Explosive Allegations 

His crack radar was off. When she stumbled at the end, that certified it for me

Yeah, all that slow talking proved it. They should have had the news video to back it up though. Because nobody would just make it up that it was on the news

@@jasonr.9863 i aint EVER seen a crackhead stumble

How you know that she is not just got a learning disability ya dont.

Like he frequently does.

🤣😄🤣🤣

😆 definitely deserved the test

Doyle not dolan

😂😂😂

💀💀😂😂😂💀💀💀

Talkin about it’s her shoes 👠 😆😆

Yeah, the judge missed this 1. He should have performed the crack test on her...

Both her and the mother drug addicts

They all are

I feel like y’all are trippin how is he supposed to know what happens after they leave the court room she didn’t start acting weird until after the ruling while his mothers eyes are closed and her head is swaying back and fourth throughout the whole case

You would think she would have brought that if she was so certain

judge Mathis still has crackish ways

coulda, shoulda, woulda....grown adults got no excuse for not knowing you need to bring all your documents, evidence, and proof with you to court to prove your allegations and case. Most don't bring their evidence because they don't any...if you have it, why would you leave it behind? If you simply "forgot", then you simply have to eat your mistake.

no , what was unnecessary was giving the plaintiff any money at all . the plaintiff committed FRAUD by knowingly trading a vehicle that she could not legally register .

@@marleonetti7 if it was illegal how did he have a clean title for the vehicle in court 🙄 pay attention before you comment

True

Exactly! If she would’ve started with “I’m a recovering addict and so is the defendant. That’s how and why we met at a shelter,” or something to that effect, he wouldn’t have gone off like that. The defendant is definitely on drugs though. I believe the mom 100%

The plaintiff was talking and I heard her attempt to air her own dirty laundry and JM went off prematurely and unnecessarily.

She technically lied from the gate. The girl wasn’t even in there for drugs! 🤣 I think he was mad about that.

Exactly, he’s starting to mess up more and more, might be time for retirement

Exactly like she a kid it’s a certain way u talk to somebody😂

He didnt have breakfast

Yes he was wrong

Judge Mathis' brother had issues with cocaine and as a result, he and his wife had to take custody of his niece. He's mentioned this a couple of times over the years. That's why he gets so triggered with cases involving drug abuse.

He was definitely over the top as if he had a personal issue with this woman. Perhaps there was somering else she said that was perhaps edited out.Regardless he was still over the top and the admitted former drug addict behaved better than he did. I believe her as she said the woman had been in and put of the shelter. All the woman did was get paperwork from ONE of the three times she had been in the shelter. What about the other times.But I get the feeling the more the scammer talked judge Mathis softened his tone to the mentor. I think he began to see the scammer indeed had issues. Shame on you judge. That's why you don't jump the gun and sometimes as the judge your eyes and ears are all the proof you need.Kudos to the former addict for maintaining her composure cause a lot of people would have yelled back and took that L.

Yesssss I was scared for her

He sometimes acts bipolar like that.

Sometimes people forget you’re coming into a court of law and that’s why I wish he would stay away from some of the gossipy stuff. They come in there like they posting on Facebook without no proof. So I’m pretty sure he was staffed on this case and knew that the plaintiff was not telling the whole truth. Now if she had came in with the article and the news clipping about this woman’s past It would’ve been a different conversation. What if this defendant decided she wanted to work with children and she couldn’t because the plaintiff is putting out her version of this women’s narrative.

Some have DLC also....Driver's License Center

I was looking for a comment about this. I was like "TF she talking about" Thanks for educating me.

Very good to know.

I thought everyone in America knew this

BMV in Indiana

Wow wow wow I knew it, you can tell she been down this road before and knew exactly what to do to keep that evidence out lol smh Mathis just don't like people automatically bringing up people's business because honestly it didn't need to be brought up at all

Judge Mathis gets to emotional over crackheads, never underestimate the power of a crackhead judge 😆

I would have said google it. Lol

I just googled too

I knew she wasn’t lying when she said it. No one just makes up a story like that. Like the son said, the woman couldn’t even stand up straight

People when you are in court. Present your hard copy evidence to a JUDGE. Do not throw stones and tell lies to try to win your case.

Completely agree.

That part 👊

The plaintiff said that she recognized the defendant from the news for leaving her child at a drug house & couldn't remember where the house was. I wish the judge would've let her prove it. That's a serious accusations for her to make.....if it actually happened.

Doyle telling judge what he suspects..is going to do what??

@@zorinamims6499 In a perfect world it would help to highlight that perhaps there was something to the story that the defendant allegedly has drug issues. But since the plaintiff didn’t have evidence to support her claim and the defendant appeared okay until the end of the case, Doyle sharing the defendant’s curious behavior with Judge Mathis would do what it do or what it don’t. Peace!

😂

Same I swear

Go to peoples court!! I’m running out of JM too 😭😭😭

Yeah I’m out of judge Mathis videos… Charleston White has been keeping me occupied 😭😂

I love Mathis and Paternity court videos

I’m sure in her mind she did by giving the letters

Its not--its circumstantial evidence at best, especially considering that they edit out certain segments.

Them ways showed up at the end

😂🤣🤣😂😂 I think so too!

Yessss 🤣🤣

It was them claws, my boy, she was talking with them claws

yea she held it together for the judge now i believe them

You know Doyle ain’t questioning anything judge messy says. He’s his employer

I’m talking skyscraper high! Lol!

So what tell her to stop lying everybody getting the business if you lie on somebody especially about being the crackhead you best believe you going to get the business

@@sidneyatkins6678 crazy part she prolly damn sure is a crackhead to so don’t say she was just lying she held onto that fact

He sensitive about drugs

That 20 years crackhead was trying to air out someone else

@@israeliteprincess6166 it's too not to

"plaintiff"

Indeed

I agree Adrian . Mathis did not need to go off the way he did . His attitude can be too much at times. I skip over some videos when I can tell his attitude is taking a turn honestly.

Yea it's bout time for him to retire

That’s a great idea

How can you tell she’s high?

@@opulence_prime her body language

The plaintiff had no information it was literally hearsay with nothing to back it up.

Can't find a single news article on it soil I think the plaintiff is definitely a liar.

At the domestic violence shelters here she must have a police report to document the claims and then it will be in her shelter intake paperwork. If she was on the news for leaving her baby at a crack house, she’d be in a county shelter with 3 hots and a cot more than likely.

Agree!

Yes! The Plaintiff's mother was definitely high on something. "There's no fool like an old fool!!! SMH

Everyone is a crackhead to Mathis 😂😂

😂😂🤣🤣🤣all cells are gone. That is def his trigger

@@ChosenVessel82 🤣🤣🤣🤣

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

"explaining "it was on the news" ain't proof in court. She could have been lying or mistaken that it was on the news; you don't know. If it was on the news, then go to the website and get a copy of the video and story to bring to court; or go down to the news station and request it for your upcoming court case. No excuses for not bringing your documented proof to court if its true - unless of course, you don't have any, 'cause it ain't true.

@@waldolydecker8118 lol true, but yet this isn’t a court of law where it’s beyond reasonable doubt. The judge had discretion on what he decided to believe and he failed to realize the defendant was on drugs or even worse, acknowledge it. I could tell by the way she walked in and was smiling lol, then I read the comments and affirmed myself. Is it proof? Nay but I have enough to make a formed opinion and the judge did not. If you don’t call them a crackhead he will or joke about it endlessly, if you call them a crackhead he’s so upset and wants proof.

@@AP-xw5px - you discredit your own comment. You can't first claim that the Judge had total "discretion on what he decided to believe," then complain that he failed to realize the defendant was on drugs. If the judge has total discretion, then he also has the discretion to either not believe the person was on drugs or even if they were, he may choose to believe it had no material negative relevancy to the primary issue on which he was ruling. Stated another way - the Judge has no obligation to see it the way you see it. And since it is doubtful you have equal or more academic and professional work experience in the practice of law than Judge Mathis, most disputes between how you see a legal issue and how a certified Judge and lawyer like Mathis see an issue is quite frankly a "no contest" competition.

Man I scrolled so far down to find someone thinking the same thing I was. Something was definitely off there...👀

Why would you say white girl ? you can just say the defendant

🤣😂😂😂😂😂

@@perlaaa4333 cause all they see is color!

@@WhiteTheRealQueens but when it’s the other way around it’s a problem!!

They were acting like lover’s stupid the end. What man hugs his mom like that?

@@Proverbspsalms Right I was thinking the same thing they were all acting weird

Probably still on drugs.

@@erikahardy121 Chill, I don’t think she’s on drugs anymore, former addicts still have some symptoms but she doesn’t seem like she’s currently using. The defendant is def using drugs and you can tell that at the end.

Yup she was nodded too..

Right while she calling her out

I know what you mean. I think speech therapy should be offered to ppl in rehab as well as cognitive skill exercises.

This the one!

Trust me you do not want to smoke with Judge Mathis that's for damn sure

@@sidneyatkins6678 Right! That man is crazy lol

🤭😆😆😂

I hollered.🤣🤣🤣

@@kerrywhite5253 I couldn’t help myself 💀

Agreed. She dropped a bomb but had no evidence to back it. Explains why he was so upset. It’s not like he can just take the plaintiff’s word for it.

@@ReignThePain_ yeah what about his eyes! lol

Well if you google her you’ll see it was correct - so … People bring up things about folks in this court to show a person’s character

@@torenee745 but you have to prove what you say.

No he didn't...the "black lady" brought no evidence to court...only her big mouth. The Judge can't award judgements based on whose mouth is the loudest.. If the "black lady" would have brought some evidence to court, maybe she would have won. The "wobbly walking lady" brought her evidence, was respectful, and was not unruly enough to get thrown out of court. Given her lack of control, Its almost as if the "black lady" acted like she was the one high in court.

@@waldolydecker8118 what about on his eyesight. You’d have to be blind not to be able to tell she was high

@@judeak2442 - may have been, but its speculation, because her BEHAVIOR in court is what is paramount. The loud-mouth, talking-over-the-Judge plaintiff arguably acted more high than the defendant, who was calm and respectful throughout the case. If she was high, she handled it well in the court room and more importantly, that still doesn't prove the plaintiff's inflammatory allegation. You can't use that as "evidence"; the plaintiff has to bring proof of her charges, because plenty of people have been high before, but that don't make them what the plaintiff claimed. If you make a claim that something is so well known and documented and that it was even "on the News" then you should be able to bring an official letterhead document, a video news clip, some internet website posting, or a newspaper clipping proving what you are talking about - you just can't bring your big mouth to court and think that's enough.

@@waldolydecker8118 This is sham court. Tv arbitration. So save the “court talk” for the real court/legal system, not this mockery.

@@judeak2442 - mockery your ass dude...the same principles and concepts oversee its operation...where do you think the basic rules and legal oversight for this program come from? Milton and Bradley? This ain't "CandyLand", clown...it might not be a full fledged outside court, but all the principles are related. Where do you think Mathis came directly from to do this show? Working in a bakery? Nope, Law School and sitting as Judge in an actual court. Not Mathis' fault that too much "court talk" brings back bad memories of you being locked up. He's got a job he's been doing for over 20 years and he's going to continue doing it, whether you think its a sham or not.

then she should have brought proof.

Thats why the drug task force went to her house. Why would they go to a woman’s house who has no association with drugs

He’s not trying to help anyone…

She isn’t on anything 😂

Right

the plaintiff won so it was not frivolous and the Mom said that and he was the one suing so defendant wouldn't have won either of those

@@flowergirlproductions the announcer said they both were suing

She didn't owe his ass anything. He tried to scam her

Okay so I’m glad you thinking the same thing as me. If he sold her a car with a lien on it, why is she responsible for his transportation needs? Maybe I need to watch again but I didn’t get that at all

@@UnFamess Incorrect. The order was that once he had paid her the judgement in full, she was to return the car to him. She delayed the return of the car by 3 weeks so at $75/week, she owes him $225.

P.Johnson you're definitely on point with this observation.

Me tooo

But turned out she was a druggy on the news. Just lack of evidence

He had to stand there and listen to JM talk trash about his mom.

Thought I was trippin'

@@elainajwoo 😂😂😂

That’s actually what it’s called in some places

She’s not high at all