Every terrible VAR decision in 1 video 

That’s why Arsenal is finished 😭😭😭😭

Yes but we can INSTANTLY and NATURALLY celebrate like we have done for 130+ years before. All the joy and fun and emotion is sucked out by SECONDARY celebrations of a SCREEN.........BIG BROTHER IS TRULY HERE...

@@Isleofskye that’s the biggest negative, but if VAR can help correct more incorrect decisions then imo it’s worth having. Right now that’s not happening which is why it needs changing.

@@BarcelonaRussia u forget barcelona isnt even close to getting fourth

I was about to give these mugs a piece of my mind I came across this comment....100% agree. I think VAR is one of the best things that have came to football in recent years. People don't like it because they can't get away with a cheeky goal anymore. Back in the day, if the ball ended up in the back of the net...almost always, the goal would stand unless somehow someway, a ref was in the vicinity and clearly saw that the goal only went in because of a hand ball for example....or if the linesman was gutsy enough to raise the flag even if he doesn't feel 100% accurate on the call and he'll hear it from the fans afterwords. VAR provides that angle where nobody else could see on the pitch. It's whether or not the person USING VAR is capable of pointing out the mistakes the correct way.

But he didnt. It wasnt on purpose. Since People say struijk didnt desrrce red against elliot this shouldnt either

But he did jump and didn’t have his leg planted. If i killed someone I would be arrested but I didn’t so I’m not

@@lukasf.b1572 the only time he touched the ball was with his hand i can think of at least 5 identical fouls that were given as reds off the top of my head

He went in studs up about shin height, completely missed the ball and had a lot of force in the tackle, it's a desperate and late attempt to get the ball but it's a red card challenge all day everyday.

@@BoydC2008 and when someone goes in like this and actually injures a player badly everyone will say we don't want to see that in football, rules have been changed to try and protect footballers from getting career ended and this couldve been a lot worse than it was and it was only because Robertson saw what stupid tackle Harry Kane was doing and jumped out of the way, still clipped him though

Why a blue flag. Ur a Liverpool fan

Jota > firmino

You are clearly Not A Liverpool Fan but A Everton, Crystal Palace or Chelsea Fan bc you are putting blue flags on a comment claiming Ur a Liverpool Fan

You are clearly Not A Liverpool Fan but A Everton, Crystal Palace or Chelsea Fan bc you are putting blue flags on a comment claiming Ur a Liverpool Fan

@@dirksaturn3211 you clearly are fucking annoying, have pissed off Leicester, city and Brighton fans for forgetting them

That’s not a red, he’s studs are up but his foot was not raised high that wasn’t a two foot challenge either, so that is not a red a foul or a yellow card is fair

He was late, studs up, reckless and it was shin height it only looked lower because Robertson jumped

@@tommurdoch1616 if Robertson jumps it’s his buissness because he jumps he didn’t get injured so when Kane went in to that challenge he’s studs were up but only caught Robertson’s foot so Robertson will only probably get the most a bit of bleeding that won’t cause any injuries so that’s not a red.

Like in F1 it shouldn't be based on the outcome it's a reckless tackle that was studs up, misses the ball because Robertson kicks it first and it was still pretty high, red all day everyday, reds have been given to players for the exact same tackle

@@tommurdoch1616 if you look at it again his studs were up but not a dangerous challenge Robertson jumped so the results were diffrent the tackle got the ball and Robertson’s leg if that was a two foot challenge that would’ve been 100% a red card

I'm not having anything about it being clumsy. It's SO late. He's not even tracking the ball. Blatant violent behaviour for me. It's an atrocity that referees in the world's best league are such petulant cunts.

100%

Totally agree and I'm a united fan

If robbos foot is on the ground there thats a quadruple leg break. Disgusting from kane, as per usual.

Agreed

He didn’t need to slide tackle it’s not in there box

I think both of them are easy reds but I’m happy the Kane one wasn’t given cause it was just a proper 90s passionate brexit tackle which gets the fans if their seat and I think football needs more tackles like that

UTV

UTRD

UTV

Same utv

Come on the villa we're gonna win the league

That was clearly for the comment section to start buzzing. How neither of them mentioned the fact that Robertson had to jump to avoid Kane's studs is astonishing. Definite bit of bias there! It's all for the reactions.

Experience vs Youth. That' says it all

And tbh im half way And i can say as ref Var didnt make a mistakr Arsenal vs palace thogdad sayd yellow and i think everyone says red and it should be but that is a mistake form var, but what thogdad sayd isnt allowed of var thought itw was yellow than they are not allowed to ive it its red or nothing Brentford pen shouldnt be talen over cause the player isnt part of the game, if he scored the rebound the defence should have had a free kick

Oh and title fight doesnt make in var

100% correct...

It’s annoying just because he is the English captain he gets away with it and robbo who is the Scotland captain does a foul that is a red he gets a red but kanes that was way more aggressive wasn’t allowed it’s just stupid

@@switchclips9711 yea... refs and pundits do anything to make sure star players dont look like the antagonists. Ronaldo did a similar challenge, to Robbos red card offence, on curtis Jones when liverpool beat Manchester United 5-0 and got away with it just because he is Ronaldo. Theres no consistency.

@@stevie6472 exactly

@@switchclips9711 totally agree

its a foul by kane and even if thiago fell lightly kane still had his hand on his back and shoved him so its a foul

@@olaoluwaoyekan3406 It's not a foul since Kane's arm wasn't folded in any instance of the "foul" meaning it wasn't a "push". The referee should've left it for VAR to decide rather than marking it off right away

It was a foul 100%, you could argue though that the challenge on Sarr should have been a red!

@@SpursAccess It was later checked and re-checked and found a foul...if you are running at that speed shove on the back is a foul as it takes the defender out as he would have gotten the ball before it reached Kane.

Pretty sure he had a yellow before that so he got a double yellow.

the difference between the two is that the player who encroached in the norwich game was the one that subsequently cleared the ball after the save. in the brentford game the player running into the box makes absolutely no difference in the outcome of the penalty.

@@isb213 fax

What about Ronaldo's dive against u when he converted from the penalty spot

@@isb213 literally makes NO difference , as the rule is written you cannot be in the box before the ball is kicked , it's a rule that isn't enforced and other times should be , just enforce the fkn law and stop just making it up as you go along that's all people want.

@@louisclark6051 that’s not the law. The law is the penalty should be taken again if the encroaching player has a material impact on the outcome of the penalty

You mean Oil $ity?

i am a city fan but i agree

@@BarcelonaRussia bantercelona fan lol focus on Europe league

@@mi-tm8vb I'd say focus on Europe but you won't win anything

@@mi-tm8vb Career destroying Club Coutinho,Griez, Dembele Tired Messi Carried them for Years after Njr ,xavi, Iniesta left him See the state now

Well done your first

💥

Doesn’t change the fact that Barcelona is bigger than whole premier farmer league ❤️💙

@@BarcelonaRussia Mate Im Being Honest With You, Your Not Going To Get Anyone To Support Barca

As an Arsenal fan i agree with you

Different mate keeper was off his line

theres hundreds they only picked 10 tho they even said if they get 10k likes they will do a part 2 with 10 more

Clearly a man united fan

@@floweryfreindlyguy8407 Clearly not. I’m a Leeds fan. That’s why it says MOT (marching on together) in my name.

@@floweryfreindlyguy8407 clearly Livarpool fan

@@kinglords7106 scenes when you realize that Manchester United have quite a lot more VAR decisions gone in their favor since it was introduced compared to “LIVARPOOL”

@@genoric4094 like i care

that game was rigged anyways.

incorrect it's on encroachment if they interfere

True

Still bad if there was a rebound he’d be there

@@htwhtw2423 but if he touches it. Then the penalty should be retaken.

Jota deliberately ran into Guaita after he saw he controlled it terribly he even looks up at Guaita it’s not like he was looking down and he lost his balance

💀

@Craig Glassford why?

I semi agree with you, should be a foot lengths margin for offsides imo, but I agree the principles alright they just haven’t stuck to the ‘clear and obvious’ rule

Do you actually ATTEND games Craig?

@@Isleofskye I go to all home games of the club I support and a handful of away games and why would that matter. Just because fans are left in the dark for little bit doesn’t mean VAR isn’t a good thing. As long as good decisions are being made more often.

@@hpanes005 yeah with the offsides I guess that’s a rule change needed but that would be hard to police as we’d need to start measuring foot lengths. For me the rule with offsides maybe should be any part of the body you can score with (basically everything but arms) but i guess whole body is easier to officiate