Feature History - Kashmir Conflict 

A long time ! No one called him by the name of Feature History

Hello comrade

@dbenson31 ok mr No Fun

@dbenson31 someone has tried both.

Who is feature history?

*Derp Derp* The Jews did it!

You could not have put it better Amigo

lmao most likes I’ve ever gotten. After more thought Kashmir is actually right full king Leopold the thirds Land and definitely not commit atrocities in

So TRUE 👍

Smartass Brits and Chinese won the day

Well Falklands has been well done by Oversimplified. And the other two may feel too similar to the Chechen episode for the viewers.

LOL wtf the Chechen wars were Islamic insurgencies. Neither of the two events OP requested has anything to do with Islam. Especially Transnistria

@@strechemall I know, but people may think that it's another one where Russia intervenes in an independence crisis, although It should be said that Chechnya was part of Russia, S.Ossetia and Transnistria aren't

These are obscure af, he should do something people care about today like Syria or WW2

What about the Palestine and Israel conflict

Polska can into Kashmir!

I was warned about the comments... But I wasnt prepared for a comment this powerful!

Kashmir je serbija

The Polish Kashmir

it is known

Yep, great timing.

HistoryMarche Yea, along with your videos I am always excited to see them pop up! Thanks so much!

@@seannaesseannaes Cheers!

Feature history loves me lol

Hey HistoryMarche, I love your channel!

And claim it as ancient Chinese land!

Carlos Rodriguez well they took cuz these were a lot in numbers millions attacking thousands those thousands ammo too ran out the worst thing happened to Indian so many people attacking at once at once that their ammo ran out while killing chinese

my mom well I just numbers were overwhelming i mean way too overwhelming for Indians to fight outnumbered 10 to 1 its quite overwhelming

@TheFandrian that does not mean that you go ahead and claim a place of land literally no one wants Chinese rule in Kashmir. People of Kashmir posses culture that is closely linked with the cultures of the Indian subcontinent no Chinese meddling please

@TheFandrian Tibet is an occupied nation it had remained fiercely independent through out its history. It's possesses a unique culture .we are not meddling into your affairs as Tibet is not yours .you guys aggressive occupied it, and the world recognised it because China had large influence on the world economy but that does not make this act of aggression any rightious

Now its mostly the subsribers who commented now. These usually don't hold particulary strong opinions. Just wait a few weeks and the shits will come floating to the top, I guarantee.

Hahah... Spicy...

.0001% bring back feature fittings

I was looking for Zeppelin. 🔥

@@ChallisVenstra Led Zeppelin's Kashmir is actually about the desert of Morocco.

I'm pretty sure a new pak-indo war is going to happen in the comments soon

RIP "any semblance of Sanity in the comments"

Here we go

Ah sh*t, here we go again

@Charlie K The Pakistani didn't even fight in the 6 days war? What are you on about?

Get lost and don't always talk about cricket.

@@itsevan4338 Jesus he just wanted to make a joke. In this kind of video, his comment is a godsend...

Nice one bro. 😂

One wrong foul call and WW3 would start lmao

All i know is Kashmir is a fire song

Definitely not

What can possibly go wrong, right?

@@rizkyardan5760 Nothing just 3 nuclear powered nation on a small piece of land along with democracy , communism and terrorism

@@zuboy4272 a bit of an understatement

"Controversial"? The video is trying really hard to be controversial. How? By not mentioning facts that are easily verifiable. One such fact is that India was not created only for Hindus and Sikhs. The very idea of India was that all religions can coexist in the same country peacefully. But a few Muslims were against that and wanted their own country. So Pakistan was created for Muslims. There is a reason that Muslim population is rising in India as a % of total population whereas Hindus have been completely erased from Pakistan. India is a secular country and Pakistan is an Islamic state as per their respective constitutions. Today, India has more Muslims than Pakistan does. But what does the video say about this? NOTHING. Its portrayed as if Muslims were never meant to be in India after independence. There are a lot of other things that this video has missed. Why? Because this video is nothing new. Every book written or video made on Kashmir by non-Indians and even by some Indians is recycling the same half-information because they are all missing the same facts. Which means their "original" research is not original at all. And this crap video is no different. I can't get over the fact that every one of these "experts" fail to mention the Hindu aboriginals' exodus from Kashmir that happened after . Another major inaccuracy in this video is the false claim that it is India who is preventing the plebiscite. Go read the relevant UN Security Council resolution 47. It states that the first necessary condition before a plebiscite can be held is that Pakistan needs to withdraw all forces from Kashmir. Did Pakistan withdraw its forces till date? No. But the idiot in this video, and every other idiot whom he copied from lay the blame of no plebiscite on India. The kind of falsehoods spun around this Kashmir issue are pathetic. And pathetic people like you fall for it. Well, idiots can keep making videos about Kashmir and more idiots, like yourself, can continue to make witty remarks on this subject as if you know it all, but that is not going to affect what is going to happen in Kashmir. Recently, Modi has been re-elected. This time, his Home Minister is Amit Shah, the second most powerful man after Modi. Shah will ensure that Kashmir is brought to heel. The constitution will be modified to ensure that we can take back Kashmir by demographic change. You a$$holes can cry about it all you want. Its simply the pot calling the kettle black because you people have never acknowledged the Hindu migrants from Kashmir who were chased from their homes and indeed, their lives.

Raj vats no it was seized but no one lives there tbh

@@efthymiosanagnostos7427 its serves as an easy route for connecting the Xinjiang province to mainland china

Some would argue that Tibet belongs China per ancient chinese dynastic borders. Then again, Mongolia and Manchuria should also be claimed, if China wants to invoke such ancient claim. Not trying to defend/attack China, but for all i know, China is no longer monarchic. Hence ancient claims should no longer valid(?)

Jericho Julius the tibetans should be given more autonomy within the chinese administration, religious freedom and the like.

@@michelsand5399 Considering PRC is a "Communist" state (which if you examine closely, it's actually closer to state capitalism), i don't think Tibet will be. If there's one thing China wants more than more lands, it's full control over said lands' administration. Although, one can argue that freedom and autonomy should be given to Tibet for cultural and hereditary reasons, the next guy can just argue with administration efficiency and stability. It's shitfest i tell you.

You obviously havent been to a Pathan tribe ..or you wouldnt be curious ..

@@moeezawan2329 they got it during Soviet afgan war from US and Pakistan.

@@gobimurugesan2411 Pathans defeated British many times during british raj ..there was no Soviet afgan war then ..Pathan were always armed tribes ....and there is difference between Pathan and Afghans dont ever confuse them again

@@moeezawan2329 Can u share any links?. May be i am confused between Pathans and Pashtuns.

@@gobimurugesan2411 Pathans and Afghans both are Pashtuns but contrary to popular beliefs not the same

He just named the state where conflict is occurring, dude just take a chill pill

HarSumit The solution would involve everyone taking a chill pill.

But both claim all the land

@@harsumit that's what zeli is saying. The state is called Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir is name of a valley in the entire State. Although now it's a union territory and not a state

@@JK-np3mi soon pok will be merge into this🙂

That might just work. We need lore.

Far cry 4?

far cry 4 is based on northern india fictional kingdom its basically kashmir

agreed

Nagorno-Karabakh war.

Yes!

Seconded.

Karabağ je Azerbaijan

Yes, one must drop the nukes first

@Shivaji the Great I wouldn't really be that hopeful. I know Pakistan and India won't fire a nuke. But there is one cookoo country in the world that just might

@Shivaji the Great Yep.

The insurgency has been minimized to two districts in south Kashmir now. Turns out, you can kill your way through an insurgency if you horribly kill enough insurgents. There's also other things like infrastructure building and stuff that helps. Like literally the highest rail line in the world (it goes to leh and ladakh) and road tunnels bored through solid granite mountains.

Oh Will McBride it will happen again, and again, and again, and again, and again!

kaiseriehc mod fan?

Mexican Civil War would be amazing

@@Yingyanglord1 yee

The Cristero War is also pretty interesting

You should hear the revolution poscast. It has a very detailed thesis on mexican revolutions.

Would love to see one on the SA border war/ Angolan civil war/ South West African conflict/ South African minor insurgencies.

@@andychauhan6544 poo in loo

@@AlligatorAndrew Triggered lol

Masked Assassin you clearly did not see the yugoslavia video.

Yeah yugoslavia video comment section is worse than this

And what about indian trolls?

Can you provide a timestamp?

Extrawarot 2:20, I think

2:20 yeah

@@TheTimoprimo good ear!

Agree

Just like africa

First so India could take Kashmir

@@rooh8258 well raja of kashmir signed for whole kashmir to become a part of india so why not ? Isn't that how all provinces came together to form a country called india ? And anyway kashmir has more hindu heritage and belongs to hindus more so the opinion of 🐷's doesn't count or matter.

@@user-gh4of6ce3t Kashmir was given by the brits to a cow sucker and if Raja signs the agreement Hyderabad and junagadh belongs to Pakistan

@@rooh8258 no it literally states that the elections would be un counducted and any seizing of land would have caused a foreign intervention .STUDY HISTORY

UN Here refers to united nations btw

He definitely should.

We dont speak about that ! Just forget it .

@Charlie K Tibet and East Turkestan should be free

Tibet is not a mess , kashmir is , tibet is integral part of China

@Charlie K The Tibetan people deserve to have a humane standard of living, without the rest of China it'll be another backwater state.

But some people will not understand because they are brainwashed by religion. That is the biggest problem

The Flying Dutchman well if it wasn’t caused by European colonialism then there wouldn’t be So much chaos in the first place. Just look at the European colonisation I’m the Middle East where all the regions were split including the decline of Palestinians... And realistically it’s every other religion trying to suppress Muslims. Can’t you do the maths? 75% vs 25%

It's specifically stated that a referendum was suppposed to be held, I don't see why it's Britains fault that India doesn't let that happen.

Indeed, the Brits should be ashamed of themselves.

cuz the British divided the Raj on idiotic grounds. Just like they did with Middle East and Africa

Freek Mulder that would increase conflict not decrease it, the raj was actually reasonably divided as they were still ruled by local kings whom answered to the Emperor/Emperess (usually the monarch of the U.K.)

Did you know the guy who had to divvy up the Raj's territory in Punjab and Sindh was given a literal fortnight to do so? Because Mountbatten was a blithering idiot more concerned with his role in history than a few million people? I can actually provide citations if you want.

Well they kind of oppressed both sides. Hell they even banded together for a while though that obviously didn't last.

muslims and hindus were fighting the british even before the 2 countries were founded there was no peace to simply begin with

If u think dialogue works you are stupid af

Only 200 were killed since the 90's acc.to the official indian govt. data. This "genocide of kashmiri Hindus" is a lie propagated by Right Wing Hindu Nationalist. Also the insurgency wasn't backed up by Pakistan. Read about JKLF.

or Malayan emergency and suez crisis

@@CosplayingHistoryNerd those would be good too

nuclear war is not possible In 1999 a war was fought when india and pakistan was a newly nuclear nation, also india has 'no first use policy' and nobody is mad to throw nukes at a nuclear country

@Qalidurut Tbf calling it a war would be overstatement

It was annexed,not given.

@@darkminister1503 lol

British Raj lost those lands, the Republic of India did not.

Utkarsh Dubey The casualties of Kashmiri Pandits pales in comparison to the civilian loss of life under Indian occupation

@@imam3801 so you're telling me that death of more than 500 people under 6 months then over 2000 deaths since 1989 as well as mass migration of more than 700000 people is something "pale".Something of that level changes whole social and demographical identity of a place, it doesn't pale in comparison to anything and if you think it does that something is seriously wrong with that analogy.

@@imam3801 another thing it's not occupation if it's done officially(in case of India),but if you send militia to a place after just getting your Independence yourself, something Pakistani pathan tribes of that time did it is occupation.

@@utkarshdubey3435 What can you expect? Foreigners deliberately paint India as the agressor in the wars when it was Pakistan's actions every single time that led to war. 1947- Pakistani tribesmen bolstered by integrated Pakistani army regulars invaded the independent state of Jammu and Kashmir hoping to induce the Maharaja to surrender. The ruler fled to India, and India took advantage of an opportunity to gain an important region. Who wouldn't? 1965- Pakistan, having constantly set off border skirmishes, sent military regulars into Kashmir disguised as freedom fighters to precipitate an independence movement, and India counterattacked in Punjab. The war was fought to a standstill, with India giving back 500 sq km of Pakistani territory, and Pakistan giving back whatever it had managed to capture in Kashmir. 1971- economic troubles in East Pakistan led to a demand for greater autonomy, which snowballed into a freedom movement. The West Pakistanis who saw the East as being inferior, ruthlessly suppressed the protests, killing thousands, leading to an exodus of refugees into India (a lot of whom are still here today and made India their home). The refugee crisis and the suppression caused considerable consternation in India, and Indira Gandhi saw an opportunity to thin the herd of hostile states surrounding India. The Indian government supplied and trained the Mukti Bahini, just as America did to the Taliban, to fight back and achieve freedom. This angered Pakistan who launched a pre-emptive strike of limited effect against the west of India to divide Indian forces and drag them into a two front war. In response a war was declared, and the Indian military which had been preparing for this eventuality, went full out, capturing over a 100,000 PoWs in East Pakistan and helping Mukti Bahini liberate Bangladesh. The war was a humiliation for Pakistan as it's advanced Naval and Air Forces came out at equal footing to the much less technologically advanced Indian fleet and Air force. 1988- after a botched attempt at election rigging by Indian National Congress party, Pakistan, which has always schemed and plotted to take control of Kashmir due to supposed ownership of the valley on religious grounds, stirred up religious tension that led to the slaughter of large numbers of Hindus in Kashmir who were a minority group there. This led to a mass exodus of Hindus as well as bolstering of Islamic terrorist cells that had carried out the vile actions. When the valley continued to become unstable at the urging of separatists bolstered by Pakistani aid, the Indian military was sent in to contain the situation. They used excessive force and coercive tactics due to the perception of the threat, similar to American actions in Iraq and Afghanistan decades later. The tensions kept escalating during the 90s until the war in Kargil. 1999- Pakistani army regulars, disguised as militant irregulars, snuck through the snowy passes in winter season, in violation of longstanding agreements by both sides to not conduct warfare in winter, and took possession of several critical peaks across the Kargil, Dras and Batalik regions, from where they bombed the supply lines connecting Jammu and Kashmir to India. The Indian army conducted large scale mobilisation in response and through concerted efforts and disproportionate losses, managed to drive off the invaders. The war exposed many of the problems in the Indian military, such as outdated equipment and poor inter-force co-ordination, that led to higher than necessary casualties. Since then, there have been no real fights, but sabers have been rattled several times by the two sides. In every case of actual conflict, even the most idiotic of readers will notice that Pakistan has been the agressor, seeking to start a conflict and somehow defeat India, often through means that would be in violation of the Geneva convention on warfare. To date, Pakistan refuses to accept that it had sent regular active duty military troops to both India and Afghanistan (in support of the Taliban). After all, Osama was found right next to the premier military training academy in Pakistan. It would be like finding Hitler down the road from West Point. Pakistan's actions speak to its morals and intent. Yet the west ignores this and continues to spin the narrative of equal blame on both sides, while continuing to support the largest terror exporter in the world, Pakistan.

Well it's well made but inaccurate.

@@Leon-pn6rb wait, explain

@@thumblads8714 He forgot to mention the brutal genocide of Bengalis in 1971. India didnt support the rebels, India was pushing at a resolution cause the people from East Pakistan were flooding India in the millions, escaping genocide and mass Rapes. This is well documented and as someone who talks about history, he shouldve known this. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Bangladesh_Liberation_War But then again, he's prob American www.smithsonianmag.com/history/genocide-us-cant-remember-bangladesh-cant-forget-180961490/ You can find other points where you missed the mark ( like not speaking of the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus or how the "tribesmen" were nothing but Pakistani Militia, trained and funded by Pakistan) in other comments.

First off, he’s Aussie (I think) That too the War in Bangladesh is a completely different issue and he can’t just “mention” the Genocide, he has to actually go through it in detail, which means that he has to talk more about the Bangladesh War which I believe should be a different video.

And this videa is factually highly inacurate.

NOBODY EVER TALKS ABOUT THAT!!!! Because it has the potential to show the truth of the Kashmir conflict.

@@death_parade let's not talk about the majority getting killed which puts a genocide to shame

@@zee2826 Which genocide are we talking? The one in East Pakistan in 1970-71? Operation Searchlight? Jiske ghar sheeshay ke hote hain vo doosron ke ghar par pathar nahi marte. But janaab yeh log Pakistani hain. Yeh laaton ke bhooth, baton se nahi mante. You want to talk about "majority getting killed"? Here is an idea: stop sending insurgents into Kashmir. Problem solved.

@@zee2826 let's talk about Balochistan then

@@AkashYadav-mr4hg and waziristan, fata🤣🤣

Think that all this mess could have been averted if only Pakistan and India hadn't tried to mess with Kashmir

Or if they just had a vote and allowed the people to decide, but sign a treaty giving India rights to the Indus.

zubair hussain Perhaps, but the thing is that India proclaims itself to be a secular country for all religions, and at the same time calls Muslims outsiders

@@parikshitverma2897 not to sound rude but do you think that muslims in karnataka where i am from were happy about the mumbai attacks we sent aid after what happened one of my family members died in that accident and you think that we rejoiced at that you think india muslims did that

@@Stale_Buns i agree that sone of our politicians may instigate that and you know that they have a massice fan base so u may think that all people say that but no i know so many hindus are compassionate caring humans who treat me not as a muslim but as an indian

@Max Payne it says kashmir belongs to Pakistan and India is occupied it illegally.

As a Pakistani, i can confirm 🤼

And as an indian I can confirm as well

This is going to be one big shitshow my friend!

Wheres the curry?

@@jacker7382 ask your mum..... Cuz she makes the best curry

You mean a bias video that had no depiction of POK and fueled by mainstream garbage then yes.

Nice

Thank you! Of course, we won't see any of our Pakistani brothers commenting on this.

@@NikhilVasishtR well I am pro-pakistan in the conflict but I don't see anything wrong in what he said.

Those tribal fighters are now pakistani army which still won't leave. Lets face it, there are always a small group of people who wants freedom like catalonia in spain,tibet and xinjinag in china, california in US. Lol just because of some mindless radicalised jihadists demand liberation, doesen't mean they deserve one.

@@edwardsnowden2313 wtf ? The absolute majority of kashmiris don't want india. You think they don't deserve to rule themselves ?

kashmiris maybe, but whole of jammu and kashmir ? may be not. The conflict is currently restricted to only and only few district in the kashmir valley, half of which already in the control of Pakistan, while rest of the state is violence free and pro India .

Get ready for the comment section. Trust me.

Never mind what the us done in Iraq and Afghanistan I don't think the white idiots learned from history but when it comes to blame others the Americans are gonna be ahead

Harpit Multani what?

@Alberto Fuijimoritalking about the topic so leave the Kashmir region to India we don't want it be another Chinese communist puppet and second of all who the hell are you fella ???

@@kaderpdi1982shut your ass

India never believed to split this state. There is no civil war but a cross border militancy trying to demoralise and subvert India's attempts to bring peace in the region. The instrument of accesion being a legal document was signed by the then head of state of kashmir which Pakistan has no right to repeal. Also the LOC or the Line Of Control is a cease fire line and not a border. 95% of the cases called as human rights violations were dismissed by the highest court of the country the Supreme Court of India. The recent unrest is paid and projected by the Pakistani military. And I have no clue why there is no coverage of lives in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) where the so called PM of their so called Azad Kashmir reports to a civil Servant, oppresion of civil liberties, no development, zero education and total fear of authorities is there. I protest on the way this video has been one sided seeing as a citizen to the only country in the world where in a counter terrorist operation we do not blow a terrorist with a drone but lose lives of our own brave soldiers to protect innocent kashmiris from terrorists every day, trained and supported by the pakistani military and their intelligence agency the ISI to harrass innocent lives and commit human rights violations every single day. This is an absolute outrage considering the fact that all three wars initiated on Kashmir were by a bankrupt and an inept state like Pakistan who is never going to be concerned for any regional stability in the region at all.

You failed to mention the forced exodus of Kashmiri Pandits (Hindus) from Kashmir valley in 1989. Also, the fact that in 1971, Pakistan was carrying out the worst atrocities against Bangladeshis (with US knowingly supporting them : see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide#US_complicity ) leading to a massive influx of Bangladeshis to India. This was what forced India to liberate Bangladesh. Also, the Siachen conflict in 1984 to occupy the previously undecided Saltoro ridge and Siachen glacier. Pakistan has funded other separatist movements in India for a long time like Khalistani movement in accordance with their military policy of "death by a thousand cuts". Your research glosses over all of this historic baggage. I understand that it is difficult to present a holistic take on such a contentious topic. Please mention the sources you used to make this video because as it stands, it presents a very one-sided, blinkered picture of the Kashmir conflict.

There's no need to mention a fact which already has been told thousands of times and will never be highlighted by people @espeon91 . I'm only worried of the support cross border terrorism is getting with such exhilaration both on social media as well as by people both from outside as well as inside.

I wrote this (rather emotional) comment earlier. Reposting for visibility (with some edits to be less combative): Off the top of my mind, here are some rather valid points that you missed mentioning: 1. The prerequisite to the referendum mandated by the UN resolution was that FIRST Pakistan was to withdraw their troops from Kashmir, followed by India, after which the referendum was to take place. That never happened. Therefore, the referendum never happened. 2. No mention of the Hindu Kashmiri Pandits who were literally ethnically cleansed out of Kashmir? Ok then. 3. No mention of Operation Gibraltar? Or that Pakistan still supports these ““insurgents””? 4. No mention of the fact that India stands by the constitutional commitment to free speech whereas Pakistan completely bans any separatist movements? That people get disappeared when they speak out in POK? And wait, Hari Singh was MADE to sign the Instrument of Accession? FYI, he did it to save his land from the Pakistani invaders who were terrorizing the locals. If Hari Singh was made to sign an agreement under duress, why did the Indians add Article 35A to it? The same piece of legislation that allows J&K to have a separate parliament, and prevents Indians to buy land there. To me, that sounds like a pretty balanced treaty with concessions on both sides. >inb4 angry Hindu nationalist Although I am an Indian, I’m actually a Muslim (not a practicing one, however). I’m just sick of how westerners have bought hook, line and sinker into the Pakistani version of the events. Sure, Indian Forces have blood on their hands. It is a reprehensible thing about conflict, that it brings out the worst in men and women. Does it imply that India, the entire nation, is responsible for the bloodshed? And what about the blood spilled by the Paki-backed ""insurgents""? Too few foreign commenters ever hold them responsible for their share of misery. They're portrayed as the perennial underdog, up against the might of the Indian State; yet few mention their Islamist sympathies and how they were responsible for the literal ethnic cleansing of the Hindus of the Kashmir valley. Everyone loves bashing India for a conflict it never wanted, conveniently forgetting that Pakistan is the one culpable here. India isn’t encroaching on sovereign territory that never belonged to her. She's merely defending what is legally her own. And hypothetically, let’s assume Kashmir does get “”freedom””. What then? You have one very geopolitically important piece of land situated at the junction of a regional power, a nascent superpower, and an irredentist state. Either the Kashmiris will be silenced by the Pakis, or have their rights utterly trampled by Emperor Xi (but with a LOT of investment in infrastructure and overall economic upliftment, though). With India, the Kashmiris have more rights than any other Indian state GIVE TO REST OF THEIR OWN CITIZENS. And India has sunk billions into the perennially underperforming Kashmiri economy. And yet the “”insurgents”” want freedom? Please.

@@aliakbarsafdari4084 Do complete it by mentioning Baramulla, a town raped, pillaged and murdered by the same Pakistani backed forces in 1947, days before the signing of the instrument of accession. If they're capable of doing that then, they're capable to do the same anytime again for a few so called freedom fighters of Kashmir. Shame on those who support these people. Shame on all of them.

You mean one of the most beautiful states in Pakistan

who cares true...smell some coffe then comment porky

No, it had to be done troop free. Please do proper research

@@arindammishra6940 any unbiased/international source to prove your UN claim????

@@ah_bb8267 unscr.com/en/resolutions/47 Herr u go bigot Official UNSC Site and its statement... Read nd tell that to ur Gafoor nd otuer fools out there

hen a skeletal force would remain and plebiscite would be conducted by "Indian authorities. " Are you drunk, mate?

Don't be too wilfully naive. It's an ideological war.

@@eJohndoe what ideology exactly? Local kashmiris don't care about Pak or india. Most of them demand a separate state. Pakistan is in no position to wage an ideological war. Because its 2 nation ideology to part with india failed in 1971 when East Pak became Bangladesh. India maintains heavy military presence to keep shit under tight control. No one cares about ideologies. It's all about geographical interest and controlling the rivers. Don't wilfully be so arrogant.

@@hasanmatloob3788 Islam and a perpetual hostility towards India. This particular video might be more helpful: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sjnrETPDuls.html

"Spicey". Please tell me that pun was intended.

@@SamIAmSXE very much 😉

Spicier than Chicken Tikka Masala

Very very spicy.

@@muhithossain7312 Spicier than Vindaloo.

This is the main reason of tribesmen attack.

@Shaurya Joshi Jummu massacre by Hindus with the help of Indian paramilitary

@Shaurya Joshi yes you had

@SHUBHANKAR SHARMA they didn't, Kahsmiris converted to Islam 1000 years ago. No one would choose Abrahamic religion over cow worshipping

I suppose that was a sarcasm

What else do these westerners know! Just Pretend to be unbiased and then push your misinformed agenda around🤷‍♀️ These ignorant cucks would never dare to mention Kashmiri Pandits.

Ah yes Pakistan in 1700s

Good job ignoring how the Indian military paraded a dead corpse of a young man on a military vehicle inside the capital city 2 years ago.

He's is boy who lived

Lol

With a cow?

1945

Karen took the kids.

Karen should never have called Tracey a bitch. But tbf Tracey was being a bit off with Karen when she asked about Dave

The amount of haircuts on both sides must be staggering.

That would take an hour to explain lol

Nah, it's as complicated as this conflict. Heck even has same patterns which fight=treaty=breaking down=fight. Only difference is that it's one sided in nature.

@@ALV694 Yeh one has an army backed by the gobal superpower while the other doesnt even have an army

@@chandsitara6686 well that side used to have multiple armies backing it, but those armies either switched sides or simply fractured with passage of time.

Same issue from 1940s

@Trz Yeah. Wiki also once said that Tony Blair put up posters of Hitler in his room as a teenager. So Wiki is a good source, right?

to the people who don't believe the numbers you can check Google, and if you are still not satisfied visit Delhi Jammu and visit all the Kashmiri pandits who are living as refugees even now without homes

@Trz Read the wiki en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exodus_of_Kashmiri_Hindus I think the guy is saying the right numbers.

kashmir was mainly owned by pandits of kashmirs who own land... and all buiseness and they are all removed killed massacared.. during 1989.

@@ShahjahanMasood you are clearly an idiot who doesn't know shit.

Lol

Indians and Pakistanis incoming on t minus 5 minutes

Another one?

@@fulcrum2951 yep

Nothing is happening as ppl are saying , the comment section is quiet

That's tragic but may be it's the inevitable fate we may come with. Goodluck for our future.

My friend, u just need to go to any news video about Kashmir, to see the cancer that is the "comments section".

@@ALV694 I can confirm. Was hospitalized for 2 months after seeing that abomination

@@yourdeath7820 don't u find it weird that both sides have this weird reverence to the word *abuse*.