Everything Wrong With Murder On The Orient Express

Подписаться 9 млн

Просмотров 2,6 млн

50% 1

Someone dies on a train in the middle of nowhere, so naturally the explanation is the most convoluted one possible. But hey, the movie looks beautiful, right? Here are the sins in Kenneth Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
Thursday: Recent-ish horror sins.
Remember, no movie is without sin! Which movie's sins should we expose next?!
•CinemaSins website: www.cinemasins.com •
•Channels•
--TVSins: / @tvsins
--MVS: / @musicvideosins
•Members get MORE! ALL videos early, bonus videos and podcasts, merch discounts and MORE on Patreon!• / cinemasins
•Merch!• teespring.com/stores/cinemasins
•Podcasts•
-SinCast A weekly chat with Jeremy, Chris and Barrett about their love and hatred for movies and entertainment. cinemasins.libsyn.com/
--Behind the Sins: CinemaSins writers Aaron, Jonathan and Deneé, give a behind the scenes look at what it takes to release the previous week's videos across the CinemaSins brand. redcircle.com/shows/behindthe...
•Writers Social•
Jeremy: / cinemasins
Chris: / sincastcinemasins
Barrett: / musicvideosins
Aaron: / aarondicer
Jonathan: / samloomis13
Deneé / deneesays
•Discord: Request on Facebook or Reddit!
•Reddit: / cinemasins
•Jeremy's Book: cinemasins.com/book

Кино

Опубликовано:

2 апр 2018

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 4,1 тыс.

@Wolf6119 6 лет назад

"If the train is fully booked, as stated earlier, how is Princess Dragomiroff getting extra options?" Cause if the Princess of Imperial Russia wants your cabin, you give her your cabin and get off the damn train lol.

@druidriley3163 5 лет назад

Aside from the murder conspiracy, normally yes. LOL. Modern folks just don't know much about how aristocracy is and was handled in Europe.

@esmenouvelle9439 5 лет назад

Judy Densch was traveling with companion/servants. She booked 3 cabins so there would be room for all of them. She then took her choice of which one she wanted.

@Ronkyort0dox 5 лет назад

She's not an Imperial Princess tho.

@druidriley3163 5 лет назад

@@hilaryhongkong - Aristocracy exists even if a country has revolted. Many aristocrats fled the country. They were Russian aristocrats in exile.

@gothicfairy2407 5 лет назад

Many Russian aristocrats or members of the royal family (by blood or marriage, but of course not the immediate royal family that everyone knows got assassinated) who escaped continued to live in luxury and with power and authority. Other countries hosted them. The Dowager Empress is one example. Hell, descendants of the Romanov line still exist, hold power, and use their titles. The current "Empress" has a son who will succeed her and there is an entire website set up in an offical governmenty type of way. It's pretty easy to look up. My one professor, Dr. Russell Martin is on her staff and edits the annuals and such that get sent out her posted.

@Cyclamenz 6 лет назад

He kept sending the eggs back so that tge kid could eat them instead without it being an obvious handout

@nerarbysocka1017 5 лет назад

Also to stall the police chief while his office was being searched.

@Ritter2749 3 года назад

wow guys

@leesloan8216 Год назад

Poirot always likes his eggs exactly the same size.

@Wolf6119 6 лет назад

Sinning the fact that Poirot coincidentally stumbles upon a murder is kinda sinning the very premise of every Agatha Christie story ever lol. Poirot and Ms. Marple are basically murder magnets.

@robinstevens7651 5 лет назад

True. What about Jessica Fletcher.... Best keep away from her..;)

@FastForwardPlans 5 лет назад

Which is also why you should run away if you ever run into Conan from Case Closed, every time he meets a new group of people a murder happens.

@rikuganshio 5 лет назад

@@FastForwardPlans how about kindaichi hajime

@tingispingis 5 лет назад

Pretty sure Detective Conan contributes massively to Japan's murder/crime rates

@1SaG 5 лет назад

Plus they almost always overhear crucial conversations between suspects well before any murder takes place. From the top of my head: This happens twice in Orient Express and at least once in Death on the Nile.

@GlennDavey 4 года назад

"Everything Wrong With Murder On The Orient Express"? Well it's illegal for starters...

@shakira9007 3 года назад

Wdym?

@Rougarou99 3 года назад

@Electro Man In most societies, murder tends to be illegal. I assume the situation is relatively unchanged if the murder were to take place on the Orient Express.

@bobbyfeet2240 3 года назад

What happens on the Orient Express stays on the Orient Express.

@becca8237 3 года назад

@@Rougarou99 i never knew that

@memebaker2355 3 года назад

This comment deserves a heart

@coralineparmentierpianist 6 лет назад

"Movie takes time to murder when I was promised Murder of the Orient, EXPRESS" GOLD :D

@coopgaming1514 6 лет назад

Coraline Parmentier - Pianist for Peace yeah that's the best of all their lines

@namingisdifficult408 6 лет назад

Coop Gaming agreed

@Garner84 6 лет назад

Coraline Parmentier - Pianist for Peace %@1

@ChiviSoda909 6 лет назад

I think you mean, 'Eggspress'

@boxturtle5643 6 лет назад

Coraline Parmentier - Pianist for Peace ✌🏽 now we

@SubscribersWithoutAnyVid-lt3vy 6 лет назад

You know it takes a lot of time and commitment to grow that kind of mustache

@theterra-path7798 6 лет назад

10,000 Subscribers Without Any Videos true, unless its prostetic. In that case it grows in seconds

@Kishurgen 6 лет назад

Obviously Poirot had the time and by golly that is a mustache!

@agonleed3841 6 лет назад

10,000 Subscribers Without Any Videos idk. I mean, mine was grown without much thought. Just didn't shave. Easy to just do NOTHING

@ForeverUnreality 6 лет назад

Yes, but it is the grooming dear Agon that is admirable. Any fool may grow facial hair, but it takes commitment to groom one of that caliber.

@neskamminga4681 6 лет назад

30k

@KATTALNUVA3 4 года назад

“My name is Hercule Poroit. You killed my father, prepare to die.” I’d pay to see that movie.

@lauragraves4342 2 года назад

I would KILL to see that movie. Of course, he would catch me afterwards so nah, nevermind.

@zaphoddog3878 2 месяца назад

Mandy Patinkin as Poirot would be amazing.

@ElenaParadoxP 6 лет назад

Sin 33: They left those clues on purpose to confuse whoever was in charge of the case. The clues would make certain characters look suspicious but they would make sure those characters had an alibi supported by another character, thus making the police not know who was guilty. There was only one clue that was left by accident (a piece of burnt paper) and what Poirot did was discover which of the many "clues" left at the scene was fake and which one was real. Dude.

@jb17415 5 лет назад

PaolaP thank you

@CalBruin 4 года назад

I agreee, @PaolaP. People, including CinemaSins never read the book. This is the second instance I have watched where @CinemaSins is makes an error for not having read the original source, which has reasonable logic as to why, the movie either shorthands original novel's exposition or deletes for time.

@georgewashington6347 4 года назад

@@CalBruin Not reading the book is not making "an error." He sins them on the movie alone. You shouldn't have to read a book to make sense of the movie. Sorry, I normally don't leave comments, but you people leave these types of commemts on every book adaptation he sins.

@CalBruin 4 года назад

@@georgewashington6347 , that would be fair but, the some of the sins are based upon the movie's direct translation of the book. In other words, they are sinning the movie for what was done in the book. NOT the movie's variation from the book BUT the direct quote from the book. Rather like chastising someone for their quoting another person's use of the F-word.

@heliakopter 4 года назад

@@CalBruin actually, have you watched cinemasins' intro? i think he said he reads the books but one of the point of the channel was "the books don't matter"

@thethreerailwayengines825 6 лет назад

You missed out the fact that Death on the Nile only works if Poirot is there at the start, before the murder happens, and yet he's only being told about it now, after the murder happens

@tuschman168 5 лет назад

Oh good. I thought I was remembering that wrong. Yeah, that scene doesn't work at all with the actual plot of Death on the Nile. Pretty big oversight. Akin to the last joke in the The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie which also made no sense and wouldn't fit the story of The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

@thatguyfromravenclaw 4 года назад

They'll retcon it.

@parkerdinhwilliams15 4 года назад

My guess would be he goes to the Nile to solve that murder and coincidentally ANOTHER more INTERESTING murder happens just as he's solving the last one.

@eventyraren 4 года назад

In the book that murder seemed spontanius and the only two with motiv Also has aliby sort of, but Also he sleeped through it all becuse he was sedated so it was not a spere of the moment. Him turning up now works by taking That out. Than again how long dose it takes to travel from London to cairo 1934?

@999SickBoy666 4 года назад

@@parkerdinhwilliams15 Yes, that's precisely the only way they have to retcon it.

@seraphinaaizen6278 4 года назад

Some of these question are actually answered in the movie. Poirot made the connection to Caseti because he discovered the mostly burned note, which was the one genuine clue, which game him the Armstrong name and allowed him to connect to the dots. If anyone but Poirot had found that note, it probably would have gone unidentified and its significance lost. All of the finger pointing and deliberate clues left behind were to create confusion, pointing the investigation towards one suspect or another, who would then be exonerated by the testimony of another suspect (since they're all in on it). The idea was to try and create a situation where NONE of them could possibly be the killer, and it would be blamed on the "small man with the high pitched voice" that they invented. In the books Poirot even remarks on the matter himself when reacts to be confounded by saying to himself: "They can't ALL be in on it", which is when he realizes that, in fact, they ARE all in on it. Their plan relied on the investigation never reaching that conclusion. And for most normal people, it probably wouldn't have.

@AdrianTangMusic 5 лет назад

5:05 For the record, the reason they all blamed each other was because they wanted to confuse the shit out of Poirot so he would keep suspecting that it was just one specific person and never be able to find out exactly who it was.

@leonpaelinck 2 года назад

Exactly. Poirot must not know they were working together. So what better way to sell the lie than to pretend antagonism.

@meerkat10 Год назад

I'd assume it'd be more suspicious if no one pointed fingers at eachother

@SingingSealRiana 10 месяцев назад

@@meerkat10 as in the book where they share some, Oh I do not like the guy I am rooming with for he is a foraigner, but I am giving him a solid as stone aliby and give a testament of his good character?

@SingingSealRiana 10 месяцев назад

in the book they dis not

@Gerilyn2003 3 года назад

The biggest problem I had with this version is they skip most of his interrogations of passengers; then he pulls deductions out of his ass in the big confrontation scene.

@zeldaofarel 6 лет назад

Actually, the Orient Express is not just any train. It's like THE train.

@christiankrarup6501 6 лет назад

King of King, Train of Trains?

@misterwuss5456 5 лет назад

Woah

@trod146 5 лет назад

@@christiankrarup6501 no

@christiankrarup6501 5 лет назад

Timothy Rodowicz Don’t question my knowledge of trains. I’ll have you know, I trained for years in a degree in Trainology

@Ixe2077 5 лет назад

Thomas?

@kf_10 6 лет назад

I wish you mentioned the fact that Hercule took the place of another passenger right before they left, which leaves you with the question: Was that person supposed to be apart of the plan? Were the other passengers dumb enough to have one person who wasn't involved in the murder be on the train? and How lucky/unlikely is it that Hercule would have bumped that one person who wasn't involved (presumably)?

@shinjig 6 лет назад

I was wondering that as well. From what I read that was supposed to be the fall guy. They booked an extra ticket using a fake name. A.M. Harris With the conductor in on the plan, he would have said that this person was actually aboard the train (ake he never was). This was why McQueen was confused when the detective suddenly became his roommate. His original roommate was supposed to be A.M. Harris. So then that way, when the murder took place, they could have blamed A.M. Harris, as he is not there anymore. Police would then be searching for someone that never existed to begin with.

@jennym8976 6 лет назад

shinjig ahh....💡 thank you for your explanation. I also was wondering about that.

@AllthePrettyPurses 6 лет назад

No, they booked that car under a false name. It was always supposed to be empty. At least in the book -- I can't recall if they mention this in the movie. There was no fall guy. The killers were obsessed with JUSTICE. That's why they needed to have exactly 12 people involved in the plot. 12 people is a jury. They would not have involved an innocent party.

@shinjig 6 лет назад

It was booked under a false name in the movie as well. It was mentioned at the beginning when the detective usurped the spot on the train as A.M. Harris never "checked in". A.M. Harris would have been the one that was missing when the train arrived at the station when the police would have been looking for the killer. Otherwise they would run the chance of any one of them or all of them being put in jail. Otherwise, why bother booking another passenger? Just write the story so that there were no extra seats for A.M. Harris to fill. Give just enough rooms for the 12 killers and the victim.

@bovnycccoperalover3579 2 года назад

He never existed. It was imperative that McQueen be alone.

@harmonlanager2670 6 лет назад

"Why is Poirot famous?" In the books, it's justified because Hastings writes books based on Poirot's adventures.

@LFire12 4 года назад

That's Dr Watson for Sherlock Holmes. Hastings never writes anything. He's only in 7 of the books. Ariadne Oliver is the writer, and she doesn't write about Poirot. Poirot is famous because of the newspapers and the high profile cases he has investigated and solved.

@AnnaMarianne 4 года назад

@@LFire12 Hastings wrote at least the ABC Murders.

@vanshika2912 4 года назад

Anna Marianne and the mysterious affair at styles, and the murder on the links and black coffee.

@Vivi_LaRue 4 года назад

Poirot is famous because he was a renowned police inspector in Belgium and then became a world renowned private detective.

@bobbyfeet2240 3 года назад

Cher Hastings also wrote a bunch of the short stories. There are probably a couple dozen cases he chronicled. Made a bit of a living at it, as I recall.

@StereotypeNerd96 4 года назад

"That scarf obviously means he's been sorted into House Gryffindor" No, that's Hufflepuff, get your houses straight

@KPhoenix23 2 года назад

As a Hufflepuff that ticked me off lol.

@mathautist 2 месяца назад

Somehow Lockhart is a magnet for trouble no matter where he goes.

@djhutchison 6 лет назад

Sin 30: They're implicating each other in order to make solving the case more difficult. They can make accusations all day and it won't matter. Everyone has an alibi corroborated by another passenger.

@idislikemints 6 лет назад

djhutchison the fact that they had an alibi each and was supported by another pretty much told you that either several of them or every single one of them was the murderer. They tried too hard to make it difficult.

@harmonlanager2670 6 лет назад

Andruşca A-N-K To be fair, that's totally a rookie mistake I could see a group of inexperienced killers making.

@idislikemints 6 лет назад

Harmon Lanager that is true, but here we are talking about a group of people who planned for this many, many years. Enough that they were prepared for almost any kind of situation. How could they have not realized that? Because at least one or two characters seemed the type to disagree with everything. Were they all that blinded with rage and guilt that they made a barely halfassed plan that could cost their lives?.. well, maybe, but the movie was trying to portray (?) them as intelligent or charming, etc, why go to this lenght to make them seem way more than they were? (Probably this has an obvious answer as well.)

@tejshah6083 6 лет назад

Because the solution that all the people in the coach is obviously so common, and certainly the first thing that anyone would have thought up.

@idislikemints 6 лет назад

Tej Maziga Shah well, that is true, but I still find the effort put into the "mystery" disheartening.

@NewSage 6 лет назад

"Like omelet that happen." 😆😂... I'm done!

@reubenhunter6152 6 лет назад

That whole line and then that to finish the pun. CinemaSins PUN-ished us

@supernova582 6 лет назад

Eggellent taste in puns this guy has. I'm eggited to hear this I just hope I'm not counting my chickens before they hatch you know but I have the feeling there will be more than just egg puns! This is going to be grate! I love puns!

@8GPWHUFC8 6 лет назад

New Sage i

@ronin_user 3 года назад

Is that a 2chan/4chan rip-off?

@justinwilliam4644 3 года назад

That was the only egg pun I don't get.

@thiismustbetheplace 6 лет назад

David Suchet plays Poirot brilliantly, and he's done about 40 2 hour episodes/movies. They're all good, especially with Hugh Fraser playing Arthur Hastings and Philip Jackson playing Chief Inspector Japp. I highly recommend it to any Agatha Christie fans such as myself :D

@HelloWorld-qn3wp 5 лет назад

That's why i couldn't watch this movie .. there's one Poirot only and he is David Suchet

@Tom_Harding 5 лет назад

No he doesn’t play Poirot brilliantly. Poirot was humble, this Poirot loudly claims he’s the best detective in the world. This Poirot speaks complete nonsense at times like the rubbish about the eggs and the bread, book Poirot only spoke when he needed to. Also this Poirot lost his cool and for some reason got angry at times for very little reason, in the book he never got angry. Also, also it seemed he accidentally stumbled on the conclusion. This Poirot was terrible.

@byeolbyeoll 5 лет назад

Finally someone that knows of this show ;-; none of my peers know of it and I’m guessing I only do cause my dad has always loved it ;-;

@byeolbyeoll 5 лет назад

Tom Harding this poirot isn’t David suchet though?

@harry781012 5 лет назад

@@Tom_Harding thank god im not the only one that think this portrayal of Poirot is a complete joke, and the whole movie is horribly to boot

@SammyJay107 5 лет назад

Actually,a lot of people get excited about a train leaving XD I got on a train once and throughout the whole ride everyone outside were waving at the people in the train Because Trains

@DaraGaming42 3 года назад

Was this is 1936 LOL

@Warden_Vtel 6 лет назад

7:16 Jeremy. That's Hufflepuff. How could you do this to us.

@xlectraheart 6 лет назад

Vtel 'Zolam Nah it would be Ravenclaw cuz it's blue

@Warden_Vtel 6 лет назад

ęlectra heart There isn't a hint of blue in that scarf

@trinaq 6 лет назад

It's definitely Hufflepuff, as their house colours are black and yellow.

@joshuaharland6373 6 лет назад

It's the dress all over again...

@originsmaster8140 6 лет назад

Well there is a bit of red and it could be argued that the stripes are gold instead dad of yellow. But you know...

@YelloDuzzit 6 лет назад

"Two mustaches fighting under the nose for dominance" is genius

@evadarkeyes4164 5 лет назад

Poirot will always be an man with egg shaped head, kind of short, and an air of 'know it all' around him for me.

@juttamaier2111 5 лет назад

I met an actual Belgian who looked exactly like I would picture him: on the fat side, very pale, little moustache, black hair and a feminine voice.

@sierrastanley3109 5 лет назад

and one great mustache!!! XD

@cgaskill13 4 года назад

And no gray hair.

@Cationna 3 года назад

Yes, and why would that be? Just because it's how he is in the source material? What an incredibly unreasonable assumption...

@pinkpanther7442 3 года назад

Yeah, DAVID SUCHET

@DopamineMax 5 лет назад

3:48 Would you look at that Gilderoy and Grindelwald talking to each other. I wonder if that would ever happen

@genesisdawn6672 4 года назад

Sure, in hell.

@mazadancoseben4818 4 года назад

Hilarious!

@mikey7257 6 лет назад

That glorious mustache erases all sin

@mikey7257 6 лет назад

chandra roy agreed but it was still magnificent

@oldenweery7510 6 лет назад

Except in the books Poirot always dyed it jet black.

@7b7BenGazing 6 лет назад

Vegeta: MOOSTACHE

@jericho823 6 лет назад

Mikey L

@susanlay9505 6 лет назад

Me too, this version is an abomination

@micahphilson 6 лет назад

2:10 Hahaha, he definitely felt bad after the Tomb Raider videos! The comments were... not always generous.

@nobodyfromnowwhere7510 6 лет назад

I think you have to at least be a little dickish to choose to make a living crapping on people's work. Doesn't mean he's evil, but at least a bit of a dick. I'm kinda a dick too, since I only come here to point out logical flaws in their arguments and crap like that. Like the one I made below about monk.

@vitlityprinceofrainwings9075 6 лет назад

Ellder Sage his job is reviewing atrocious movies

@daxtron2 6 лет назад

That's not what cinema sins is about. It's not about reviewing, that would entail a recommendation for/against it. Cinema sins is about showing us that ALL movies have sins, none of them are perfect, it can always improve.

@nobodyfromnowwhere7510 6 лет назад

Except very few of them are atrocious.

@JHowesitgoing123 6 лет назад

You're an absolute moron if you take CinemaSins seriously. They're COMEDY videos ffs.

@brianbommarito3376 4 года назад

8:33 When the book was originally published, it was not entitled “Murder on the Orient Express” but “Murder in the Calais Coach.” The Istanbul-Calais Passenger Coach was where the murder took place, and because all the passenger coaches were locked during the night and were under guard by the coach attendant (in this case, Pierre Michel), it was deemed by Poirot as impossible that the murder could’ve been committed by anyone outside of that coach. You could say that the piano player and most of the train staff have alibis.

@christophermaybury4918 3 года назад

“Murder in the Calais Coach” was only the original U.S. title; the title was “Murder on the Orient Express” when it was first published in the U.K.

@JohnOConnell 2 года назад

In addition, one running theme through all of Agatha Christie’s novels is that the lower classes, the employees, the help, are almost never the murderers. In fact, in most of her novels they rarely get even a mention, as if they don’t exist.

@JohnOConnell 2 года назад

@@christophermaybury4918 Murder in the Calais Coach was the original title of the serialised first publication in a magazine, before it became the novel.

@christophermaybury4918 2 года назад

@@JohnOConnell It was published as a novel, titled “Murder on the Orient Express”, in the U.K. before it was published in any form in the U.S.

@JohnOConnell 2 года назад

@@christophermaybury4918 True, but before it was published even as a novel, it was serialised in a magazine as I previously stated.

@Owehoreva 4 года назад

“Omelette that happen” 🔥🔥🔥

@javiermunoz2199 6 лет назад

The scene where Poirot stands on the top of a train that has just been hit by an avalanche and is barely standing on a bridge next to an abyss while looking for evidence without even wearing a coat out in the cold, might just be the most unlike Poirot thing I've ever seen.

@o.g.2836 5 лет назад

No-no-no! His brother's name is Achille Poirot! :)

@leonpaelinck 2 года назад

So true. In the sequel he gets into a gunfight and a chase.

@abhishankpaul Год назад

All I knew is that they were just stranded. There was no bridge nothing else. I did not get to see the Taurus Express trip either

@sophie-ss6ue 6 лет назад

*Aaron Burr missed*

@kelseycarroll9090 6 лет назад

soph he didn’t with hamilton😋

@andrewshi6579 6 лет назад

He aims the pistol at the sky (WAIT)

@cheshirecat6551 6 лет назад

I snorted when he said that

@dayzzofdr3ad 6 лет назад

If only...

@casazcie2616 6 лет назад

I actually fangirled when he said that

@reneesoriano3703 4 года назад

" Why is Olaf with a shirt running away here?" OMG I CAN'T BREATH 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@riyaj9633 6 лет назад

9:36 "Who's the detective now, smirky Herc-y?" XD

@edencorevods4174 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr misses" I WAS WAITING FOR THAT REFERENCE SINCE LESLIE STARTED TO APPEAR IN SCREEN

@booberfraggle 6 лет назад

Lee Scharfenberg YES

@cannedcream 6 лет назад

Pardon me, but was he Aaron Burr, sir?

@baldr6894 6 лет назад

That depends, who's asking?

@ChiviSoda909 6 лет назад

Oh sure sir! I'm Alexander Hamilton, I'm at your service, sir! I have been, looking for you

@baldr6894 6 лет назад

I'm getting nervous

@loulabelle5082 6 лет назад

"Who gets this excited about a train leaving?" Jeremy clearly doesn't have children or he would have witnessed them exploding with excitement and waving so hard they give themselves a dislocated arm every time a train passes by!

@wingsandash 4 года назад

He has at least one son.

@unsweetsweets 4 года назад

Not even just it leaving; it wasn’t a train, but I remember waving at planes in the sky all the time as a kid

@justarandomperson2020 4 года назад

Omg yes!! When I was a kid i used to get really excited whenever a train passed

@richardludwig3673 4 года назад

Not even just kids - a whole category of people enough to have a name: Rail Fans!

@davidkee2363 3 года назад

And this was 1920s. Trains were still new and the Orient Express was quite famous.

@ysi7045 4 года назад

"There's not even a rugby team from Uruguay around for if he gets hungry" you did not just say that.

@valadao 5 лет назад

"Who's that excite about a train leaving?". All the kids from my town when I was like 5 or 6. We ran with the train until it was far away. Then, I moved to a capital to live in a building...

@typing7644 6 лет назад

’Arron Burr misses’ I love how he knows

@danimiller9932 3 года назад

Love it!

@dogcatchen 6 лет назад

"what happens when the engine stops?" "we all freeze and die"

@1222medi 3 года назад

i understood that reference. Steve Rogers

@JWR-fu7yl 3 года назад

When it comes to Poirot, to me nobody plays the character better than David Suchet, especially in Murder on the Orient Express

@Virtuoso80 4 года назад

A lot of things that don't make sense here are explained in the 1970's version, as well as the book.

@steeledminer616 6 лет назад

Y'know, just watched the movie. I love how they did set up all the clues right at the start. "If like lucifer... we must fall" She blatantly says they all did it.

@thegooddoctor413 6 лет назад

Those egg puns were Scrambled together. But you did go Over-easy

@DigitalDashh 6 лет назад

Stop with the yolks! They’re not eggcellent! It’s very eggervating!

@catluvr2 6 лет назад

Just add some more on fried-ay.

@user-vz7mu4su9n 6 лет назад

catluvr2 save it for the hollandaise.

@timmoore9855 6 лет назад

The Good Doctor I found them a bit soft boiled

@blupee_pen2855 5 лет назад

9:14 I applauded you for putting a Hamilton reference into my favourite movie I love it

@lesliesackey2515 3 года назад

CinemaSins: “Aaron Burr misses.” Me: ITS THE 10 DUEL COMMANDMENTS!!!!

@MaySwenon 6 лет назад

I know the creators of Monk talk about how Sherlock Holmes was “the” major inspiration for the character of Adrian Monk, but even in the BBC/Suchet productions - where they don’t play up the obsessive-compulsive angle so much - it’s pretty clear that the Monk concept fits the Poirot mold more closely than it does Holmes. The persnicketiness of the main character is more in line with Poirot, and the way Monk and Stottlemeyer interacted was far closer to the cooperative Poirot-and-Japp dynamic than the competitive Holmes-and-Lestrade dynamic.

@wherewolfprime 4 года назад

Very well noted re:Poirot has to be the actual basis for Monk.

@Peppermint_Winter 4 года назад

Exactly! Poirot was the first obsessive fussy detective!

@genesisdawn6672 4 года назад

Poirot, Monk, House and many others are all inspired by Sherlock Holmes.

@loganharris2166 4 года назад

@@Peppermint_Winter Not to be that person, but Holmes came way before Poirot.

@Peppermint_Winter 4 года назад

@@loganharris2166 Not to be obnoxious, but I'm gonna be obnoxious! Do you think it doesn't count if you point it out yourself? Just curious.

@MA-cq8gv 6 лет назад

5:24 It was explained in the books and probably in the movie as well. They left all the clues, because they contradicted themselves (time of the murder, the owner of the pipecleaner, the handkerchief). It was supposed to make the solving of the crime impossible for Poirot as paradoxically the excess of clues was harder for him to solve than the lack of them.

@thatrandomguy8988 4 года назад

Sin 68 : No train wasn't popular at that time of the year...It usually ran empty which was mentioned atleast 20 times in the book at the start

@davionelliot 5 лет назад

3:00 cinemas in’s has never seen Harry Potter before

@Felarchy 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr misses."

@djhutchison 6 лет назад

Sin 35: Poirot is able to read part of the note left for Rachett. It said, "Remember Daisy Armstrong." Who else would the note be for if not Cassetti? It's a revenge killing, and they wanted him to know why he was going to die. Poirot knew Cassetti fled they U.S. with his fortune. He knew Rachett wasn't what he claimed to be. The note answered a lot of questions.

@CatMuto 6 лет назад

There are tons of sins he points out that were explained in the novel...

@jasonant24 6 лет назад

Yes, in the novel, not necessarily in the movie. CinemaSins doesn't care about the books, only the movies

@CatMuto 6 лет назад

And this movie adaptation is shit. Can't even explain itself properly.

@entitledOne 6 лет назад

Unfortunately that's the destiny of most novel based movies. Movies will never do justice to good novels simply because of the amount of detail the move has to skip in order to not be 5 hours long.

@CatMuto 6 лет назад

Yeah, but some of the changes they make just... make no sense! Or fully contradict what the book says. Like here, Miss Debenham is not supposed to be a redhead; yes, Helena said her governess was red-headed and called Freebody, which Poirot knows is a lie because she's going the complete opposite of what Debenham looks like. ...and then you have crap like the Harry Potter movies, which altered so much, you pretty much can't understand half of what's going on in the last one, unless you've read the book. That's one of the worst things an adaptation can do: be incapable of standing on its own, without knowing the original source.

@GBOAC 2 года назад

12:10 it was *not* a popular train in wintertime, that’s the entire point and provided a vital clue to Poirot that there was something fishy going on when they left Istanbul. Helping him to stay on the lookout for clues before the murder even took place.

@suchartboontid2560 6 лет назад

One major alteration from the book was the 12 members of jury that let Cassetti go free vs 12 murderers on the train thing. I thought that was a clever part in the book. I don't know why they had to change it. Anyway it's always hard to adapt Agatha Christie's books because most of the time the detecting part happens in Poirot's head and seeing him think or review evidence is probably not as interesting as seeing characters interact with each other. This movie is like a theater version of the book but filmed as a movie. I would have liked to see something like The Girl with the Dragon tattoo, though. That movie was great at showing how the detectives come to a conclusion without much exposition.

@ZaxorVonSkyler 6 лет назад

"What happens when the engine stops? We all freeze and die!"

@Statalyzer 6 лет назад

Zaxor Von Skyler ah you watched the video too?

@ZaxorVonSkyler 6 лет назад

??? Bro I like that part, it's called having an opinion!

@tahaahmed9722 6 лет назад

Someone from Snowpiercer?

@edb36mar 6 лет назад

Sin snowpiercer

@ZaxorVonSkyler 6 лет назад

Ice cell6, he already did!

@DakotaAbroad 6 лет назад

That scarf looks much more Hufflepuff though...

@augustoalves158 4 года назад

"there's not even a rugby team from uruguay for if he gets hungry" wow how far did you go there

@anxiety_ridden_teen3249 5 лет назад

Is it bad that the last 20 minutes in the movie when he was explaining everything I kept crying more and more

@korinakucinic5403 6 лет назад

You forgot two sins that could’ve easily been avoided by looking at a map. There are no mountains or even hills nowhere near Vinkovci, for 150km. That area is known for its flatness. And the other thing is that when the train arrived in Slavonski Brod (which is a city, not just a station) the officers were not Yugoslavs and trust me, there were little to no African immigrants in Yugoslavia in that time.

@abhishankpaul Год назад

They did not show Taurus Express trip as far as I know

@BarryHart-xo1oy 9 месяцев назад

Thank you for pointing these facts out.

@sourdrop 2 месяца назад

That also stood out to me. The whole reason that Poirot gave in and took the case was because Bouc told him that if he didn't the Yugoslavian police would charge and hang Arbuthnot or Marquez for the murder due to their skin color/ethnicity. Why would such a prejudiced organization hire the very people they were prejudiced against?

@Valeria-dn5pk 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr misses" who's throwing away their shoot now huh

@staticrainbow1297 6 лет назад

Valulisa HAHAHAHHH LOL

@JS-hw8ve 4 года назад

I watch your videos for 3 reasons: 1) make fun of movies I hate. 2) laugh at movies I love. 3) your wit. This video is all about reasons 2 and 3. I still love this movie.

@forrestdavis8796 5 лет назад

Do: Everything Wrong With Clue. The one with Tim Curry!!!

@Valks-22 6 лет назад

Another sin is the setting, between vinkovci and brod is some of flattest land in croatia (part of yugoslavia) nowhere near Alps like mountains shown. Plus the black yugoslavian policeman at the end is also hillarious

@KillaBeeeeeeeeee 5 лет назад

Ivor Omerzo bravo. I didn’t want to mantion that, but you are right 😎

@codyridsdale3861 5 лет назад

Ivor Omerzo If there's anything more annoying that the pompious attitude of Cinema Sins towards fiction, it's wannabees.

@vrededromer8955 5 лет назад

I have heard this comment before, but that is a sin to the book, not the movie, as the original Novel had the same exact issue, so can't blame the movie for that

@draganadarling 4 года назад

True. I noticed the same thing. And it's a big one!

@norbertmunch6218 4 года назад

@@vrededromer8955 Have you read the novel? It did not have the exact same issue. In the novel the train is held up by a snowdrift. No mountains, no avalanche.

@kittykat7584 6 лет назад

Ahh, the movie I wanted to see but never did, so I’ll just watch cinemasins and piece together the plot from there

@TylireousGaming 6 лет назад

kitty kat Dude, same.

@petergriffin1250 6 лет назад

kitty kat, same! Why watch it if you can get a summed up version of all the stupid things!

@user-ju4lq1us6y 6 лет назад

_ Tylireous _ same

@josiahbaumgartner7643 6 лет назад

I hate people like you. Intentionally watching spoilers of mostly the bad parts and thinking it somehow is a good representation of the movie.

@Sierra-mn5ye 6 лет назад

it’s boring you didn’t miss anything

@SupremeRacer-fk8dv 4 года назад

2:59 "Who gets this excited about a train leaving?" You haven't heard of the 20th Century Limited, have you?

@guideon_anidus 6 лет назад

The reference to the accident of the rugby team took me by surprise, even more so than the pronunciation of my own country but still a great job on that education or research or whatever you guys do. (for the creation of these videos i mean)

@EeveeRealSenpai 6 лет назад

Seems there is another case to solve! Let's get -Sherlock Gnomes- _I MEAN SHERLOCK HOLMES_ To help.

@Jusu331 6 лет назад

Jeesus I read it as sherlock gnomes and when I reread it, It really did read that... what has my life become when this is the funniest thing happened to me today

@DingoWalley01 6 лет назад

You mean Hercule Poirot, right?

@himbalodzodenever 6 лет назад

Why not Gnomeo?

@michaeliobay82 6 лет назад

I feel like I just saw you at a JackSepticeye video.

@trainerred9756 6 лет назад

Why are u everywhere?

@augustgates2629 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr missed." IF ONLY-

@baldr6894 6 лет назад

*small sniffle*

@augustgates2629 6 лет назад

Honestly high five

@JamesWilson-vr3ql 6 лет назад

Not a big fan of the Federalists myself. Burr did us all a favor.

@Kirbo14 5 лет назад

“I should have known. I should have known the world was wide enough for both Hamilton and me. The world was wide enough for both Hamilton and me...”

@anzuwyliei1353 5 лет назад

@@Kirbo14 *applauds*

@ItsRoronoaZoro 3 года назад

1:45 Guy does backflip before even running into the cane *DING*

@ItsRoronoaZoro 3 года назад

@@willowwisp107 Ahhh, I could see that happening.

@MatthewLatter 5 лет назад

I was waiting for a Hamilton reference and you did me proud cinemasins

@danimiller9932 3 года назад

Pride is not the word I'm looking for, there is so much more inside me now....Sorry.

@sebastiencimpaye5871 3 года назад

My father wasn’t around man

@oliver_burnell8684 6 лет назад

Allonsy! "Doctor Who said what now" 😂

@nighton3 6 лет назад

David Suchet will always be the best Poirot.

@bejbimama6689 5 лет назад

Nightone exactly. And episode Murder on the Orient Express was very powerful. This picture here is weak copy.

@arturdent5168 5 лет назад

@@bejbimama6689 the original Albert Finney is the best

@silverysnowfox 5 лет назад

He was absolutely fantastic and I watched every of his episodes at least twice lol

@waffiie 5 лет назад

That is true

@majormalfunction3757 5 лет назад

No ew

@Glitterlover506 5 лет назад

I loved the misssing car thing 😂 and the scarf is a Hufflepuff scarf, but u think you said that by purpuse

@lachlanbrowse6939 5 лет назад

Sin 34: seeing your breath on a cold day requires impurities in the air, which I imagine there are much fewer on a 19th century mountain

@ThePuffi27 6 лет назад

That Uruguay Rugby joke though... COOOLLLLDDDD

@MentalBreakdownn 6 лет назад

I was looking for this comment. ICE COLD

@claudiathomson3214 6 лет назад

CinemaSins: Aaron Burr misses Hamilfans: *start freaking out and bouncing around*

@staticrainbow1297 6 лет назад

Rowena Ravenclaw me lol I literally searched the comment section for a comment about this XD

@aastylez40 6 лет назад

Static Rainbow literally same

@stevemarquez5054 6 лет назад

Rowena Ravenclaw mee

@madyseeen 6 лет назад

SAAMMEE

@nonotthehi-c 6 лет назад

Ah my friends

@WillowWispGaming 5 лет назад

These videos make me appreciate these movies even more. Like I loved the movie before, but I also love being able to laugh at all the sins

@n00bplayer72 2 года назад

One thing that always bothers me about this adaptation: The train stops AFTER the murder took place. In the book, the train was stopped for a while before the murder, so Poirot rules out the suspect's escape because the deep snow would have shown footprints. Here Poirot reaches the same conclusion, but we see the train was running for more than long enough for the suspect to jump out and get well away.

@sonicandshadowsjunction 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr Misses" I knew I wasn't alone.

@DennisGerik 6 лет назад

Same!!

@staticrainbow1297 6 лет назад

Eyyyy

@aastylez40 6 лет назад

A-yo-yo-yo yo yo!

@TitaniumTigerz 6 лет назад

Burr threw away his shot

@cidcrisis 6 лет назад

He just had to wait for it.

@RMcNeil13 6 лет назад

Cid Crisis I'm crying in the club rn

@baldr6894 6 лет назад

He was in the room where it happened

@enessis 6 лет назад

I appreciate all your videos muchly. Thank you for choosing this line of strange strange work.

@AndriiMalenko 5 лет назад

6:41 serving tea from a teapot without handle (ding).

@issyrose1504 6 лет назад

When I miss it in the cinema, I catch up on the film here 😂

@bob857able 6 лет назад

Issy Rose Or to see if it is a movie that should rent/red box.

@skysayshi4039 6 лет назад

I actually really liked this film, they did good by the original films/book, but.. Cinemasins gotta do what Cinemasins gotta do..

@skysayshi4039 6 лет назад

I also like that both Branagh and Jacobi were in Hamlet together hehe

@Abba_Fan 6 лет назад

Agree, after a shitshow that was justice league, this movie made me happy

@sdb3068 6 лет назад

Actually the Writer and director of the movie didn’t even read the book so he could have his own take on the story

@watcherzero5256 6 лет назад

indeed, they even give sins for unanswered questions that they themselves answer in later sins such as why didn't one person just murder him (they all wanted a shot and it was conspiracy), how did they all fit in one tiny cabin at the same time (followed by clip of them queuing in the corridor to take turns), why did they do it on a train how did they expect to get away with it (by planting the evidence to point to disgruntled Mafia business associate and to make it look like the murderer was an intruder on the train that had already fled) and why were they all in the same coach on a fully booked train (they had booked out the entire carriage for conspiracy members but Hercule was moved there at the last moment taking the room reserved for company directors)

@sftgunner 6 лет назад

I also really liked it, but it seemed that they unnecessarily changed certain details from the book for the heck of it. I get the stuff like the dramatic chase and shooting cause, y’know Movies. But what was wrong with the Chauffeur being Italian? Why did we have to start in Jerusalem rather than Aleppo? Additionally, the original line in French was “Ce n’est rien. Je me suis trompé”. Why did this need to be shortened?! Also, in the film, I’m pretty sure that Daisy Armstrong’s name doesn’t feature on the burnt scrap, but in the book the only reason Poirot makes the connection is because it says “... remember little Daisy Armstrong...”. Perhaps it was a mistake reading the book directly before seeing the film...!😂

@jessicadegen8433 3 года назад

"who gets this excited about a train leaving?" i do. fucking love watching trains.

@m4rz111 6 лет назад

"Aaron Burr misses." I'm weak 😂

@thomasgoodall4917 6 лет назад

The biggest issue with this film is that its not David Suchet playing Poirot

@xyz7572 6 лет назад

"There's not even a rugby team from Uruguay around for if he gets hungry" I see what you did there, Jeremy

@TheTsar1918 6 лет назад

Okay, I love your reviews, but the ending clips had me in stitches and tears!

@andrewstack4889 5 лет назад

I love that this had a Monk reference

@hoteltrivago190 6 лет назад

I watch cinemasins because im too poor to afford movie tickets

@Lodatzor 6 лет назад

I watch cinemasins because so few movies these days are worth the ticket price.

@hoteltrivago190 6 лет назад

Lodatz emoji movie was a great movie mind you

@Lodatzor 6 лет назад

English Much It's sad how no-one cared about it's snub at the Oscars

@flashplays1204 6 лет назад

This movie is in redbox

@user-vz7mu4su9n 6 лет назад

I watch cinemasins because I couldn't be bothered watching full movies but I still want to see what they are about.

@SarahShowsHerArt 6 лет назад

AARON BURR MISSES

@Mar-yl8xy 6 лет назад

I saw that joke coming from last year, still love it

@neobro234 6 лет назад

I didn't get that joke is it something to do with the actor Nvm it's from Hamilton

@kit-rg7ib 6 лет назад

BITCH i SCREAMED

@abbyception0719 6 лет назад

*screm*

@shadowhunter240 6 лет назад

I was waiting for someone to cmment this

@chrisp289 5 лет назад

sin47: in the book the Count&Countess say they will allow their suitcases to be opened and searched,so that was not an option

@amythetaylor7253 4 года назад

Cinema sins really loves Hamilton. There is so many Hamilton references (no in this, but overall). I’ve noticed the, since I became obsessed. In this he says ‘Aaron Burr misses’... I know it could just be history, but he has also sung the opening when something sounded similar (forgot which film he was sinning). There you go, some useless information. 😂

@danimiller9932 3 года назад

It is a reference to Hamilton, because the guy who was shooting is played by Leslie Odom Jr., who was Aaron Burr in Hamilton. Also I think the other reference was in Mary Poppins. Yay useless Hamilton information!!!

@meghannc3583 6 лет назад

Is no one going to talk about "smirky Hercy"?

@MissChinBK99 6 лет назад

No.

@dodgy_penguin 6 лет назад

Gryffindor? GRYFFINDOR?

@polkadotpink5175 6 лет назад

Skyeboat Smh it should be Hufflepuff not Gryffindor.

@DPWFG 6 лет назад

Oh good, someone said it. I initially though Ravenclaw, because of the dark blue of the scarf though..

@littletee3649 6 лет назад

Actually, if anything it's _clearly_ a hybrid of Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff, or rather *Ravenpuff* 😉 💙💛

@t-rexcenny6536 6 лет назад

Huffleclaw or Ravenpuff.

@lunabearsong2043 6 лет назад

Little Tee Thank you for saying it!

@opheliaismyname9180 2 года назад

On the floor about the Hot Fuzz bit ("accidents happen all the time, what makes you think it was mur-dur?")

@nhmooytis7058 4 года назад

Monk theme was perfect!

@TheNN 6 лет назад

All the sins this movie had should've been taken away if the real twist was that Derek Jacobi was actually The Master the whole time.

@MACarcano 6 лет назад

I loooove this channel, even when sometimes it ruins movies that I enjoyed... like this one. Interesting fact about sin number 31, in the book Poirot deduces that they only pointed fingers at each other when that other’s alibi could immediately be verified, so that their relationship was concealed. Also, in the book, alibis were given only by people who initially claimed to dislike each other.