F.D.Roosevelt DONE AND DONE - World of Warships 

@@maeror1022 more carriers were sunk by submarines than any other source. Midway colours our perception.

Its a game so reality doesnt mattee here. Still bad design

@@auzor5900 the japanese supercarrier that was never fully complete (still had a few boiler rooms incomplete amongst other things) had to be moved further inland to protect it from bombing runs that were getting close to its harbour. It couldnt move at full speed and a single (cannot recall nationality, maybe british?) submarine had spotted it and through sheer luck for the sub and incorrect decision making by the carrier's captain, the sub was able to sink it and pretty much end japan's super weapon before it ever came to bear fruit. I guess what im trying to say is that wows cannot be called a simulation of naval combat at all beyond the fact that it features some historic ships and tried to build their hulls as close to the originals as possible. Almost everything else is made up for the sake of it being a game, and i suppose there's no other way to have it unless they make the battles to last 2 hours on much bigger maps and with added objectives and gameplay depth :p

and when the malta had perma flooding, it was hardly doing anything

@@yann9915 Oh, I wasn't in favor of adding subs to the game. Or even the CV reeework. And submarine torpedoes go at ludicrous speeds (the tier 10 Balao torps go faster than Langley & The Russian T4 *plane* cruise speed). But historical facts matter, subs were very, very effective vs CV's, and transports. Despite the US having faulty torps, despite German subs being heavily hunted, and despite the Japanese mostly using their subs as fleet support. What WOWS totally misrepresents is how effective subs were during WW1 - WW2 vs active warships, destroyers especially. And subs diving after eating a few heavy shells. Etc... Or subs running away from destroyers underwater... destroyer should be quite capable of overtaking.

It is, but it's very good for surface ships. Been using it a lot for spotting fighters. You see fighters dropped to spot and send asw planes, they fly further than the drop window so you can cancel fighters and remove the spotting. In rare cases you can use this offensively to help your cv chase a dd that's been given cover.

Yup this is a nice counterplay against fighter spotting and will bring back some power to surface ships. (Though I'm very sure WG will surely patch this ASAP lol)

Absolutely fun and engaging

I blame it on Eagle and United States

Midway is better than FDR tho

​@@pedrolft9010How? It is by far the worst Carrier for me. Slow planes, that you lose very fast.

I got nuked into oblivion by FDR in Massachusetts.

@@redeclipse4ever409 It has faster planes than FDR, much more damage potential (as you dont need to wait 20 sec to strike again) and her planes still have more health than MVR and Haku (Haku is still better than midway because speed > Health). And midway can absolutely murder DDs, which FDR cant do in a consistent way. If you are losing too many planes, try managing the heal a bit more and avoid groups of ships.

Yup

Yes they are, which makes AA completely and utterly useless.

Not really, but they shoot first the planes in the squadron that don’t attack, instead of the attacking ones, as one tends to do in a real fight. WG way of reality.

I think he choose not to do that to maximize his damage output. Sending the planes back to base allows you to have more late game, but then you spend less time attacking the targets at the game start due to the flight time for each small group.

@@custommotor yeah but my point was either way he was only striking 2 or 3 times with each squadron. Sending 2-3 sets back would still allow that + more planes for late game.

They have armoured decks that can bounce 483mm shells. The DCP is automatic and lasts 10 seconds. They auto detect nearby submarines and drop depth charges on them with perfect precision. Truly a balanced class.

I'm not sure that counts for all CVs vs all dive bombers, but yeah. Quite a few T10 CVs are pretty OP, but all the new ones WG pulled out of their ass are nuts. CVs at lower tiers are a bit better balanced (and can be bombed), but that isn't saying much.

@@clefsan I dint care anymore mate I quit 2 years ago and now only watching how can they become more toxic... 😆

just Malta specifically because that ship's deck are as tough as the armor belt on BBs !! Other CVs would have get clapped !! That armored deck is one the reason why Malta is so strong !

That's FDR for ya, mate. 😇