I know right? Zlewikk played to be powerful and snowball while ParadoxAddics played for pretty borders, and an orgasmic world to look at. That New Byzantine and Italy gave me chills.
Feel free to join our new Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/Zlewikk. If you would like to talk to me, ask some questions and play together, come to my Discord channel: discord.gg/NAys3pf.
Do a Prussia game where you prohibit yourself from expanding to much into the east. A line down from Memel to the carpathians. And primarily expand into Germany.
dude on the right's rulers were insane the whole game. That's a lot of chucking the baby in the river (spending prestige to kill bad heirs), or savescumming, or both. The world may never know. I refuse to believe he's just that lucky that ALL of his heirs are in the 75th percentile or greater and I'm just that unlucky.
And if you still have any concerns, ESPECIALLY about savescumming, just watch the campaign, coz everything is recorded ;) ru-vid.com/group/PLQYwQrZmzDdIzX58Pvjy-gFzRVUf6dwdx
Additional evidence toward this is that he changes dynasties more than once or twice. I am going to watch more of these to see, but I'm expecting to see more of the same. But I guarantee the amount of points accrued by dude on the right was many many more than dude on the left, and there's your difference. It's an easily cheese-able thing that makes the largest difference in the game. What type of rulers do you get?
@@smoothkid765 you know that revolution is republic and it has elections every few years (different "dynasties) and in every reelection the ruler get 1 of each point?
Od dawna próbuję zrobić swoje pierwsze World conq i zawsze wykladam się na Indiach i mingu w okresie absolutyzmu i rewolucji. Mam wrażenie że nie wykorzystuje tego czasu jak trzeba. Przecież żeby tak schrupać Indie to trzeba mieć w każdym dwuletnim cyklu corowania 100% over ext. non stop bez przestojów. To jest niemożliwe. :(
Hi. which version EU did you play Prussia and how did you make core so many regions? In my game its costs many adm and dip points for expansion. Despite I hired expensive advisors but this actually turned Prussia to low development tech. How did you solve that problem in your game of Prussia? Its not problem with wars and expansions but lacking adm points to make cores to region is really a problem.
1.27 I think. Here is the playlist with the whole campaign: ru-vid.com/group/PLQYwQrZmzDdIzX58Pvjy-gFzRVUf6dwdx Until midgame I didnt plan a WC, just stacking bonuses so the run was with quite a latency on expansion. Generally you always need to remember that when the absolutism and adm efficiency come, you can conquer everythibg with extreme speed, especially when you stack vassal integration and dip rep bonuses
I wonder why neither of them chose the HRE route. It's not difficult to win the religious war and be elected and by that time (early 1600s) you should have all of Eastern Europe, Anatolia and Scandinavia to add to the HRE, meaning instantly 3 to 4 reforms. The 10% coring cost alone is worth doing that, not to forget that this way you can later get the entire German region full cored for free, or half the world if you feed the vassal swarm. This isn't a Prussia run, this is a Germany playthrough, because the only reason to forego the HRE emperorship is to form Germany.
@@ZlewikkTV I love how active you are but can you tell me a secret my man? How do you have time for a job, a girl and so many EU4 campaigns? I'm happy if I can get in maybe 4 hours of gaming a week.
*takes quantity in 1663* WTH thats an earlygame ideagroup, by this time it has started to fall off, AND HE TOOK OFFENSIVE EARLY, filthy roleplayers. HE EVEN TAKES DEFENSIVE EVEN LATER
Did paradox really have to add in t-series? "Hey Jake how's the reviews going for our new game" **Jake is watching the T-series and pewdiepie fight** "I got a idea"
![[EU4] Double Timelapse - Prussia - Zlewikk vs ParadoxAddicts](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
