Exposing the Truth about Mythology's Influence on the Bible 

The Ancient Aliens Show has definitely propagated these stories about similar Flood Accounts from different civilizations. As far as similar flood stories, this makes perfect sense. After the Tower of Babel, the people still had the same history so they told them in different languages.

Yah name is Yahuah and His precious Sons name is Yahusha

Since all mankind came from Noah and his sons, every culture has a portion of the ancient past including the flood. The scripture explains it correctly if you study it.

Ironically, the first thing that happened after the invention of writing, was plagiarism 🤣

This story abt annunaki's & them being gods and creating humanity is just getting out of hand. This is pushing as humans to worship different gods, and it wont matter in the end. This hoodwinking should stop, even the annunaki's were created, and they believed and they also knew their was a much bigger creator of all universe, the anunnaki just tried to breed new creature not creat. If those stories ever existed.

This video presents an interesting perspective on the discoveries of 19th-century archaeological writings, which describe events similar to those found in the Bible, such as the flood story, the creation story, and accounts of giants. The video suggests that before these discoveries, there were two main assumptions: 1. The Bible is the oldest written source. 2. The Bible is the only written source that talks about such events, with this knowledge given by God. After these discoveries, the video claims that new assumptions emerged: 1. Since we have discovered writings that predate the Bible, these stories are just myths. 2. The Bible writers copied these ancient stories. Additionally, it is suggested that if these stories were attributed to foreign gods rather than the God of the Bible, it confirms that each culture created the same myths and attributed them to their local gods, making the Jewish accounts just one among many. I find these new assumptions illogical and based on incorrect conclusions. First, the Bible's story of the flood was global within the Mesopotamian region, where ancient civilizations thrived, meaning it affected many cities and kingdoms in this area. Even places that were not directly affected knew about these horrific floods, which destroyed many cities, and these accounts were likely transmitted orally from generation to generation. The fact that many ancient cultures talk about such an event actually adds to the credibility of the Bible's story. For example, it has been discovered that the Egyptians recorded plagues similar to those described in the Bible. The erroneous assumption is that these people must have written about myths and that the Bible writers simply copied these myths. The logical assumption is that the fact these plagues and events, which the Bible claims affected people, were actually talked about by those people means that the Bible story is even more credible because it has supporting evidence. We also know that the Bible, along with the Book of Enoch, speaks about the fallen angels who took human wives and created an evil race of giants, half spiritual and half human. These giants had superpowers and superior knowledge to humans and deceived people by attributing the creation of the universe, mankind, and God's punishment to themselves, claiming they were gods. The flood destroyed most of them, but some survived, as mentioned later in the Bible (e.g., Genesis 6:4). These fallen angels (demons) deceived people in the past, continue to do so in the present, and, as foretold in the Bible, will deceive in the future. One prime and recent example we Christians believe is Islam. We believe that Gabriel was a demon who claimed to be an angel and told Muhammad that Allah (a demon) is the god that created the universe, mankind, and performed supernatural events like the flood. As Jesus said in Matthew 24, during the pre-tribulation time there will be false prophets, and after the tribulation, there will be false prophets and false Christs (the two beasts of Revelation). Revelation mentions that they will perform wonders with the power of Satan to deceive many, forcing people to worship Satan as these two liars claim he is god (Revelation 13:13-14). The Bible also states that foreign gods are actually demons and our real enemies are the evil spiritual forces (Ephesians 6:12). The fallen angels deceived humanity in the past and will continue to do so in the future by attributing the creation and supernatural events to false demon gods. This explains the origins of ancient religions where fallen angels created and deceived humanity. In conclusion, these archaeological discoveries, which describe events recorded by the people who were affected by them, give more authority to the Bible rather than diminishing it. This is the logical conclusion and the proper analysis of the archaeological evidence.

I agree with the point the presenter is trying to make but he totally misses the nail. All these stories are similar because they share a common origin. That's it. Point blank. Thousands of years ago there were no copyright or plagiarism laws. There's no such thing as "stealing" from previous stories because even those stories were hundreds or thousands of years old and had even at that point been told and retold repeatedly. The point is there's a common origin for all of them. It doesn't matter if one was (according to our discoveries at least) recorded prior to another. What matters is that they agree and tell the same narrative. The many commonalities between ancient origin "stories" or "myths" should not lead you to wonder which is "first", but rather, why do these commonalities exist? Similar stories repeated from south America to Asia should logically lead to the same conclusion: all these stories had the same origin. Throughout ancient history those stories were passed down through oral tradition. Clearly there's going to be differences. That shouldn't distract from the point that the basic narrative is the same and exists across cultures around the world. In short: why does it matter who wrote it first when we're talking about history before writing? What matters is the similarities in the stories, not the differences.

Same story written by different cultures. That is all. One demon is a god for other culture.

Lies are the devils work

I think it’s important to recognize the other, similar stories outside of our traditional Biblical sources. I appreciate your emphasis on oral tradition because it makes these stories like a game of Telephone where the source material gets distorted over time for whatever reason (language, politics, culture, etc.) I believe the stories are well-intended and the original is holy, but we have a translation that is imperfect and confusing today. Studying the Bible by itself my not bring full enlightenment for Christians or aspiring-Christians, but in conjunction with prayer and reflection, there is a lot of good the Bible can still do. I think this is where many religious organizations fall short in explaining the Bible is that it’s ‘perfect in every way and how dare you questions it- you clearly don’t understand it well enough’ which is unlike how Jesus would actually approach non-Believers according to my my understanding of the New Testament. I’m lucky to not only have this channel where I can exercise my spiritual thoughts , but I actually found a local church that supports these kinds of questions and assertions because it’s more about my relationship with Jesus than the particulars. Excellent video, thanks for sharing.

I love the way CS Lewis puts it in Pilgrims Regress: God sent Israel Words while sending everyone else pictures.

which batman movie/cartoon was that myth quote from?

The devil is known for being the great deceiver, so any way the devil can try to discredit God’s word he will!

Can you do a video explaining John 21: 21-22?

Are the tests to determine the age of documents accurate? Are they using Carbon Dating? If so, I've read that they're only accurate for a few thousand years and definitely can not be used for rocks.

None of this is plagiarism and I think people are getting this wrong. Where the Levant is which is pretty much Israel Jordan Lebanon and lower parts of Syria it is a crossroad for several cultures and empires. Concord reconquered and Concord again throughout history. It's stupid not to think that there's going to be crossed fertilization of ideas. As people bring their stories back and forth people take those stories run with them and add their own twist to it. Anyone who lives near body of water eventually will encounter a flood probably a major one and a story will probably come out of that. That is normal.... That's like saying every culture pretty much around the world has stories of dragon like creatures or the undead does that mean zombies and vampires and dragons are real. Course not. Hebrews were influenced by other cultures and other religions. They ook their mythology and rolled it up into other powerful belief from other empires and other religions in the area. What happens to this day. You can take a story like Star Wars and see how it was influenced by King Arthur and the knights of the round table. The Bible is not history it's a book that was put together featuring stories mythology Legends laws poetry and some history. Together with a vague narrative thread.

Wow dude! your video got crushed in the comments 😂

The works of Dr. Michael Heiser on The Divine Council has the final say on all these issues.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. John:1:1-2 The Word existed before mythology.

♪♫♥ - Very Interesting, thank you for sharing this - 𒀭

Nothing NEW here! Same OLD FOOLISH TALES past from ONE FOOL to ANOTHER FOOL (i.e. the CURRENT FOOL being the NARRATOR of this video).

😂