Europe's New Border Force Explained 

Doesn't it sound like a Czech TV show with cops steamed in an English speaking country?

Lemmino too

And Mustard. Great content.

Dude he's the chosen one what do u expect

@@Dixxi yo your so right his animations are god as well

**cough** **cough** Kurzgesagt **cough** **cough**

Yeah

Y u simp bro?

Thank you! I used your texture pack for the animations in this video ;)

I love both of you guys because of the godly editing

@@neoexplains which program/s you used for animations

Hopefully

@@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368NATO is the western world united, and I happen to like our American allies. The goal should be to cooperate, not divide.

@@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 Europe doesn't get a free ride, that is misinformation. The US gets to station tons of military in Europe, which they use as a threat against Russia and to send planes from to the Middle East. The US would never give anything for free.

@@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 True. NATO is a European scam to drain American taxpayers.

@@noxiteprova8878 yes they do only like three countries actually meet their defense commitments. And ststioning troops there costs Americans money. Either Russia is not a threat and it's waste of money to be there or it is a threat and europe has plenty of money to protect itself.

Then why are they not bunting them out? It is almost like anyone who lands in EU can just take over; whoever the hell designed such suicidal laws?

@@utkarshg.bharti9714 you should look in to the NGOs funding and organising the importation of people in to European nations.

Like all those refugees love Greece so much? Lol they just wanna go to Germany France etc, Greece is just getting used as a dog by the European union. If Greece had some balls against Germany it would let the refugees in.

@@yurauro1900 You think those migrants love Germany or Sweden instead?

@@ddpmk355 more then Greece lmao

creating a pocket of rich white people to protect from the scary brown people

Tough situation. I'm from Italy and even there the disparity between North and South is stark.

keep your heart guiri lol

@@marcelloziglioli8954 southern italy put italy on the map though. all those gangster movies.

It would be more fair if refugees were equally distributed among all EU countries so that the southern countries wouldn't be overwhelmed by having to take care of all of those refugees. Those refugees wanted to go to the EU, it's unfair that Southern countries have to deal with too many of them while some the other countries refuse to take them in.

@@ooooneeee I agree, such a sharing scheme would force us in the North to invest more heavily in border protection and making better deals with relatively safe non-EU countries. People shouldn’t have to cross the dangerous Mediterranean sea when there are multiple alternative countries on their long journey.

No problem

Theyre in other words, economic migrants, not refugees

some people are in danger in the turkish state (from norther part of syria)

@@Neuzahnstein some, but not the whole bunch of people that rush into Europe every day

We don’t want them in Turkey neither

@@Zappuify they were from syria , so they are asylum seekers to you ,so thay are not our problem Also if you dont want them stop supporting hamas!!!

Standing corpse sounds so much more threatening lol

this is one of the reasons why the english language sucks😭

because reasons 🤷🏻

He probably pronounces it "corpse", as in Afrika Korps. That's European enough, especially in brown people removal context ...

@@miroslavhoudek7085 mad cause europe has had enough

EU isn’t a country, you’re a citizen of only one country in the Union.

@@fifteen_march Wrong. EU Citizenship has been a thing since 1992. Never voted at EU elections or used your European Health Insurance Card?

That greatly depends on how they strenghten it. Seeing the videos and photos that come from the bulgarian-croatian border (people beaten and thrown in frozen rivers, broken hands, crushed phones, stolen documents) doesn't really inspire much faith in their methods.

So you also support threatening valid asylum seekers, breaking human rights and betraying our values?

​@@qdaniele97Exactly.

Because their actions against migrants are more often than not illegal. Whether or not you yourself think these countries have an obligation to receive migrants, the law does say you can't just turn them away with gunboats. If LAW ENFORCEMENT agencies aren't following laws, well, what is the point? Either go for revising the UN charter on rights entitled for migrants, withdraw from it (and receive the understandable backlash) or stop breaking laws. You can't just keep breaking international treaties you signed up to.

Because they made the problems, they should have take the consequenses which are the immigrants

The migrants are breaking the law by not respecting borders

@@chinguunerdenebadrakh7022 The law mentions refugees and not migrants. They are not refugees but migrants like you mentioned.

because they have laws saying they won't, and there's internal disagreement about it. we're just saying they have to either follow their own rules or change them.

Especially from someone who is trying to illegally enter it

Immigration due to suffered political or ideological persecution is not illegal. Demanding Asylum is not illegal. Denying asylum and sending people back is not illegal, but that costs too much. What technically seen illegal is, is to not hear these refugees out. Since you never know their reasons for emigration of their home country. And forcing them to go back where they might get killed. That's the issue at hand. It isnt just black and white. There is alot of gray going on. ✌.

@@davgg9621 you are 100% right. This issue is very complicated. But I have an opinion which is quite unpopular in western Europe. I support Russian policy regarding refugees. We accept only refugees from Ukraine. These people don't have any problems with integrating in our community because the only difference between locals and them is pronunciation of the letter G ([h] instead of [gh]). They're not a threat because they have the same faith, mentality and level of education as we do. I know, it's quite cynical but safe for us

@@davgg9621 unfortunately there is a lot of “ gray “ in this you are right. But let be honest the most people ( over 90% ) who comes over the Mediterranean Sea or the Balkan route are Asylum seekers. They are escaping there homeland to have a “ better “ life.

@@glebbak19 absolutely agree with you.

@BolinFYMThere are good arguments for both letting the immigrants in and keeping them out, however both of these groups don't see the big picture. If they really want to address the problem, they should focus their energy on the root cause of this issue, which is terrible living conditions in the middle east. The people who do actually get into the EU are just a small percentage of the people who suffer under terrible conditions at home. Doing this would satisfy everybody since we would both help the immigrants and stop their influx into the EU.

@@Domi-cv7oo The Problem is, that at the current rate of climat catastrophes getting more frequent, there are going to more and more refuges and some of them won't even have a home to return to or stay at anymore. If we don't combat problems like that and the many many wars being fought in those countries and instead just worry about letting people into our union, we will loose a big chunk of our humanity. So yes I agree. We have to combat the root of the problems, which isn't the migrants themselves.

@@benediktgsell4428 Unfortunately most of those in power do not have a moral compass. If they had one, they would do everything that is possible in order to create a better world. But instead, they only put up an image of morality and focus on gaining power and wealth. They are very intelligent people, and they are aware that global warming will cause mass famine and uninhabitability of large parts of the world. But they simply do not care, because this will not affect them personally, they will be long dead by the time the world is totally screwed up, so they focus on enjoying their life as much as possible.

@@Domi-cv7oo if they had a moral compass they wouldnt be in power in the first place. Life is not a fairytale and only the most ruthless gets to dominate.

@@miniaturejayhawk8702 Of course, I'm fully aware of that. I just find it depressing how we're headed for destruction because of our messed up nature, how because of our nature there is so much unnecessary suffering. But hey, at least we aren't living in the middle ages, where people would be burned alive for having such views.

I always wonder what goes through peoples’ minds when they hear about large agencies violating international laws and human rights, then continue to support them. Nevermind that the immigration rates are slowing down, or that Fortex’s utilization of drone surveillance is creepy, is that really the price to pay so that some conservative in his safe home can feel more at peace? We have the same issue in the States. A right-wing who increasingly focuses on immigration, despite data pointing in the opposite direction, all so that they get a nice soundbyte at a rally. It’s silly.

@@DrOctatonic You really dont understand the problem do you? There is too much of these immigrants already, and they dont want to adopt our culture nor assymilate. Europeans are dying out because the immigrants have more children than an average EU couple. Europe should belong to Europeans and you shouldnt have a problem with that.

@@DrOctatonic come to Europe and see the areas they reside, you will boil with anger. These so called refuges are for free welfare and imposing their set barbaric laws in the civilized lands, please research before putting such nonsense in internet

Lol they called Trump in my country for border security yet Europeans agree it’s necessary

@@DrOctatonic I support Frontex because we need to control our external borders in order to maintain our internal borders open as they should be. You can't ask a nation or a federation to have no control over who enters its borders. Methods used should of course respect laws. I'm not an expert but it's reasonable to assume that drone surveliance is much more efficient in spotting migrants than boats patrolling. this means that with the same resorces more boats can be spotted and rescued saving more lifes, this is not said in the video. In view of future possible mass migrations caused by climate changes new international laws should be discussed to regulate the proces as much as possible. I'm proud to live in the EU that many consider soo much better that are ready to risk their lives to reach it, a well regulated immigration can be a resource as well as a bad regulated or disregulated one is a problem.

are they now sending them back tho?

@@nuibui6667 Very rarely, they don't usually say where they come from, and even when we know, African/Islamist countries don't want them back.

Same here.

Who beheaded her?

@@A.S.D442 Who do you think? "PARIS/NICE, France (Reuters) - A knife-wielding Tunisian man shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is Greatest) beheaded a woman and killed two other people in a church in the French city of Nice on Thursday before being shot and taken away by police.".

Soon to be "Islamic European Union".

Well Europe is going to become a Islamic caliphate of 21st century.

Thank you so much!

You’re aware that the surface area of a country is a terrible metric for population totals, right?

@@coenogo I knew that I would get such a moronic reply. Everybody who wants to understand my comment does understand it.

@@Sagittarius-A-Star Then explain it to me, so that I can understand it. And how is my reply 'moronic', when I'm simply stating a fact?

@@coenogo i think by size he refers to amount of countries, which is not wrong

@@magnuscoles5010 Then he should/would have said “the sheer *number* of countries”

How do they let you know of their presence?

@@supersecularboypants they do a lot of rioting.

I love how muslims speak sh1t about non muslims but then also try to get in those countries

@@supersecularboypants Modest clothing, darker features (more apearent in Northern and Western Europe), accents, and even slight things like what they buy at the grocery store can greatly sway your opinion if the person is an expat or not.

Θεσσαλονίκη? Cool!! DJ LOSER is from there! I’m from California, but yeah, he’s a favorite musician of mine.

Thank you!

> is thankful for living in a peaceful country > Wants people who aren't peaceful in her country

@@nostro1940 i never said that! i just said i'm grateful to live in a good country. i don't know where you got that assumption from haha

@@nostro1940 what do you mean by "people who aren't peaceful" ? how can a refugee be a threat?

@@ibrahimkhatib1554 thats the thing. You assume something that isn't true. They aren't refugees but economic migrants. 2021 and people still fall for that

Refugees are not a threat, they are fleeing war. Have some humanity

@@ibrahimkhatib1554 there is a difference between refugee and illegal immigrant. Most that cross over are illegal immigrants. They are just using the middle east situation for their own benefit.

@@lianglonglong Like Syrians? Someone fleeing war and death is a refugee not an immigrant. They had no choice but to leave their home country or face death.

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ibrahimkhatib1554 yeah why they are fleeing. See what Is lamists are doing in Europe. Arson, riot, murder, r@pe, rampant in Europe due to these people.

The EU is the reason they exist to begin with, abd the reason you can't deport them. The EU should collapse

@@Fyrdman pretty sure our high level of wealth has to do with it, wether we are in the EU or not. Still no borders between EU states makes it more easy ofcourse

Completely agree increased border security will hold progressive and conservative EU states together. Immigration really is the only real concern of states like Hungary and Poland and their infighting in threatening EU stability. The EU should fortify it’s external border and each member state can choose how many immigrants it wants to take.

@@robertjonker8131 the laws the EU has makes it so you can't deport people back to a country they deem unsafe.

@@JamesBond-rb1ln Yeah! Because if the EU doesn't secure it's borders then the insividual states will, and by that point you've literally ended the free movement of goods and peoples policy which is one of the cornerstones of the EU

Why? Isn't it from from the Latin corpus "body"?

@@ml9849 I have no idea

Along with this correction: Maroco is spelled Morocco

@@ml9849 Yes, but ... It came to English twice. Once straight from Latin, as the word corpse. Once from French, as the word corps. Pronounciation is different because it would be really disconcerting to talk about military units as dead bodies. It would be a bit too "on the nose".

And also when Neo said Melilla he said Me-Lilla instead of May-ee-a I think how it pronounced in Spanish.

I like the look too but without the UK Frontexs budget is payed 50/50 from France and Germany.

I love the map of EU without the U.K. too, our economy will finally prosper

@Milschisch huge loss for the EU but us in the U.K. are very happy

So happy to not be included in this federal creep. Like the British Land Rovers though.

@@tornadochaser7226 I know why ur happy and it’s great that finally someone left the EU but Germany won’t ever leave the EU

i thought the US doesn't follow the push back rule at all though? like they'll turn away mexicans even if they're genuinely seeking asylum

why not spend the millions for the planes on some sort of larger ship where you can legally check and register each refugee and legally deport them afterwards if they are not allowed to enter? the goal should be to protect the boarders AND save the refuges that can not go home duo to risk of their life. if the goal is to protect without thinking about human lives they might as well sink the boats imo. the current system (as this video described it) sounds like smth china would do with nord korea tbh

@@dawre3124 That's not really practical. It can take months or even years to process an asylum claim because there is such a massive backlog. A ship holding thousands of asylum seekers for a very long time is a logistical and safety nightmare. It would become a floating refugee camp within days.

Wtf wasnt the EU army a conspiracy theory a couple years ago?

@@KVQ0 everything is a conspiracy if said soon enough

Well said. Imagine what Europe can do with an entire NATO budget.

Let's vote! ...realy can we???

EU army would be great

Africa also.

More like 1916.

@@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 As if Britain and France would've cared LOL

@@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 ah yes the ottoman empire once a bastion of knowledge and the society that gate kept the entrance to Asia. Wealthy, prosperous and while stagnant in power was certainly not "backwards" by The end of WW1

That was diversity. Diversity is/was their greatest strength.

Not in English.

@@arnaup5240 in english as well

@@arnaup5240 Ignacio is right. In English it's pronounced using Spanish rules. I'm British and have always called the city "Me-lee-ya" with the elle / doble-ele sound.

Yes. Same in Frensh

Google translate pronounce melilla me-li-la in english

cringe

Safe from what?

@@richpryor9650 From people that are trying to enter illegally

Frontex isn't new though. They've been a thing for many years.

Its time to form an EU🇪🇺 army, to protect our continent's borders!

There is no need for a EU army to protect our borders. Cooperation, yes please. Centralization, no thanks.

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 and you know that how?

​@@ggoddkkiller1342 nice word salad

As a racist*

@@AutonomousPlayground no, I don’t care, wouldn’t want them here if they were white or blue or green

@@AutonomousPlayground House one of their families yourself for a year, then talk.

@@sipa1593 I have housed refugees

@@AutonomousPlayground Where are you from? Which refugees specifically.

citation needed

@@-morrow and citation needed for all of this video.

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 Good on Greece & Spain for doing that. These fake refugees should go left or right instead of always heading for Europe. The majority of these people are just opportunists looking for a job. Push them all away, fix your problems in your own countries and don't make them ours.

@@dkpirie Fake refugees? I guess according to you ridiculous people there aren't 3.6 million Syrian refugees in Turkey rather they are just ''fake'' numbers, huh?? And it is ''their own problems'' due western countries never ever invaded countries one after another in the region, never supported shady groups and even terrorists like US support to alqaeda between 1979 and 1989, right??? You people are such biased jokes...

What do you suggest?

@@neoexplains honestly didn't expect a reply and I cannot say I have a great title in mind. The only idea I have is "How Europe's Approach to Immagration is Changing." You make amazing videos deserving of millions of views and I'd hate for any of them to be overlooked due to confusion. I wish I could be of a better help

@@g-rated3514 I tried something new now with the title and thumbnail. Let's see what happens.

@@neoexplains I pray it works!

No it isn't. Neither belong in Europe or even America. Nobody was ever asked. We were told.

@@aguelch Lmao your social security systems would collapse without a constant influx of skilled immigrants. And I don't think I need to tell you what happens after that.

@@angadsingh9314 imigrants on average, statistically are a net sink, they take more then they give trough welfare.

This needs more upvotes

@@apoked let’s give it to him, people should see the difference

Absolutely agree.

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 @Ggoddkkiller that's why I said the majority, not all of them, there are some honest refugees that will stop at the nearest safe place, but sadly a majority of the people trying to enter europe are illegal immigrants or economic migrants wanting to exploit the terrible situation that the refugees are going through

Some of thoese mexicans illegal should really be considered refugees ,organized crimes it rampent and alot of familes get threatend if there son doaent join the gang so they flee

@@mikeoxsmal8022 It's true but i don't think half of Mexico is under threat.

@@wat4089 I'm from a country that is in worse condition than mexico, Venezuela, and i can tell you that at least the 60% of the population (here) is in some kind of risk (social, political, economic,sanitary, of health etc)

@@JesusGarcia-ec7jo economical risk does not give you the right to asylum.

@@wat4089 i know and this is something unfair for some prespective. Thik this way: You are in a country where you cant buy enough food for a week, you win arround 30$ per month and almost every food article of 1 kg cost 1$, how do you survive in conditions like this? linving this way alone is hard. And 30$ just for food, no including in this equal: house rent, basic services, ipounds, if you live with other people, if you get sick. And the other factor is: in this case you habe a job that is "good paid" (for this price in the place that i live) I think the economic risk is something that can make you more vulnerable to other kind of risk ... PD:Sorry if my english sucks

As if the USA will allow it...lol! If this were to happen, the CIA will likely stage some false flag attack, raise the boogeyman of "evil Russia" and then Germany and Swedistan will crap their pants and run towards the USA.

The problem is that France wants to use EU army as their own, while Germany does not want any army and prefers making business deals with the enemies.

@@utkarshg.bharti9714 LOL CIA doesn't have to do anything. Most important EU countries are Germany and France. Germany is selling weapons to Turkey despite Greece protest while France is allied with Islamist warlord in Libya. Every EU countries knows they cant trust EU army.

@@utkarshg.bharti9714 That's not how the CIA operates.

our lord USA wont let us have common army, remember we are occupied vassels, nothing else

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 nerd

@@barendgaming2847 Yep, knowing and caring about international laws is being ''a nerd''...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 if you cared about international law you would know that refugees must stay in the first safe country they get to after fleeing their own country. After that they are no longer refugees, but economic migrants. Just so you know, about 95% of immigrants coming to Italy have their asylum request denied, as they do not qualify for it.

@@agiosromylos1315 Reaching a safe country doesn't magically take away refugee rights from those people instead they are considered as refugees as long as the war in their home continues according UN refugee convention 1951!!! So it is just another cheap excuse you ''international law experts'' found that we can see it in ''about 95% immigrants coming to Italy have their asylum request denied'' nonsense as you wrote IMMIGRANTS while those people are refugees!! No country which is signatory in UN refugee convention 1951 can refuse asylum request of refugees rather has to provide a place for them to stay and this is why both Greece and Spain are violating international laws by assuming all those people are illegal immigrants not refugees and using force against them...

Greece and Spain commit illegal push-backs simply because majority of those people aren't illegal immigrants rather refugees who have a right to seek asylum!!! Greece can easily send illegal immigrants back to Turkey or Spain to Morocco but they can't send refugees back according to UN refugee convention 1951 therefore they just ''assume'' all those people are illegal immigrants without any proof nor investigation and forcefully push them back which is against international laws without any question at all...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 well we can't let millions of people in, there's just not enough resources for that

@@oleksandr6187 Then EU must force assad for the reforms he already promised which would convince many refugees to return or establish a safe zone inside Syria!! But does EU do anything about those subjects??? NOPE, even if there are several thousand French etc soldiers inside Syria!! Rather they are beating refugees...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 it's not their business to meddle into other countries internal affairs.

@@oleksandr6187 It isn't their internal affairs if they displace more than 12 million people that 8 million of them became refugees in other countries!!..

Do u love Erdogan?

I wonder if a time will come when countries fed up with mass immigration will opt out of the Refugee Convention. I wonder if it is even possible to opt out.

That's not really accurate, given that part of the motivation for the convention came in the aftermath of WWII, where thousands of Jews sought asylum and were denied. Things are obviously more complicated than that alone, but to claim that mass migrations were not thought of is incorrect.

Nonsense. Refugees by definition come in big waves. Each war creates s huge number of refugees in a short time. E.g. all the people evacuated out of Afghanistan this summer. Or the many millions displaced by world war two.

Frontex practices like pushbacks would only be illegal if legal immigration alternatives wouldn't exist

who said it's not ok

Böhmerman is a clown