Evolution Is A Theory With Many Holes

Подписаться 413 тыс.

Просмотров 167 тыс.

50% 1

Rick from Canada believes that the theory of evolution is full of many holes including that Forrest can’t disprove talking donkeys, horses, and snakes.
The Atheist Experience 27.01 for January 8, 2023 with Forrest Valkai and Dave Warnock
Call the show on Sundays 4:30pm-6:00pm CT: 1-512-686-0279 or use your computer to save on long-distance charges: tiny.cc/calltheshow
► Don't like commercials? Become a patron for ad-free content & more: / theatheistexperience
► Podcast versions of the show may be found at:
www.spreaker.com/show/theathe...
► Atheist Experience merch can be found at: bit.ly/aenmerch
► Become a RU-vid member: / @theatheistexperience
► Join our discord:
tinyurl.com/TheACAdiscord
► Chat room rules:
atheist-experience.org/chat-ru...
► The most up to date Atheist Experience videos can be found by visiting
atheist-experience.com/archive/
Note: We request pronouns as part of the call screening process on our shows, and we display the pronouns our callers provide. If you see a caller with no pronouns indicated, this is because they chose not to provide us with any, and we respect that decision.
-------
WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?
The Atheist Experience is a weekly call-in television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.
We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.
VISIT THE ACA'S OFFICIAL WEB SITES
www.atheist-community.org (The Atheist Community of Austin)
www.atheist-experience.com (The Atheist Experience TV Show)
► More shows and video clips can be found in the archive:
www.atheist-experience.com/arc...
► DVDs of the Atheist Experience can be purchased via:
www.atheist-community.com/prod...
NOTES
TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. "The Atheist Experience" is a trademark of the ACA.
The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
Opening Theme:
Shelley Segal "Saved" www.shelleysegal.com/
Limited use license by Shelley Segal
Copyright © 2011 Shelley Segal
Copyright © 2022 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

Опубликовано:

12 янв 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3,2 тыс.

@yoredeerleader Год назад

I worked all the time with snakes who could talk, until I decided to stop working for the financial industry.

@lindarockafellow5058 Год назад

Lol

@angelman906 Год назад

@Brandon Letzco lawyers aren’t bad as a whole, it’s the big law firm lawyers that are bad, funnily enough they also work a lot with banks and insurance.

@uncleanunicorn4571 Год назад

I bet they never ask you how your day was either.

@Angelum_Band Год назад

Politics and specially the white house is full of talking snakes.

@Timbo6669 Год назад

I have also chatted with talking snakes….but then I came down.

@acgsmith5937 Год назад

Forrest never gets upset, he just smiles at you and hammers you with knowledge and logic.

@SnuffHoover Год назад

Unless you think slavery is ok then he starts to get heated but yes Forrest is awesome and super knowledgeable

@jimd6641 Год назад

You bear a striking resemblance to Curly Howard😁

@acgsmith5937 Год назад

@@jimd6641 I get that a lot.

@venyredun5221 Год назад

Oh he does, there is a video of some moron from florida where he talks about how slavery is not that bad and forrest goes nuclear.

@aev6075 Год назад

That's what working with facts gets you

@andrewreynolds9559 Год назад

Forrest is a national treasure. So knowlegable and articulate.

@rl7012 Год назад

He knows zilch

@jonclark8252 Год назад

@R L "He knows zilch" What is your exploration for the origin of life on this planet and what evidence do you have that proves your claim?

@kaiza6467 Год назад

@@rl7012 Whatever you say, Professor some dude on RU-vid xD

@fredbohm4728 Год назад

@@rl7012 You mean, you know zilch compared to Forrest.

@strangementalitypaperYT Год назад

He's brilliant but I think he has a tendency to alienate people due to speaking over their heads. You're not going to be able to reason with someone if you can't meet them on their own intellectual level.

@jackkraken3888 Год назад

Forest:"Let me answer every issue you discussed." Caller:"Nah dawg you're wrong though" (gives basically zero evidence)

@joeyfalco7009 Год назад

So random dude who thinks snakes are physically capable of speech wants to argue biology with a biologist.

@martinsoukup562 Год назад

Why do you think he thinks that?

@snatchadams69 Год назад

And he's a skeptic....🤨

@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu Год назад

@@martinsoukup562 the dude himself said that did you not watch the video

@martinsoukup562 Год назад

@@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu where in the video did he say that?

@jackwhitbread4583 Год назад

@@martinsoukup562 he literally said he thinks the story of Adam and Eve and the magic talking serpant was real and literal. Try actually watching the video

@stephenland9361 Год назад

This is what happens when you 'learn' biology from a Christian, faith based, school 'textbook' taught by your home-schooling, Biblically based mother. What could go wrong?

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Evolution? There is no new anatomy differing from ancestry (evolution) - not ever. There's been no new anatomy in humans, chickens or horses for +/- 10,000 yrs and there never will be, because matter only loses information; there's never a gain of information (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution). Those lies have never been observed, because they're IMPOSSIBLE. Proof of God is easy: All matter/life in the universe (including any multiverse) is contiguous/under the same laws/LOSING INFORMATION/decaying in disorder and goes only in one direction: bad to worse. We observe this fact over time, when women can’t have babies anymore, our vision is no longer 20/20, our hearing ability weakens. We continue to decay & eventually lose enough information to arrive at our end (heat death). In every moment of our life, we don’t gain information, but we decay/experience a relentless loss of INFORMATION and we are DYING, as part of FINITE NATURE (time/space/matter/energy). Humans, chickens & horses have had the same anatomy for 10,000 yrs. There’s not going to be SUDDEN NEW ANATOMY (evolution) appear before your eyes. There's no such thing as NEW INFORMATION (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution). That’s why NONE of it has ever been observed or proved to be possible. That means there’s no such thing as “natural processes” adding NEW INFORMATION. An entity that only LOSES INFORMATION will not be able to provide NEW INFORMATION (evolution). EVERYTHING is dying, therefore our cause has to be a NON-DYING, INFINITE, SUPERNATURAL entity (God). There’s no other option. And God takes credit for creation (finite time/space/matter/energy) in the very first verse of the Bible (see below). It’d be cause to pause, if atheists had a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality, but they don’t. That’s because God is real. “In the beginning (time), God created the heavens (space) & the earth (matter/energy).” - Genesis 1:1

@stephenland9361 Год назад

@@neverendingparty7741 "What could go wrong?" I assumed that what could go wrong didn't need explaining. You obviously thought otherwise.

@Studio732JRL Год назад

How ironically appropriate that "Never Ending Party" immediately shows up when someone poses the facetiously asked question "what can go wrong". Never Ending Party is the result of a woman asking "what can go wrong" after having a never ending meth bender while pregnant.

@nathanaelgazzard7989 Год назад

Why would you call me out like this?!?

@jpbaley2016 Год назад

That’s not completely accurate. It’s when someone is given the barest information regarding biology, evolution, geology and other sciences and now believes what they know is the end all of information available. As they do not have the majority of information, they, therefore, fail to understand how certain conclusions could be drawn from it and so easily accept the supernatural explanation. People, like Rick, refuse to accept they are lacking in anything, whether it’s knowledge or understanding the reasoning behind scientific theories. They are skeptical of the theories of evolution because it would mean others know more than them; are able to understand more than them; are intellectually better than them. The talking snake puts everyone on the same playing field and the feeling of superiority comes from the fact they believe in the talking snake and are therefore chosen and those that don’t believe will either be left behind or punished.

@jackfrost3573 Год назад

I have been watching this show for a long time. One observation I have noticed is that Religion limits an individual's willingness to learn. Religion limits intellect.

@tooluser Год назад

If you think you've been given privileged knowledge by a supernatural being (or their spokespeople), why bother asking more questions.

@martinsoukup562 Год назад

There are scientists who would tell you that they were willing to learn because of their faith. So your observation seems incorrect.

@martinsoukup562 Год назад

@@tooluser Because it's natural for people to ask more questions.

@jackfrost3573 Год назад

@@martinsoukup562 There are acceptations to all rules. "Seems" is subjective and I was talking about my personal experiences so...

@martinsoukup562 Год назад

@@jackfrost3573 you worded it in a way that suggests objectivity. Yes i used the word "seems" on purpose to show it's my subjective opinion. What's your point about the word "seems"?

@dancedecker Год назад

Relevant quote of the day, No. 37. "It's difficult to argue with an expert. It's IMPOSSIBLE to argue with an idiot!!"

@Angelum_Band Год назад

Let me guess the Ferengi Rules of Adquisition 69?

@ajclements4627 Год назад

@@Angelum_Band There isn’t a RoA #69, at least not in live action ST.

@adamboyen4727 Год назад

@@ajclements4627 it went up to like 285 or something like that, so there must be a 69th rule

@ianmichael5628 Год назад

I just love the pure joy that oozes from Forrest when he talks about biology 😊

@notreallydavid 11 месяцев назад

He's never had to get decent electron microscope images of the insides of cells.

@whatabouttheearth 5 месяцев назад

@@notreallydavid He works with Homo erectus remains at University of Tulsa to reconstruct their paleo environments to make inferences on their paleo climate. So, I don't know if he's going that small.

@yoredeerleader Год назад

I’m sceptical of the caller’s understanding of the definition of words.

@_Omega_Weapon Год назад

Most theists don't understand simple definitions or simply lie about them.

@ajclements4627 Год назад

Most theists (especially in the threads) are simple.

@FourDeuce01 Год назад

In theist-talk, words mean whatever they want them to mean, subject to change at any time.🤡

@scapegoatiscariot2767 Год назад

The Bible and their favorite scholars tell them what words mean. Reality never gets a chance. (Former believer)

@gknight4719 Год назад

@@FourDeuce01 Yes for sure, they have to! otherwise, their magic world would fall apart.

@alexkilgour1328 Год назад

As a Canadian, I feel the urge to say "Sorry about that guy". We have our Bible thumpers, too.

@markstoudenmire4935 Год назад

Our condolences...

@Angelum_Band Год назад

You have a good example of a talking snake in the form of Justin Trudeau.

@finbarrsaunders8688 Год назад

I blame your neighbours.

@strangementalitypaperYT Год назад

Why are you apologizing? He's the nicest Bible Thumper I've ever heard speak.

@Angelum_Band Год назад

@@finbarrsaunders8688 Russia?

@bodricpriest8816 Год назад

Neither Dave nor Forrest just cracked up and laughed uncontrollably, I find this to be impressive.

@CronoXpono 9 месяцев назад

I thought I was going to crack a rib when Forrest smartly pointed out "wait, so you think snakes CAN talk!?" and Rick had to backpedal like a mufucka LOL!!!!

@XMeK Год назад

"I'm a true skeptic at heart... and there was a talking snake" 🤣😂🤣

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@XMeK Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 1st, By definition ALL species are transitional species. 2nd, why are you asking this of an anonymous internet person? A simple search on "Prokaryote Fossils" will yield SUNY, NIH, UOCB. You could also read the paper: "A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land" - Battistuzzi, et al. All of the answers to your questions are published. You just have to want the answers bad enough to look for them. So... Question Time: With the OVERWHELMING evidence for Evolution, you're going to tell me magical Blue Bogeyman Daddy did done it? And your evidence for that is?? Your book of Fables? Do you also believe a rabbit challenged a tortoise to a race? Pffft!

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@ajclements4627 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Nothing better to do than spam?

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@bennettfloyd2715 Год назад

It never ceases to amaze me, the sheer arrogance creationists display when trying to argue with actual subject-matter experts on topics they CLEARLY don't understand the first thing about.

@norbertjendruschj9121 Год назад

Nothing fuels arrogance better than ignorance.

@gordon3186 Год назад

*I've yet to meet a layman who disputes Evolution because he's impartial and weighed the evidence. To a man, everyone I've encountered who does so, does because he's wedded to a literal interpretation of a Bronze Age Creation myth that he's decided is revealed truth.*

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Wrong. It's very easy to debunk the farce of evolution and go on to prove the entire cult of atheism is a lie: 1. You have no RATIONAL POSSIBLE coherent step-by-step atheist explanation for NOTHING to MAN existence. A mud puddle or moist rock didn't violate the 2nd law/Adamic Sin Curse by gaining complexity/new information & come from NOTHING & give rise to a first cell that had systems within to eat, digest food, eliminate waste, move, breathe & reproduce. NEITHER did that cell have the DNA blueprints for 10 million DIFFERENT species that MINDLESS, NON-PURPOSED, NEVER OBSERVED evolution came out of nowhere to diversify. Genesis (Creation) is already proven by science because we already know that all life had to have all bodily systems present and intact to survive, and that's why we know all life had to be created SUDDENLY and not in stages by a MINDLESS, NEVER-OBSERVED process (evolution). 2. A cell cannot form from a cooled down rock that got rained on, much less have within the systems to eat, digest food, eliminate waste, move breathe and reproduce. You have no RATIONAL, POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality, because there isn't one. 3. The 2nd law forbids all atheist ideas (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, evolution, mutations that make the host better, star formation) that require a gain of complexity/new information, because a gain of complexity/new information is impossible due to the 2nd law/Adamic Sin Curse. NONE OF IT has ever been proven to be possible, much less observable/demonstrable via any scientific experiment. 4. A cell can't from from “Primordial Soup” and have with it the DNA blueprints for 10 million species. THIS IS REQUIRED if you're going to get 10 million species from a cell. 5. There is no transitional evidence on any fossil or living specie. NEVER has there been new anatomy differing from ancestry. The gene pool of ancestry is the limit of variation and is another fact that makes evolution impossible. 6. Atheists finding some extinct animal, saying it’s “TRANSITIONAL” and placing it in some assumed pattern and calling such a fact for evolution, is not science whatsoever, but SPECULATIVE ASSUMPTION, which is all atheism really is. You have to BELIEVE in evolution and the rest of the ideas of atheism (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation), because nobody has ever seen it. Yet TRUE NATURE (e.g. gravity, flower bloom, reproduction, sunshine) is readily observed. Try to learn.

@gordon3186 Год назад

@@neverendingparty7741 --- *Atheism doesn't posit ANYTHING other than that theists haven't met their burden of proof. Therefore, your objections, 1-6, valid or invalid, aren't applicable to atheism.* *That said, this observer thinks Evolution DOES provide the most plausible explanation for this planet's biodiversity. If you have a better explanation, I'd love to hear it. But Bronze Age creation myths certainly do not.* *Even if Science someday supplants Evolution as the foremost theory for life on earth with one that better supports the data, that doesn't mean theists have met their burden of proof. They haven't. As a default position, 'That gods must have done it' is ludicrous.*

@nealjroberts4050 Год назад

Well yes. That's because the evidence is hard to ignore. Change in inherited characteristics across generations happens and is easy to see. Everything else is just arguing over mechanisms and their significance.

@occamraiser Год назад

That has been told and retold for a thousand years before being written down and recopied and edited for 2 thousand years..... all guided by the hand of their invisible friend to make sure it is perfect and accurate. So where was the invisible hand of the omniscient one when the wicked bible was published? "Thou shalt commit adultery" proves that transcription is not driven by the hand of the god-botherers' invisible friend.

@AbsurdlyGeeky Месяц назад

You can be honest, you can understand how evolution works, or you can deny that evolution is real, but you can only do two of these at the same time.

@MERLE1593 Год назад

So Rick from Canada can simply write a scientific paper describing those holes, submit it to a scientific journal for peer review, and collect his Nobel Prize.

@jesterc.6763 Год назад

It's so funny that after all these years, no religion or religious person has ever done it and actually win a noble prize.

@Cuffsmaster 9 месяцев назад

They want to teach that crap to our kids in school also.

@houstandy1009 7 месяцев назад

It wouldn’t win a noble prize as the holes are common knowledge and numerous. Of course holes don’t falsify the theory but you can’t say they don’t exist. Personally I think the theory of evolution/ modern synthesis needs a big fat downgrade to a hypothesis which I think it will get in the none to distant future as the evidence doesn’t support it. To clarify when I say evolution I mean the idea that all life has a universal common ancestor and has evolved primarily through the process of natural selection acting upon random mutation

@jackwhitbread4583 6 месяцев назад

@@houstandy1009doesn't matter what you think, evolution has been proven time and time again. There is no scientific theory on earth that has more evidence than evolution, including the theory of gravity. Yes you're going to have holes on fossil records, 99 per cent of all life that has ever existed is now extinct. Humans will never know every single animal that has ever existed, every time you find a missing link you find 3 more missing links you previously didn't know about. Nothing is going to change that.

@Hyperpandas 6 месяцев назад

@@houstandy1009Which holes would those be? Because Rick didn't identify any... he just showed his poor understanding of evolution.

@billhinsperger8120 Год назад

Best line I ever heard Dave. You believe in talking snakes but your a skeptic Lmao and the guy said yes lol

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@heinshaaine8153 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 what is the evidence for hydrogen being created by a god?

@TheTruthKiwi Год назад

Rick didn't even realise how absurd that is.

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@laserfan17 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 The evidence comes not from the fossils, but from molecular and cellular evidence: 1. Mitochondria and chloroplasts have double membranes, unlike typical cells, this indicates that they are a result of the fusion of two membranes. This only makes sense with Endosymbiosis. 2. Mitochondria and Chloroplasts have their own separate DNA, with their own genes and others borrowed from the host cell. Their genes are similar to those of some bacteria. 3. Their genomes are stored in a circular fashion just like other Prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea) and unlike their host cells. 4. Mitochondrial DNA is more similar to that of Rickettsial bacteria than that of other bacteria. 5. Chloroplasts are also very similar to some bacteria, specifically Cyanobacteria. 6. Both Chloroplasts and Mitochondria reproduce by binary fission and not by mitosis, much like Bacteria and very unlike their host cells. The evidence only makes sense if eukaryotes evolved from the union of prokaryotic organisms. This process is called endosymbiosis. given that single celled and even early multi-celled organisms would have had a terrible time fossilizing it would be nearly impossible to find any transitional fossil of them, the only exception being stromatolites.

@mrdontgothere Год назад

What always killed me about the "why are there still monkeys" people was them thinking scientists who spend their whole lives studying this stuff wouldn't notice something so blatantly obvious. This is maybe one step above that. Just another science denier with no background in the field arrogantly thinking they've thought of something the experts haven't.

@finbarrsaunders8688 Год назад

Which sums up most conspiritards, flat earthers, gravity deniers........they're always poorly educated, low-intellect underachievers that believe they can debunk the entire world of science, geology and everything else that supports what we know about the universe (at the moment).

@andanandan6061 Год назад

Still waiting the researcher to discover a 50,000 years old pyramid and all this human evolved from monkey theory can be put aside.

@finbarrsaunders8688 Год назад

@@andanandan6061 Who says humans evolved from monkeys?

@rodshop5897 Год назад

@@andanandan6061 "Still waiting the researcher to discover a 50,000 years old pyramid..." What would a 50,000 year old pyramid tell us about evolution?

@atticmuse3749 Год назад

@@andanandan6061 You know humans were around 50,000 years ago, right?

@chrisgregory3063 7 месяцев назад

Why are people so quick to believe in things with no evidence based solely on faith but fight so hard against peer reviewed facts with decades of collected evidence behind them.

@larryparis925 Год назад

Much credit to these two hosts for having the fortitude to deal with such callers. They have my admiration.

@kennyw871 Год назад

Christians make me bang my head against a brick wall, and frankly, I've suffered enough skull fractures to last me a lifetime.

@kinglyzard Год назад

And a lot of *patience*

@sigridm.hughes Год назад

I love how Forrest just bombards morons with facts and they have NOTHING to say in response.

@Firedrake1313 Год назад

Yeah, they usually just restate their original idea like they're still right even though they were just destroyed.

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@isdrakon9802 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 the evidence for is in your own cells cloroplasts and mitochondria each contain their own DNA and multiply independently of your own cells. It's the easiest argument to make as I am quite tired at the moment

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

@@isdrakon9802 Incorrect. 😇

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Delete

@anotherhuman8173 Год назад

Poor guy. Forrest's brilliance is probably wasted on him.

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@cy-one Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect. 😇

@anotherhuman8173 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 I'm not the best person to ask, but the thing is I'm actually a biology student, so I do know a little bit. There's some pretty interesting evidence pointing to the first eukaryotes being amalgamations or "fusions" of multiple prokaryotes. In fact, it's pretty widely accepted that mitochondria and chloroplasts are actually the remnants of once-independent prokaryotes. Look up Endosymbiotic Theory to learn more from actual experts. My question for you is, even if we don't know everything about the history of life on Earth, how does that prove a God?

@peris666 Год назад

The way this guy absolutely asserts all this bs that has been painfully carved in his brain, is quite scary.

@VicViper1984 Год назад

People arguing against the existence of evolution inevitably leads to them demonstrating that they haven't even the slightest functional understanding of what it actually is

@bobtimster62 8 месяцев назад

This guy arguing with Forrest is like a guy who brings a knife to a gunfight.

@FourDeuce01 Год назад

Forrest has met another brick wall of willful ignorance.🤤

@ninjabluefyre3815 Год назад

All in all it's just another brick in the wall

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@FourDeuce01 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 No, child, it’s not question time. It’s time for theists to either prove their imaginary god exists or admit they can’t.🤤

@wayno5655 Год назад

I am in ae of Forrests knowledge and articulation. He doesn't treat callers as idiots ans is calm and respectful. Amazing to watch.

@roblane66 Год назад

Forrest’s knowledge is phenomenal and he articulated it so well!! A masterclass in debate

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Don't be silly. Forrest is CLUELESS. The lost & clueless religious cult of atheism is IDNFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. No atheist has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. That's because there isn't one. THESE GUYS ADMIT THAT THEY HAVE NO ANSWERS!!! The fact remains that along w/ DYING/FINITE space/matter/energy, TIME had a cause. The logical conclusion (when we follow the evidence) is that such a cause is TIMELESS. And if you're TIMELESS, do you have a beginning or end? No. We call that cause "OUR INFINITE, SUPERNATURAL GOD," who by definition is TIMELESS, CHANGELESS, BEGINNINGLESS, SPACELESS, IMMATERIAL and ENORMOUSLY POWERFUL. These topics are the most important topics known; thus, EVERYONE should have a vast understanding of the facts that frame the truth of these topics and not be so content to gulp down the false propaganda of channels such as this one. THESE GUYS ADMIT THAT THEY HAVE NO ANSWERS!!!

@roblane66 Год назад

@@neverendingparty7741. Atheism is completely separate from evolution and is a LACK of belief in a single proposition that gods exist. Even if someone did come along with absolute proof that evolution is false, it still doesn’t get you one step closer to proving the existence of a timeless creator. “I don’t know” is a far more honest answer than something for which there is ZERO evidence! It’s the god of the gaps!

@Cretaigne95 Год назад

Caller: Snakes are the only proof of lost limbs Me who got his degree on genetics by writing about the vestigial limbs of whales: oooh I really hope Forr... Forest: did you know that Whales... Very happy

@Lingboysc2 Год назад

I love Forrest's personality and ability to explain things so much

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@EyeonthePrize247 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Get well soon!

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Irrelevant.

@SaintD382 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 This is the only question Ultra Instinct Goku knows. He repeats it over and over throughout the comments section, but he doesn't actually know the correct answer. He is a troll.

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@mike5556 Год назад

Forrest is going to be the next science superstar as his exposure grows.

@klocke5247 Год назад

He appears to be very knowledgeable of a number of different fields.

@junepearl7993 Год назад

That’s what the world needs

@whatabouttheearth 5 месяцев назад

Almost never happens to biologists and people in earth sciences, the mainstream ones are almost always astronomers, physicists or engineers. Dawkins is the only well known mainstream biologists but that's mainly for his atheist activism. Biology, ecology and earth sciences are sadly not that popular, probably because they just don't get as much mainstream promotion as astronomy and physics.

@whatabouttheearth 5 месяцев назад

@@klocke5247 His undergrad degree focused on multiple scientific fields. He currently works at a lab at University of Tulsa studying Homo erectus remains to learn about their paleo environments to learn about their paleo climate.

@whodey2112 Год назад

It boils down to this: If they accept evolution, then their entire belief system disintegrates. It would mean that the Bible isn't actually the word of god.

@noamfinnegan8663 Год назад

"two major problems with what you just said" Totally agree with Forrest, he spoke and we heard it, both major problems.

@michaeljackson2838 Год назад

Yes, I'm a skeptic, but only on evolution. Wow, just wow! Forrest is worth watching for the educational value alone.

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@michaeljackson2838 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 What?? 🤣🤣

@ajclements4627 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Oh good, more spam.

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@TheTruthKiwi Год назад

Wow, dunning kruger much? I love how confident Rick is in his ignorance.

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

"Confident?" Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS, MORALITY, the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy.

@areid5907 Год назад

I had a pet snake who I named Slippery Sam, until one day he spoke and told me his name was Philip .... talking snakes, who knew!? Next thing he wanted a PS5

@rembrandt972ify Год назад

Never give a snake a PS5. It is almost as bad as giving a drummer a microphone. It always ends in tears.

@peternjenga4420 Год назад

🤣🤣🤣

@mikeyuskiw3477 Год назад

Forest makes me want to go back and study biology. These two make quite a team. I have to go back and watch this full episode now.

@randolphphillips3104 Год назад

You guys need to use mute a bit more. You are careful to let the caller finish, but the minute you try to answer they jump in to derail things. Mute there butts and tell them flat out "we let you finish, we expect the same courtesy".

@KulaGGin Год назад

Yes, pull the Dillahunty on their asses.

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@randolphphillips3104 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Question time: WTF does that have to do with them not muting a rude caller? Do you just not understand what my comment actually said? Or did you just want to sound smart and can't understand how a comment could be about behaviour? You believe your specific example is unprovable, so that trumps everything and completely dismantles what is likely the most supported theory in science. (You realize it isn't all just what fossils have been found, right,?)

@paolagrando5079 Год назад

@@randolphphillips3104 it's a troll. It doesn't reason or have a logic and adult conversation.

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@swerviness Год назад

I spoke to a snake yesterday and he tried to sell me an extended warranty on my car.

@KonwTheTrut Год назад

Forrest and Dave is why I'm watching TAE again. Love these humans.

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@isdrakon9802 Год назад

I thought you said Tate and I about lost it

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@BlarglemanTheSkeptic2 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 where's your video of Jesus resurrecting?

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@dougtutt2720 Год назад

Annihilated him with science.

@ninjabluefyre3815 Год назад

They annihilated me with science! *funky keyboards*

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

Sweet as any harmony

@lidbass Год назад

Poetry in motion

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Science? Science points directly to God. GOD DID IT. The proven lies of atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) have NOTHING to do with “science” whatsoever, as NONE of the lies of atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) can be tested, measured or observed (scientific method). All of the lies of atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) go hand-in-hand for the atheist DELUSIONAL explanation of existence. You can’t have 1 atheist lie without the other 2 atheist lies. NONE of which have YOU PERSONALLY EVER SEEN. So you can STOP w/ the “certainty” attitude. ALL your atheist ideas are easily debunked, as I have proved and will continue to prove ad nauseam.

@steveg1961 Год назад

Caller says, "I'm a skeptic," and he believes in a literal talking snake in a religious myth in a religious book. Which means he doesn't even know what the word "skeptic" means.

@saiyanlegend77 Год назад

Forest is one of the best things that’s happened to this show ngl

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Don't be silly. Forrest has ZERO ANSWERS. The asinine, lost & clueless cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS and yet it's lost & clueless NO ANSWER followers cling desperately to that garbage.

@saiyanlegend77 Год назад

@@neverendingparty7741 ok bro

@tanus451barbarus Год назад

My boy Forrest is WICKED SMART!

@mjjoe76 Год назад

I was hoping Forrest would bring up whales as soon as Rick claimed that snakes were the only evidence of vestigial structures.

@andreant862 Год назад

And humans have tail bones

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@DontRespectTheUS Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Again, you’re spamming a question rather than putting in effort.

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@nagranoth_ Год назад

The really sad thing is the guy was saying it's the only real evidence because the bible has a story about a snake.....

@the1khronohs40 8 месяцев назад

THIS is why Forrest is one of my heroes in this field! A very quick recollection of excellent verified examples of what is talked about, is not easily frustrated with individuals when discussing, and is rarely shooting someone down for not understanding. Actually he never does that. Only when it’s understood that they don’t want to understand. And not least, he is genuinely interested in learning, discussing, understanding different views and helping others understand why facts are, in fact, facts. ❤

@jaymercha3859 Год назад

Forest stays so calm when faced with such intentional ignorance.

@noelwass4738 Год назад

So much fascinating stuff here including cave salamanders losing eyes and vestigial limbs on whales. Forrest is very knowledgeable and can easily answer any questions on evolution. The losing eyes part is scary.

@SilentKabob Год назад

I like how the caller used literal snakes and their vestigial structure as evidence for the genesis then when asked if he actually believed in talking snakes, he dodged and fell back to a metaphorical serpent. Surprised they didn't pin him down on that one.

@isdrakon9802 Год назад

Because a snake and serpent are the same thing, but no matter what he'd claim ignorance. After arguing with people like this long enough you already know what the argument will be like by the first few sentences

@nagranoth_ Год назад

There was just too much stupid to all pin down...

@nagranoth_ Год назад

@@isdrakon9802 no they're not. A serpent is any kind of elongated lizard like animal, even Comodo dragons were called serpents. Snakes are a sub set of serpents, with serpent being an incredibly vague non biological term, while snake has an actual biological definition. But yeah, he was totally dodging.

@wizardsuth Год назад

"My bible is literal and inerrant, but if you prove it contains obvious errors it's clearly metaphorical!"

@uncleanunicorn4571 Год назад

I believe in the book that says snakes and donkeys can talk, but slow and gradual change over time, that apparently is more difficult. lol

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@ajclements4627 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Got anything other than spam?

@TheCthulhurlyeh Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 incorrect

@sirbarryvee-eight6485 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 The evidence WAS in the Bible, in the bits that got taken out so they could fit in the bits where girls get their dad drunk so they can have a 3 way with him, and then some men gang raped an angel that was staying on outskirts of town. Then some really nice dude came along and said "turn the other cheek and respect each other" but the authors wrote him out and replaced him with a bigot called Saul. In summary, go study biology.

@erinfarmer960 Год назад

It is refreshing to have someone so knowledgeable about biology debate evolution- Forrest elevated this debate far beyond what I’m used to hearing when the average person debates evolution. It was a nice bonus to learn some fun facts about vestigial structures too!

@tooluser Год назад

His in-depth knowledge reminds me of Aron Ra (who is also a snake expert i believe) but Forrest has a little more of a lighter/conversational tone. Love AR and these hosts.

@williamcreighton1417 Год назад

Talking snakes. English. Perfect diction. Donkeys ditto. Love it.

@derinderruheliegt Год назад

Bears, beets, battlestar galactica.

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

Talking snakes? Talking donkeys? You believe that humans are blobs of rearranged stardust and thus, you literally believe that stardust can talk :) Either there is a God, in which "talking snakes" and “floods” are no problem, or there isn't a God and you have to explain how the DNA blueprints of 10 million animals came from MINDLESS NOTHING. And How life, intelligence, love, consciousness and morality came from a mud puddle that came from NOTHING, instead of coming by someone who had the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE and MEANS to give these attributes to us in the first place - our living, intelligent, loving, conscious and moral God. Atheism is a stone cold stupid idea that’s not just debunked by these facts, but many others.

@sirbarryvee-eight6485 Год назад

That was my question too. Like okay, I'll let Rick have his theory that "evolution (which he denies) could have given us talking snakes and donkeys" but he has to explain how those snakes and donkeys taught themselves (and/or each other) the language of Adam and Eve - whatever language it was they spoke. Over to you Rick...

@geoffmoon2903 Год назад

@@sirbarryvee-eight6485 come on, surely you know what the response will be.

@rikardotsamsiyu Год назад

Can Forrest get angry? 😂😆 I feel like his opponents become even more angry at the fact that he remains so calm despite their attempts to get a reaction out of him and I’m here for it! ❤️

@brianbeattie3305 Год назад

The funniest thing I have heard all day ... I'm a true skeptic

@Angelum_Band Год назад

You must be the life of the party then lol!

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@brianbeattie3305 Год назад

@@Angelum_Band I'm not sure that's how that works

@TBomb39 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Incorrect.

@SuperJal1979 Год назад

@Jebus Anti-Theist keep up the good work, I wonder how many accounts he has spamming the same nonsense?

@cyrenedomogalla5127 Год назад

He's not listening. Forest mentioned evolution in labs (with bacteria or flies or whatnot) and he just blew past it to "my neanderthal point". Not a skeptic, not a learner.

@Captain_Pudding Год назад

I like how half way through his call where he does nothing but preach his faith, he makes sure to let you know he's a sceptical person

@whitegoose2017 7 месяцев назад

Skeptical about everything else but his own information. Religion is such a bad way to explain the world around us. For community religion works, but for understanding the natural processes around us.. Uh oh.

@jameshicks7125 Год назад

Wow! Aside from being caught up in the psychoanalysis of the caller's psycho-epistemic method of cognitive suppression, I learned that Whales and Deer are related through the Artiodactyl family! Thanks Forrest!

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

QuestionTime: What's the evidence for prokaryotes evolving into eukaryotes and where's the fossils for the transitional species of prokaryotic species evolving into eukaryotic species? 😇

@heinshaaine8153 Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 so you buy your slaves from the countries around you like god told you?

@chillinsquirtle Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 fossil evidence for Jesus please

@DontRespectTheUS Год назад

@@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Why don’t you look it up? If you can type that here why not do some research of your own? Or like the caller, do you expect others to take the burden of your learning?

@ultrainstinctgoku2509 Год назад

@@chillinsquirtle Incorrect. 😇

@angeliparraguirre7329 Год назад

Dave was quick with the 'no', no hesitation. Absolute legend.

@highdough2712 7 месяцев назад

I’ve always wondered why these people don’t notice that people like Forrest are exponentially more knowledgeable about literally everything to do with evolution than they are, and maybe that should be a sign they don;t know what they’re talking about.

@mikemcmike6427 Год назад

As a Canadian this caller is most likely from Alberta. It’s basically Canadas Texas

@jonnythelegs2597 Год назад

Ive been waiting to hear Forest really get his teeth into his specialist subject with someone and that really hit the mark spot on 👌 it was quite literally one of funniest yet highly informative conversations ive ever listened to. You two are such a good pairing possibly the best on this and your kindred channels.

@lunarwuffy5299 Год назад

Wow, someone really did not pay attention in school.

@skinfully 11 месяцев назад

today was a stressful day. and on top of the thing i'm stressing about, i'm also currently at my religious family's and it's exhausting at times. forrest does not know it, but today he helped me tremendously. his words are so refreshing, i feel like they're cleansing my mind. thank you atheist experience.

@sc2_Nightmare Год назад

"I am a skeptic. I question everything. Except my faith." Okay then.

@nagranoth_ Год назад

Caller thinks he's a skeptic, also only accepts evidence if it sort of fits with a story in his fairy tale book, while rejecting the exact same evidence for _everything_ else...

@Lupinemancer87 Год назад

I would like to hear Rick's explaination for why we humans have a tailbone.

@robertsparling Год назад

We used to have longer tails, but we are down to only three except in our embryonic development. The three that remain secure other tissues that we need or they would probably be gone by now also.

@neverendingparty7741 Год назад

For correct posture. Many muscles connect to the coccyx.

@Lupinemancer87 Год назад

@@robertsparling And you are telling me this why?

@robertsparling Год назад

@@Lupinemancer87 Because that is why we have a coccyx.

@Lupinemancer87 8 месяцев назад

@@robertsparling And you are assume I didn't know that, why?

@lnsflare1 Год назад

The produce aisle at your local grocery store would look a lot different if the principles of evolution didn't work.

@firefalcoln Год назад

13:00 “Well it was a serpent” 😂 Apparently the mistake isn’t accepting that some ancient holy book accurately documented a talking reptile within a story. The issue is that some people think that this talking reptile was a snake, when it was really a serpent. That’s the true skepticism. 😆

@jeremyarcus-goldberg9543 Год назад

Forrest has amazing information and a fantastic way of communicating it.

@MrThailik Год назад

I could listen to Forrest all day . So interesting .😊😊😊

@afroatheist-isnowafroantit6154 Год назад

Now, the caller should have known not to challenge Forrest. He is an actual scientist......

@darksoul479 Год назад

Isn't it distressing how people that call to debate Evolution obviously have not studied evolution? This is a crazy world.😞

@Chardonbois Год назад

A masterly take-down by someone who is on top of his subject!

@aaronrivers64 Год назад

Wow, Forrest is a freaking genius. So much knowledge about biology.

@gleanerman2195 7 месяцев назад

He makes me feel like a stupid ape.

@johnsperry9494 5 месяцев назад

When I was 5 or 6 years old, my parents gave me books about Aesop’s fables, Mother Goose stories, Fairy tales, etc., and almost all of those stories had talking animals. I asked my Dad if animals can really talk, and he told me that it was make-believe (which I later labeled Suspended disbelief). I put those books on my make-believe shelf, along with Mickey Mouse, Peter Rabbit, and Winnie the Pooh. One day my Presbyterian grandmother gave me a book of Bible stories for children. In the very first story, I found a talking snake. That book went straight to the make-believe shelf, where it has remained for over 65 years.

@satie321 Год назад

Another great lecture from Forrest!

@yep_2431 Год назад

I hate callers that are not willing to grow and change That's got to be such a disappointing way to live life

@hermixtonen Год назад

Dave is so inspiring . What amazing bravery . Love seeing him laugh

@canbest7668 Год назад

Rick - T ball batter Forrest - Major league pitcher

@keithhicks9518 8 месяцев назад

Beautifully explained !

@thomasmuller8703 Год назад

I love listening to Forrest talk about biology and evolution, I always learn something. I had never heard of exaptation before.

@richtraube2241 Год назад

Caller has an organ that's "dragging": his brain. Forrest is a force of science.

@zachshine6170 10 месяцев назад

Forrest is just about the most adorable human

@DarkAngel71180 Год назад

Rick doesn't want to hear about evidence or learn about things he has no knowledge about, he just wants his turn to talk.

@rossjames7871 Год назад

Rick is not playing with a full deck. Anytime anyone has to say "right' after childish comment or ludicrous point you just know Mother Hubard went to the cupboard but the cupboard was bare.

@wunnell Год назад

He's got the jokers, but that's all.

@philbreadcrumbs8179 Год назад

Poor Rick, he so didn't want to admit believing in a talking serpent because even he knows deep down that it's so incredibly silly.

@brentrollens8090 Год назад

Forrest exhibits a knowledge and friendliness that is impressive to even the evolution doubters. They want to talk to him even though he disagrees with their beliefs. I suppose they believe their unfounded wisdom will change his mind .

@tanaka173 Год назад

Its a natural response I feel like. It goes like this Here's this reasonable, friendly, knowledgeable person. I'm a reasonable friendly knowledgeable person. If we just talk I'm sure he'd see things my way. Because he's like me.

@tonydarcy1606 Год назад

To summarise this call as a newspaper headline: *"Loudmouth Fails to Diss Evolution"* !

@janusatthegate6201 Год назад

I would love to see Forrest and Neil Tyson together answering questions. Star Talk!

@surinderparkash1135 Год назад

Wow! First time I’ve watched Forrest. The dude is incredible!!

@emperordalektardis Год назад

Rick had absolutely no idea at all that Dave was taking the piss out of him.

@heitorcoutinho4462 Год назад

It's so delightful to listen to Forrest teaching

@Miguelsw Год назад

For a snake to talk intelligibly, I would have thought that it would also need a very large cranium, housing a large brain, but I understand Rick, so maybe the brain isn’t so important

@finbarrsaunders8688 Год назад

Notwithstanding the fact that snakes and other animals lack the physiological components to speak as we do. It's impossible for them to form our words.

@UlexiteTVStoneLexite Год назад

@@finbarrsaunders8688 that can't make sounds other than hissing

@Tybren Год назад

Some birds can talk, so I don't think a big brain is a requirement..

@ajclements4627 Год назад

With birds, is it really talking or simply mimicking the sounds of English or whatever language the owner speaks? Parrots can imitate many things, from spoken words to creaking doors to barking dogs, so I’ve heard, having never owned a bird.

@Miguelsw Год назад

@@Tybren but can those birds convince people to eat more fruit?

@howdoyouknow1218 Год назад

These calls are like the order of operations math problems you see on FB and TikTok. People will have the wrong answer and argue like crazy…even when shown the problem worked through, step by step, they will cling to their wrong answers.

@drblaque521 Год назад

This was highly educational, I learned so much more about Evolution and zoology/paleontology. It was brilliant, thank you

@blackwolfe638 Месяц назад

Forrest works so hard to make things clear to callers that just are not capable of understanding or believing in the real world.

@LaRossaSelvaggia Год назад

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Forrest Valkai: the smiling savage

@revwillyg6450 Год назад

Friendly savagery! Lol. Matt would have gotten pissed and cussed him out

@ragingbullalf5790 Год назад

Not my quote but "when you find a rabbit in the Pre Cambrian, THEN you disprove Evolution"!

@roner61 Год назад

So true. 🙂

@howdoyouknow1218 Год назад

Damn! I’d settle for Cretaceous!

@brucebaker810 4 месяца назад

Bertrand Russel, methinks.

@doneestoner9945 Год назад

I learn so much from Forrest (what a great name!)

@ecpracticesquad4674 Год назад

Why is it that the most ignorant people speak with the most confidence about subjects they literally know nothing about? Creationists never cease to amazing with their silliness. Also, Forrest has quickly become a favorite science communicator of mine.