Ibig sabihin pati opinion can be fake if we say something that is not delightful to the ears of the fact checkers? I myself am fact checked several times and warned. Well I don't care if the close my fb account. Nag co comment kang naman ako and/or share luminous karambola tambayan tp sass badong aratiles vlogs. And others I find need spreading.
😭 di ako umabot sa live! You're so pretty Atty. Trixie ❤ support kita lagi sa advocacy mo to spread true information and expose all the lies ng kabilang parlor including their allies
Tila fini-flex ng fini-flex ng mga "fact-checkers" na 'to ang kanilang swaggering around, na kahit na si JPE ay kaya nilang banggain. So tila may minsahe sila na, lahat tayo, ay open season sa kanilang paningin! I'm really hoping na sana, may makapag-come up po sana sa hanay ninyo'ng mga Attys. ng magandang pang sungal-ngal sa mga out of line fact-checkers na 'to. Count me in po na suportado ko po kayo! Thank you so much po!
agree ako na hindi maganda ang sobrang fact checking. i think meron sistema ng fact checking na pwede naman ma impose na maging beneficial sa free speech at sa mga tao in general. i think kailangan ng cooperation ng both parties 2 make it work. the 2 parties ay ang fact checker at ang finafact check. i think there are 2 main things na pwedeng pag simulan ng successful and fruitful fact checking. first lahat ng mass communicators pag meron silang sasabihin na hindi sila sigurado need to make an effort para gumawa ng disclaimer at sabihin na ang sasabihin nila ay hindi nila sigurado kung fact o hindi. at yun fact checker naman dapat i identify muna nila ang mga topic at areas na pwedeng i fact check like date and time and place ng pangyayari etc. kung news reporting dapat facts ang i report mo. kung gagawa ka ng opinion about sa news reporting mo eh dapat i warn mo ang audience kung saan magsisimula ang opinion mo ang isang particular na punto and not to be taken as fact. mahabang usapin ang pag identify kung ano ang mga pwedeng i fact check.
Exclusive lang sa kanila ang freedom of speech. Unfair talaga ang style nila . Buti na lang may @Luminous by Trixie-Cruz Angeles and Ahmed Paglinawan.isa sa mga malakas na katapat ng mga fact checkers. Thank you po Atty.Trixie.
Grabe nga Atty Trixie... Kakaiba ...one sided ang nangyayari sa socmed...hawak talaga nila ang Twitter, facebook... madami pa namang naloloko pati mga seniors ... naniniwala lang sa mga news sa tv ...kaya mahirap kumbinsihin na tayo ang may alam ng tama.
Kailangang magkaroon ng apps na tulad ng youtube na applicable sa Pinoy, para di pinakikialaman ng mga fact checker na parang may absolute decision what is fake or not.
Team replay🥰. Sino po ba ang nag-appoint sa mga fact checkers? Sino-sino po ba yang mga fact checkers na yan? Dapat siguro ay kilala natin sila na may integridad at kapasidad sa ganyang gawain. Anu-ano po ba ang qualifications na kailangan para pumasang fact checkers? Ano po ba ang guidelines nila sa pagpa-fact check? Kung si Sir JPE na nagsasalita based on his experiences ay ipa-fact check pa nila...aba e... maliwanag na pwede nilang gawing itim iyong puti at puti iyong itim. Ano na nga po ang tawag sa ganyang gawain?
Atty. Trixie , ang Vera files at rapper hindi b sila dapat magkaroon ng liability sa kanilang fact checking? Kung sa tingin natin ay may masama sila intensyon? Dahil sa halata nman hindi equal ang pagpuna Nila sa issue tinatakay sa fb or sa youtube?
Atty Trixie, yong finile nila Pi-Sot ay para dun sa mga vlogger na pro-Digong. Tailored masyado yong details sa mga pro-admin ….kasi kulelat silang dalawa sa survey….kaya pilit nilang pino push yan….
Hindi po ba pwedeng idala na ang mga issue na to sa korte? curious lang po kasi parang nagiging information suppressor na sila. Facebook philippines is getting more and more biased with the information they want and don't want to end up online.
Just asking po maam Trexie..so sino po ang nagbigay sa kanila ng authority to fact check and they have that authority to say that ,that certain said/written/video-ed is bad or not appropriate or libelous thing to say publicly to anyone?. Common Sense is vanishing! Because they say good to the bad! And criminalizing what is GOOD! Its doomsday. Birth Pangs of tribulation..the wrath of GOD is nigh.. As John the Baptist says: REPENT! BELIEVED IN CHRIST JESUS AS THE LORD AND SAVIOR, WHO DIED AND RISEN FROM RHE GRAVE. READ THE BIBLE for KNOWLEDGE.
Salamat po atty. Base po sa mga napapanuod ko ganyan na sila sa US. Fact checking at censorship ng todo sa mga kumukontra at gustong magsalita. Ewan ko kung totoo nga. Sana gumawa ng hakbang ang gobyerno na maprevent ang social media companies na magdikta ng kung ano lang ang side na gusto nilang iparating sa madla.
Section 230 is a section of the United States Communications Decency Act that generally provides immunity for website platforms from third-party content. ... Section 230 protections are not limitless, requiring providers to still remove material illegal on a federal level such as copyright infringement.
Facebook should be regulated. I think a congress bill siguro to regulate them and check those feeling "righteous fact checkers" or we should demand FB have a committee of counter-checkers for those checkers who suppresses the information or things we share in FB. This is also the reason I left FB for 5 years already, aside toxicity, these checkers suppresses my freedom of speech and favors the speech of others.
Hello Atty. Trexie. I did not expect my heroine to be early but I am so excited to know what you are about to say. Before I continue listening to you....please accept my appreciation for your help in giving legal enlightenment to ordinary men/women like me/us. PRRD needs kind and intelligent people like you. Thank you very much. See you everyday!
It only shows the mainstream or traditional media is losing its ground as a reputable source of information. Kagagawan din nila kasi they have allowed themselves to be used by people who has money to make twisted news. But independent vloggers presents a different perspective of information.
There is a rumor that some publications have started hiring trolls. Not saying that Inquirer does it. But those that do, hire chuwariwap trolls to push their editorial slant.
2x ako naka pagbasa ng fact checking ngnabanggit mo mam na article sa rappler . . .kailangan kasi ito mam . . . marami tayong mga kababayan na hindi nag veverify sa mga napapanood nila . . . .ang intindi ko mam, yung na post sa social media na isang gawang video or kwento ay magkaibang magkaiba sa katotohanan daw . ., ang post sa social media like youtube ang mga binabanggit na source ay mga social media rin while yung sa rappler fact checking nag qu quote sila ng source ng report nila . . . . kung ikaw ang reader, puede mo i double check kung totoo o me credibility nga ba yung nasulat na fact check . . sa akin as long na binabanggit sa isang social media or open at ginguide pa mismo yung manonood or subscriber paano ma verify report o kwento na ginawa mas may credibility yon . . . . masydo rin vague yung definition binanggit mo mam na parang oppose ang fact checking sa freedom of speech . . . . the people would benefit kung may ganitong FACT CHecking . . . .
The vagueness of their definition of what constitutes fake news is even more dangerous. News can be fake one day the. True the next when it is time bound. For instance, saying that the senate terminated its hearing. Vera files fact checked a post saying the hearing wasnt terminated yet as the resolution needed two more signatures. Two days later the statement was already true. The problem also is that they inpose penalties. Kung wala yon, ok lang, then people will not when something is tue or false and an open debate about it can be conducted. But fact checking Fb style TERMINATES a discussion. No appeals. So you see, the damage is greater than the one sought to be prevented.
Furthermore, why is the onus on the reader when it should be on the person POSTING? Fact checkers penalize even those who SHARE. How is that fair? Sa libel laws nga natin mere sharing is not penalized.
parang gusto mangyari ng trad media sila lang may karapatan sa freedom of speech hindi naman yata makatao yan dapat ang gawin sa trad media na yan ipasara ng taong bayan sa pamamagitan ng pagrally sa harap ng stasyon nila ..ang trad media negosyo yan na dapat ihabla ng taong bayan..
@@LUMINOUS_Channel atty, may tanong ako kanina sa inyo sa Karambola about kung hindi bumaliktad si JPE s admin ni Pangulong Marcos, what do you think ang naging present ng bansang Pilipinas? Kasi I think isa sya factors kung bakit ganito ang Pilipinas ngayon...
@@LUMINOUS_Channel Salamat atty, dalawa kasi ang version nya bkit tumiwalag sya noon sa admin ni Pang Marcos, so for me and in behalf ng mga Pinoy na gusto ng katotohanan, why should we believe him sa mga expose' nya eh kung pabago bago sya ng sagot????
Everyone has the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, which includes the internet & social media, freedom of the press and other media of communication. I believes that social media freedom remains an important part of democratic societies.