Evolutionists Have NO Idea What’s Happening Here 

God created the heavens and earth and all the creatures. God created man in His image. 🙏🏻♥️✝️

Scientist on the BBC in the 70's: consequent to the Clean Air Act 1956 the bark of the plane trees became lighter, thus turning the tables on the vulnerability of the lighter moth and darker moth to predators, eventually the lighter ones becoming more prolific. Proof of evolution. My question: what is the lighter moth evolving into? Answer: it isn't. It's a moth. It's still 'just' a moth. Whenever I post this I get the response that I don't understand evolution.

Tim made a good point about the good things that man has done for the environment. An example would be the reclamation of hundreds of thousands of acres after the Mt St. Hellns eruption. Weyerhaeuser, a timber management company, went in shortly thereafter and planted tens of thousands of acres with young trees. 20 years later there was already a thriving ecosphere where they planted. The adjacent government owned land , where no reclamation was done, today looks like a moonscape.

It is quite interesting that when asked if children should be allowed to get tattoos people say "No, that is a permanent change to their bodies" and then turn around and say that "pub3rty b1ock3rs" are just fine for children. The lies being told in the US are outrageous!

We've been told lie after lie. It was a devastating awaking over 20 years now. I'm good though. But I've cried millions of tears. Nobody believed me and just thought i was out of my mind. All things will be revealed. Father blesses his children either here or there.

Genetics proves design on the molecular level.

I've said it before, if CO2 levels are such a concern, then plant more. More fruit trees and more vegetable gardens since plants need CO2. This also could put a big dent in another problem - world hunger!!! 🤯 You're welcome!

So variation in organisms is a good thing because it keeps them "strong". How does it make a species "stronger" if there is only a loss of genetic information?

I like a little tarter sauce on my peppered moth . 😁

When arguing with evolutionists about adaptation I like to use Alex Honnold, the famous rock climber, as a perfect example of how earthly creatures don't evolve but adapt to their environment. Alex Honnold's freakishly huge hands have adapted to climbing up a vertical rock face hundreds of feet high with his finger tips. He didn't evolve that way he has adapted to his environment. You would be amazed at how many evolutionist will argue tooth and nail with you until you ask them to explain how evolution specifically made him that way.

Maybe these people just lived in an isolated environment and did not change much after the Flood.

I don't know who wrote the headline for the article (Humans are driving a new kind of evolution in animals), but whoever wrote it is wrong. This is not a "new" kind of evolution, this is just evolution. When an environment changes some organisms do better, and others do worse. It doesn't matter what the cause of the change of environment is. The article points to environmental changes caused by humans. That is relatively new. Up until the industrial age, humans didn't have much effect beyond the local environment. That doesn't mean they didn't have any effect at all. Agriculture changes the local environment to favour certain plants and animals. With the industrial age came the ability to make larger scale changes. Nowadays we are making changes to the global environment. The article in question points this out. As far as the comment by the presenter at the beginning that "natural selection isn't evolution", that is just silly. Natural selection is a part of evolution. In evolution, a random mutation proposes, and the environment disposes. It is a simple fact that most often, the environment disposes by driving the organism to extinction. Be happy, you are one of the 1% of organisms that have survived. You carry in your body a strand of DNA that has existed since the beginning of life on earth. That makes you a walking, talking museum of the evolutionary history, not just of mankind, but of all living things.

I evolved to need coffee that is freshly ground every morning 😅😅

Patricia Engler is such a bright and intelligent speaker. Thank God for this entire panel and thank God for her bold encouragement for the younger generation!

Why do thesist keep acting like everyone who believes in evolution is an atheist and act like this is some ridiculous theist vs atheist game that needs to be won? 🤔 You dont need to mention atheism, just address the science, thats literally all you need to do.

I am very thankful for AIG and other creation ministries. God bless them and encourage them in their research and study of God's creation.

I wrote that I found this channel years after I found Jesus CHRIST, & my comment was taken down

19:32 I'm moving to Peru right now 👍👍

Genetics confirms all living humans came from Noah.

What study, citation needed.

YECs get published which proves your point, not all published science is good science.

“Very high elevations in Australia” 😂🤦🏻‍♂️🦘

I feel like we don't talk about adaptation enough. Look at the colors of people and where they are on the Earth. Adaptation

Secularists are very keen on redefining every kind of change as evolution. That's why even companies "evolve" their way of working, we "evolve" in our way of living, and moths "evolve" to be dark when trees are full of soot. They don't even realize they are destroying their own case by diluting the term evolution. Now every-single-time the word evolution is used we must ask what is meant, because it might be everything from abiogenesis to speciation to change in general.

Thanks for posting

What is your take on the Neanderthal debacle? Please respond, thank you..

Reproduction and adaptation are part of creation and are based on YEC assumptions.

Genetically, historically and demographically, humans are thousands of years old.

I wouldn't call it "natural" selection. It's more like God selection as God has given each creature the ability to adapt to a certain degree. Nature doesn't really select anything. 🙂🙏✝️🕊️

Female hysteria was also listed as a mental disorder. Should we bring that back?

Exactly how did different creatures get buried in different strata if the fossil record is made up of a single 40 day event that happened 6000 years ago?

If they wont hear Moses, they won't believe a man was raised from the dead.

Fabulous!!👍👍

Hi. There was a Catholic visionary in Belgium (died +1949), by the name of Leonie van den Dijck. She claimed that the different colored races emerged after God put a Mark on Caïn (Gen 4,15). She said to have seen it happen in a vision. What would be your comment on that.

My favorite evolutionary dodge is when they claim that individuals don't evolve, it is populations that evolve. Ummm....excuse me my dear evolutionists...but aren't populations made up of individuals? And if those individuals do not evolve, then how does the population made out of those individuals evolve? Anything they can think of to avoid the Truth.

changing the title ?

I have two interesting things... 1. Dna problems in our dna is getting worse. We have 26 well known and less known DNA problems. Like sickle cell, porphyria, etc... The dna is transferred to our children and of course it gets worse when my child with a certain dna problem marries one with another. Thus degredation of humans is just getting worse. Now... the otherside... If you think of the records that gets broken daily these days... for instance 100m sprint. Breaking such a record means that you ran faster than any other recorded person in the world and thr ones the lived loooong before you. Wont that be seen as becoming better?

"God built in variation so creatures can change to adapt to their environment." She doesn't understand evolution. "Creatures" are not changing. Individual months did not change colors. That would not be evolution but adaptation of individuals. But where a population changes because of the environment (i.e. those with a new trait (dark color) survive and those with the old trait do not, then the species has evolved.

“Evolutionists” is bit of a silly word, really - rather like calling a meteorologist a “weatherist” : someone who believes in the existence of weather. No matter... "evolutionists" know exactly “what is happening here” - far better than you three self-satisfied charlatans do. That is why you do not even take the trouble to ask a competent evolutionary biologist to explain it to you. They would have no difficulty whatsoever in putting you right in all your elementary misconceptions. Not that you would listen. You abhor the truth, because it contradicts all that you make your despicable living from.

How much putty was on the ark? Seems all the wood eating creatures onboard would have had a field day!

These people don't have the faintest clue what evolution actually is or how it works.

Human bodies apparently needed a gall bladder to survive at one time, which is why our bodies have them, but we can now survive without it. (I am walking proof of that. 😊) They call that evolution, but that is just adaptation.

Evolution is a theory, not a hypothesis.

Amen 🙏

So if God "built in" this ability to adapt into the "kinds" he created, does that mean the "man" kind had the ability to develop better brains when that lead to better adaptation to the environment?

Please stop with the clickbait titles😂 As hundreds of comments indicate, your claims don’t hold up under scrutiny!

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean God did it. It means you don't understand.

Yet another utterly dishonest title for an AiG video. I’m not playing games. I am not wishing to be difficult. I would just like followers of this RU-vid channel to take a minute to think what this title says (and then apply the same reasoning to plenty of other AiG offerings). Why are atheists mentioned in the title ? Why are atheists targeted on a subject that concerns evolutionary biology ? There may or may not be a relatively high proportion of atheists among evolutionary biologists, but atheism and evolutionary biology are not in the least bit inter-dependent. They are not even comparable. To suggest otherwise is blatantly dishonest. There are plenty of Christians (and followers of other religions) who recognise the overwhelming evidence that supports the theory of evolution. It would require only the strictest minimum of honesty for you to acknowledge that being a Christian does not preclude the possibility of harbouring doubts over the veracity of outlandish tales of talking snakes and floating menageries. Oh, and incidentally, no-one - atheist, Christian or Trinidadian Vodunu - is suggesting a “new kind of evolution”. It is evolution. That is all. Evolution upon which human activity is exerting a marked and growing influence.

I have always found Answers in Genesis thoroughly nauseating in its conceited, pharisaical lie-mongering, but since stumbling upon a couple of truly repugnant videos of a certain Calvin Smith promoting the sickening hypothesis that Darwin’s study of evolution was directly responsible for the Holocaust, I have realised just how depraved and condemnable their preaching really is. Those episodes should be removed and an apology issued.

***one thing is certain for everybody, God creates everything that is what counts, the rest is only talk talk talk and nothing changes what really happens, evolution or not, praise the Lord.***

Were Neanderthal on the ark? Or were they diversification from the "man" kind? What about the other species of hominid?

The great commission means we go to all cultures about the exclusivity of Jesus. The culture /religion you're born into doesn't condemn you. Its the refusal to believe on Jesus Christ as the only way to be saved that condemns you.

Can someone explain the dinosaurs and the beginning of man!

Concerning the mice, perhaps they are confusing learning with evolution?

"Animals can change according to environmental conditions". Sounds downright evolutionary.

We do. We do our research and you just quote that book

So if God "built in" ability to change, what stops one species from evolving into another?

Adaptation is not the same as evolution. Animals adapt and thrive because God created them to do so. Those that don't become extinct. We do see proof of that for sure. We don't see proof that any creature changes into another creature.

These are the most ignorant people on the internet

I reap where I do not sow,...You better remember where God comes from. Outside of earth. Condition and ecological niches and radiation from space are a few of the factors that promote mutation which through natural selection bring about evolutionary effect.

We are God's special creation 🙏🏿❤️

No, you don't start with old age to use dating methods. Is there some way to speed up nuclear decay you know about? The entire scientific community would love to see it. No? You'll just keep ignoring this as your cult membership dwindles? Ok...

Hebrews 4:12 - For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Matthew 4:4 - But he answered, “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Psalm 119:105 - Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.

How is it that a moth population which over time has adapted to the environment by changing color be "losing" genetic information? What information has it lost?

The transition of nonlife to basic life is an example for macroevolution, but has never been observed.

It's funny... Even in this current run of Planet of the Apes, they admit (in a roundabout way) that Evolution requires help from man - in this version, the apes gained intelligence from a virus that man made in a lab.

Assertion: "Natural selection removes genetic information that's already been there... it can explain the survival of the fittest but not the arrival of the fittest." Correction: Natural selection is a mechanism of evolution that favors the survival and reproduction of individuals with advantageous traits. Evolution is the change in the genetic composition of a population over time, which includes the introduction of new genetic variations through mutations. These new genetic variations can then be acted upon by natural selection. Assertion: "The peppered moth is an example of genetic variation, not evolution... it's just a moth and it hasn't turned into anything else." Correction: The peppered moth is a classic example of natural selection where the frequency of different color morphs changed in response to environmental changes (industrial soot darkening tree bark). This is a clear instance of evolution at work, as it shows a change in the allele frequencies within the moth population over time. Assertion: "Animals will never evolve fins to swim because they don't have the genetic information." Correction: While it is true that major evolutionary changes like evolving fins require new genetic variations, these variations can arise through mutations, gene duplication, and other genetic mechanisms. Evolution is a cumulative process over many generations, not an instantaneous one. Assertion: "Unprecedented CO2 rising 10 times faster than any time in recorded history is exaggerated." Correction: Climate scientists use ice core data to reconstruct past atmospheric conditions. These methods are well-validated and show that the current rate of CO2 increase is indeed unprecedented in the context of Earth's recent geological history. Assertion: "Fossilization happens rapidly and is a testament to the global flood of Noah." Correction: Fossilization is a process that typically takes thousands to millions of years under specific conditions. The dating of fossils using radiometric methods provides robust evidence for the Earth's long history, far beyond the few thousand years proposed by young-Earth creationists. Assertion: "Animals reproduce within the created kinds that God put in place... this is variation within kinds, not evolution." Correction: The concept of "created kinds" is not a scientific one. Modern biology recognizes species and populations, which can change and diverge over time through evolutionary processes. The observable changes within species (microevolution) can, over long periods, lead to the formation of new species (macroevolution).

Glueing dead moths to trees as evidence of evolutionism never made sense to me.

First he says moths are changing color. Then he says there's no change its the same "creature." How is it the same creature if it is a different color? Is he claiming that the same month just gets a really good tan? Genetic changes in a population due to adaptation is evolution. The individual months are not changing color. The population is changing color because over generations as better adapted animals are surviving and the ones that don't adapt are not.

If Darwin was right about the survival of the fittest, only lions would have remained in the animal kingdom, and only killer whales at sea, but there are many unfit creatures still alive and well, including many unfit people among very few fit ones, so you can trash that stupidly. Also, the clever God made it on purpose, that the higher the animal is in the food chain, the less cubs or eggs it has, and the lower it is, lets say rabbits, the more babies they have, and so the chain is ongoing endlessly, just like God planned.

Every time you guys talk about evolution you show how little you know about it.

If an organism has a DNA sequence of ABDC and a mutuation occurs to make it ABCD and better adapted to its environment, what is the "loss" of genetic information?

Well, well, well ! Am I permitted to give myself a hearty pat on the back? It appears that AiG have seen fit to change the title of this pestiferous little video. Have they finally experienced a pang of remorse at constantly misleading their votaries and bearing false witness against their neighbours ? Or are they just seeking to render my earlier comment incomprehensible to anyone who had not seen the original (although the gist of it is still made clear in the grey caption box) ? No, no, no...how cynical of me ; I should be ashamed of myself. I am sure they are all now offering up sacrifices to placate their ever-watchful creator, lest he punish their sinful ways with fire and brimstone. Or worse : he could flood Kentucky, and they’d all have to seek refuge in the ark.

I am going to Italy this Fall. Maybe I should skip out on my hotel bill and when they come to arrest me I will say, "Take me to Ceasar!"

Nothing proves Evolution, everything proves Creation.

Evolution is more like a giant lie that appealed to all the God haters rather than a hypothesis, lol.

It's not "biblical convictions" it's scientific, normal convictions that people in all societies throughout history have had. Don't be so narrow-minded.

Evolution is what you get when you fail to obey God. Whoever was around Darwin when he came up with this nonsense, should have corrected him. Proverbs 26:4-5 ESV [4] Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. [5] Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.

These people have no idea what they are talking about. Adaptation is not evolution.

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean God did it. It means you don't understand.