NKJV counterfeit. NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV a fraud. NKJV demotes Jesus among other things. In John 1:3 it says, all things were made through him. S/b by him. By definition their Jesus cannot be God. God is the Creator Being. Modern bibles go further, they quote Jesus in a lie. In John 7:8 their Jesus says I am not going to the festival. (No, not me, not going). He waits and then goes. Liar! BLASPHEMY!!! Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. (No not right now, no not yet). He waits and then goes. No lie! No CONFUSION. Many changes are made. Book Look What's Missing by David Daniels chick Publication. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. This has some American history. Church history: Lamp in the Dark video RU-vid. What will Jesus do with those who honor the lying Jesus or accept His demotion??? NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV a fraud. NKJV counterfeit.

@@judyswiderski2682 your cut and paste nonsense is getting really old. What does your KJV say about women teaching men?

@@Nick-wn1xw When last I looked these were discussions. Women can argue a point. Amazing how many men will pull that one out when they are not choosing to seek the truth!

Cody The basic issue is are you using the correct Greek Text. The Revision Revised by John W Burgon who lived during the time of Wescott and Hort. These two men were determined to go to hell and it seems that they may have succeeded. And like most evil deceivers they do not want to go there alone.

​@@judyswiderski2682 The NKJV is translated from the TR. Not the CT.

Paul said it meant 1 in this instance in Galatians.

Yes, and I'm referring to the OT reading.

So Paul was wrong?

Paul wasn't wrong. You may be wrong in your exegesis of the Bible in that one place. This is exactly how false doctrine gets started. Beware, and that's exactly what I'm saying. I have an Interlinear Bible and usually consult that to be sure of anything like this. You want to start an argument, and all I'm saying is "descendants" makes more sense in the verse here. It doesn't diminish the Bible in anyway to have the correct wording here. Unless the apostles quote the Bible to make it clear what they are saying, then it would make sense. Exegesis is sometimes just another person's opinion. My faith does not ride on a person's opinion.

Maybe it would make you feel better to know the Septuagint version of the NKJV has "seed" in that verse.

Amen. So often modern versions keep popular passages intact, so as not to arouse controversy.

In Galatians 4 Paul says it is seed, singular, not seeds plural. Yet the NKJV translates the Ot passage Paul is referring to as plural, descendants. Inspired Paul knew Greek better than the NKJV translators. It’s a prophecy of Messiah.

I read them also.both of these translations is a word for word translations

James, would both accurate in saying : "God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering" or " God will provide for himself the lamb for a burnt offering"

The NKJV denotes Jesus. In John 1:3, all things were made through Him. He cannot be God by definition. God is the Creator Being. NKJV counterfeit. NKJV a deadly translation. NKJV a fraud.

@@judyswiderski2682 You have taken one verse out of context. John 1:1-2 affirms the Diety of Jesus.

Amen

Amen!

I think it discourages them more when Paul translates it singular in the New Testament while the NKJV translators say it should be plural, in contrast to Paul’s inspired writing. Introducing an error in Scripture is terrible!

You are blessed. I used the NKJV for many years. Some parts of it bothered me, like John 1:3, made through him instead of made by him. Wish I had known years earlier. I went through testing and found the words of man do not have the power of the word of God. Blessings.

@@judyswiderski2682 You are decieved. Neither conveys the accurate meaning of the Greek fully. Some Greek concepts do NOT translate into English clearly. You are attempting to define the actions of the infinite timeless Godhead in finite terms which is impossible. Nor can the mind if man or the language of man express creation adequately. Neither is fully accurate. Both are at best approximations.

Stay with and study the KJB , the rest aren't front God , God will never lie.

@@nzbrotrev9028 God does not lie so true. But the KJV only cult lie to try and justify the KJV only deception

@@samlawrence2695 Both can't be right , only one is from God , the other a cursed , a false gospel.

@@nzbrotrev9028 How are modern translations cursed when God is using and blessing them to bring many to Christ. Born again of the Spirit of God. Loving the Lord Jesus Christ, unlike the KJV only cult the fruit of the Spirit is evident. If you were a Bible believer instead of a KJV idolater. You would know that "it is by their fruit that you know them" Not what translation of scripture you read. The fruit of the KJV only cult is absolute poison. Full of hypocrisy, double standards and outrageous lies. Calling the word of God cursed because it is not the idol you worship. Is close to blaspheming the Holy Spirit. How can Satan cast out Satan? You sound very much like false teacher and KJV only heretic the Jack Hyles. Again showing how vile and demonic the KJV only cult that Satan has raised up really is. No doctrine is changed in the modern more accurate translations that God has blessed us with. Not one despite your delusions and fantasies. The NIV the translation that Satan hates most, therefore the KJV only cult hates most. Is far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than your idol the KJV. Also the KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. They said that even the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult in their delusions pride and arrogance think they know better. KJV onlyism is an indefensible unbilical Christ dishonouring cancer from the pit of hell.

Maybe the American KJV? Remember the thees and thous are singular, ye’s and yous are plural. So they do serve a purpose.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGagotcha, another question, are there flaws with the KJV that are similar, or would they be considered minor, compared to the the other versions in this video.. thanks for the reply

KJVER,= KJV easy read, look it up here on youtube

I was there one time myself. Read it from cover to cover.

And I'm sure you are full of & exhibit its errors, Christian Lives Matter // Crews.

@@fiery.mercaba The NKJ is a vast improvement over the KJ - BUT BOTH come from corrupted catholic texts - and neither should be considered an accurate representation of God's revelation. They are a diminishing concession to tradition and Catholicism.

See my other post I addressed to you a few minutes ago,@@paulrobinson9318 , for it also adequately answer this post of yours here.

@@paulrobinson9318 lol so which should we use???

Huh, John Lee?

No, you must be baptized.

Seems to me baptism is a work. Saved by grace through faith. Was just Lot baptized? Last you heard from him he was drunk in a cave having sex with his daughters. Was Adam lost? What good works did he do? Sampson was whoring around with someone he shouldn’t have been with and committed suicide while killing thousands. King David committed adultery and murder and was never baptized. All saved because of faith. Even Rahab the harlot who’s in the lineage of Jesus’s was saved due to her faith. Sirs what must I do to be save? Acts 17, believe on the Lord Jesus. Didn’t say anything there about believing and being baptized. Good place to put it if that was the case. John 20 states that the things written in John were written so that believing you would be saved. God never changes, Old Testament or New. Saved by grace through faith and that not of yourselves it a a gift of God not of works. Amen

Yes. Unless Jesus was lying to the thief on the cross.

Glad it was helpful!

Nah. My issue is I sit down once a week and do all of these videos, 10-20, off the top of my head from previous study. So it won't be detailed on minutiae normally. But I appreciate the information! God bless!

No one seems to question the Greek sources, just the KJV. Its a forgone conclusion that the KJV not accurate with a majority of authorities (so-called) saying so. But ridicule follows if we question those authoritative voices. How do we know the Greek is correct and not corrupt? I agree that what the Bible says goes and should not be filtered through doctrine, but the other way around. Nor should we look to all what is purported to be the original languages because we don't like whats in the KJV.

Your view lacks objectivity. What Greek? The Greek of the KVB translators, Dead Koine Greek, Four other dead Greek languages, Strong's secular Greek, Greek in the Sinaticus, Greek in the Vaticanus? Which one is correct? "you want the translator to put what should be there doctrinally"...is simply your biased opinion.

greg harvey I'm NKJV and I agree

greg harvey Thank you; my point too

Go to our Church website

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa ok . i sent email :" TEST : Iraqi Christian leaving Catholic faith ministry " . I found nohing about the Odin question on your site sir

This is just what kjvonlyists do. Super hypocritical.