Every Weapon Inaccuracy in Call of Duty Modern Warfare III 

🔥 Start your Wanted: Dead adventure with 50% off - act NOW: bit.ly/WD-TheFrosty_1 Thank you to Wanted: Dead for supporting the channel with this sponsor! Check out the Channel of our weapon researcher, Munancho Inc here: www.youtube.com/@munanchoinc Big credit to information sourced from this games IMFDB page here: www.imfdb.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_III_(2023) Massive thanks to Munancho Inc and others including US Marine student gunsmith AstroPigey for the review and research help.

That 9MM AR-15 gets even more deranged when you realize thats going to be a second barrel with an aftermarket part.

The inaccuracies are pretty bad, but the animations are generally great. Animation team did a good job.

We worked hard on this video and i hope everyone enjoyed it :)

On the ar9 stock: a company called dead foot makes short ar9 buffer tubes and the game seems to have based it on that. It is entirely possible to give this wierd stock to an ar9

How did you manage to miss the fact the piston leads directly into the magazine on the "AN-94" which means no matter the barrel choice, the gun wouldn't function anyways?

Not to defend the game but I think the whole point of 3D printed aftermarket parts is that they DONT already exist

The Man. The Myth. The Legend. The Frosty 1. Excellent video dude, the gun inaccuracies are incredible, please keep this series going 🙏🙏🙏🔥🔥🔥

on the “mts-569”, you missed an inaccuracy. Despite the barrel being on the bottom of the cylinder to help with recoil, when partially reloading, the character removes the spent cases starting with the top right, as if the barrel were actually on the top like most other revolvers.

14:55 that thing looks more like a galil than an AN-94

its incredible how we have come from mw2019s fantastic level of detail to this in just a few years

Can’t wait for MW4’s weapon inaccuracies

Additional notes: 1. Renetti has straight cocking serrations instead of the real life's angled serrations. 2. Not sure and correct me if I'm wrong, but there seems to be compensator cuts above the COR-45's slide, rendering suppressors useless. Regarding the different name and not using the X- system, the X16 in MW2019, and X12 & X13 in MW2022 are manufactured by XRK, while the COR-45 is manufactured by Corvus. In real life, there are different companies manufacturing their own Glock part kits. An example would be the PF940 in Insurgency: Sandstorm, a Glock 17 kit. 3. Regarding the 3D printed conversion for the Rival-9, cited from IMFDB: "Interestingly, this particular conversion has more real-world basis than any other in the game: there is an actual 3D-printable Scorpion Evo 3 file package available, the AWCY? Scz0rpion EVO, which can include M-LOK handguards of varying lengths; at least one version was built into a select-fire SMG (legally, by a registered SOT) using a factory S/1/3/A trigger pack, though no known examples are restricted to burst fire exclusively (whatever "known" means in the context of home-manufacturable firearms)." 4. For the FR 5.56, taken from IMFDB: "Unlike in MW2019, the rifle is incorrectly loaded with brass-cased rounds for most of its ammo types, including the default ammunition. It should be loaded with steel-cased rounds, as brass rounds were notorious for causing malfunctions. The only steel-cased rounds in-game that it can use are the Armor Piercing rounds." 5. In some Multiplayer insertion sequences, bare-bones MTZ-556 rifles are handed to the players and magically turns to whatever weapon they are using. 6. This is obvious, but there are no 40mm Grenade speedloaders in real life. Anything else that's missing here?

*And they were doing so good with MW19.*

Now I know why these guns look and feel so strange, thank you!

As a gun guy, I always just spend hours inspecting the weapons in games.

I'd like to see a video about the historical inaccuracies in the original Modern Warfare trilogy. Although there is an alternative history, the armies shown in these games can be assessed from the perspective of the time when these games were released - the late 2000s and early 2010s.

Activision: c'mon man i can't pay for the royalty for the gun name Also Activision: hehehe 30 dollar skin

Take a shot every time a gun gets 3D printed parts

Call of Ripoff : Inaccurate Firearms Warfare III

Appreciate all the work u put into your videos

Dude you're so cool, I've been following this channel for such a long time. Keep doing what you're doing. I like the switch from historical innacuracies to weapon inaccuracies.

they were getting firearms more accurate back in 2007 than they are now

35:27 a screenshot from the act man where the enemy fired a noob tube at him just as he direct impacted said enemy with one. A very cool moment!

Honestly I wouldn’t count the copyright name as an inaccurate because that’s a legal thing

Id love to see you go through the attachments and their inaccuracies. There are so many optics that flatout dont exist or are absolute fever dreams of what theyre supposed to be IRL. But that video would probably end up being like an hour long lol

I think pretending like some of the liberties the devs took on the guns are “mistakes” is a little bit insulting

34:20 There is an M203 variant that has ejected casing (because it is compatible with M406 grenade of the infamous thumper) called T40 in its prototype stage. And it was equipped at small numbers in Vietnam's special forces since 2015 under the old name M203. I'm still don't know how in the hell Activision knew the existence of that thing, because of the info of that variant is extremely rare

Well done man i wouldn’t know most of these even though I know a little bit about guns! Thanks for bringing awareness and hopefully cod will fix this.

yall remember when the developers actually went out in real life and field tested every single gun they put in the game? i do

I believe the notBeretta is based off the M9A3, which does have a frame cut with three (not 4) slots of 1913 and a similar looking trigger guard.

there is a stanag adapter for the hk g36c. but still those mags for the g36c in game are for the og magwell not the stanag one

For the next video, could you please analyze every historical inaccuracy in the first Call of Duty (2003)?

3 minutes in and already 18 inaccuracies

I miss when they called an AK and an AK and not a Kastov. It irks me to no end, because I want the weapons to be the weapons that they represent. Like a Glock being called a Glock, or a SCAR being called a SCAR. I may be a minority in this, but I just want them to be named correctly and possibly, if Activision-Blizzard grows a few brain cells, look like the gun. Like just use a reference for the weapons you put in games. Lesser games like Insurgency Sandstorm, (I'm calling it lesser because it was made by a smaller studio- I think it's better in every way than modern CoD,) get the weapons rights. It can't be that hard

since when are CZ weapons from usa? Czechia doesnt have oil

THIS IS WHAT I NEED!THANK YOU FROSTY!

Hope we see more of this series with other games EDIT also the reason the Steyr hs 50 is stated as MADE IN SCOTLAND is because John Soap Mactavish is from Scotland at least it’s the only reason I could think of

Don't tell him about the 60 round binary trigger Origin 12 knockoff, or the double barrel G36 conversion kits. I'm talking about the JAK Maglift and JAK Backsaw kits. Oh, and a conversion kit turning the MCX Spear into a lever action rifle.

At first, I thought this was a little silly, but remembering that Activision is a huge AAA company, there's no reason they can't make these guns accurate, and miss details like firing pins. Stylization is great in my opinion, but completely changing the gun and making it not work isn't cool.

To my knowledge, the PKP Pecheneg wasn't designed during the Soviet Union, but after the collapse of Soviet union. It is very close the the PKM, but its not a PKM.

hmm yes we need more weapons videos!

In every modern cod red dots and 1x sights slow down your ads when in irl aiming with iron sights is slower than using a 1x sight

Every historically inaccuracy in Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain?

Now we need part 2 of this until the season rotation ends

Are you certain the Renetti isn't supposed to be a PT92 stand-in? I know the M9 would make more sense, but it seems to have more in common with the PT visually Edit: Also, the TYR would just be the Tyr, as in the Norse god of war and namesake of Tuesday. His name is pronounced like "tier".

Um, hate to criticize your weapon description, but at 6:39, The LWRC International was founded in 1999 at Cambridge, Maryland, USA. Therefore, it’s pretty unlikely that the LWRC SMG-45 was made in Germany. And at 8:38, the CZ Skorpion Evo 3 A1 is of Czech Republic origin, not USA.

30:56 I can't believe that Black Ops 2 was more accurate with their future guns than this modern warfare one...

That first one about the California legislation just proves that even with the 18+ rating of the game that the intended/core audience of Call of Duty is kids/teens...

The chances of seeing this is low but you should do a video about historical inaccuracies in call of duty finest hour

19:01 idk if you mentioned it but it also has the loosey-goosey charging handle

The tavor also has the magic charging handle that pulls itself back with pure and raw MAGIC (Just like with the Origin shotgun)

Cod has been making gun hybrids for decades. The naming is not because copyright, but so because no gun manufacturer wants their name on these when so many shootings are happening and they are being blamed

We went from mw2019s realism to this

We need a part 2 of this...

171 wasn't even an inaccuracy, you just felt like counting it

There is a few bolt action AKs but none of them look like that… *thing..* (Edit: Just watched the entire video, yeah he pointed out that bolt action AKs exist, my fault.) Also, I thought the Rsh-12 (“Tyr” in-game) was a Matever Chiappa, and I knew about the existence of the Rsh before buying the game, that’s how fucked up the model is in MW3

You should discuss movies like band of brothers or saving private Ryan but keep doing these games my bro

Rip soap he couldn't survive bad writing

Those conversion kits look like stuff we drew elementary school to make them look more powerful 😂

I feel like they changed all guns' names is not for some copyright reason and it's simply an excuse for them to fuck up every single one of them and not following the actual designs, so they can just be like ''no it's a fantasy weapon, not whatever you think it is.''

The California bill has nothing to do with copy write. It’s about not being seen as advertising guns to kids. Gun manufacturers WANT their guns in games, it’s free advertising.

Tbf since they aren’t officially partnered w/ the companies they can make whatever that want. You can thank worried moms who think school shootings are because Cod. There’s a whole video explaining why cod doesnt use the weapons actual name anymore. So there technically isn’t any inaccuracy. But if it was accurate to the actual weapon then it defeats the purpose of not being partnered anymore and lawsuits would still occur.

Make historical inaccuracies in Battlefield 1 please

You had a mistake in your video the CZ Scorpion Evo 3 A1 does not originate from USA it rather originates from Czech Republic

Remember the days when Call of duty took pride in dealing with real arms licensing to the point we knew what real firearms were instead of fictional garbage counterparts?

I can imagine the names being wrong is just cause they don’t wanna pay these companies the licensing fee

So glad i didnt buy thus game. So corporate and uninspired beyond belief. Great video as always! Keep it up!

XRK isnt a "glock stand-in" XRK is the "generic gun manufacturer" stand-in. its been this way since mw19

I'll personally add 30 more inaccuracies just because that SVA 545 exist.

If CoD ever gets sued by any weapon company, this video would be a great aid in court.

This is gonna sound kinda strange but for the next game innacuracies video can you make it count like mutliple different categories of inaccuracies like minor ones like wrong uniform or wrong gun calibre and then major ones like misrepresenting an entire faction? Just a thought.

I can't take this seriously "THis is a fictional weapon" *marks it as an innacuracy* Like bro, how sad is your life that you have to nit pick every single aspect of a weapon. Like the fact all names of the weapons were fictionalized should give you an HINT that the weapons themselves wont be 1:1 to reality, like when I think of "Weapon Inaccuracy" I think of like M1 Garand with Magazine that still makes a Ping sound or a revolving shotgun with a Magazine, not the fucking missing tiny detail in the asshole of the weapon. Like this feels like watching the Nerd Emoji for 37 minutes

aren't the guns made a little bit different from there real life counterpart on purpose for copyright issues?

The idea with the various parts changing looks is to give you a version of that other weapon that you mention, without the devs having to make new guns. I think a lot of design inaccuracies are due to wanting to avoid copyright.

the flashy animations in the new call of duty titles make me wanna throw up idk why

An inaccuracy I noticed on the Jak ferocity carbine kit is that all muzzle attachments are secured by thin air and are not actually mounted to anything at all. Meaning that in game they not only should not function but should also fall off immediately.

25:05 that image is so cursed 😭

The pt 92 and the baretta are two different guns the safety is frame mounted on the Taurus and slide mounted on the baretta you can get baretta frames without the rail too

Bruh a bolt action 7.62x39 ak is rediculs. Bruh why not just have muh beloved draganov😭

Every time I see the longbow I can only think that Kalashnikov is rolling in his grave because that thing is a SIN on his name

4:59 I always thought the WSP Swarm was based off the UZI PRO instead of the Micro Uzi lol

You can tell hes angry about the guns in game if hes as calm as he was in the vanguard video.

The standard Uzi in game also fires from a closed bolt when the realy Uzi is an open bolt gun.

Say I’m wrong, but I think the ammo in empty mags is a shooting range bug and it’ll be normal in an actual match

Yknow, if these all weren't supposed to be based on real guns, the weapon design wouldnt be *that* bad, theyre kind of uncanny valley guns. Like you know theyre supposed to be something, your brain recognizes them as that thing, despite not being them at all.

Please make a part 2 to this video with all the new guns that have been added since

1:04 the beretta 92 has a lot of models, i personally own a 92x which has identical features to the gun in game

Honestly, I wanna dominate the lobby, as long as my pew pew looks nice i have my fun

This is a very small inaccuracy but you labeled the CDX-50 Tremor as having originated from the United States when in reality Cadex is a Canadian firearms manufacturer. It would make sense if this was a typo though.

I have just 1 inaccuracy to point out in this vid. It is CZ scorpion and somehow you written a country of its origin as USA.😅 its a czech weapon made in czech republic

So is this like a side project you’re doing in addition to the next historical inaccuracy video which seems to be Battlefield V?

I personally wouldn't count names changed for copyright reasons as an inaccuracy, since it's intentional

Tbh, I have my own fictional gun ideas for Call of Duty. Hint: They are all rat sized.

There’s one more thing on the Sva554. It’s magazine is straight and not curved.

What’s with CoD devs not wanting to add revolvers with 6 shots?

Quick note: 11:50 the MAG slides out

As much as I hate MW3, pretty sure a lot of these inaccuracies can be attributed to copyright. MW2019 did it too, i remember people making a big deal out of the Vector design

the SL8 is also depicted as a double stack mag whereas the real one is single stack, making it incompatible with g36 magazines. the SL8 is just the worst thing ever even IRL, and somehow this game makes it worse.

Not only do I hate the new CoDs for what they do, I further hate this game for not even doing it right.